Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., ap, v. Kevin Wilson, etc., respondent def — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 4, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 5, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.US Bank National Association, etc., res, v. Robert P. Bochicchio, appellant def — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time to serve and file a brief until February 2, 2018, on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, both dated February 21, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 16, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Roberto C. E.-C. (Anonymous), ap — Appeal by Roberto C. E.-C. from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated July 5, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 2, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Zhahaya A. Dockery, res, v. Latif S. Reid-OGarro, ap — Appeals by Latif S. Reid-O’Garro from two orders of the Family Court, Dutchess County, both dated May 23, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the children to serve and file a brief on the appeals is enlarged until February 2, 2018.MATTER of Jessica Lyons, ap, v. Nicholas Sepe, res — Appeal by Jessica Lyons from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated August 30, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on December 26, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the child in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.MATTER of Kyle C. (Anonymous), appellant child. Nassau County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Daniel C. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Ryan C. (Anonymous), appellant child. Nassau County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Daniel C. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by Kyle C. and Ryan C. from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated February 17, 2017. The appellants’ brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on December 26, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the briefs for the respondents in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.MATTER of Rikisha Reid, ap, v. Ian Brown, res — Appeal by Rikisha Reid from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated June 12, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 30, 2018.US Bank National Association, etc., res, v. Rosa Fernandez, ap, et al., def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until February 2, 2018, to serve and file a reply brief on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 13, 2016, and December 16, 2016, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until January 25, 2018, the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.MATTER of Gustavo Ruiz, res, v. Linda M. Spinnelli, ap — Appeal by Linda M. Spinnelli from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated March 31, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on December 27,, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the children in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.MATTER of Jaylen D. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Jennifer D. (Anonymous), respondent- appellant res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Kyla D. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Jennifer D. (Anonymous), respondent- appellant res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by Jennifer D. from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated October 18, 2016. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on December 27, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the briefs for the petitioner-respondent and the attorney for the children in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.Francisco Almedia, ap, v. The City of New York res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 10, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until January 17, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MATTER of Jamiah C. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Victoria O. (Anonymous), res-ap, et al., res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Donyea C. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Victoria O. (Anonymous), res-ap, et al., res — (Proceeding No. 2) N-1637-13, N-1638-13) — Appeals by Victoria O. from two orders of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated May 15, 2013, and August 23, 2016, respectively. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on December 27, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the children in the above-entitled appeals shall be served and filed.MATTER of Jasiah T.-V. S. J. (Anonymous). Heart Share Human Services of New York, Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, petitioner- appellant-res, Joshua W. (Anonymous), res-res, Shatesse J. (Anonymous), respondent-res-res — Appeal by Heart Share Human Services of New York, Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, and cross appeal by Shatesse J., from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated June 5, 2017. The petitioner-appellant-respondent’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on November 8, 2017, and the respondent-respondent-appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on December 27, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the reply brief of the petitioner-appellant-respondent, the brief for the respondent-respondent, and the brief of the attorney for the child in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.McKinnon Doxsee Agency, Inc. ap, v. Frank G. Gallina res — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 30-day enlargement of time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 23, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellants’ time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until January 16, 2018, the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.HSBC USA, National Association, etc., res, v. Gurmeet Kaur Sikka def, Virenderpal Singh Sikka, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered October 5, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply is enlarged until January 22, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Jason Campbell, ap — Appeal by Jason Campbell from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 8, 2017. By order dated November 8, 2017, the Supreme Court, Kings County, granted an application pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law §380.55 for poor person relief.Now, upon the order dated November 8, 2017, it isORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Seymour W. James, Jr., Esq.The Legal Aid Society199 Water Street – 5th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on application upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on application upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Christine Pasieka, ap, v. LBP Lido Blvd, LLC res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 8, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 25, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Trischa Williams, res, v. Claude Jenkins, ap — V-457-12/15C) — Appeal by Claude Jenkins from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (IDV Part), dated March 3, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 9, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Sonia Thaxton, res, v. Luis Chapman, ap — Appeal by Luis Chapman from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated May 25, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 26, 2018.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of George R. (Anonymous). SCO Family of Services petitioners- res, Samantha L. M. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Samantha L. M. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated November 17, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent SCO Family of Services to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 2, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Jeremiah G. F. (Anonymous). Edwin Gould Services for Children and Families, et al., petitioners-res, Gideon F. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Gideon F. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated July 27, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 2, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Gabriela T. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- appellant; Angelina T. (Anonymous), respondent- res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Noelia T. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- appellant; Angelina T. (Anonymous), respondent- res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by Administration for Children’s Services from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated July 17, 2017. The appellant’s replacement brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on December 27, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the children in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.Premier Restorations of NY Corp., plaintiff- res, v. Neal Wittels defendants third-party plaintiffs-appellants; Melvin Benzaquen, third-party def-res — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated April 12, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 5, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.U.S. Bank, National Association, etc., ap, v. Loraine R. Degraff, defendant- respondent defendants; Pierre Defraff, etc., nonparty-res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 21, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 1, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Jesus Arevalo, ap — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until February 5, 2018, to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered July 11, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 19, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Valerie Alliger-Bograd, res, v. Neal Bograd, ap — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered May 5, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 13, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.MATTER of Drew W. Matsen, res, v. Megan E. Matsen, ap — V-5856-16/16A, V-5857-16/16A, V-848-17/17A, V-849-17/17A) — Appeal by Megan E. Matsen from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated June 28, 2017. Pusuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 2, 2018.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Shawn Childs, ap — Appeals by Shawn Childs from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County, both rendered October 24, 2017. By order dated October 24, 2017, the Supreme Court, Kings County, granted an application pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law §380.55 for poor person relief.Now, upon the order dated October 24, 2017, it isORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeals:Seymour W. James, Jr., Esq.The Legal Aid Society199 Water Street – 5th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appeals will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on application upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeals, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeals expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeals; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on application upon the clerk of the court from which the appeals are taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Dupree M. (Anonymous), ap — Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Samantha Q. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Dupree M. from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated February 10, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent Samantha Q. to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged, and the brief submitted to the Clerk of this Court is accepted for filing and deemed timely served.MATTER of Karnail S. (Anonymous), pet-res, v. Malkit K. (Anonymous), et al., respondents-res, Harmanpreet S. (Anonymous), nonparty-ap — Appeal by Harmanpreet S. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated August 21, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 5, 2018.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Jie Chen, ap — Appeal by Jie Chen from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 1, 2017. By order dated November 1, 2017, the Supreme Court, Kings County, granted an application pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law §380.55 for poor person relief.Now, upon the order dated November 1, 2017, it isORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Seymour W. James, Jr., Esq.The Legal Aid Society199 Water Street – 5th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on application upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on application upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Kelly M. Coventry, res, v. Brian K. Coventry, ap — Appeals by Brian K. Coventry from three orders of the Family Court, Suffolk County, all dated May 26, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeals is enlarged until February 2, 2018.Andrew Spodek, etc. plf-res, et al., plf, v. Charles Neiss, etc. ap, Moses Fried defendants-respondents def — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 28, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 26, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. William H. (Anonymous), ap — Appeal by William H. from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 31, 2017. By order dated October 31, 2017, the Supreme Court, Kings County, granted an application pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law §380.55 for poor person relief.Now, upon the order dated October 31, 2017, it isORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Seymour W. James, Jr., Esq.The Legal Aid Society199 Water Street – 5th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on application upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on application upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Pauline R. Cameron, pet-res, v. Garry King, appellant; Nassau County Department of Social Services, intervenor-res — Appeal by Garry King from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated January 17, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the Nassau County Department of Social Services to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 2, 2018.Andrew H. Spodek, etc. plaintiffs- respondents plf, v. Charles Neiss, etc. ap, Moses Fried defendants-respondents def — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 28, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 26, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Andrew H. Spodek, etc. plaintiffs- respondents plf, v. Charles Neiss, etc. ap, Moses Fried defendants-respondents def — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 28, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 26, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Andrew H. Spodek, etc. plaintiffs- respondents plf, v. Charles Neiss, etc. ap, Moses Fried defendants-respondents def — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 28, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 26, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.By Roman, J.PEOPLE, etc., plf, v. Dayquan Segar, def — Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 11, 2017, which has been referred to me for determination.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is denied.By Chambers, J.P.; Sgroi, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.MATTER of Michelle Crane, res, v. John Santiago, ap — Motion by the appellant for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated July 20, 2017, as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied, with leave to renew on or before February 1, 2018, upon proper papers, including the appellant’s affidavit setting forth the appellant’s full financial situation including all assets, both real and personal, as well as any and all sources of income and expenses; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this decision and order on motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), on or before February 1, 2018, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, as set forth above; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5), above, has been taken on or before on or before February 1, 2018, the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.CHAMBERS, J.P., SGROI, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Maltese and Lasalle, JJ.MATTER of Nicole L, Ferrer, res, v. Todd A. Brown, ap — Motion by the appellant for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated September 15, 2017 , as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the child, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s assigned counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to Family Court Act §1120 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Gary E. Eisenberg, Esq.10 Esquire Road, Suite 10New City, NY 10956845-634-0135and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to 670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), within 30 days after the date of this decision and order on motion, the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that this decision and order on motion has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.DILLON, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Maltese and Lasalle, JJ.Lydia Badr, ap, v. Kenneth I. Blumberg, etc. def, United Hospice of Rockland, Inc., res — 2017-06897Lydia Badr, appellant,v Kenneth I. Blumberg, etc. defendants,Bradley Cohen, etc., respondent.(Index No. 35885/14)2017-06903Lydia Badr, appellant,v Kenneth I. Blumberg, etc. defendants,Nyack Hospital, respondent.(Index No. 35885/14) 2017-07921Lydia Badr, appellant,v Kenneth I. Blumberg, etc. defendants,Nyack Hospital, respondent.(Index No. 35885/14)Motion by the appellant to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of appeals from three orders of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated April 17, 2017, May 17, 2017, and May 18, 2017, respectively, and a judgment of the same court dated June 1, 2017, and to consolidate the appeals.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal from the order dated May 17, 2017, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated upon entry of the judgment dated June 1, 2017 (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241); the issues raised on the appeal from the order dated May 17, 2017, may be brought up for review and raised on the appeal from the judgment; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to consolidate the appeals is denied as unnecessary with respect to the appeals from the orders dated April 17, 2017, and May 18, 2017, and the judgment as those appeals may be consolidated as of right (see 22 NYCRR 670.7[c][1]), and otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the time to perfect the appeals from the orders dated April 17, 2017, and May 18, 2017, and the judgment is enlarged until February 20, 2018.DILLON, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Maltese and Lasalle, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. David Solis, ap — Motion by counsel assigned to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 8, 2016, in effect, to be relieved on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal by failing to respond to communications by assigned counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant is directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal, by filing an affirmation or an affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court on or before February 5, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion by assigned counsel, in effect, to be relieved is held in abeyance in the interim; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court or her designee is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the appellant at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and upon the attorney who last appeared for him, and upon the District Attorney, by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2).DILLON, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Sgroi, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Jose Pena, ap — Motion by the counsel assigned to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered September 8, 2016, to be relieved on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal by failing to respond to communications by assigned counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant is directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal, by filing an affirmation or an affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court on or before February 5, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion by assigned counsel to be relieved is held in abeyance in the interim; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court or her designee is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the appellant at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and upon the attorney who last appeared for him, and upon the District Attorney, by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2).CHAMBERS, J.P., SGROI, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Sgroi, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Gerard K. Fleming, ap — Motion by counsel assigned to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered January 21, 2016, to be relieved on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal by failing to respond to communications by assigned counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant is directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal, by filing an affirmation or an affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court on or before February 5, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion by assigned counsel to be relieved is held in abeyance in the interim; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court or her designee is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the appellant at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and upon the attorney who last appeared for him, and upon the District Attorney, by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2).CHAMBERS, J.P., SGROI, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Maltese and Lasalle, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Isiah Nelson, ap — (S.C.I. No. 2952/16) — Motion by counsel assigned to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered January 26, 2017, in effect, to be relieved on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal by failing to respond to communications by assigned counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant is directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal, by filing an affirmation or an affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court on or before February 5, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion by assigned counsel, in effect, to be relieved is held in abeyance in the interim; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court or her designee is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the appellant at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and upon the attorney who last appeared for him, and upon the District Attorney, by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2).DILLON, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Austin, Lasalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Jose Antonio Tzintzunfrias, ap — Motion by counsel assigned to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, rendered March 20, 2012, in effect, to be relieved on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal by failing to respond to communications from assigned counsel. By decision and order dated April 26, 2017, the matter was remitted to the Supreme Court, Richmond County, for further proceedings on the appellant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilty, and the appeal was held in abeyance pending receipt of the Supreme Court’s report. In its report dated June 30, 2017, the Supreme Court advised that the appellant had withdrawn his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant is directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal, by filing an affirmation or an affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court on or before February 5, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion by assigned counsel, in effect, to be relieved is held in abeyance in the interim; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court or her designee is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the appellant at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and upon the attorney who last appeared for him, and upon the District Attorney, by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2).BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Priscilla Hall, J.P.; Austin, Sgroi and Christopher, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Kevin L. Purnell, ap — Motion by the appellant to extend the time to serve and file a replacement brief on an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered March 11, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the appellant’s replacement brief submitted to the Clerk of the Court is accepted for filing and deemed timely served; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 5, 2018, and the respondent’s brief, if any, shall be served and filed on or before that date.HALL, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Sgroi, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. John Discon, ap — Motion by counsel assigned to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered May 31, 2016, in effect, to be relieved on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal by failing to respond to communications by assigned counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant is directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal, by filing an affirmation or an affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court on or before February 5, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion by assigned counsel, in effect, to be relieved is held in abeyance in the interim; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court or her designee is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the appellant at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and upon the attorney who last appeared for him, and upon the District Attorney, by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2).CHAMBERS, J.P., SGROI, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Priscilla Hall, J.P.; Austin, Sgroi and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Sinem Dokmeci, ap, v. Joseph Herbert, res — Motion by the appellant for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated August 31, 2017, as a poor person.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the child, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s pro bono counsel, Morningside Heights Legal Services, Inc., 435 West 116th Street, New York, NY 10027, (212)854-3123, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the appellant’s counsel. The appellant’s counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to 670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant’s counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant’s counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), within 30 days after the date of this decision and order on motion, the appellant’s counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that this decision and order on motion has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.HALL, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Austin, Nelson and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Breon Jordan H. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner; Latasha G. (Anonymous), res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Latasha Goldsmith, pet, v. Westchester County Department of Social Services, res — (Proceeding No. 2) V-11548-17) — Motion by Breon Jordan H. for leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated November 28, 2017, and to stay all proceedings in the above-entitled matters, pending hearing and determination of the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to appeal is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied as academic.BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Austin, Nelson and Christopher, JJ.Laura Wise, res, v. Monika Filincieri, et al., ap — Motion by the appellants to stay all proceedings in the above-entitled matter, including the trial, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 24, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Austin, Nelson and Christopher, JJ.Nexgen Construction Corp., plf-res, v. James Mohan, defendant third-party plaintiff- appellant; Ralph Pollio third-party defendants- res — Motion by James Mohan for leave to appeal to this Court from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated November 20, 2017, as directed a hearing, and to stay enforcement of the order, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from the order.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Austin, Nelson and Christopher, JJ.HSBC Bank USA, etc., res, v. Darryl Murray ap, et al., def — Motion by the appellants, inter alia, to stay the sale of the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 8, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that the right of direct appeal from the order dated May 8, 2017, terminated upon entry of a judgment dated May 8, 2017, in the above-entitled action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241); the issues raised on the appeal from the order may be brought up for review and raised on the appeal from the judgment pending under Appellate Division Docket No. 2017-08931; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is denied as academic.BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.Leroy Wood, ap, v. Magda Villanueva, def, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, etc., res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 30-day enlargement of time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 30, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until January 12, 2018, the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, etc., ap, v. Miawatte Sewdial def, Gleen Rock, Inc., res — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until January 30, 2018, to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 7, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 16, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.By Priscilla Hall, J.P.; Sgroi, Cohen and Connolly, JJ.Dean A. Bailey, res-ap, v. N. C. Vitrano, Jr. appellants- res, Israel R. Herrera respondents def — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the decision and order on motion of this Court dated January 2, 2018, in the above-entitled matter, on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 24, 2016, and August 9, 2016, respectively, is amended by deleting from first and third paragraph thereof the words “and cross appeal.”HALL, J.P., SGROI, COHEN and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.Ruth Jacob Sowell, ap, v. Israel Gansburg, res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 7, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 19, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Carver Federal Savings Bank, ap, v. Melady Baptiste, etc. def, Maryse Jean Baptiste, etc., res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 30-day enlargement of time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 6, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until January 19, 2018, the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Connolly and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.M & T Bank, ap, v. Michael Delvecchio, etc., res — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 12, 2016, for failure to comply with an order on application of this Court dated July 18, 2017, or, in the alternative, to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, CONNOLLY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.Town of Warwick, plf-res, et al., plf, v. Black Bear Campgrounds defendants-respondents defendants; Giroa Neeman intervenor-ap — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated January 25, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until January 17, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.PEOPLE, etc., ex rel Karen Accomando, on behalf of J. A. A. (Anonymous) and G. A. (Anonymous), pet-res, v. Elizabeth Kirschner-Melendez, ap — Appeal by Elizabeth Kirschner-Melendez from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 17, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled matter shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Supreme Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Supreme Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Supreme Court and that her financial status has not changed since that time, or that she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Supreme Court, and listing her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.
