MATTER of Samatha B. (Anonymous), ap — Childrens Aid Society, petitioner-res, Cynthia J. (Anonymous), res-res, et al., res — Motion by Cynthia J. to strike Points III and VI of the brief filed by Children’s Aid Society on an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated January 11, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission thereof.BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, AUSTIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Miller, Barros and Christopher, JJ.Norman Eskenazi, etc., ap, v. Long Beach Medical Center, etc., res — Motion by Georgaklis & Mallas, PLLC, for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered April 20, 2017, and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in relation or opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is dismissed without prejudice to renew, upon proper papers, including proof of service of the motion upon the appellant.DILLON, J.P., MILLER, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Hall, Sgroi and Duffy, JJ.HSBC Bank USA, etc., ap, v. Valene Josephs-Byrd, res, et al., def — Motion by the appellant for leave to reargue an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 16, 2015, which was determined by decision and order of this Court dated March 8, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., HALL, SGROI and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Leventhal, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ.JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., ap, v. Anthony Corbin res — Motion by the respondents to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 6, 2013, for failure to timely perfect. Separate motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion by the appellant is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion by the respondent is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e]).BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HINDS-RADIX and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Lasalle, Nelson and Christopher, JJ.Yuri Starikov, ap, v. Ceva Freight, LLC res — Motion by the appellant for leave to reargue an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 22, 2015, which was determined by decision and order of this Court dated September 20, 2017, or, in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the decision and order of this Court.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied, with $100 costs.LEVENTHAL, J.P., LASALLE, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Chambers, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Wells Fargo Bank, NA, etc., res, v. Yvonne E. Chaplin, appellant def — Motion by the appellant for leave to reargue appeals from three orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 16, 2013, November 15, 2013, and March 14, 2014, respectively, which were determined by decision and order of this Court dated November 23, 2016, or, in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the decision and order of this Court.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied, with $100 costs.BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Austin, Hinds-Radix and Lasalle, JJ.MATTER of Isabella McClancy, etc., res, v. Plainedge Union Free School District, ap — Motion by the respondent for leave to reargue an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered February 24, 2016, which was determined by decision and order of this Court dated September 27, 2017, or, in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the decision and order of this Court.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied, with $100 costs.DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, HINDS-RADIX and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Austin, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Duffy and Connolly, JJ.CSI Group, LLC res, v. Martin W. Harper ap, et al., def — Motion by the respondents for leave to reargue an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated April 1, 2015, which was determined by decision and order of this Court dated September 20, 2017, or, in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the decision and order of this Court.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied, with $100 costs.AUSTIN, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Leventhal, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ.Karen Issokson-Silver, etc., plaintiff- res, v. Ian Lustbader def, Kenneth Hymes, etc. def-res, Gerald Bailey, etc., et al., ap — Motion by the appellants to strike stated portions of the plaintiff-respondent’s brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated February 14, 2017, on the ground that they refer to matter dehors the record.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission thereof.BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HINDS-RADIX and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Dana Davino, res, v. Anthony Davino, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from a decision of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated June 16, 2017, and an order of the same court also dated June 16, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal from the decision is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies from a decision (see Schicchi v. J.A. Green Constr. Co., 100 AD2d 509); and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal from the order is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies as of right from an order that is not the result of a motion made on notice (see CPLR 5701), and leave to appeal has not been granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the application is denied as academic.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Roman, Miller and Lasalle, JJ.Larry Katz, res, v. Marna Katz, ap — Motion by the appellant for leave to reargue an appeal from a judgment of divorce of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 19, 2014, which was determined by decision and order of this Court dated August 30, 2017. Separate motion by the respondent, in effect, for leave to reargue the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motions are denied.DILLON, J.P., ROMAN, MILLER and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Maltese and Lasalle, JJ.Vassilios Kefalas res-ap, v. Efstathios Valiotis appellants-res — Motion by the appellants-respondents on an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 26, 2017, to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellants-respondents’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 5, 2018, and the joint record or appendix on the appeal and cross appeal (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][1]) and the appellants-respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondents-appellants shall serve and file the answering brief, including the points of argument on the cross appeal, in accordance with the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]).DILLON, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Maltese and Lasalle, JJ.MATTER of George Makhoul, pet, v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, res — Motion by the petitioner to enlarge the time to perfect a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 which was transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated February 28, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the petitioner’s time to perfect the proceeding is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the record or appendix and the petitioner’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.DILLON, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Maltese and Lasalle, JJ.Jintendra Panday res, v. Tashema Allen ap — Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered October 19, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 5, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.DILLON, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Sgroi, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.Neal Neumann, ap, v. Zamira Hercz, res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered July 25, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 5, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.CHAMBERS, J.P., SGROI, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Priscilla Hall, J.P.; Austin, Sgroi and Christopher, JJ.Wells Fargo Bank, NA, etc., res, v. Joseph N. Barrella, etc. ap, et al., def — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated June 3, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 5, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.HALL, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Sgroi, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Jonathan Bird, ap — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered April 25, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 5, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.CHAMBERS, J.P., SGROI, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Priscilla Hall, J.P.; Sgroi, Cohen and Connolly, JJ.Scott Zieselman, etc., ap, v. Forest Manor Care Center, Inc., etc. res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 25, 2017. Cross motion by the respondents to dismiss the appeal, inter alia, for failure to timely perfect.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the cross motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 5, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the cross motion is denied.HALL, J.P., SGROI, COHEN and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Priscilla Hall, J.P.; Sgroi, Cohen and Connolly, JJ.Jesus Humberto Lopez-Lobo, etc., res, v. US Nonwovens Corp. ap — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated January 6, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 5, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.HALL, J.P., SGROI, COHEN and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Priscilla Hall, J.P.; Sgroi, Cohen and Connolly, JJ.Gina Vaccaro ap, v. American Transit Insurance Company, res — Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered December 21, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 5, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.HALL, J.P., SGROI, COHEN and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Priscilla Hall, J.P.; Sgroi, Cohen and Connolly, JJ.Charles Makropoulos, ap, v. City of New York, res — 2017-03112Charles Makropoulos, appellant,v City of New York, respondent.(Index No. 10691/14)Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered September 21, 2016, and February 2, 2017, respectively, and to consolidate the appeals.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeals is granted and the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until February 5, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to consolidate the appeals is denied as unnecessary as the appeals may be consolidated as of right (see 22 NYCRR 670.7[c][1]).HALL, J.P., SGROI, COHEN and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Priscilla Hall, J.P.; Sgroi, Cohen and Connolly, JJ.Joseph Soffer, ap, v. US Bank, National Association, etc., res — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 23, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 5, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.HALL, J.P., SGROI, COHEN and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Todd Ruffalo, ap, v. Nicholas F. Prisco, res — Appeal by Todd Ruffalo from an unsigned transcript of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated August 29, 2017.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies from an unsigned transcript (see Ojeda v. Metropolitan Playhouse, Inc., 120 AD2d 717).SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Austin, Nelson and Christopher, JJ.Cynthia Settles, ap, v. Onewest Bank, FSB respondents def — Motion by the appellant pro se on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered February 2, 2017, to waive compliance with the requirements of 22 NYCRR 670.10.2(f) regarding certification of the record on appeal. Separate motion by the respondent to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the record is inadequate or, in the alternative, to direct the appellant to serve and file a supplemental record and to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief, and for an award of costs and attorney fees.Upon the papers filed in support of the appellant’s motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the respondent’s motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the respondent’s motion which is to direct the appellant to serve and file a supplemental record is denied on condition that on or before February 5, 2018, the appellant shall serve and file a supplemental record which contains all papers filed in connection with the motions which were determined by the order entered February 2, 2017, that are not contained in the record; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the respondent’s motion which is to enlarge the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 5, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondent’s motion is otherwise denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s motion to waive certification is denied with leave to renew by a motion made simultaneously with the filing of the supplemental record.BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.MATTER of Olivier Wright, respondent v. Kashauna Perry, ap — Appeal by Kashauna Perry from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated September 20, 2017. By order on certification of this Court dated December 21, 2017, the following attorney was assigned as counsel for the appellant on the appeal:Richard L. Herzfeld, Esq.112 Madison Avenue, 8th FloorNew York, NY 10016212-818-9019By letter dated January 2, 2018, the assigned counsel has informed this Court that the appellant wishes to proceed with the appeal. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order on certification of this Court dated December 21, 2017, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Giovanna Merritt, res, v. Mark Merritt, ap — F-10750-14/16G) — Appeal by Mark Merritt from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated December 13, 2016. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on December 29, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the brief for the respondent in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Kaylarose J. H. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Rena R. D. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Yashamay D. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Rena R. D. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeals by Rena R. D. from two orders of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 16, 2016, and May 25, 2016, respectively. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeals is enlarged until January 29, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Jeremiah B. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Francine B. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Isaiah B. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Francine B. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2) N-09516-15/17B) — Appeal by Francine B. from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated October 13, 2017. By order on certification of this Court dated November 14, 2017, the following attorney was assigned as counsel for the appellant on the appeal:Loren Glassman, Esq.99 Court StreetWhite Plains, NY 10601914-946-9225By letter dated December 28, 2017, the assigned counsel has informed this Court that the appellant wishes to proceed with the appeal. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order on certification of this Court dated November 14, 2017, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Renee P.-F. (Anonymous), res, v. Frank G. (Anonymous), ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Frank G. (Anonymous), ap, v. Renee P-F. (Anonymous) res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Joseph P. (Anonymous), petitioner- res, v. Frank G. (Anonymous), ap, Renee P-F. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 3) Z-874-15, V-1144-15, V-1145-15, V-6147-14/15A, V-6148-14/15A, V-2691-15, V-2692-15) — Appeals by Frank G. from four orders of the Family Court, Orange County, dated February 14, 2017 (two orders), May 10, 2017, and August 2, 2017, respectively. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the children to serve and file a brief on the appeals is enlarged until February 1, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Louis J. Palumbo, res, v. Benjamin Beechwood, LLC ap — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until April 14, 2018, to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 23, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 15, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.MATTER of Drew W. Matsen, res, v. Megan E. Matsen, ap — V-5856-16/16A, V-5857-16/16A, V-848-17/17A, V-849-17/17A) — Appeal by Megan E. Matsen from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated June 28, 2017. Pusuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the children to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 2, 2018.Glenn C. Kleiber, res, v. Robert P. Fichtel ap — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 19, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 13, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Malachi M. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Mark M. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Malique R. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Mark M. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by Mark M. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated May 18, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 2, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Yosepha K. (Anonymous), a/k/a Chaya K. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Chana D. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Rivah K. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Chana D. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by Chana D. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated May 2, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the petitioner-respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 29, 2018; and it is furtherORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.CRE/ADC Venture 2013-1, LLC, ap, v. Associated Beth Rivkah School for Girls, Inc. res — Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 22, 2018, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Harvey Cavayero, res, v. Beth Cavayero, etc., ap — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 90-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 21, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 26, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Richard B. Thompson, ap, v. Olga Sterin res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 13, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Golden Eagle Capital Corp., ap, v. Paramount Management Corp. def, Young Hoon Kang res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated August 21, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Harinson Cruz Perez, ap — Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 26, 2014.Upon the stipulation of the appellant and the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated December 28, 2017, it isORDERED that the appeal is marked withdrawn.Mateen Hashmat, plf-res, v. Beth E. Gladston, ap, Michael Licatese, def-res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 5, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Shalom Bayit, LLC, res, v. Kalmon Glovin def, Chavic Glovin ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 5, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.CitiBank, NA, res, v. Princetta Johnson, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to perfect appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, both dated January 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until January 22, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeals and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Miguel Montalvo, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, dated April 30, 2010.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.X & Y Development Group, LLC, res, v. Epic Tower, LLC appellants def — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 22, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Clifford St. Prix, plf, v. New York City Transit Authority, res, Levy Nelson def, City of New York, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 10, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Inna Karaseva, plf-res, v. EAN Holdings, LLC def, Michele J. Worden def-res, Brian J. Labuda ap — Application by the defendant-respondent Edward J. Molloy pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 3, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the applicant’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 9, 2018, the applicant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Bank of New York Mellon, etc., res, v. Maria Leone ap, et al., def — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 6, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Daniel Duran ap, v. John M. Tobin res — Application by the appellants for leave to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 20, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Jasbir S. (Anonymous), pet, v. Kulwinder K. (Anonymous) res, Gurpreet S. (Anonymous), nonparty-ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated April 21, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Jacqueline Nichols, ap, v. Carrie McCay, etc. res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 28, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Manuel Alejandro Chamba, plf-res, v. City of New York def-res, Jimmy G. Hartofilis, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 6, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Melva C. Stevens, plf, v. Instant Refund Tax Center, LLC, def, Serlin Building Limited Partnership, ap, Penn-Hill Realty Corp., res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 22, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Nicole Savello Bagnasco res, Y. Guerrero-Hernandez ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.2662 Kingsbridge Terrace, LLC, res, v. Howard Levy, def, Occidental Fire & Casualty Company of North Carolina, ap — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 16, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated December 29, 2017, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Applications for Extensions of Time — Parties in the following causes have filed applications pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to extend the time to perfect or to serve and file a brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the applications, it isORDERED that the applications are granted and the following parties in the following causes are granted the specified extensions of time:Title Docket No. Applicant Name(s) Extended DeadlineAboulissan v. Kingsland 2017-07469Kingsland 79, LLC79, LLCFebruary 27, 2018Bank of New York Mellon2017-07882Bank of New York Mellonv GraffiJanuary 22, 2018Cid v. Pointe Plaza Hotel, 2017-07476Congregation Beth OsherLLCPointe Plaza Hotel, LLCFebruary 16, 2018Deutsche Bank National2017-02830Reginald WinslowTrust Company v. WinslowJanuary 19, 2018Emigrant Bank v. Wade2016-09963Emigrant BankJanuary 31, 2018Everbank v. Greisman2017-04144Everbank January 29, 2018Greenberg v. Grace Plaza2017-04755Calman GreenbergNursing & RehabilitationCenterJanuary 19, 2018Hempstead Housing 2017-06333Middle County ResourcesManagement, Inc.Middle County ResourcesTitle Docket No. Applicant Name(s) Extended DeadlineAuthority v. Middle County Management-Parkside, LLCResources Management, Inc. Dan HesterJanuary 19, 2018HSBC Bank USA, National2017-07022Katherine FaethAssociation, v. FaethJohn FaethFebruary 16, 2018HSBC Bank USA, N.A.2017-06763Margaret O’Neillv O’NeilFebruary 13, 2018Islam v. Destefano2017-05021Christopher Destefano+1January 16, 2018JBBNY, LLC v. Dedvukaj2017-08173Violata Dedvukaj+1Victor DedvukajFebruary 21, 2018JPMorgan Chase Bank, 2017-07334Lisa GriffithNational Associationv GriffithFebruary 13, 2018Licursi v. Wenglin2017-04550Chris LicursiLorraine LicursiFebruary 1, 2018Matter of Government2017-05386Keshia WilliamsEmployees InsuranceTayquan ShieldsCompany v. WilliamsFebruary 5, 2018Matter of Hill, deceased2017-11325Charity SpencerElizabeth Saphire Roy-HillFebruary 27, 2018Matter of Schoonmaker v. 2015-10560New York State DepartmentNew York State Departmentof Motor Vehiclesof Motor VehiclesJanuary 22, 2018People v. Barrett-Johnson, 2016-11806People of the State of New YorkSimoneJanuary 25, 2018Pusey v. HSBC Bank USA,2017-05990HSBC Bank USA, N.A.N.A.January 26, 2018U.S. Bank National2017-04921U.S. Bank National AssociationAssociation v. Fredric A. +1Powell, et al.January 22, 2018Title Docket No. Applicant Name(s) Extended DeadlineU.S. Bank National 2017-03894Pedro RoqueAssociation, v. Roque+1January 22, 2018MATTER of 1216 Henry Ave, LLC, ap, v. Village of Mamaroneck Planning Board Comprised of Stewart Sterk, Chairman, etc., res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated February 7, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Samuel P. Doctor, ap — Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered January 14, 2014.Upon the stipulation of the appellant and the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated December 28, 2017, it isORDERED that the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Leventhal, J.P.; Chambers, Miller and Duffy, JJ.Citimortgage, Inc., res, v. Nityanand Kalicharan, ap, et al., def — Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to stay the sale of the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 14, 2015.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled action on the ground that no appeal lies from a judgment entered upon the default of the appealing party (see CPLR 5511), by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before January 26, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties by regular mail.LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Chambers, Miller and Duffy, JJ.Pennymac Corp., res, v. Shahid Siddiqi, appellant def — Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to stay the sale of the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered May 11, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Chambers, Miller and Duffy, JJ.Zdravko Budesa res, v. Health Science Center at Brooklyn Foundation, Inc. appellants; (and a third-party action). — Motion by the appellants to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 23, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Chambers, Miller and Duffy, JJ.Moshe Simpson appellants-res, v. 1147 Dean, LLC respondents-ap — Motion by the appellants-respondents to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 23, 2016, and June 30, 2017, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.MATTER of Howlands Lake Partners, L.P., ap, v. Town of Dover respondents-res, Dover Union Free School District, intervenor-res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated January 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged, and the reply brief submitted to the Clerk of this Court is accepted for filing and deemed timely served.By Leventhal, J.P.; Austin, Miller and Duffy, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Delesley Dessasau, ap — Motion by the appellant on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered August 14, 2017, to extend a stay of execution of said judgment, which was granted by the Supreme Court, Kings County, on that date, pending determination of the appeal to this Court.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the stay of execution of the judgment granted by the Supreme Court, Kings County, on August 14, 2017, is extended pending hearing and determination of the appeal, on condition that the appeal is perfected by March 19, 2018, and on the same conditions as set by the Supreme Court, Kings County; and it is further,ORDERED that this stay shall terminate and be of no further effect, and the appellant shall thereafter surrender to serve the sentence imposed, unless the appeal is perfected on or before March 19, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that upon the termination of this stay as provided above, this order shall constitute authorization to any peace officer to arrest and deliver the appellant to the sentencing court to begin the execution of sentence.LEVENTHAL, J.P., AUSTIN, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.
