John G. Juliano, res, v. Kelly Ann Juliano, ap — Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 15, 2014.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until May 24, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the motion is otherwise denied; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.DILLON, J.P., MILLER, MALTESE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Maltese, JJ.Joaquin Garcia res-ap, v. Peter Garcia, appellant-res — (Action No. 1)Peter J. Garcia, appellant-res, v. Michael Garcia res-ap, Brooklyn Properties 21, LLC ap — (Action No. 2)— Motion by the respondents-appellants to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 1, 2017. Separate motion by the appellant-respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the respondents-appellants’ motion is granted, the respondents-appellants’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 26, 2018, and the respondents-appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant-respondent’s motion is denied as premature.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.MATTER of Thomas Conway, res, v. Joy Gartmond, ap — Appeal by Joy Gartmond from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated September 28, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until March 23, 2018. MATTER of Amor S. W. (Anonymous). Forestdale, Inc., petitioner-res, Leonard H. (Anonymous), respondent- appellant res — Appeal by Leonard H. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated September 28, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the petitioner-respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until March 26, 2018.MATTER of Monique Nikole Sellers, ap, v. Derek Jobete Gardner, res — Appeal by Monique Nikole Sellers from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated May 19, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until March 20, 2018.MATTER of Thomas A. Ledbetter, res, v. Woodlyne Singer, ap — V-4865-15) — Appeal by Woodlyne Singer from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated August 10, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until March 26, 2018.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Kyle C. (Anonymous), ap — Nassau County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Daniel C. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Ryan C. (Anonymous), ap — Nassau County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Daniel C. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by Kyle C. and Ryan C. from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated February 17, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent Daniel C. to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until April 5, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Mayra C. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- appellant; Adan C. (Anonymous) respondents- res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Daniela C. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- appellant; Adan C. (Anonymous) respondents- res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Alma R. C. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- appellant; Adan C. (Anonymous) respondents- res — (Proceeding No. 3)MATTER of Angel C. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- appellant; Adan C. (Anonymous) respondents- res — (Proceeding No. 4)MATTER of Alexandra C. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- appellant; Adan C. (Anonymous) respondents- res — (Proceeding No. 5) N-19537/15, N-19538/15) — Appeal by Administration for Children’s Services from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated July 28, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent Adan C. to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until March 23, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Andrew S. (Anonymous), ap — Appeal by Andrew S. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated July 28, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until March 22, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Saphora Magana, res, v. Dirk Delph, ap — Appeals by Dirk Delph from two orders of the Family Court, Kings County, both dated May 30, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeals is enlarged until March 26, 2018.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Baby Boy I. (Anonymous), a/k/a Ethan I. (Anonymous). Edwin Gould Services for Children and Families, petitioner-res, Edna I. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Edna I. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated October 27, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Richard Colodny, Esq., dated February 12, 2018, it isORDERED that pursuant to Family Court Act §1120, the following named attorney is assigned as the attorney for the child on the appeal:Robert J. Marinelli, Esq.305 Broadway, Suite 1001New York, NY 10007212-822-1427and it is further,ORDERED that Richard Colodny, Esq., is directed to turn over all papers in the proceeding to the new attorney for the child herein assigned.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Malachi M. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Mark M. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Malique R. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Mark M. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by Mark M. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated May 18, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the petitioner-respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until March 26, 2018.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Leventhal, Maltese and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Abdus Shahid, ap, v. Dechert, LLP, res — Motion by the appellant pro se on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 31, 2017, to waive compliance with the requirements of 22 NYCRR 670.10.2(f) regarding certification of the appellant’s appendix.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., LEVENTHAL, MALTESE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Leventhal, Maltese and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.MATTER of Tyquan Terry, res, v. Elaysia Ortiz, ap — Appeal by Elaysia Ortiz from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated March 24, 2017. By order to show cause dated January 18, 2018, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings for failure to comply with a decision and order on motion of this Court dated November 15, 2017, issued pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]). Application by the appellant to withdraw the appeal.Now, upon the order to show cause and the papers filed in response thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., LEVENTHAL, MALTESE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Maltese, JJ.MATTER of Joanne Gorelick, ap, v. Suffolk County Comptrollers Office, res — Motion by the appellant pro se on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 7, 2017, to waive compliance with the requirements of 22 NYCRR 670.10.2(f) regarding certification of the record on appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.MATTER of Karin Wolf, ap, v. Edward Crane, res — V-12570-17/17A) — Appeal by Karin Wolf from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated November 8, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Maximus G. (Anonymous), ap — Appeal by Maximus G. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated April 6, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on February 20, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the brief for the respondent in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.MATTER of Thomas v. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Justyna Z.-V. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Anthony v. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Justyna Z.-V. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Andrew v. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Justyna Z.-V. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 3) — Appeal by Justyna Z.-V. from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated January 17, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the respondent-appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the respondent-appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the respondent-appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the respondent-appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the respondent-appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Abigail Cruz-Desiena, res, v. James M. Desiena, ap — O-6173-16/17B) — Appeal by James M. Desiena from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated January 24, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of the Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Jayla K. (Anonymous), ap — Dutchess County Department of Social Services, res — Appeals by Jayla K. from two orders of the Family Court, Dutchess County, both dated January 2, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Paul I. Weinberger, Esq., dated January 28, 2018, it isORDERED that pursuant to Family Court Act §1120, the following named attorney is assigned as the attorney for the child on the appeals:Dawn Shammas, Esq.600 Mamaroneck Avenue, Suite 400Harrison, NY 10528917-609-2975and it is further,ORDERED that Paul I. Weinberger, Esq., is directed to turn over all papers in the proceeding to the new attorney for the child herein assigned.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Zana C. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner- res, Dana F. (Anonymous), respondent- ap — Appeal by Dana F. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated January 2, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the respondent-appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the respondent-appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the respondent-appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the respondent-appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the respondent-appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of the Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Lorna Samuels, ap, v. Reginald Pegues, res — Appeal by the appellant Lorna Samuels from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated January 18, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Frank M. Galchus, Esq., dated February 20, 2018, it isORDERED that the appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Leighton M. Jackson, Esq.174 W. 4th Street, #259New York, NY 10014646-290-7857and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the appellant at the address provided by the Court, and on or before March 12, 2018, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal, in writing, that he has done so and that either(1) the appellant is interested in prosecuting the appeal, or(2) the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal, or that he has been unable to contact the appellant, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment;and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the child, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that the appellant is interested in proceeding with the appeal, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur. MATTER of Cynthia M. v. (Anonymous). SCO Family of Services, petitioner-res, Jose v. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Angelo R. v. (Anonymous). SCO Family of Services, petitioner-res, Jose v. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by Jose V. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated October 19, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until March 19, 2018.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Maltese, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Richard Kassebaum, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 20, 2017, issued pursuant to CPL 440.30(1-a), as a poor person, for the assignment of counsel with respect to that appeal, and to consolidate that appeal with an appeal from a judgment of the same court rendered August 15, 2013.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeals will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of any proceedings held in connection with the order dated December 20, 2017, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeals:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates2 Rector Street – 10th FloorNew York, New York 10006and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeals expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeals; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeals are taken.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Leventhal, Maltese and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Esther York, res, v. Joseph York, defendant-appellant; William York, nonparty- ap — Motion by the respondent, inter alia, to dismiss appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered July 8, 2016, on the ground that the joint appendix is inadequate, or, in the alternative, to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to dismiss the appeals is denied on condition that on or before April 2, 2018, the defendant-appellant and nonparty-appellant shall either serve and file a replacement joint appendix containing the corrections set forth at paragraph 15 on pages 7 and 8 of the affirmation in support on the motion dated December 28, 2017, or correct the copies of the joint appendix filed with the Clerk of this Court by replacing page A13 with a legible copy of that page of the document, remove pages A14 through A21, A28 through A30, A178 through A191, A279, A280, A343, A355, and A356, and correct the caption heading on pages A110 and A336, and serve and file a supplemental appendix containing the material listed in items 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, and 13 of paragraph 15 on pages 7 and 8 of the affirmation in support of the motion dated December 28, 2017; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 2, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., LEVENTHAL, MALTESE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.MATTER of Neal N. McKenzie, res, v. Kenika Williams, ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Kenika Williams, ap, v. Neal N. McKenzie, res — (Proceeding No. 2) V-01257-15/16B, V-01256-15/16C, V-01257-15/16C, V-01256-15/16C, V-01257-15/16C, V-01256-15/16E, V-01257-15/16E) — Appeal by Kenika Williams from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated August 17, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on February 21, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this , the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the children in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.MATTER of Trischa Williams, res, v. Claude Jenkins, ap — V-457-12/15C) — Appeal by Claude Jenkins from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (IDV Part), dated March 3, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until April 18, 2018.By Rivera, J.P.; Chambers, Roman and Iannacci, JJ.New York State Thruway Authority, plf, v. Ketco, Inc., defendant third-party plaintiff- respondent defendants; Conrad Geoscience Corp., third-party defendant-appellant third-party def — Motion by the third-party defendant-appellant, inter alia, to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated December 18, 2014.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is granted, the third-party defendant-appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until May 7, 2018, and the record or appendix on appeal and the third-party defendant-appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.RIVERA, J.P., CHAMBERS, ROMAN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.Lorraine McLoughlin, ap, v. Public Administrator, etc. res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 24, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Maria A. Azevedo res, v. The Stop & Shop Supermarket Company, LLC, et al., ap — Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, dated October 24, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated February 20, 2018, it isORDERED that the appeal is marked withdrawn.S.S.N., etc. plf-res, v. PRP LLC, etc. def-res, Brooklyn View, Inc., ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 8, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Rose Lyons res, v. Brooklyn Bureau of Community Services ap — Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 17, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated February 21, 2018, it isORDERED that the appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Unity T. (Anonymous). Ulster County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Dennis T. (Anonymous) respondents- appellants res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Joleda T. (Anonymous). Ulster County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Dennis T. (Anonymous) respondents- appellants res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Dyani T. (Anonymous). Ulster County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Dennis T. (Anonymous) respondents- appellants res — (Proceeding No. 3)MATTER of Dennis T. (Anonymous), Jr. Ulster County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Dennis T. (Anonymous) respondents- appellants res — (Proceeding No. 4)MATTER of Andrew T. (Anonymous). Ulster County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Dennis T. (Anonymous) respondents- appellants res — (Proceeding No. 5)MATTER of Steven L. (Anonymous), Jr. Ulster County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Dennis T. (Anonymous) respondents- appellants res — (Proceeding No. 6) N-2097-16, N-2098-16, N-2099-16, N-2100-16, N-2101-16, N-2102-16, N-2103-16, N-2104-16) — Separate appeals by Dennis T. and Tanya K. from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated October 11, 2016.The appellants’ briefs were filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on May 8, 2017 and February 20, 2018, respectfully. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this , the briefs for the respondents and the attorney for the children in the above-entitled appeals shall be served and filed.MATTER of Leah Fruchthandler, res, v. Ephraim Fruchthandler, ap — Appeals by Ephraim Fruchthandler from two orders of the Family Court, Kings County, dated July 21, 2017, and July 24, 2017, respectively. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until March 23, 2018.MATTER of Chloe W. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Tara W. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Tara W. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated August 10, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on February 21, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the child in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., etc., res, v. Claudette Matthews ap, et al., def — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 31, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Delroy A. (Anonymous) Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-appellant; Marcia A. (Anonymous), res-res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated February 6, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Alexis B. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Julie K. (Anonymous), respondent- appellant res — Application by the respondent-appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated December 21, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Doka USA, Ltd., res-ap, v. Manny P Concrete, Inc. appellants- respondents def — Application by the respondent-appellant to withdraw a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 5, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the cross appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Rivera, Miller and Hinds-Radix, JJ.MATTER of Jiheen Hutchinson, ap, v. Turkana Smith, res — V-22367-16, V-22801-16) — Appeal by Jiheen Hutchinson from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated August 16, 2017. By order to show cause dated January 18, 2018, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with a dated October 30, 2017, issued pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).Now, upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to comply with the dated October 30, 2017, issued pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).SCHEINKMAN, P.J., RIVERA, MILLER and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Rivera, Miller and Hinds-Radix, JJ.MATTER of Jose Dimas Salmeron, ap, v. Jocelyn B. Zelaya, res — Appeal by Jose Dimas Salmeron from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated August 31, 2017. By order to show cause dated January 18, 2018, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with a dated November 29, 2017, issued pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).Now, upon the order to show cause and the papers filed in response thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), within 30 days after the date of this decision and order on motion, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received and indicating the date that it was received, or stating that the transcript has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; and it is further,ORDERED that if the appellant fails to file the affidavit or affirmation within 30 days after the date of this decision and order on motion, as set forth above, the Court will dismiss the appeal, without further notice.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., RIVERA, MILLER and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.Chui-Har Liu, plf-res, v. Alejandro Teles-Perez def-res, Pro-Man Liu, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 11, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Dillon, J.P.; Chambers, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Hung Ling Fu, res, v. Andre Wilson, ap — Appeal by Andre Wilson from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated April 11, 2017. By dated January 11, 2018, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal was enlarged until February 9, 2018. The appellant has failed to perfect the appeal.Now, on the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to timely perfect in accordance with the rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2],[4]) and prior order of the Court.DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Chambers, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Karen Mary Kelly, res, v. Michael J. Feingold, ap — Appeal by from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated December 21, 2017.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies as of right from a nondispositional order in proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, part 3 (see Family Ct Act §1112), and leave to appeal has not been granted.DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.MATTER of Jamayla C. M. (Anonymous). New York Foundling Hospital, petitioner- res, Marcela A. C. (Anonymous), a/k/a Marcella C. (Anonymous), etc., res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Marcela C. R. (Anonymous). New York Foundling Hospital, petitioner- res, Marcela A. C. (Anonymous), a/k/a Marcella C. (Anonymous), etc., res-res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeals by Marcela A. C., a/k/a Marcela C. from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, both dated May 17, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the children to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until March 28, 2018. MATTER of Taylor P. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Kevin R. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeals by Kevin R. from two orders of the Family Court, Richmond County, both dated September 20, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeals is enlarged until March 28, 2018.By Dillon, J.P.; Chambers, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Derrick Harris, ap, v. Antionette Trotman, res — Appeal by Derrick Harris from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated June 30, 2017. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated December 27, 2017, within 30 days after the date of that decision and order on motion, the appellant was directed to file in the office of the Clerk of this Court an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript had been received and indicating the date that it was received, or if the transcript had not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it had been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript was expected. The appellant has failed to file the affidavit or affirmation.Now, on the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to comply with the decision and order on motion of this Court dated December 27, 2017 (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2],[4]).DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, ap, v. Valerie Burgois, res, et al., def — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated July 8, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Nour Annabi, ap, v. Sadouf Annabi, res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, dated July 7, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Dillon, J.P.; Chambers, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.NYCTL 2009-A Trust, etc., ap, v. Walter Morris, respondent def — Motion by the appellant to stay all proceedings in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered December 26, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and all proceedings in the above-entitled action are stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal on condition that the appeal is perfected on or before March 28, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the appeal is not perfected on or before March 28, 2018, the Court, on its own motion, may vacate the stay, without further notice, or the respondent may move to vacate the stay, on three days notice; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondent shall serve and file a brief, if any, on or before April 27, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant shall serve and file a reply brief, if any, on or before May 14, 2018.DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Chambers, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.Lazaro Sotolongo, ap, v. Robert L. Cristofaro, etc., def, Elliot G. Gross, res — Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to hold in abeyance an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered May 31, 2016, pending determination of certain proceedings in the Court of Appeals. Cross motion by the respondent to dismiss the appeal for failure to timely perfect.Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the appellant’s motion is dismissed for failure to provide proof of service of the motion in accordance with the terms of the order to show cause; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until April 2, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargements of time shall be granted; and it is further,ORDERED that respondent’s motion is denied.DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Chambers, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.B&A Realty Management, LLC res, v. John Gloria, ap — Motion by John Gloria for leave to appeal to this Court from an order to show cause of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated October 26, 2017, and, in effect, to stay enforcement of a temporary restraining order contained in the order to show cause, pending hearing and determination of the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to appeal is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal purportedly taken as of right is dismissed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied as academic.DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Chambers, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.David Nyskohus plf-res, v. Queens West Development Corporation, et al., ap, Rockrose General Equities, LLC def-res — Motion by the appellant Simply Food LIC, LLC, to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 4, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition and in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Chambers, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.Advanced Remodeling of Long Island, Inc., et al., res, v. Mary Ann Monahan, ap — Motion by the appellant to stay all proceedings in the above-entitled action, including an inquest, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered January 19, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and all proceedings in the above-entitled action, including the inquest, are stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal on condition that the appeal is perfected on or before April 3, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the appeal is not perfected on or before April 3, 2018, the Court, on its own motion, may vacate the stay, without further notice, or the respondents may move to vacate the stay, on three days notice.DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.MATTER of Mary Louie, ap, v. Ian Plissner, res — Appeals by Mary Louie from two orders of the Family Court, Richmond County, both dated August 10, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on February 21, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this , the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the child in the above-entitled appeals shall be served and filed.By Dillon, J.P.; Chambers, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.Cindy Hogan, etc., plf-res, v. Peninsula General Nursing Home Corp., etc., ap, Saint John’s Episcopal Hospital South Shore, def-res — Motion by the appellant to stay enforcement of so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 14, 2017, as directs it to produce certain employee personnel files, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from the order.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and enforcement of so much of the order as directs the appellant to produce certain employee personnel files is stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal.DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Chambers, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.Judy Zhou, etc. res, v. Tuxedo Ridge, LLC ap — Motion by the appellants to stay enforcement of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered January 9, 2018, pending hearing and determination of an appeal therefrom.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and enforcement of the judgment is stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal on condition that the appeal is perfected on or before April 2, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the appeal is not perfected on or before April 2, 2018, the Court, on its own motion, may vacate the stay, without further notice, or the respondent may move to vacate the stay, on three days notice.DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Chambers, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Abraham Asante, res, v. Benedicta Annan, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated June 7, 2017, as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the child, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s assigned counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to Family Court Act §1120 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Francine Shraga, Esq.869 East 12th StreetBrookyn, NY 11230718-377-4894and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to 670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), within 30 days after the date of this decision and order on motion, the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that this decision and order on motion has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, the Clerk of the Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Miller, Hinds-Radix and Duffy, JJ.MATTER of Deborah D. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner- res, Elliot D. (Anonymous), respondent- ap — MATTER of Isaac D. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner- res, Elliot D. (Anonymous), respondent- ap — Motion by the respondent-appellant pro se on an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated October 24, 2017, for leave to reargue the branches of his prior motion which were to waive the filing fee, for free transcripts, and for the assignment of counsel, which were determined by decision and order on motion of this Court dated January 24, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), within 30 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, the respondent-appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4), above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, the Clerk of the Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.LEVENTHAL, J.P., MILLER, HINDS-RADIX and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Leventhal, Sgroi and Connolly, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Fredy Reyes, ap — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the decision and order on motion of this Court dated February 20, 2018, in the above-entitled matter, on an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, is amended by deleting from the second paragraph thereof the words “no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto” and substituting therefor the words “the papers filed in opposition thereto.”MASTRO, J.P., LEVENTHAL, SGROI and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, etc., res, v. Jeanette Corvino, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated June 2, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged, and the reply brief submitted to the Clerk of the Court is accepted for filing and deemed timely served.MATTER of Rhonda Root, res, v. Bradford Root, ap — F-9988-12/14I) — Appeals by Bradford Root from two orders of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated January 13, 2016, and July 6, 2016, respectively. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeals is enlarged until March 2, 2018.
