Appellate DivisionSecond DepartmentMotion List released on:December 27, 2017Josette Thomas, ap, v. City of New York res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 3, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 22, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Nancy Kammerer, res, v. Robert J. Kammerer, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 20, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 18, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, res, v. Lawrence B. Sobel, appellant def — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated December 5, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 25, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Nicholas Tomei, ap, v. Town of Riverhead res — Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated February 15, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 2, 2018, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Cindy Ann Lauder, ap, v. Paul B. Goldhamer, etc. res — Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated December 12, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 25, 2018, the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.By Dillon, J.P.; Miller, Barros and Christopher, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Dante D. Taylor, ap — Motion by the appellant’s assigned counsel to abate an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered July 29, 2016, upon the death of the appellant on October 7, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appeal is dismissed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings consistent with People v. Mintz (20 NY2d 770).DILLON, J.P., MILLER, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Miller, Barros and Christopher, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Michael A. Cerasaro, ap — (S.C.I. Nos. 80/07, 209/15) — Motion by the appellant pro se to be provided with additional documents to aid in the preparation of his supplemental brief on appeals from an amended judgment and a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, both rendered October 14, 2015.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied as academic as the appellant filed his pro se supplemental brief on October 18, 2017.DILLON, J.P., MILLER, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.2017-04417ORDER ON APPLICATION The Bank of New York Mellon, etc., res, v. Reginald Daniels appellants def — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.(8)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 22, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 16, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Lavar Sprinkle, ap — (S.C.I. No. 8522/16; — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute appeals from three judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County, all rendered September 26, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeals will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeals, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeals:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeals expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeals; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeals are taken.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Emina McMahon, res, v. Patrick McMahon, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 90-day enlargement of time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated March 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 18, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.NYCTL 2013-A Trust, et al, res, v. 66 Tehama, LLC, etc., appellant def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 4, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 11, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, plf, v. Rose Belony, etc., defendant; Federal National Mortgage Association, nonparty-res, Wenefred Chery, etc., et al., nonparty-ap — Application by the nonparty-appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 90-day enlargement of time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 6, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 10, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, etc., res, v. Ann Reed, ap, et al, def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered Mary 30, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 11, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Board of Managers of Village Mall at Hillcrest Condominium, ap, v. Jimmy Wong res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until January 25, 2018, to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 24, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 16, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Kevin Edwards, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 14, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until January 11, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Xin Fang Xia, ap, v. Laura Saft, res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 30-day enlargement of time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 14, 2016, and entered January 11, 2017, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until January 12, 2018, the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Board of Managers of Village Mall at Hillcrest Condominium, ap, v. Jaganmohan Pasapula, res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2)for an enlargement of time until January 25, 2018, to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered April 5, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 16, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.US Bank, res, v. Yosef Hasan, appellant def — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, both dated August 4, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 16, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Jalaysia S. (Anonymous). Westchester Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Joshua Spillman, res-res — Appeal by Jalaysia S. from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated November 1, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Daniel Pagano, Esq., dated December 4, 2017, it isORDERED that the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Daniel L. Pagano, Esq.2649 Strang Boulevard, Suite 303Yorktown Heights, NY 10598ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the child, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this order, the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcripts have been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcripts have not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that this order has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcripts are expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of the Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of George R. (Anonymous). SCO Family of Services petitioners- res, Samantha L. M. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Samantha L. M. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated November 17, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 22, 2018.MATTER of David A. H. (Anonymous). Childrens Village, petitioner-res, George T. J. (Anonymous) respondents- ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Dorie M. H. (Anonymous). Childrens Village, petitioner-res, George T. J. (Anonymous) respondents- ap — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeals by George T. J., and separate appeals by Charvella A. H., from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, both dated January 9, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the children to serve and file a brief on the appeals is enlarged until January 22, 2018.MATTER of Maya Worsoff, res, v. Mitchell Worsoff, ap — V-1951-17/17A, V-1950-17/17A, V-1953-17, V-1952-17, V-1951-17, V-1950-17) — Appeal by Mitchell Worsoff from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated May 2, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 22, 2018.MATTER of Edwin Lozaldo res, v. Robert Cristando, ap — Appeal by Robert Cristando from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated June 27, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 22, 2018.MATTER of Priciliyana C. (Anonymous). Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner; Jacklyn L. (Anonymous), res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Shannon F. (Anonymous). Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner; Jacklyn L. (Anonymous), res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Alexander L. (Anonymous), ap — Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Jacklyn L. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 3)MATTER of Dustyn L. (Anonymous), ap — Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Jacklyn L. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 4)MATTER of Skyler L. (Anonymous), ap — Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Jacklyn L. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 5)MATTER of Tabbietha L. (Anonymous), ap — Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Jacklyn L. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 6)MATTER of Veronica L. (Anonymous), ap — Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Jacklyn L. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 7)MATTER of Gwendalinn L. (Anonymous), ap — Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Jacklyn L. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 8)MATTER of Nadiya L. (Anonymous), ap — Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Jacklyn L. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 9) N-2370-16, N-2371-16, N-2372-16, N-2373-16, N-2374-16, N-2375-16) — Appeal by Alexander L., Dustyn L., Skyler L., Tabbietha L., Veronica L., Gwendalinn L., and Nadiya L., from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated November 22, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the appellants to serve and file a reply brief on the appeal is enlarged, and the reply brief submitted to the Clerk of this Court is accepted for filing and deemed timely served.MATTER of Thomas A. Ledbetter, res, v. Woodlyne Singer, ap — V-4865-15) — Appeal by Woodlyne Singer from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated August 10, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on December 18, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the brief for the attorney for the children in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Roger Dupont, respondent- ap, v. Antoinise Gaston, appellant- res, A. D. nonparty-ap — O-8-16, O-80-16/16B) — Appeal by Antoinise Gaston, separate appeal by A. D. and P. D., and cross appeal by Roger Dupont from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated October 6, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Kristine A. Ciganek, Esq., dated December 13, 2017, it isORDERED that the appellant-respondent is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute her appeal:Arleen Lewis, Esq.P.O. Box 219Blauvelt, NY 10913845-359-2149and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the appellant-respondent at the address provided by the Court, and on or before January 10, 2017, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeals and cross appeal, in writing, that she has done so and that either(1) the appellant-respondent is interested in prosecuting her appeal, or(2) the appellant-respondent is not interested in prosecuting her appeal, or that she has been unable to contact the appellant-respondent, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeals and cross appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant-respondent, the respondent-appellant, and the attorney for the children, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant-respondent’s counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeals and cross appeal, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appellant-respondent’s appeal expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that the appellant-respondent is interested in proceeding with her appeal, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeals and cross appeal are taken.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Khamari S. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Keith S. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Keith S. from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated May 18, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 9, 2018.MATTER of David Naftali, ap, v. Galit Naftali, res — O-21887/14) — Appeal by David Naftali from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated December 22, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 29, 2018. MATTER of Robert v. Sofia, ap, v. Kellie M. Hendry, res — Appeal by Robert V. Sofia from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated August 19, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 29, 2018.MATTER of Emiliano Ermini, pet-ap, v. Viviana Vittori, res, Genci Bilali nonparty-ap — V-3112-16/16A, V-3111-16/16A, O-506-12/16C) — Appeal by Emiliano Ermini, Genci Bilali, and Bilali & Associates, LLC, from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated July 26, 2017. The appellants’ brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on December 18, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the children in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.By Priscilla Hall, J.P.; Austin, Sgroi and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Malik Peters, pet, v. Vincent Del Giudice, etc. res — Motion by the petitioner to stay the trial in an action entitled People v. Peters, pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under Indictment No. 8885-15, pending hearing and determination of the above-entitled proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied as academic in light of the determination of the proceeding (see Matter of Peters v. Del Giudice, __ AD3d __, [2d Dept, December 27, 2017]).HALL, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.MATTER of Isabella M. (Anonymous). Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner; Benida M. (Anonymous), res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Joseph G. (Anonymous), ap — Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Benida M. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Santiago A. (Anonymous), Jr. Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner; Benida M. (Anonymous), res — (Proceeding No. 3) B-6123-11/15C) — Appeal by Joseph G. from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated July 21, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent Orange County Department of Social Services to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 22, 2018.By Eng, P.J.MATTER of Jeffrey VanZandt, res, v. Michelle Lynch, ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Michelle Lynch, ap, v. Jeffrey VanZandt, res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by Michelle Lynch from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated October 6, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Kelli M. O’Brien, Esq., dated December 15, 2017, it isORDERED that the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Kelli M. O’Brien, Esq.84 6- Station RoadP.O. Box 562Goshen, NY 10924ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the child, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this order, the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcripts have been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcripts have not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that this order has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcripts are expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of the Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.MATTER of Jeffrey VanZandt, res, v. Michelle Lynch, ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Michelle Lynch, ap, v. Jeffrey VanZandt, res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by Michelle Lynch from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated October 6, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Marvin J. Williams, Esq., dated October 6, 2017, it isORDERED that pursuant to Family Court Act §1120, the following named attorney is assigned as the attorney for the child on the appeal:William E. Horwitz, Esq.P.O. Box 63Ardsley-on-Hudson,NY 105-03914-479-0990and it is further,ORDERED that Marvin J. Williams Esq., is directed to turn over all papers in the proceeding to the new attorney for the child herein assigned.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur. MATTER of Omar Krubally, ap, v. Fatou Jobe, res — Appeal by Omar Krubally from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated December 2, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 26, 2018. MATTER of Robert S. New, ap, v. Emma T. Sharma, res — Appeal by Robert S. New from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated May 13, 2016. The appellant’s pro se supplemental brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on December 20, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the briefs, if any, for the respondent and the attorney for the child in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Suffolk County Department of Social Services, on behalf of Donna B. (Anonymous), ap, v. Dominick C. (Anonymous), res — Appeal by Suffolk County Department of Social Services, on behalf of Donna B., from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated June 30, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 19, 2018; and it is furtherORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Katarina Tumanova, ap, v. Ahmad Ali, res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Ahmad Ali, res, v. Katarina Tumanova, ap — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by Katarina Tumanova from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated August 2, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on December 21, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the child in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.MATTER of Shalar N. (Anonymous), ap — Appeals by Shalar N. from two orders of the Family Court, Kings County, dated November 2, 2016, and September 1, 2017, respectively. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 29, 2018.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Pedro Pena, res, v. Rosa Tiburcio, ap — Appeal by Rosa Tiburcio from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated May 6, 2016. The following named attorney was assigned by the Family Court, Queens County, as the attorney for the respondent:Roberta Chambers, Esq.110-21 Francis Lewis BlvdQueens Village, NY 11429Now, on the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that Roberta Chambers, Esq., the attorney for the child, is relieved and is directed to turn over all papers MATTER to the new attorney for the child herein assigned; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to Family Court Act §1120, the following named attorney is assigned as attorney for the child:Helene Bernstein, Esq.44 Court Street, #905Brooklyn, New York 11201917-748-9854ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Maya Worsoff, res, v. Mitchell Worsoff, ap — V-1951-17/17A, V-1950-17/17A, V-1953-17, V-1952-17, V-1951-17, V-1950-17) — Appeal by Mitchell Worsoff from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated May 2, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the children to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 22, 2018.MATTER of T. N. (Anonymous). Rockland County Department of Social Services, pet-res — Alec N. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Alec N. from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated June 14, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 31, 2018.By Chambers, J.P.; Sgroi, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.MATTER of Marjorie Nicolia Swan, ap, v. Keith Phillip Paris, res — V-1307-16/17C, V-1307-16/16D, V-1308-16/16A, V-1308-16/16B, V-1308-16/17C, V-1308-16/16D) — Appeal by Marjorie Nicolia Swan from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated May 5, 2017. By order to show cause dated November 2, 2017, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings for failure to comply with a decision and order on motion of this Court dated September 21, 2017, issued pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).Now, upon the order to show cause and the papers filed in response thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to comply with the decision and order on motion of this Court dated September 21, 2017, issued pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).CHAMBERS, J.P., SGROI, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Priscilla Hall, J.P.; Austin, Sgroi and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Sally Muckle, res, v. George Muckle, ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of George Muckle, ap, v. Sally Muckle, res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by George Muckle from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated June 23, 2017. By order to show cause dated November 2, 2017, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered relieving the attorney assigned by order on certification of this Court dated September 13, 2017, to perfect the appeal on behalf of the appellant on the ground that the attorney had been unable to contact the appellant, and dismissing the appeal.Now, upon the order to show cause and the papers having been filed in response thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, assigned counsel is relieved of the assignment, and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).HALL, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Priscilla Hall, J.P.; Austin, Sgroi and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Susana Del R. Lopez, res, v. Maoz M. Ruvio, ap — Appeal by Maoz M. Ruvio from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated July 13, 2017. By order to show cause dated November 14, 2017, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with a dated September 29, 2017, issued pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).Now, upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to comply with the dated September 29, 2017, issued pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).HALL, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Priscilla Hall, J.P.; Austin, Sgroi and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Derrick Harris, ap, v. Antionette Trotman, res — Appeal by Derrick Harris from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated June 30, 2017. By order to show cause dated November 14, 2017, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with a dated September 27, 2017, issued pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).Now, upon the order to show cause and the papers filed in response thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this decision and order on motion, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received, or if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; and it is further,ORDERED that if the appellant fails to file the affidavit or affirmation within 30 days after the date of this decision and order on motion, as set forth above, the Court will dismiss the appeal, without further notice.HALL, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Priscilla Hall, J.P.; Austin, Sgroi and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Sir D. C. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Tamarah C. (Anonymous), respondent- appellant res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Haile J. C. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Tamarah C. (Anonymous), respondent- appellant res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Jessie G. (Anonymous), Jr. Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Tamarah C. (Anonymous), respondent- appellant res — (Proceeding No. 3) — Motion by the respondent-appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated September 15, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 25, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.HALL, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Sgroi, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.Marguarita McCaul, ap, v. Patrick Noel McCaul, res — (Action No. 1)Marguarita McCaul, ap, v. Patrick Noel McCaul, res — (Action No. 2)— Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 3, 2016, and to enlarge the record to include a certain document.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until January 8, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.CHAMBERS, J.P., SGROI, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Sgroi, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.Michael Valva, res, v. Justyna Valva, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 30, 2016, for poor person relief, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 26, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.CHAMBERS, J.P., SGROI, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Sgroi, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.Robert G. Gahagan, res, v. Betsy Gahagan, ap — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 5, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 22, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.CHAMBERS, J.P., SGROI, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Sgroi, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.Miriam S. Perlman, res, v. Joseph Yerachmel Perlman, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 24, 2017, to waive compliance with the requirements of 22 NYCRR 670.10.2(f) regarding certification of the appellant’s appendix.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted.CHAMBERS, J.P., SGROI, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Sgroi, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.Lisa Hopkins, res, v. Simon Hopkins, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, dated April 7, 2016, for poor person relief, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 26, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.CHAMBERS, J.P., SGROI, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Balkin, Austin and Sgroi, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Luis Barruos, ap — Motion by the appellant’s assigned counsel on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 5, 2016, in effect, to be relieved of the assignment on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal by failing to respond to communications by assigned counsel. By order to show cause dated October 19, 2017, the appellant was directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant had abandoned the appeal, and assigned counsel’s motion was held in abeyance in the interim.Now, upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of assigned counsel’s motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel’s motion is granted.ENG, P.J., BALKIN, AUSTIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Austin, Roman and Cohen, JJ.Lazaro Sotolongo, ap, v. Robert L. Cristofaro, etc., def, Elliot G. Gross, res — Motion by the appellant on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered May 31, 2016, for leave to renew and reargue a motion by Robert L. Cristofaro, in effect, for leave to renew his prior motion to dismiss the appeal insofar as taken against him on the ground that it was untimely taken, which was determined by decision and order on motion of this Court dated November 24, 2017, and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal. Cross motion by Elliot G. Gross to dismiss the appeal for failure to timely perfect. Separate motion by the appellant to strike the motion by Elliot G. Gross, to impose a sanction upon Elliot G. Gross, and for an award of costs and an attorney’s fee.Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and the cross motion, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the appellant’s motion which is for leave to renew and reargue is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the appellant’s motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is granted, the time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 26, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that cross motion is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s motion to strike the motion by Elliot G. Gross, to impose a sanction upon Elliot G. Gross, and for an award of costs and an attorney’s fee is denied.ENG, P.J., AUSTIN, ROMAN and COHEN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Georgia Barker, ap, v. John T. Rohack, res — V-1797-16/16A, V-2094-16/16A, V-2095-16/16A, V-2096-16/16A) — Appeal by Georgia Barker from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated October 11, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Kamiyah D. B. v. (Anonymous), a/k/a Kamiyah B. v. (Anonymous), a/k/a Kamiyah B. (Anonymous), a/k/a Kamiyah v. (Anonymous). Little Flower Children and Family Services of New York, petitioner-res, Myron B. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — Appeal by Myron B. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated September 11, 2017. By order on certification of this Court dated October 25, 2017, the following attorney was assigned as counsel for the respondent-appellant on the appeal, and was directed, inter alia, to contact the respondent-appellant and determine the respondent-appellant’s interest in perfecting the appeal:Daniel E. Lubetsky, Esq.155-03 Jamaica AvenueJamaica, NY 11432-3829718-264-8156By letter dated December 19, 2017, assigned counsel notified the Court that he has been unable to contact the respondent-appellant.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered relieving the assigned counsel for the respondent-appellant and dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before January 17, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties or their attorneys, and upon the respondent-appellant, by regular mail.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Andre Broderick, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 5, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Wilanshia (Anonymous), P., ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 7, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Unique Jones, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered August 1, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Nyquan English, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 30, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Todd Deas, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered August 8, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Tony McNair, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 3, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Jose Guerrero, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered August 7, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Nicholas Heaven, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered July 7, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Quentin R. Lowery, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered March 27, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Edward Hunter, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, rendered April 4, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Mario Casanova, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, rendered July 18, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Daniel Nieto, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, rendered July 27, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Wayne Thomas, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, rendered August 8, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Leon Shenandoah, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, rendered June 28, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Applications for Extensions of Time — Parties in the following causes have filed applications pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to extend the time to perfect or to serve and file a brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the applications, it isORDERED that the applications are granted and the following parties in the following causes are granted the specified extensions of time:Title Docket No. Applicant Name(s) Extended DeadlineBank of New York 2017-08575 Bank of New York Mellon January 22, 2018Mellon v. Forman+1Bank of New York2017-02270Gregory Van RotenMellon v. Van Roten January 16, 2018City of New York v2017-06478City of New YorkBay Ridge Prince, LLCJanuary 22, 2018Dongbu Insurance Company,2017-06497Harleysville InsuranceLtd. (U.S. Branch) v. Company of New JerseyHarleysville InsuranceFebruary 20, 2018Digrigoli v. City of New 2017-06398Concetta DigrigoliYorkFebruary 13, 2018Federal National Mortgage2017-08080Delourdes RomainAssociation v. DelourdesRomainMarch 8, 2018HSBC Bank USA, NA v2017-07863Leong WongLee-Boon Koh Wong+1February 20, 2018Title Docket No. Applicant Name(s) Extended DeadlineHutchinson v. New York2016-09002Dianne HutchinsonCity Health and HospitalsCorporationJanuary 9, 2018JPMorgan Chase Bank, 2016-10599Christina LyonNational Association v. Lyon+1January 10, 2018Krobath v. South Nassau2017-02583Eric KrobathCommunities HospitalFebruary 13, 2018Leitner v. National Senior2017-05321National Senior Insurance, Inc.Insurance, Inc.February 23, 2018Lindner v. Guzman2017-09766John LindnerFebruary 6, 2018Matter of Arroyo v. Central2017-05774Gail ArroyoIslip UFSDJanuary 12, 2018Matter of Buie, deceased2017-07676Teresa BuieLinda BuieFebruary 13, 2018Matter of Rising Tide Fuel,2017-04899Robert BambinoLLC. v. Bambino January 30, 2018Parker, Waichman, LLP v2017-07432Elena M. Perez, Esq.GetreuFebruary 20, 2018Puglisi v. Embro2017-08560Helene StetchSam Puglisi February 20, 2018Re/Max of New York, Inc.2017-07860Re/Max of New York, Inc.v WeberMarch 16, 2018Spitzer v. Ruttner2017-01808Grid Gardens Corp.Emanuel SpitzerJanuary 22, 2018U.S. Bank National2017-07515Daniel CalleAssociation v. CalleJanuary 29, 2018W. M. Movers, Inc., ap, v. State of New York, res — (Claim No. 122929) — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until January 12, 2018, to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims, dated October 21, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until January 5, 2018, the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.MATTER of Jason Edge res, v. Beacon City School District ap — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated February 14, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until January 8, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Wells Fargo, NA, res, v. Gene Burshtein, appellant def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until January 31, 2018, to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 8, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until January 8, 2018, the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Houdek Real Estate Company, LLC, appellant- res, v. Bayport Postal Realty, LLC, res-res — Application by the respondent-appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until January 12, 2018, to serve and file a brief on an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 6, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent-appellant’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 5, 2018, the respondent-appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, etc., res, v. Roopnaraine Sankar appellants def — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 30-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, both entered January 18, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 10, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.By Chambers, J.P.; Roman, Miller and Duffy, JJ.U.S. Bank, N.A., res, v. Clement Morrison appellants def — 2015-10707, 2015-12254U.S. Bank, N.A., respondent, v. ClementMorrison appellants defendants.(Index No. 30754/10)2015-12250U.S. Bank, N.A., respondent, v. ClementMorrison appellants defendants.(Index No. 30754/10)2016-04169U.S. Bank, N.A., respondent, v. ClementMorrison, etc. appellantsdefendants.(Index No. 30754/10)Motion by the appellants, inter alia, to withdraw appeals from five orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 26, 2015, September 11, 2015, October 6, 2015 (two orders), and January 27, 2016, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is dismissed for failure to serve the motion in accordance with the terms of the order to show cause.CHAMBERS, J.P., ROMAN, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.Richard Bennett ap, v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, et al., respondents def — (Action No. 1)State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, etc., plf, v. Creative Landscaping by Cow Bay, Inc. def — (Action No. 2)Richard Bennett ap, v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, et al., respondents def — (Action No. 3)— Application by the respondent Holzmacher, McLendon & Murrell, PC, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 30-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 17, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the applicant’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 11, 2018, the applicant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Patrick Skuret, ap, v. Yoyo Cab Corp. def, Daniel Skuret, Jr., res — (Appeal No. 1) Patrick Skuret, ap, v. Yoyo Cab Corp. res, Daniel Skuret, Jr., def — (Appeal No. 2) — Application by respondents Yoyo Cab Corp., and Mahmoud A. Ghuraibi pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 29, 2016, and January 6, 2017, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the applicants’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 12, 2018, and the applicants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Maria Colella, ap, v. Geico General Insurance Company, res — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered January 12, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until January 5, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.M243645 Wells Fargo Bank, NA, respondent, v Patricia McClintock, appellant, et al., defendants. (Index No. 26466/09) Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered February 8, 2017, and March 3, 2017, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 22, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Motion List released on:December 28, 2017By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Ted Farkas, res, v. Margaret Farkas, ap — Appeal by Margaret Farkas from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated October 13, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Tiffany Moseley, Esq., dated December 13, 2017, it isORDERED that the appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Heather Fig, Esq.Bayport Professional Centre982 Montauk Highway, Suite 6Bayport, NY 11705631-419-6111and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the appellant at the address provided by the Court, and on or before January 11, 2017, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal, in writing, that she has done so and that either(1) the appellant is interested in prosecuting the appeal, or(2) the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal, or that she has been unable to contact the appellant, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment;and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the child, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that the appellant is interested in proceeding with the appeal, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin , JJ.MATTER of Thomas A. Ledbetter, res, v. Woodlyne Singer, ap — Appeal by Woodlyne Singer to this Court from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated August 10, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Keith Utsey, Esq., dated December 18, 2017, it isORDERED that the respondent is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to respond to the appeal:Robert J. Marinelli, Esq.305 Broadway, Suite 1001New York, NY 10007212-822-1427and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the respondent at the address provided by the Court, and shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal on or before January 11, 2018, in writing, that he has done so and that either(1) the respondent is interested in responding to the appeal, or(2) the respondent is not interested in responding to the appeal, or that he has been unable to contact the respondent, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.U.S. Bank, National Association, etc., res, v. Sandra Gadson def, Michael Knott ap — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until February 13, 2018, to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 1, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 29, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.U.S. Bank National Association, etc., ap, v. Uwayemwense Osunbor, respondent def — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered January 10, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 5, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Mary Ng, res, v. G. Warren Whitaker, etc., ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered February 7, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 16, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.MATTER of Rachel Z. (Anonymous). Jack Z. (Anonymous) petitioners-res, Anna B. (Anonymous), a/k/a Chanie B. (Anonymous), cross petitioner-appellant; Frieda Rosengarten nonparty-res — Application by petitioners-respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 26, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the applicants’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 18, 2018, the applicants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Joseph Cerrato, ap, v. Earnest Jacobs, res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 24, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 17, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.By Priscilla Hall, J.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Hang Bin Li, ap — Motion by the appellant pursuant to CPL 460.20, for a certificate granting leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from a decision and order of this Court dated October 25, 2017, which affirmed a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered March 4, 2013.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.By Eng, P.J.; Balkin, Austin and Sgroi, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Thomas Barnable, ap — Motion by the respondent to dismiss, for failure to prosecute, an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered May 30, 2006, which was deemed abandoned pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(f).Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.ENG, P.J., BALKIN, AUSTIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Balkin, Austin and Sgroi, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Kleve Panayoty, ap — Motion by the appellant’s assigned counsel on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 11, 2016, in effect, to be relieved of the assignment on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal by failing to respond to communications by assigned counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant is directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal, by filing an affirmation or an affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court on or before January 22, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion by assigned counsel, in effect, to be relieved is held in abeyance in the interim; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court or her designee is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the appellant at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and upon the attorney who last appeared for him, and upon the District Attorney, by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2).ENG, P.J., BALKIN, AUSTIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., etc., res, v. Glen Johnston ap — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated March 20, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 26, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, New York, res, v. Christ the King Regional High School, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until January 26, 2018, to serve and file a reply brief on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, one entered March 22, 2017, and one dated August 25, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until January 22, 2018, the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Miguel Martinez, res, v. Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 30-day enlargement of time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated May 15, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until January 16, 2018, the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Bank of America, N.A., res, v. Maurizio Carusone ap, et al, def — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to perfect appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered February 1, 2017, and February 16, 2017, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellants’ time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until January 16, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeals and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Galina Makaveyev, res, v. Victor Paliy, ap — Appeal by Victor Paliy from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated April 5, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 29, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.J. H., etc., ap, v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, etc., res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 4, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 26, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.MATTER of Joseph McLaughlin, ap, v. Audrey deWys McLaughlin, res — Appeal by Joseph McLaughlin from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated June 21, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Elizabeth Lopez, ap, v. Jaris Divios Sweet respondents- respondents res — Appeal by Elizabeth Lopez from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 8, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent Mercy First to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 26, 2018.Brian Levi, ap, v. Tara Levi, res — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 20, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 5, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Lapina-Skyba, etc. plf-res, v. Laura Edith Kreft, def-res, Paul Kreft, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 26, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 16, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.HSBC Bank USA, N.A., etc., appellant v. Lazer Werczberger, res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 31, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 17, 2017, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.By Eng, P.J.MATTER of Cristal O. C. (Anonymous). Forestdale, Inc. petitioners-res, Chris C. (Anonymous), res-ap, et al., res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Deshawn T. W. (Anonymous). Forestdale, Inc. petitioners-res, Chris C. (Anonymous), res-ap, et al., res — (Proceeding No. 2) B-7880-14) — Appeals by Chris C. from two orders of the Family Court, Kings County, both dated July 11, 2016 (one as to each child). Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the children to serve and file a brief on the appeals is enlarged until February 9, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Andrew H. Spodek, etc. respondents-appellants plf, v. Charles Neiss, etc. appellants- res, Moses Fried res, et al., def — Application by the appellants-respondents on an appeal and cross appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered March 30, 2017, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal until February 26, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellants-respondents’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 25, 2018, the joint record or appendix on the appeal and cross appeal (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][1]) and the appellants-respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondents-appellants shall serve and file their answering brief, including their points of argument on the cross appeal, in accordance with the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]).By Chambers, J.P.; Sgroi, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Ralphie Hayes, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the County Court, Orange County, dated July 10, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel. By order to show cause dated November 1, 2017, the appellant was directed to show cause before this Court why the appeal should not be dismissed on the ground that the order dated July 10, 2017, is neither appealable as of right nor by permission.Now, upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the appellant’s motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed (see CPL 450.10, 450.20); and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s motion is denied as academic.CHAMBERS, J.P., SGROI, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Maltese and Lasalle, JJ.MATTER of Trevor Burton, et al, res-ap, v. Port Washington Water District, appellant-res — Motion by the respondents-appellants for a preference in the calendaring of an appeal and cross appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered December 21, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.DILLON, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Maltese and Lasalle, JJ.HSBC Bank USA, National Association, etc., res, v. Michael N. Bazigos, etc., appellant def — 2017-02225HSBC Bank USA, National Association,etc., respondent, v. Michael N. Bazigos,etc. appellants defendants.(Index No. 69187/13)Motion by the appellant Michael N. Bazigos on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, both dated March 11, 2016, and a judgment of the same court dated January 6, 2017, to stay enforcement of the judgment pending hearing and determination of the appeals. Separate motion by the respondent to dismiss the appeals from the orders on the ground that the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated upon entry of the judgment or, in the alternative, to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief in connection with the appeals from the orders. Separate motion by the appellant Michael N. Bazigos, inter alia, in effect, to enlarge the time to perfect the appeals from the judgment and to consolidate the appeals from the order with the appeals from the judgment.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion by the appellant Michael N. Bazigos to stay enforcement of the judgment and the papers filed in opposition and in relation thereto, upon the papers filed in support of the motion by the respondent and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the motion by the appellant Michael N. Bazigos, inter alia, in effect, to enlarge the time to perfect the appeals from the judgment and to consolidate the appeals and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the appellant Michael N. Bazigos’s motion to stay enforcement of the judgment is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the respondent’s motion which is to dismiss the appeals from the orders is held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeals from the orders for determination upon the argument or submission thereof; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the respondent’s motion which is to serve and file a brief in connection with the appeals from the orders is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 29, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant Michael N. Bazigos’s motion, inter alia, in effect, to enlarge the time to perfect the appeals from the judgment and to consolidate the appeals is granted to the extent that the time to perfect the appeals from the judgment is enlarged until February 13, 2018, and the motion is otherwise denied; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.DILLON, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.Mary McConville res, v. Alice Kim, etc. ap — Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until March 2, 2018, to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 23, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 20, 2018, the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Natalie Bronstein, ap, v. Benderson Development Company, LLC res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until February 27, 2018, to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, dated April 26, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 20, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Jeffrey Beard, a/k/a Timmothy Parker, ap — Application by the appellant pro se for leave to vacate a decision and order on motion of this Court dated August 14, 2017, which granted his motion for leave to serve and file a supplemental pro se brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, rendered April 15, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the decision and order on motion of this Court dated August 14, 2017, is recalled and vacated, and the appellant’s motion for leave to serve and file a supplemental pro se brief is denied.By Eng, P.J.; Cohen, Maltese and Iannacci, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Samuel Lewis, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se to enlarge the time to serve and file a supplemental brief on an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered October 31, 2013.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the appellant’s supplemental brief shall be served and filed on or before February 27, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant shall file nine copies of the supplemental brief and serve one copy on the District Attorney.ENG, P.J., COHEN, MALTESE and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Maltese and Lasalle, JJ.Cassandra Johnson-Hendy, res, v. Nicolae Mosu appellants def — Motion by the appellant Hemangi Shukla to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered August 15, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition and in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.DILLON, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Maltese and Lasalle, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Anthony Baldwin, ap — (S.C.I. No. 72660/15) — Motion by the appellant on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered December 21, 2016, to extend a stay of execution of the judgment which was granted by decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 29, 2017, and extended by decision and order on motion of this Court dated August 15, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the stay of execution of the judgment granted by the decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 29, 2017, and extended by decision and order on motion of this Court dated August 15, 2017, is further extended pending determination of the appeal on condition that the appeal is perfected by March 1, 2018, and upon the same bail conditions imposed by the decision and order on motion of this Court dated August 15, 2017; and it is further,ORDERED that this stay shall terminate and be of no further effect 120 days from the date hereof and the appellant shall thereafter surrender to serve the sentence imposed, unless the appeal is perfected on or before March 1, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that upon the termination of this stay as provided above, this order shall constitute authorization to any peace officer to arrest and deliver the appellant to the sentencing court to begin the execution of sentence; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.DILLON, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Maltese and Lasalle, JJ.Pyong Rudolph, ap, v. Scott Rudolph, res — Motion by the appellant to stay enforcement of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated November 13, 2017, pending hearing and determination of an appeal therefrom, and, in effect, for a preference in the calendaring of the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.DILLON, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Maltese and Lasalle, JJ.Penny Mac Corp., res, v. Donald Bradley, ap — Motion by the appellant to stay the foreclosure sale of the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 25, 2017, and a judgment of the same court also dated September 25, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.DILLON, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Maltese and Lasalle, JJ.Recovery Racing III, LLC, etc. res, v. Bespoke Motor Group, LLC, et al., ap — Motion by the appellants to stay all proceedings in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered September 29, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.DILLON, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Maltese and Lasalle, JJ.MATTER of Michael Frain, pet, v. Melissa Ho, res — Motion by Melissa Ho for leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated September 28, 2017, and to stay enforcement of the order, pending hearing and determination of the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition and in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to appeal is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied as academic.DILLON, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Maltese and Lasalle, JJ.Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, etc., res, v. Ephraim Yurowitz, appellant def — Motion by the appellant to stay enforcement of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered November 16, 2016, pending hearing and determination of an appeal therefrom and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to stay enforcment of the order is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 29, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.DILLON, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Balkin, Austin and Sgroi, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Paolo Jean, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered July 29, 2016, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Seymour W. James, Jr., Esq.The Legal Aid Society199 Water Street – 5th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., BALKIN, AUSTIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.PEOPLE, etc., plf, v. Stevie P. Robinson, def — Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the County Court, Dutchess County, dated October 17, 2016, which has been referred to me for determination.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is denied.By Eng, P.J.; Balkin, Austin and Sgroi, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Dondi M. Johnson, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, rendered August 24, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Thomas N. N. Angell, Esq.Public Defender22 Market StreetPoughkeepsie, New York 12601and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., BALKIN, AUSTIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.By Priscilla Hall, J.PEOPLE, etc., plf, v. DeLano Hubert, def — Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated September 26, 2017, which has been referred to me for determination.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is denied.By Eng, P.J.; Balkin, Austin and Sgroi, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Robert Anderson, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered August 29, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Thomas N. N. Angell, Esq.Public Defender22 Market StreetPoughkeepsie, NY 12601and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., BALKIN, AUSTIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.PEOPLE, etc., plf, v. James Currie, def — Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 24, 2017, which has been referred to me for determination.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is denied.By Eng, P.J.; Balkin, Austin and Sgroi, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Natasha Yancy, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se pursuant to CPL 460.30 for an extension of time to take an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered March 17, 2017, and for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation and opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to extend the time to take the appeal is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the moving papers are deemed to constitute a timely notice of appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., BALKIN, AUSTIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.PEOPLE, etc., plf, v. James Kelly, def — Application by the defendant, pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 30, 2017, which has been referred to me for determination.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is denied.By Eng, P.J.; Balkin, Austin and Sgroi, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Stheven Rosado, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se pursuant to CPL 460.30 for an extension of time to take an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered May 18, 2017, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s moving papers are deemed to constitute a timely notice of appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that, upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., BALKIN, AUSTIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Balkin, Austin and Sgroi, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Appollo Thompson, ap — and to Assign Counsel — Motion by the appellant pro se pursuant to CPL 460.30 for an extension of time to take an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered May 9, 2017, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to extend the time to take the appeal is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s moving papers are deemed to constitute a timely notice of appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for poor person relief is denied, with leave to renew upon proper papers, including the appellant’s affidavit setting forth (1) the appellant’s full financial situation including all assets, both real and personal, as well as any and all sources of income before conviction, (2) whether the appellant was represented by assigned counsel or retained counsel in the trial court and, if retained, the amount and source of counsel fees paid to retained counsel, and (3) whether the appellant was on bail before conviction, and, if so, the amountand source of the bail money, and if bail was the appellant’s own money, what happened to the same after conviction.ENG, P.J., BALKIN, AUSTIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.By Barros, J.PEOPLE, etc., plf, v. Dwayne Riggins, def — Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the County Court, Westchester County, dated May 16, 2017, which has been referred to me for determination.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is denied.By Roman, J.PEOPLE, etc., plf, v. Rory Hines, def — Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the County Court, Westchester County, dated February 10, 2017, which has been referred to me for determination.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is denied.By Eng, P.J.; Balkin, Austin and Sgroi, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Sunday Medina, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered July 26, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., BALKIN, AUSTIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Balkin, Austin and Sgroi, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Dillon Patterson, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 12, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., BALKIN, AUSTIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Maltese and Lasalle, JJ.MATTER of Auctions International, Inc., ap, v. County of Orange res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated September 20, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and upon payment of the filing fee on or before January 12, 2018, the record and appellant’s brief submitted to the Clerk of the Court will be accepted for filing and deemed timely served.DILLON, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Balkin, Austin and Sgroi, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Marquise Frederick, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 28, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., BALKIN, AUSTIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.Candice Landano res, v. Jason Karp, etc. ap — Application by the appellants Jason Karp, David Katz, and North Shore Pulmonary Associates, P.C., to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 26, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal by Jason Karp, David Katz, and North Shore Pulmonary Associates, P.C., is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Kevin C. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- appellant; Xuehau C. (Anonymous), respondent- res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Chongxia C. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- appellant; Xuehau C. (Anonymous), respondent- res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated November 9, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Applications for Extensions of Time — Parties in the following causes have filed applications pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to extend the time to perfect or to serve and file a brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the applications, it isORDERED that the applications are granted and the following parties in the following causes are granted the specified extensions of time:Title Docket No. Applicant Name(s) Extended Deadline45-34 Pearson Street LIC,2017-02789Pearson Street FundingLLC v. OhanaLIC, LLCJanuary 5, 2018Ackerman v. Berkowitz 2017-07372David AckermanFebruary 16, 2018Basile v. Wiggs2017-08135Christopher BasileFebruary 27, 2018Bologra v. City of Newburgh2017-08159Justin BolograMarch 8, 2018Cayetano v. Port2017-07854CTE IncorporatedAuthority of New Yorkand New JerseyJanuary 18, 2018Citimortgage, Inc. v. 2017-07403Andre Sultan, a/k/aSultan, a/k/a SultonAndre SultonJanuary 22, 2018Gary v. Deshommes 2017-07598Wayne K. EwingMarch 7, 2018Hendels v. Preferred 2017-07636Preferred ContractorsContractors InsuranceInsurance Company RRG, LLCCompany RRG, LLCFebruary 9, 2018Lennon v. Digrazia2017-07630Mary Elizabeth LennonMarch 19, 2018Title Docket No. Applicant Name(s) Extended DeadlineLevites Family, L.P.2017-06415Xi Wu Huv PerezJohn J LiFebruary 20, 2018Matter of Hitner v. Planning2017-08738Michele SweigBoard of the Town of PattersonHarry HitnerMarch 7, 2018People v. Smiley, Antoine2016-07021People of State of New YorkJanuary 24, 2018People v. Zaimi, Lani2016-09437People of State of New YorkFebruary 9, 2018Reis v. J.B. Kaufman RealtyCo., LLC2017-10961Juvenal ReisJanuary 5, 2018US Bank v. Gokhberg2017-08289Tatyana GavrikovaYury GokhbergFebruary 20, 2018US Bank National Assoc.2017-04486Cathy Oliverv OliverJanuary 12, 2018Waring v. Matalon2016-12568Martin MatalonJanuary 12, 2018Y&E Construction and2017-08015Y&E ConstructionDevelopment, Inc. vand Development, Inc.Cascade Condominium, LLCFebruary 28, 2018PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Jose Rodriguez, ap — Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered March 4, 2013.Upon the stipulation of the appellant and the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated December 21, 2017, it isORDERED that the appeal is marked withdrawn.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Jose Rodriguez, ap — Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered March 4, 2013.Upon the stipulation of the appellant and the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated December 21, 2017, it isORDERED that the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Jean Fremont, ap — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the decisions and orders on motion of this Court dated October 16, 2017, and November 22, 2017, respectively, in the above-entitled case are recalled and vacated, and the following decision and order on motion is substituted therefor:Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 26, 2017 as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Carol Kahn, Esq.225 Broadway, Suite 1510New York, NY 10007and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Chihadeh Alkhabbaz, plf-ap, v. Lon Best, def-ap, Jerrick Associates, respondent def — Application pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 8, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until March 14, 2018, and the joint record or appendix on the appeals and the briefs of the plaintiff-appellant and the defendant-appellant shall be served and filed on or before that date.Youssef Attar, plf-ap, v. Lon Best, def-ap, Jerrick Associates, res — Application pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 6, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until March 15, 2018, and the joint record or appendix on the appeals and the briefs of the plaintiff-appellant and the defendant-appellant shall be served and filed on or before that date.Francisco Castro-Brion, plf-res, v. SP Realty, LLC def-res, Canido Basonas Construction Corp., ap — Application by the plaintiff-respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 45-day enlargement of time and separate application by the defendant-respondent SP Realty, LLC, for a 30-day enlargement of time, to serve and file their respective briefs on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 15, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the applications and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application by the plaintiff-respondent is granted to the extent that the plaintiff-respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 29, 2018, the plaintiff-respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the application by the defendant-respondent SP Realty, LLC, is granted, the time of the defendant-respondent SP Realty, LLC, to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 29, 2018, and the brief of the defendant-respondent SP Realty, LLC, shall be served and filed on or before that date.HSBC Bank, N.A., res, v. Danny Vaswani ap, et al., def — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge until January 22, 2018, the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 10, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January11, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.ORDER ON APPLICATION Marie E. DiFrancesca res, v. Navid Mootabar def, Jaspreet Singh ap — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, both dated April 24, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until January 5, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.
