PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Oraine McKoy, ap — Motion by Oraine McKoy pursuant to CPL 460.30 for an extension of time to take appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered September 30, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the moving papers are deemed to constitute a timely notice of appeal.RIVERA, J.P., CHAMBERS, DUFFY and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Chambers, Duffy and Lasalle, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Jose Nunez-Garcia, ap — Motion by the respondent on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered July 19, 2016, to strike stated portions of the appellant’s brief on the grounds that they contain or refer to matter dehors the record. Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to strike an undated newsday.com article is denied as unnecessary as no unbound page containing that article is present in the copies of the appellant’s brief filed with the Clerk of the Court; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to strike the last sentence of footnote 20 on page 21 of the appellant’s brief is granted, and on or before March 2, 2018, the appellant shall delete the last sentence of footnote 20 on page 21 from the copies of the appellant’s brief filed with the Clerk of the Court; and it is further,ORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until April 3, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.MATTER of Aryelle L. F. (Anonymous), etc., ap — Forestdale, Inc., petitioner-res, Esperanza F. F. (Anonymous), respondent- res — Appeal by Aryelle L. F., a/k/a Aryelle F., from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated May 31, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until March 14, 2018.MATTER of Jennifer S. Solomon, res, v. Marc H. Fishman, ap — V-10058-14A/B, O-7850-14) — Appeal by Marc H. Fishman from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated November 15, 2017. By order on certification of this Court dated January 26, 2018, the following attorney was assigned as counsel for the appellant on the appeal:Del Atwell, Esq.39 5th StreetEast Hampton, NY 11937631-267-2067By letter dated February 6, 2018, the assigned counsel has informed this Court that the appellant wishes to proceed with the appeal. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order on certification of this Court dated January 26, 2018, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Amber L. M. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Cheryl M. (Anonymous) respondents-ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Devon M. N. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Cheryl M. (Anonymous) respondents-ap — (Proceeding No. 2) B-1145-17, B-1147-17) — Separate appeals by Cheryl M. and Richard N. from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated June 6, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant Cheryl M.’s time to perfect her appeal is enlarged until March 9, 2018.City of New York, ap, v. Bay Ridge Prince, LLC, res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 12, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief submitted to the Clerk of the Court is accepted for filing and deemed timely served.MATTER of Franklin U. (Anonymous), ap — Appeal by Franklin U. from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated June 19, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until March 12, 2018.US Bank, ap, v. Lisa Spence def, Jaystone, LLC, res — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 30-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 16, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 21, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.MATTER of Imani L. J. (Anonymous). SCO Family of Services, petitioner-appellant; Shaunta J. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Jeremiah W. T. (Anonymous), a/k/a Jeremiah W. J. (Anonymous), ap — SCO Family of Services, petitioner-appellant; Shaunta J. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Wilesiah W. B. (Anonymous), a/k/a Wilesiah W. J. (Anonymous). SCO Family of Services, petitioner-appellant; Shaunta J. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 3)MATTER of Zackariyah M. T. (Anonymous), a/k/a Zackariyah M. J. (Anonymous), ap — SCO Family of Services, petitioner-appellant; Shaunta J. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 4) B-12790/14) — Appeal by Jeremiah W. T., a/k/a Jeremiah W. J., and Zackariyah M. T., a/k/a Zackariyah M. J., and separate appeal by SCO Family of Services, from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated July 5, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant SCO Family of Services’ time to perfect its appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until March 15, 2018.By Rivera, J.P.; Chambers, Duffy and Iannacci, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., plf, v. Oraine McKoy, def — Motion by Oraine McKoy pursuant to CPL 460.30 for an extension of time to take appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Queens County, rendered June 16, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is transferred to the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts, for determination under the rules of that court.RIVERA, J.P., CHAMBERS, DUFFY and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Miguel Verduga, appellant-res, v. L & M 2180, LLC respondents- ap — Application by Miguel Verduga on an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered July 11, 2017, to withdraw the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Leventhal, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.MATTER of The Miness Family Trust Dated October 10, 1988. Saul Fenchel, petitioner-res, Mark Miness objectants-ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of The Miness Family Trust Dated October 10, 1988. Francis W. Deegan, petitioner-res, Mark Miness objectants-ap — (Proceeding No. 2) (File Nos. 2012-369167/B, 2012-369167/A) — Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County, dated January 24, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until April 16, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Maltese and Iannacci, JJ.Amelia Politi Johnson, ap, v. City of Mount Vernon, res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated August 8, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 15, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Austin, J.P.; Roman, Sgroi and Connolly, JJ.Alissa Raineri, etc. ap, v. Barry Huppert respondents def — Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered February 8, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 16, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.AUSTIN, J.P., ROMAN, SGROI and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Balkin, Cohen and Duffy, JJ.Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, res, v. Adesoji Sodamade ap, et al., def — Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, both dated August 17, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until March 16, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeals and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, COHEN and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Dante Hunter, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered July 18, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Kareem Lopez, ap — 1120/17) — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute appeals from four judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County, all rendered June 28, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeals will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeals:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeals expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeals; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeals are taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Leventhal, Barros and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.481E21, LLC, res, v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association, etc., ap, et al., def — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 7, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until April 16, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., LEVENTHAL, BARROS and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Dillon, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.Andrew Lee, etc., ap, v. Queens Center for Rehabilitation & Residential Health Care, et al., res — 2017-06079Andrew Lee, etc., appellant, v. Queens Centerfor Rehabilitation & Residential Health Care,et al., respondents.(Index No. 705245/14) Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered September 21, 2016, and June 6, 2017, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until March 16, 2018.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., DILLON, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Roman, J.P.; Sgroi, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.Hector Luna, ap, v. 4300 Crescent, LLC, et al, res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered April 13, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 16, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.ROMAN, J.P., SGROI, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Roman, J.P.; Lasalle, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Aish Hatorah New York, Inc., pet-res, v. Jacob Fetman, etc., respondent-appellant; Merkaz Center, Inc., nonparty-ap — Motion by the petitioner-respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on appeals from three orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 29, 2014, December 17, 2014, and July 6, 2015, respectively, and a judgment of the same court dated October 7, 2014.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the petitioner-respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 16, 2018, and the petitioner-respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.ROMAN, J.P., LASALLE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Leventhal, Barros and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Donna Tolkoff, etc., ap, v. Margaret M. Goldstein, etc., et al., res — Separate motions by the respondents Margaret M. Goldstein, Jagpreet Dhillon, North Shore Pulmonary Associates, Jay M. Barbakoff, Walter Szcupak, and Anthony C. Theodoris, by the respondent Long Island Diagnostic Imaging, by the respondents Dimitri Pyrros and Zelen & Pyrros, M.D., P.C., and by the respondent Long Island Medical Imaging to enlarge the time to serve and file their respective briefs on appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated November 18, 2015, and five judgments of the same court entered January 15, 2016, February 18, 2016, February 23, 2016 (two judgments), and March 3, 2016, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motions are granted, the movants’ time to serve and file their respective briefs is enlarged until March 16, 2018, and the movants’ briefs shall be served and filed on or before that date.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., LEVENTHAL, BARROS and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Maltese and Barros, JJ.Frederick M. Cioffi ap, v. S.M. Foods, Inc. defendants third-party plf-res, Altanta Foods International defendants- res, Village of Tuckahoe third-party def-res — Motion by the defendants third-party plaintiffs-respondents and the defendant-respondent Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 2, 2015.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the movants’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 16, 2018, and the movants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Dillon, Maltese and Iannacci, JJ.Onewest Bank, FSB, res, v. Rani Kaur, ap, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., def — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered November 14, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 16, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MASTRO, J.P., DILLON, MALTESE and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Chambers, Duffy and Lasalle, JJ.MATTER of State of New York, res, v. Bobby W. (Anonymous), ap — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 8, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 30, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Dillon, Maltese and Iannacci, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Rohan R. Hankerson, a/k/a Rohan Hankerson, ap — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered September 16, 2015.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 16, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MASTRO, J.P., DILLON, MALTESE and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Miller, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ.Nathaniel Wilson, res, v. Linda Mazewski ap — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 24, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 16, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.RIVERA, J.P., MILLER, HINDS-RADIX and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Roman, J.P.; Lasalle, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.Doreen Galardi, ap, v. Town of Hempstead def, County of Nassau, res — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 21, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 30, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.ROMAN, J.P., LASALLE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Roman, J.P.; Lasalle, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, ap, v. Jovanee McLaurin, et al., res — Motion by the respondents Jovanee McLaurin and Kathy Corbin to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated May 9, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the movants’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 16, 2018, and the movants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.ROMAN, J.P., LASALLE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Leventhal, Barros and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Feng Xie, etc. ap, v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, et al., respondents def — Motion by the respondent New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered November 18, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the time for New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 16, 2018, and the brief of New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation shall be served and filed on or before that date.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., LEVENTHAL, BARROS and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Austin, Miller and Hinds-Radix, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Wilson Garcia, ap — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered November 22, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 7, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, MILLER and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.By Roman, J.P.; Lasalle, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.SJ Fuel Co., Inc., res, v. Dorann Resources, Ltd., etc., ap, et al., def — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 8, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 30, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.ROMAN, J.P., LASALLE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Dillon, Maltese and Iannacci, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Dennis McBee, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se to enlarge the time to serve and file a supplemental brief on an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered May 4, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the appellant’s supplemental brief shall be served and filed on or before April 16, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant shall file nine copies of the supplemental brief and serve one copy on the District Attorney.MASTRO, J.P., DILLON, MALTESE and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Dillon, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Dwayne Webb, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se to enlarge the time to serve and file a supplemental brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 20, 2014.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the appellant’s supplemental brief shall be served and filed on or before April 16, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant shall file nine copies of the supplemental brief and serve one copy on the District Attorney.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., DILLON, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Duffy, Barros and Iannacci, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Ryan Hematian, ap — Motion by the appellant, in effect, to enlarge the time to serve and file a replacement brief or a supplemental brief on appeals from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, both rendered March 14, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the appellant’s replacement brief or supplemental brief shall be served and filed on or before April 16, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant shall file nine copies of the replacement brief or supplemental brief and serve one copy on the District Attorney.RIVERA, J.P., DUFFY, BARROS and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Miller, Nelson and Iannacci, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. John Smith, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se to enlarge the time to serve and file a supplemental brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered July 27, 2011.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition and in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the appellant’s supplemental brief shall be served and filed on or before April 16, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant shall file nine copies of the supplemental brief and serve one copy on the District Attorney.RIVERA, J.P., MILLER, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Chambers and Barros, JJ.Bank of America, N.A., res, v. Willard Afflick, appellant def — Motion by the respondent, inter alia, to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered October 29, 2014, on the ground that the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated upon entry of an order of the same court dated July 20, 2017, or on the ground that the appellant failed to comply with a decision and order on motion of this Court dated November 8, 2017, or, in the alternative, to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 16, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, CHAMBERS and BARROS, JJ., concur.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Sean Bailey, ap — Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 18, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the appellant and the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated February 7, 2018, it isORDERED that the appeal is marked withdrawn.Michael Steward, ap, v. Mount Sinai Church of God in Christ, res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 14, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Saunders, deceased. Diana F. Ronalds, petitioner-res, Walter Saunders & Sons Jefferson, LLC, nonparty-ap — (File No. 2662/14) — Application by the nonparty-appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, dated October 27, 2014.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Balkin, J.P.; Chambers, Duffy and Lasalle, JJ.Indymac Federal Bank FSB, ap, v. Ana A. Jones, etc. res — Motion by the respondents to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered November 9, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 2, 2018, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.MATTER of Saunders, deceased. Diana F. Ronalds, petitioner-res, Walter Saunders & Sons Jefferson, LLC, nonparty-ap — (File No. 2662/14) — Application by the nonparty-appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, dated February 24, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Mastro, J.P.; Dillon, Maltese and Iannacci, JJ.Roberto Morales, res-ap, v. City of New York respondents def, NASCO, appellant-res — Separate motions by the appellant-respondent and the respondent-appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 15, 2017, and separate applications by the appellant-respondent and the respondent-appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for the same relief.Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and the applications, and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motions and the applications are granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant-respondent’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 16, 2018, and the joint record or appendix on the appeal and cross appeal (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][1]) and the appellant-respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondent-appellant shall serve and file the answering brief, including the points of argument on the cross appeal, in accordance with the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]).MASTRO, J.P., DILLON, MALTESE and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.Cenlar, FSB, res, v. Rechelle Shenker appellants-res, Board of Managers of Borough Park Towne House Condominium, res-ap, et al., def — Application by the respondent-appellant on an appeal and a cross appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 1, 2017, and an appeal from an order of the same court dated October 18, 2017, for leave to withdraw the cross appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the cross appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Fatma Adbelghany, etc., ap, v. City of New York res — Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 12, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 15, 2018, the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Zenova Corp., res, v. McLaughlin & Stern, LLP, appellant (and a third-party action). — Application by the defendant third-party plaintiff-appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 1, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Mastro, J.P.; Dillon, Maltese and Iannacci, JJ.Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., etc., res, v. Gail Palmore Archer, appellant def — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 14, 2015, for failure to timely perfect. Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 16, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MASTRO, J.P., DILLON, MALTESE and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.MATTER of Roger Dupont, respondent- ap, v. Antoinise Gaston, appellant- res, A. D. nonparty-ap — O-8-16, O-80-16/16B) — Application by the nonparty-appellants on appeals and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated October 6, 2017, to withdraw their appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal by the nonparty-appellants is marked withdrawn.U.S. Bank National Association, etc. res, v. Frank DiStefano, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 6, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.U.S. Bank National Association, etc. res, v. Frank DiStefano, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 8, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.U.S. Bank National Association res, Frank DiStefano, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 8, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Margarita Puello De Zapata, ap, v. City of New York res — Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until March 5, 2018, to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 2, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 16, 2018, the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.MATTER of Joseph Yerachmiel Perlman, pet, v. Rachel Amy Adams res — Application by the petitioner to withdraw a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Rachel Amy Adams, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, to issue orders on certain motions pending before that court.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the proceeding is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Yuk L. Cheung, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered September 25, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Nokoro Miller, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered September 26, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Michael Vattiato, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered September 29, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Paul D. Rizzo, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered September 26, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Jason Goldberg, etc., res, v. Barrie Meyers, etc. ap — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 12, 2017, and an order of the same court September 8, 2017, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged, and the reply brief submitted to the Clerk of the Court is accepted for filing and deemed timely served.MATTER of Applications for Extensions of Time — Parties in the following causes have filed applications pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to extend the time to perfect or to serve and file a brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the applications, it isORDERED that the applications are granted and the following parties in the following causes are granted the specified extensions of time:Title Docket NumberApplicant Name(s) Extended Deadline2900 Stillwell Ave., LLC v. U.S. Underwriters Insurance Co.2017-095012900 Stillwell Ave., LLCApril 11, 2018Chou Mei Chen v. J Mart Group, Inc. 2017-09260J Mart Group, Inc.March 23, 2018Clarke v. Turner Construction Company2017-09430Kerk ClarkeApril 11, 2018Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Van Alst2017-07138 +1Marie D. Van AlstEdward J. Van AlstMarch 9, 2018Dorchester, LLC v. Herzka Insurance Agency, Inc. 2017-07779 +1Dorchester, LLCApril 6, 2018E. Tetz & Sons, Inc. v. Polo Electric Corp. 2017-08552Polo Electric Corp.Celebrity Farms, LLCMarch 26, 2018Fasano v. St. Bernard Church2017-09000Carol FasanoMarch 15, 2018Flanagan v. Mack2017-08941Mana DejhallaMercy Medical CenterMarch 9, 2018Freer v. Jean-Georges Management, LLC2017-09230Turner Construction CompanyApril 19, 2018HSBC Bank, USA v. Willis2016-12704 +1Vernon WillisMarch 7, 2018Hassett v. Allstate Insurance Company2017-08580Neil L. Hassett, Jr.April 2, 2018JBGR, LLC v. Chicago Title Insurance Company2017-08831Chicago Title Insurance CompanyMarch 23, 2018Joseph G. Kelley Construction Management, Inc v. Sahn2017-09650Robert SahnApril 30, 2018Maher v. White2016-13412LPS Mortgage Processing Solutions, Inc.LPS National Taxnet, Inc.LPS Real Estate Data Solutions, Inc.LPS Services, LLCServicelink, LLCMarch 5, 2018Matter of State of New York v. J. (Anonymous)2016-08096State of New YorkFebruary 16, 2018Mid-Island Mortgage Corp. v. Damato2017-08898John DamatoTracy DamatoMarch 9, 2018Nationstar v. Ahmad2017-08927Richard GarnerMarch 12, 2018People v. Edison, Dennis 2016-11623People of State of New York March 13, 2018People v. Willis, Timothy2016-01766People of State of New YorkFebruary 15, 2018Roberts v. New York City Transit Authority2017-12018New York City Transit AuthorityThe Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityMarch 12, 2018Romeo v. Muenzler-Romeo2017-10149Carmine RomeoMarch 30, 2018Skura v. Wojtlowski2017-10783Cinthia SkuraFebruary 23, 2018Velednitskaya v. Smile Today Corp. 2017-07607Smile Today Corp.Basil HunterMarch 19, 2018Ward v. New Century Home Care, Inc.2017-08510New Century Home Care, Inc.March 23, 2018Watkins-Bey v. City of New York2017-04506 +1Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityMTA Bus CompanyFebruary 27, 2018
