PEOPLE, res, v. Todd C. Deboe, ap — Motion by the appellant for leave to file a late notice of an appeal from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County, dated February 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied as unnecessary as the papers filed in connection with the motion do not reflect that the notice of appeal was untimely filed (see CPLR 5513; Corrections Law §168-n[3]).CHAMBERS, J.P., SGROI, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Spiritual A. A. M. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Luz A. (Anonymous), respondent- appellant; Miguel M. (Anonymous), nonparty-ap — Appeal by Luz A., and separate appeal by Miguel M., from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated August 31, 2017.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the order on certification of this Court dated December 18, 2017, is recalled and vacated; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of David R. Sachs, Esq., dated November 27, 2017, the respondent-appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeals, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute her appeal:Deborah Clegg, Esq.455 Main Street, Suite 204New Rochelle, NY 10801914-637-1922and it is further,ORDERED that the appeals will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the parties. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the respondent-appellant’s assigned counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeals, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the respondent-appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal by the respondent-appellant expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondent-appellant shall perfect her appeal in the above-entitled proceeding either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this decision and order on motion; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this decision and order on motion, the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeals; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that this decision and order on motion has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeals are taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal by the respondent-appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeals to show cause why the appeal by the respondent-appellant should or should not be dismissed.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Connolly and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Julie Shacknow, res, v. Jeffrey R. Fischman, ap — Motion by the appellant, inter-alia, to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 13, 2017, and to enlarge the record to include certain motion papers.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 13, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, CONNOLLY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.Emmett Laffey, appellant-res, v. Philip Laffey respondents-ap — Applications pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 13, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the applications are granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant-respondent’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 26, 2018, and the joint record or appendix on the appeal and cross appeal (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][1]) and the appellant-respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondents-appellants shall serve and file the answering brief, including the points of argument on the cross appeal, in accordance with the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]).Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, ap, v. Joanne Gambino, respondent def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated April 14, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 7, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.HSBC, etc., ap, v. Mariame Kone, respondent def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 26, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Pilar Cruz, res, v. 69-70 Associates, LLC, defendant third-party plf-res, Irish Mist Corp., defendant-res, Darnell General Contracting, third-party defendant/fourth-party- plaintiff-respondent-appellant; K.R.L.s Landscaping, Construction and Service, Inc., fourth-party defendant appellant-res — Applications pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 19, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the applications and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the applications are granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the fourth-party defendant appellant-respondent’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 12, 2018, and the joint record or appendix on the appeal and cross appeal (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][1]) and the fourth-party defendant appellant-respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the third-party defendant/fourth-party-plaintiff-respondent-appellant shall serve and file the answering brief, including the points of argument on the cross appeal, in accordance with the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]).Lewis & Murphy Realty, Inc., ap, v. Anthony Colletti res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 90-day enlargement of time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 25, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until April 3, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.MATTER of Joanne Gorelick, ap, v. Suffolk County Comptrollers Office, res — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 7, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition and in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 27, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.538 Morgan Avenue Properties, LLC plf-res, v. 538 Morgan Realty, LLC appellants; Haidong Weng third-party def-res — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 90-day enlargement of time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 3, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 28, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.By Rivera, J.P.; Cohen, Miller and Christopher, JJ.Wells Fargo Bank, NA, res, v. Edward Mandrin, appellant def — Motion by the appellant to stay all proceedings in the above-entitled action and the sale of the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, both dated May 22, 2014, and a judgment of the same court entered December 17, 2015.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and all proceedings in the above-entitled action and the sale of the subject premises are stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeals.RIVERA, J.P., COHEN, MILLER and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.U.S. Bank Trust N.A., etc., res, v. Donald A. Leone, appellant def — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 30-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 20, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 21, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Bank of New York Mellon, res, v. Ann Forman, appellant def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 20-day enlargement of time to serve and file a reply brief on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, both dated June 6, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until February 26, 2018, the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.MATTER of Samira Mrsic, appellant-res, v. Kwak Yen Kwan, res-res — V-27961/09, V-27962/09) — Appeal by Samira Mrsic, and cross appeal by Kwak Yen Kwan, from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated December 9, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent-appellant to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until March 2, 2018.MATTER of Susan M. Greco, ap, v. Robert N. Greco, res — Appeal by Susan M. Greco from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated May 17, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 28, 2018.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin , JJ.MATTER of Kwana Newton, pet-res, v. Christopher McFarlane, respondent-res, Kaishawna M. (Anonymous), nonparty-ap — Appeal by Kaishawna M. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated December 21, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Robert J. Epstein, Esq., dated December 29, 2017, it isORDERED that the respondent is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to respond to the appeal:Austin I. Idehen, Esq.89-31 161 Street, Suite 810Jamaica, NY 11432718-558-4191and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the respondent at the address provided by the Court, and shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal on or before February 19, 2018, in writing, that he has done so and that either(1) the respondent is interested in responding to the appeal, or(2) the respondent is not interested in responding to the appeal, or that he has been unable to contact the respondent, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin , JJ.MATTER of Mia C. (Anonymous), ap — Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Misael C. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Ruth C. (Anonymous), ap — Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Misael C. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by Mia C. and Ruth C. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated December 3, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Leslie D. Ching, Esq., dated January 3, 2018, it isORDERED that the respondent is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to respond to the appeal:Cheryl Charles-Duval, Esq.44 Court Street, Suite 909Brooklyn, NY 11201718-522-7472and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the respondent at the address provided by the Court, and shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal on or before February 19, 2018, in writing, that he has done so and that either(1) the respondent is interested in responding to the appeal, or(2) the respondent is not interested in responding to the appeal, or that he has been unable to contact the respondent, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Ryan L. (Anonymous). Nassau County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Carrie A. L. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Brandon L. (Anonymous). Nassau County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Carrie A. L. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by Carrie A. L. from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated November 6, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Steven R. Herman, Esq., dated January 5, 2018, it isORDERED that pursuant to Family Court Act §1120, the following named attorney is assigned as the attorney for the children on the appeal:Gail Jacobs, Esq.10 St. George RoadGreat Neck, NY 11021516-773-3107and it is further,ORDERED that Steven R. Herman, Esq., is directed to turn over all papers in the proceeding to the new attorney for the children herein assigned.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Wilmington Trust Company, etc., res, v. Edward Gewirtz, appellant def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 9, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies from a decision (see Schicchi v. J.A. Green Constr. Co., 100 AD2d 509); and it is further,ORDERED that the application is denied as academic.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., etc., res, v. Valeriy Kolmykov, appellant def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a decision and order (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated December 7, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed on the ground that no appeal lies from a decision (see Schicchi v. J.A. Green Constr. Co., 100 AD2d 509), and no appeal lies from an order that was not the result of a motion made on notice, and leave to appeal has not been granted (see CPLR 5701), by filing an affirmation or affidavit on those issues with the Clerk of this Court on or before February 26, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the application is held in abeyance in the interim; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, shall serve a copy of this order to show cause on the parties by regular mail.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Danielle Ascani, res, v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company, et al., appellants def — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 11, 2016.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated December 14, 2017, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, ap, v. T.D. Paucar-Sinchi, et al., res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 28, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Kristin Palermo ap, v. Village of Babylon, res — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated May 19, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Luz Alvarado, res, v. Eagle Brothers, Inc., appellant def — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 25, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Marie Ovetta Hall-Nesbitt, res, v. Cynthia I. Fount Leroy ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 13, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Evelis Guevara, res-ap, New York City Transit Authority, appellant-res — Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 15, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal and cross appeal dated January 29, 2018, it isORDERED that the appeal and cross appeal are marked withdrawn.Doris Amiot, res, v. Cie Yun Lin, def, Optimum Wash Laundromat, Inc., ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 14, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of the Estate of Lorraine Madigan, deceased. Liane Spodek, respondent-appellant; Ellen Reid, pet-res — (File No. 908/16) — Application by the respondent-appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Richmond County, dated September 21, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Marian Derewenda, res, v. Mieczyslaw Hajec ap — Application by the appellants for leave to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 6, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Rolaika McFarlane, res, v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 18, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Pauline Barrett, res, v. New York City Transit Authority, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 30-day enlargement of time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered October 28, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until February 23, 2018, the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.MATTER of Mary R. Cardella, pet, v. Department of Health of State of New York, et al., res — Application by the petitioner to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 31, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Cindy Ann Lauder, ap, v. Paul B. Goldhamer, etc. res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 30-day enlargement of time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated December 12, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until February 22, 2018, the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.MATTER of Lisa M. DAvanzo, ap, v. Nassau Health Care Corp., res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 15, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Saige F. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Christina F. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant; Terrence W. (Anonymous), nonparty-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Niyah W. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Christina F. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant; Terrence W. (Anonymous), nonparty-res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Application by the appellant to withdraw appeals from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, both dated December 15, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeals are marked withdrawn.By Rivera, J.P.; Miller, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ.MATTER of Kent Waterfront Associates, LLC, et al., appellants pet, v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, P.A., res — Motion by the appellants to stay an arbitration proceeding between the parties, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 17, 2017. Separate motion by the respondent, inter alia, to compel the appellants and the petitioner to participate in arbitration.Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and the papers filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the appellants’ motion is granted and the arbitration proceeding between the parties is stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal on condition that the appeal is perfected on or before March 7, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the appeal is not perfected on or before March 7, 2018, the Court, on its own motion, may vacate the stay, without further notice, or the respondent may move to vacate the stay, on three days notice; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondent’s motion is denied.RIVERA, J.P., MILLER, HINDS-RADIX and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Miller, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ.Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, etc., plf, v. Unknown Heirs at Law of John J. Armato, Sr. def — 2018-00289, 2018-00290Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, etc.,respondent, v. Unknown Heirs at Law of John J.Armato, Sr. defendants, John J. Armato, Jr.,appellant.(Index No. 54348/14) Motion by the appellant, inter alia, for leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 22, 2017, to stay all proceedings in the above-entitled action as well as the foreclosure sale of the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of the appeal from the order dated December 22, 2017, and appeals from an order and a judgment of the same court both dated October 30, 2017, and to consolidate the appeal from the order dated December 22, 2017, with the appeals from the order and the judgment dated October 30, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to appeal to this Court from the order dated December 22, 2017, is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to stay all proceedings in the above-entitled action as well as the foreclosure sale of the subject premises is granted and all proceedings in the above-entitled action as well as the foreclosure sale of the subject premises are stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeals from the order and the judgment dated October 30, 2017, on condition that those appeals are perfected on or before March 7, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the appeals from the order and the judgment dated October 30, 2017, are not perfected on or before March 7, 2018, the Court, on its own motion, may vacate the stay, without further notice, or the respondent may move to vacate the stay, on three days notice; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.RIVERA, J.P., MILLER, HINDS-RADIX and MALTESE, JJ., concur.Saint Annes Development Company, LLC, et al., res, v. Jay Edmund Russ ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 6, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Giulio R. Novello res, v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (AHM), appellant def — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 28, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Ayana Johnson Jones, res, v. Khalid Malih appellants def — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 12, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Gary Mitchell, res, v. Anjun Khokhar, et al., ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 15, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Jian Li Handal, res, v. James Handal, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 22, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Karlene White res, v. JMM Springnex, LLC ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 7, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., res, v. Zikar Dhanani, appellant def — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 3, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Robert Arena, plf-res, v. Crown Castle Ng East, Inc., ap, City of New York def-res, et al., def — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 7, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated January 22, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Spiritual A. A. M. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitoner-res, Luz A. (Anonymous), respondent- appellant; Miguel M. (Anonymous), nonparty-ap — Appeal by Luz A., and separate appeal by Miguel M., from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated August 31, 2017.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the order on certification of this Court dated December 18, 2017, is recalled and vacated; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Eve Bunting-Smith, Esq., dated December 11, 2017, the nonparty-appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeals, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute his appeal:Lisa F. Colin, Esq.44 Church StreetWhite Plains, NY 10601914-771-7711and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the nonparty-appellant at the address provided by the Court, and on or before February 20, 2018, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeals, in writing, that she has done so and that either(1) the nonparty-appellant is interested in prosecuting his appeal, or(2) the nonparty-appellant is not interested in prosecuting his appeal, or that she has been unable to contact the nonparty-appellant, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeals will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the parties. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the nonparty-appellant’s assigned counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeals, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the nonparty-appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the nonparty-appellant’s appeal expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that the nonparty-appellant is interested in proceeding with his appeal, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeals are taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Applications for Extensions of Time — Parties in the following causes have filed applications pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to extend the time to perfect or to serve and file a brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the applications, it isORDERED that the applications are granted and the following parties in the following causes are granted the specified extensions of time:Title Docket NumberApplicant Name(s) Extended DeadlineAthanasatos v. Scarpa2017-09961Annette AthanasatosApril 25, 2018Bank of New York Mellon v. Hussain 2017-04433 +1Bank of New York Mellon February 13, 2018Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Karibandi2017-08169Ramakrishna KaribandiMarch 9, 2018Federal National Mortgage Association v. Unger2017-08870Jo-Anne Unger April 2, 2018HSBC Bank USA, NA v. Elianor2017-01143 +1HSBC Bank USA, NA February 23, 2018Hernandez v. Pagan Corporation2018-01407Maria HernandezApril 9, 2018Hester Development Corp. v. Rosenberg2017-08822Hester Development Corp.April 5, 2018Laurent v. Belony2017-09760Herriot LaurentCarlene LaurentApril 30, 2018Levin v. Levin2017-09641Raitze LevinApril 30, 2018Matter of Heino, deceased2017-03048Harvey HeinoFebruary 15, 2018Matter of Piller v. Eisner2017-08968Abraham PillerApril 10, 2018Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Wilson2017-07103Russell CarboneMarch 7, 2018People v. Brooks, Marquis2016-09606Marquis Brooks February 26, 2018People v. Hunter, Chaka2016-07633Chaka Hunter February 27, 2018People v. Ramos, Daniel S. 2015-07623Daniel S. Ramos February 16, 2018RTT Holdings, LLC v. Nacht2017-03800Pearl NachtFebruary 15, 2018Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB v. Sheikh2017-13031 +1Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSBMarch 26, 2018
