Appellate Division Second Department Motion List released on: February 23, 2018

Appellate DivisionSecond DepartmentMotion List released on:February 23, 2018In the Matter of Nichelle S. E. B. (Anonymous). (Proceeding No. 1);  Michael A. T. (Anonymous), Jr. (Proceeding No. 2); Hezekiah J.-M. E. (Anonymous). (Proceeding No. 3); Za-Nayla T., Jr. (Anonymous). (Proceeding No. 4), Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-respondent; Kyondra E. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant, et al., respondent. — Appeal by Kyondra E. from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated September 20, 2017.  By order on certification of this Court dated January 12, 2018, the following attorney was assigned as counsel for the respondent-appellant on the appeal, and was directed, inter alia, to contact the respondent-appellant and determine the respondent-appellant’s interest in perfecting the appeal:William Martin, Esq.44 Church StreetWhite Plains, NY 10601914-771-7711By letter dated February 14, 2018, assigned counsel notified the Court that he has been unable to contact the respondent-appellant.On the Court’s own motion, it is ORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered relieving the assigned counsel for the respondent-appellant and dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before March 19, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties or their attorneys, and upon the respondent-appellant,  by regular mail.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Nikolaos Kanterakis, ap, v. Emily Kanterakis, res — 2015-12372Nikolaos Kanterakis, appellant,v Emily Kanterakis, defendant-respondent;Salvatore A. Lecci, nonparty-respondent.(Index No. 200615/12) ‌Nikolaos Kanterakis, respondent-appellant,v Emily Kanterakis, defendant-appellant-respondent;Salvatore A. Lecci, nonparty-appellant-respondent.(Index No. 200615/12) ‌Appeal by Nikolaos Kanterakis from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 12, 2015. Separate appeal by Nikolaos Kanterakis, by permission, from so much of a decision and order (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated November 13, 2015, as directed him to pay counsel fees to Emily Kanterakis in the sum of $45,000. Separate appeals by Emily Kanterakis and Salvatore A. Lecci, and a cross appeal by Nikolaos Kanterakis from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered July 12, 2016.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal from the order dated March 12, 2015, on the ground that (1) no appeal lies as of right from an order that is not the result of a motion made on notice (see CPLR 5701), and leave to appeal has not been granted, (2) any right of direct appeal from the order terminated upon entry of the judgment entered July 12, 2016 (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241; Maddaloni v. Maddaloni, 142 AD3d 646), or (3) the appeal has been rendered academic upon entry of the judgment entered July 12, 2016 (see Maddaloni v. Maddaloni, 142 AD3d 646), by filing an affirmation or an affidavit on those issues in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy on each other on or before March 19, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal from the decision and order dated November 13, 2015, on the ground that any right to appeal from the order terminated upon entry of the judgment entered July 12, 2016 (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241), by filing an affirmation or an affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy on each other on or before March 19, 2018, or, if Nikolaos Kanterakis be so advised, by making a motion, on or before March 19, 2018, pursuant to CPLR 5520(c) to consolidate the appeal from the decision and order dated November 13, 2015, with the appeals and the cross appeal from the judgment, to deem the record and the parties’ briefs filed in connection with the appeal from the decision and order dated November 13, 2015, to be filed in connection with the appeals and cross appeal from the judgment, and for leave to serve and file a supplemental record containing the judgment and the notices of appeals and cross appeal from the judgment; and it is further,ORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeals from the judgment entered July 12, 2016, for failure to timely perfect in accordance with the rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e]) and prior decision and order on motion of this Court dated October 3, 2017, which enlarged the time to perfect the appeals from the judgment until December 1, 2017, by filing an affirmation or an affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy on each other on or before March 19, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court or her designee is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties by regular mail.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Leventhal, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Joseph Koch, ap — Motion by assigned counsel to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered November 10, 2016, and for the assignment of new counsel. The appellant’s motion for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for assignment of counsel was granted on October 10, 2017, and the following named attorney was assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Michael Ciaffa, Esq.333 Earle Ovington Blvd, Suite 1010Uniondale, NY 11553Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the former assigned counsel is directed to turn over all papers in the action to new counsel herein assigned; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Marianne Karas, Esq.980 Broadway, Suite 324Thornwood, NY 10594and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Maltese, JJ.Jorge Sarmiento plf-res, v. Russell J. Bonker ap, Tomy v. Joseph, def-res — 2017-08849, 2017-12119Jorge Sarmiento plaintiffs-respondents,v Russell J. Bonker appellants, TomyV. Joseph, defendant-respondent.(Index No. 65849/16) ‌Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 23, 2017, and July 11, 2017, respectively, and a judgment of the same court entered August 7, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the appellants’ time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until April 24, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be grantedDILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Chambers, Roman and Iannacci, JJ.J. G., etc. res, v. MPDG Associates, LLC, ap — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 23, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until April 9, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.RIVERA, J.P., CHAMBERS, ROMAN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Maltese, JJ.Mary Ruiz, ap, Rajashree Patil, etc., plf-res, v. Oleg Opsha, etc., et al., def-res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated April 7, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 26, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Maltese, JJ.Concept 9, LLC, plf-res, v. 614 Realty, LLC def-res, et al., defendant; Jacob Daskal, nonparty-ap, Jeffrey Saltiel nonparty-res — Motion by the nonparty-appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 1, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the nonparty-appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 26, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the nonparty-appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Maltese, JJ.MATTER of Diane DeSousa pet, v. Town of Babylon, res — Motion by the petitioners to enlarge the time to perfect a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, which was transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated April 10, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the petitioners’ time to perfect the proceeding is enlarged until April 24, 2018, and the record or appendix and the petitioners’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Maltese, JJ.Bank of New York Mellon, etc., res, v. Monica Prestia appellants def — Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated May 26, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 26, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Maltese, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Andrea Benson, ap — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, rendered May 12, 2015.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 26, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Chambers, Roman and Iannacci, JJ.HSBC Bank, USA, National Association, etc., res, v. Vishnu Sawh, appellant def — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered November 4, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 9, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.RIVERA, J.P., CHAMBERS, ROMAN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Chambers, Roman and Iannacci, JJ.S. P., etc., res, v. Dongbu Insurance Co. ap — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 8, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 26, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.RIVERA, J.P., CHAMBERS, ROMAN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Maltese, JJ.Patrick Skuret, ap, v. Yoyo Cab Corp. def, Daniel Skuret, Jr., res — (Appeal No. 1) Patrick Skuret, ap, v. Yoyo Cab Corp. res, Daniel Skuret, Jr., def — (Appeal No. 2) — Motion by respondents Yoyo Cab Corp., and Mahmoud A. Ghuraibi to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 29, 2016, and January 6, 2017, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the movants’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 26, 2018, and the movants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Chambers, Roman and Iannacci, JJ.Jonathan Landow, ap, v. Tracy Landow, res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered August 25, 2015, and an order of the same Court dated April 13, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until March 16, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.RIVERA, J.P., CHAMBERS, ROMAN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Chambers, Roman and Iannacci, JJ.Mohammed Islam, res, v. Christopher Destefano, ap — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 20, 2017, and December 7, 2016, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until March 9, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.RIVERA, J.P., CHAMBERS, ROMAN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Chambers, Roman and Iannacci, JJ.Inna Grechko, etc., ap, v. Maimonides Medical Center respondents def — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered February 25, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until March 9, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.RIVERA, J.P., CHAMBERS, ROMAN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Chambers, Roman and Iannacci, JJ.Miguel Cedano, ap, v. New York Racing Association, Inc., defendant third-party plaintiff-res, Triple Star Horse Feed, Inc., third-party def-res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered September 20, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until March 9, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.RIVERA, J.P., CHAMBERS, ROMAN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Austin, Miller and Hinds-Radix, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Crystal Joseph, ap — Motion by the appellant to be provided with the transcripts of certain proceedings on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered January 22, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the decision and order on motion of this Court dated August 22, 2016, which granted poor person relief to the appellant, is amended to include a direction to the court reporter to make, certify and file two transcripts of the stenographic minutes of the proceedings which occurred on the following dates in the above-entitled action, in the Criminal Court, Queens County, if they are available: January 12, 2011, January 14, 2011, January 21, 2011, January 26, 2011, February 4, 2011, February 7, 2011, February 8, 2011, February 23, 2011, March 30, 2011, May 9, 2011, May 25, 2011, June 8, 2011, June 23, 2011 (APAR1/3), and June 23, 2011 (AP6); and to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the stenographic minutes of the proceedings which occurred on the following dates in the above-entitled action, in the Supreme Court, Queens County, if they are available: July 13, 2011, July 27, 2011, August 4, 2011, August 11, 2011, August 22, 2011, September 7, 2011, November 1, 2011, December 6, 2011, January 10, 2012, February 23, 2012, March 5, 2012, April 4, 2012, April 26, 2012, June 11, 2012, June 14, 2012 (K6), June 14, 2012 (TAP A), June 28, 2012, July 26, 2012, August 16, 2012, September 13, 2012, September 25, 2012, October 1, 2012, October 4, 2012, November 13, 2012, December 3, 2012, December 19, 2012, February 1, 2013, February 19, 2013, March 8, 2013, April 9, 2013, May 2, 2013, June 13, 2013, July 8, 2013, September 9, 2013, October 18, 2013, November 26, 2013, December 6, 2013, January 29, 2014, March 14, 2014, April 29, 2014, June 16, 2014, September 3, 2014, October 8, 2014, October 31, 2014, November 7, 2014, December 10, 2014, January 15, 2015, March 16, 2015, April 20, 2015, May 4, 2015, June 15, 2015, July 6, 2015, July 22, 2015, and July 27, 2015; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer is directed to make, certify and file such transcripts within 45 days of the date of this decision and order on motion and the clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings to the appellant’s counsel, Paul Skip Laisure, Esq., Appellate Advocates, 111 John Street – 9th Floor, New York, NY 10038, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the transcripts for a codefendant, then the clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions.DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, MILLER and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Cohen, Maltese and Barros, JJ.Ralph Keppler plf-res, v. Theresa Kiel, etc. ap, Lawrence Garnier def-res — 2018-00194Ralph Keppler plaintiffs-respondents,v Theresa Kiel, etc. appellants, LawrenceGarnier defendants-respondents.(Index No. 603255/16) ‌Motion by the appellants on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered December 12, 2016, and October 19, 2017, respectively, inter alia, to preclude the plaintiffs-respondents from “having or using” certain business records, in effect, for summary reversal, to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal from the order entered December 12, 2016, and to consolidate the appeals.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal from the order entered December 12, 2016, is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeals from the order entered December 12, 2016, are dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to timely perfect in accordance with the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e]); and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to consolidate the appeals is denied as academic; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise deniedCHAMBERS, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Sgroi, Cohen and Maltese, JJ.Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., etc., res, v. Modupe Oyenuga def, Philomina Ilonze, ap — Motion by the appellant for leave to reargue an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 12, 2015, which was determined by decision and order of this Court dated December 13, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.MASTRO, J.P., SGROI, COHEN and MALTESE, JJ., concur.MATTER of Lisa Pesco, res, v. Jeffrey Pustai, ap — Appeal by Jeffrey Pustai from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated December 21, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Tomer T. Levin, res, v. Efrat Blum, ap — Appeal by Efrat Blum from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated November 17, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Deanna E. R. (Anonymous). SCO Family of Services, petitioner-res, Latisha M. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Latisha M. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated November 8, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the respondent-appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the respondent-appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the respondent-appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the respondent-appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the respondent-appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Nicole Haims, appellant-res, v. John Lehmann, res-res — Appeal by Nicole Haims and cross appeal by John Lehmann from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated December 18, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that John Lehmann shall perfect the cross appeal in the above-entitled proceeding within 60 days after the receipt of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , John Lehmann shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal and cross appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the cross appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal and cross appeal to show cause why the cross appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Mary Bosse, ap, v. Orville Sampson, res — Appeal by Mary Bosse from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated November 30, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Suzanne Greenwald, res, v. Brian Greenwald, ap — Appeal by Brian Greenwald from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated December 11, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appellant shall perfect the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding within 60 days after the receipt of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if he is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for poor person relief and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his financial status has not changed since that time, or that he had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Fatima Vera Melo, res, v. Bismark Zuniga, ap — Appeal by Bismark Zuniga from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated December 7, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Kenneth Goode, ap, v. Jessica Sandoval, res — Appeal by Kenneth Goode from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated January 11, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Maria Joy Frank, Esq., dated January 23, 2018, it isORDERED that the appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Marc Greenberg, Esq.45 Knollwood Road, Suite 502Elmsford, NY 10523914-347-1250and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the appellant at the address provided by the Court, and on or before March 9, 2018, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal, in writing, that he has done so and that either(1) the appellant is interested in prosecuting the appeal, or(2) the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal, or that he has been unable to contact the appellant, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the children, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the children, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any   or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that the appellant is interested in proceeding with the appeal, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Claudio E. Vielma, ap, v. Jennifer Santiago, res — Appeal by Claudio E. Vielma from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated November 6, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Noely Diaz, ap, v. Gus Rodriguez, res — Appeal by Noely Diaz from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated January 17, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Larry S. Bachner, Esq., dated January 19, 2018, it isORDERED that the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Larry S. Bachner, Esq.c/o Bachner & Associates, PC39 Broadway – Suite 1610New York, NY 10006(917) 674-9516ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the children, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the children, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this order, the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcripts have been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcripts have not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that this order has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcripts are expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Marnelle Deronette, ap, v. Rosiny Deronette, res — Appeal by Marnelle Deronette from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated December 15, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Michael Kaszubski, Esq., dated February 7, 2018, it isORDERED that the appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Ralph Carrieri, Esq.200 Old Country Road, Suite 620Mineola, NY 11501516-248-1188and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the appellant at the address provided by the Court, and on or before March 9, 2018, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal, in writing, that he has done so and that either(1) the appellant is interested in prosecuting the appeal, or(2) the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal, or that he has been unable to contact the appellant, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment;and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the children, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the children, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any   or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that the appellant is interested in proceeding with the appeal, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Katherine Kearney, ap, v. John J. Kearney, Jr., res — V-11742-17/17A, V-11743-17/17A) — Appeal by Katherine Kearney from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated January 5, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Lori A. Janczewski, ap, v. Adam J. Janczewski, res — Appeal by Lori A. Janczewski from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated January 29, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Eligio Turcios, res, v. Elizabeth Cordero, ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Elizabeth Cordero, ap, v. Eligio Turcios, res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeals by Elizabeth Cordero from an order and a decision of the Family Court, Orange County, both dated January 16, 2018.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appeal from the decision is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies from a decision (see Schicchi v. J.A. Green Constr. Co., 100 AD2d 509); and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), the appeal from the order in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this decision and order on motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), within 30 days after the date of this decision and order on motion, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal from the order; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal from the order, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal from the order as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that her financial status has not changed since that time, or that she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal from the order; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal from the order to show cause why the appeal from the order should or should not be dismissed.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Patricia Bah, ap, v. Mohammed Sallieu Bah, res — Appeal by Patricia Bah from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated December 28, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Janemarie T. Davis, res, v. Lamar D. Nicks, ap — Appeal by Lamar D. Nicks from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated November 3, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Arthur Janvier, ap, v. Marcia Janvier, res — Appeal by Arthur Janvier from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated December 22, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Gerard P. Salvatore, res, v. Pamela C. Frawley, ap — Appeal by Pamela C. Frawley from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated June 12, 2017. The transcripts were received by the appellant on or about December 6, 2017, and pursuant to a   of this Court dated August 21, 2017, the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding was to be perfected within 60 days of the date of the receipt of the transcripts. The appeal has not been perfected. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with the   dated August 21, 2017, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before March 19, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties by regular mail.MATTER of Marcia Lewis-Daniel, res, v. Lennox Daniel, ap — V-7036-13/17H, V-7035-13/17H) — Appeal by Lennox A. Daniel from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated December 21, 2107. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Olaitan K. Olawuyi, ap, v. Nadine A. Rollins, res — Appeal by Olaitan K. Olawuyi from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated December 11, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Peiyi Wang, ap, v. Gregory James Christensen, res — Appeal by Peiyi Wang from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated December 18, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Matthew D. (Anonymous), ap, v. Lisa D. (Anonymous), res — Appeal by Matthew D. from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated December 12, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of the Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Amanda Feliciano, res, v. Orlando Cooper, ap — Appeal by Orlando Cooper from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated January 8, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Ella Esha, Esq., dated February 3, 2018, it isORDERED that the appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Ronna Gordon-Galchus, Esq.61-43 186th StreetFresh Meadows, NY 11365781-229-2628and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the appellant at the address provided by the Court, and on or before March 9, 2018, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal, in writing, that she has done so and that either(1) the appellant is interested in prosecuting the appeal, or(2) the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal, or that she has been unable to contact the appellant, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the children, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the children, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any   or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that the appellant is interested in proceeding with the appeal, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Maribel Q. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- appellant; Malisa Q. (Anonymous), respondent- res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Jimmy Q. (Anonymous) III. Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- appellant; Malisa Q. (Anonymous), respondent- res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Evelyn J. Q. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- appellant; Malisa Q. (Anonymous), respondent- res — (Proceeding No. 3)MATTER of Elijah Q. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- appellant; Malisa Q. (Anonymous), respondent- res — (Proceeding No. 4)MATTER of Yvette Q. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- appellant; Malisa Q. (Anonymous), respondent- res — (Proceeding No. 5)MATTER of Rosa E. Q. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- appellant; Malisa Q. (Anonymous), respondent- res — (Proceeding No. 6)MATTER of Alisa E. Q. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- appellant; Malisa Q. (Anonymous), respondent- res — (Proceeding No. 7) N-5116-17, N-5115-17, N-5114-17, N-5113-17) — Appeal by the Administration for Children’s Services from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated January 31, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Elizabeth Grill, res, v. Christian Genitrini, ap — Appeal by Christian Genitrini from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated January 18, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Jessica Grady, res, v. John Consolazio, ap — Appeal by John Consolazio from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated December 28, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Raquel D. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Elizeth P. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Jonathan L. P. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Elizeth P. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Leonardo L. P. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Elizeth P. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 3) — Appeal by Elizeth P. from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated August 2, 2017. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated January 2, 2018, the respondent-appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the Court, on or before January 31, 2018:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript was expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.The respondent-appellant has failed to comply with the decision and order on motion of this Court dated January 2, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings for failure to comply with the decision and order on motion of this Court dated January 2, 2018, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before March 19, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties by regular mail.MATTER of Michelle Crane, res, v. John Santiago, ap — Appeal by John Santiago from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated July 20, 2017. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated January 3, 2018, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the Court, on or before February 1, 2018:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript was expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.The appellant has failed to comply with the order decision and order on motion of this Court dated January 3, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with the decision and order on motion of this Court dated January 3, 2018, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before March 19, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties by regular mail.MATTER of Alexandra M. Stebelsky, ap, v. Randy B. Schleger, res — F-12936-04/14AS) — Appeal by Alexandra M. Stebelsky from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated July 20, 2017. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated January 2, 2018, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the Court, within 30 days after the date of the order:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript was expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.The appellant has failed to comply with the decision and order on motion of this Court dated January 2, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings for failure to comply with the decision and order on motion of this Court dated January 2, 2018, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before March 19, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties by regular mail.MATTER of Nichelle S. E. B. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Kyondra E. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Michael A. T. (Anonymous), Jr. Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Kyondra E. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Hezekiah J.-M. E. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Kyondra E. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 3)MATTER of Za-Nayla T. (Anonymous), Jr. Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Kyondra E. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 4) N-5193-16, N-5194-16, N-5195-16, N-5196-16, N-5197-16) — Appeal by Kyondra E. from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated September 20, 2017. By order on certification of this Court dated January 12, 2018, the following attorney was assigned as counsel for the respondent-appellant on the appeal, and was directed, inter alia, to contact the respondent-appellant and determine the respondent-appellant’s interest in perfecting the appeal:William Martin, Esq.44 Church StreetWhite Plains, NY 10601914-771-7711By letter dated February 14, 2018, assigned counsel notified the Court that he has been unable to contact the respondent-appellant.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered relieving the assigned counsel for the respondent-appellant and dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before March 19, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties or their attorneys, and upon the respondent-appellant, by regular mail.MATTER of Suzanne Greenwald, appellant-res, v. Brian Greenwald, res-res — Appeal by Suzanne Greenwald, and cross appeal by Brian Greenwald, from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated August 24, 2017. By order on certification of this Court dated January 11, 2018, the following attorney was assigned as counsel for the respondent-appellant on the appeal and cross appeal, and was directed, inter alia, to contact the respondent-appellant and determine the respondent-appellant’s interest in perfecting the cross appeal:Heath J. Goldstein, Esq.90-50 Parsons Blvd., Suite 216Jamaica, NY 11432646-436-1052By letter dated February 14, 2018, assigned counsel notified the Court that he has been unable to contact the respondent-appellant.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered relieving the assigned counsel for the respondent-appellant and dismissing the cross appeal in the above-entitled proceeding by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before March 19, 2018; and it is further,