MATTER of Sinem Dokmeci, ap, v. Joseph Herbert, res — Appeal by Sinem Dokmeci from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated August 31, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Debra Bloom, Esq., dated October 18, 2017, it isORDERED that pursuant to Family Court Act §1120, the following named attorney is assigned as the attorney for the child on the appeal:Amy L. Colvin, Esq.9 Everette PlaceHuntington, NY 11743631-424-8495and it is further,ORDERED that Debra Bloom, Esq., is directed to turn over all papers in the proceeding to the new attorney for the child herein assigned.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Melissa Disisto, res, v. Francis Dimitri, ap — Appeal by Francis Dimitri from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated December 15, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Daniel Pagano, Esq., dated December 15, 2017, it isORDERED that the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Daniel L. Pagano, Esq.2649 Strang Boulevard, Suite 303Yorktown Heights, NY 10598(914) 830-5288ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the child, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this order, the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcripts have been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcripts have not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that this order has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcripts are expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of the Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Nichelle S. E. B. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Kyondra E. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 1) MATTER of Michael A. T. (Anonymous), Jr. Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Kyondra E. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 2) MATTER of Hezekiah J.-M. E. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Kyondra E. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 3) MATTER of Za-Nayla T. (Anonymous), Jr. Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Kyondra E. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 4) N-5193-16, N-5194-16, N-5195-16, N-5196-16, N-5197-16) — Appeal by Kyondra E. From an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated September 20, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Stephen Kolnik, Esq., dated December 14, 2017, it isORDERED that the respondent-appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:William Martin, Esq.44 Church StreetWhite Plains, NY 10601914-771-7711and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the respondent-appellant at the address provided by the Court, and on or before January 26, 2018, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal, in writing, that he has done so and that either(1) the respondent-appellant is interested in prosecuting the appeal, or(2) the respondent-appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal, or that he has been unable to contact the respondent-appellant, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the respondent-appellant, the petitioner-respondent, and the attorney for the children, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the respondent-appellant’s counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the children, if any, when counsel serves the respondent-appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that the respondent-appellant is interested in proceeding with the appeal, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Noely Diaz, ap, v. Gus Rodriguez, res — Appeal by Noely Diaz from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated December 18, 2017.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party (see CPLR 5511).SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Chambers, Miller and Duffy, JJ.MATTER of Raees T. B. (Anonymous), — Appeal by Raees T. B. from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated September 27, 2017. By dated November 24, 2017, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding on the ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party.Now, upon the and the papers filed in response thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.MATTER of Paul Patscot, Jr., ap, v. Anna Fisco, res — Appeal by Paul Patscot, Jr., from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated August 21, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 7, 2018.MATTER of Jennifer Lallas Stillwell, res, v. Elizabeth Bolin, ap — V-20776-08/16E, V-20776-08/16F) — Appeal by Elizabeth Bolin from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated June 7, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 27, 2018.MATTER of Abigail M.-W. (Anonymous). New York Foundling Hospital petitioners-res, Kello W. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 1) MATTER of Isaiah M.-W. (Anonymous). New York Foundling Hospital petitioners-res, Kello W. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 2) MATTER of Adam M.-W. (Anonymous). New York Foundling Hospital petitioners-res, Kello W. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 3) B-3159/16) — Appeal by Kello W. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated July 19, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 26, 2018.MATTER of Yvette Llada, res, v. Kaream Ellington, ap — Appeals by Kaream Ellington from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, both dated March 20, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeals is enlarged until February 5, 2018.MATTER of Mary OGrady, pet, v. Jay Kiyonaga, etc., res — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, which was transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated June 28, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 26, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee for Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust, Inc., res, v. Joseph Singer appellants def — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 30-day enlargement of time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 21, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellants’ time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until January 25, 2018, the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Cecilia Brown, res, v. South Nassau Communities Hospital, ap — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 30-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 28, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 5, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.By Roman, J.P.; Miller, Duffy and Connolly, JJ.MATTER of Ashley G. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-appellant; Eggar T. (Anonymous), respondent-respondent res — (Proceeding No. 1) MATTER of Jason A. T. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-appellant; Eggar T. (Anonymous), respondent-respondent res — (Proceeding No. 2) MATTER of Sharman E. S. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-appellant; Eggar T. (Anonymous), respondent-respondent res — (Proceeding No. 3) MATTER of Amy G. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-appellant; Eggar T. (Anonymous), respondent-respondent res — (Proceeding No. 1) N-20951-16, N-20952-16) — Motion by the attorney for the children to modify or, in effect, vacate a decision and of this Court dated November 30, 2017, which granted the petitoner-appellant’s motion to stay enforcement of an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated November 9, 2017, and, in effect, to continue the terms of certain orders of protection dated August 23, 2017, in favor of the subject children and against Eggar T., and to stay enforcement of so much of an order of the same court also dated August 23, 2017, as allowed Eggar T., supervised visitation with the subject children or, in the alternative, to remit the matter to the Family Court, Kings County, to modify the underlying Family Court orders.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition and in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.ROMAN, J.P., MILLER, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Duffy and Lasalle, JJ.Vincent Altieri, ap, v. Vlada Altieri, res — (IDV No. 2013ID000012) — Motion by the appellant to stay enforcement of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (IDV Part), dated October 18, 2017, pending hearing and determination of an appeal therefrom.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appeal has been rendered academic by a decision and order of this Court dated December 13, 2017, under Appellate Division Docket No. 2016-07211, by filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue with the Clerk of this Court on or before February 2, 2018, and by serving one copy of the same on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion for a stay is held in abeyance in the interim; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court or her designee is directed to serve a copy of this on the parties by regular mail.CHAMBERS, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., etc., res, v. Vince J. Mone, ap — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until February 16, 2018 to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 16, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 30, 2018, the respondent’s brief must be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.By Chambers, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Lasalle and Barros, JJ.US Bank National Association, etc., res, v. Annmarie Rode, etc., appellant def — Motion by the appellant to stay the sale of the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 26, 2015, and September 15, 2015, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeals from the orders dated February 26, 2015, and September 15, 2015, on the ground that the right of direct from the orders terminated upon entry of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, in the above-entitled action on September 8, 2017 (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241), by filing an affirmation or an affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court on or before February 2, 2018, or, if the appellant be so advised, by making a motion, on or before February 2, 2018, pursuant to CPLR 5520(c) to deem the notice of appeal from the orders to be a premature notice of appeal from the appeal from the judgment to the extent that the judgment brings up for review the orders, to deem the record and the parties’ briefs filed in connection with the appeals from the orders to be filed in connection with the appeal from the judgment, to limit the issues raised on the appeal from the judgment to the issues raised in the briefs filed in connection with the appeals from the orders, and for leave to serve and file a supplemental record containing the judgment entered September 8, 2017; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s motion is held in abeyance in the interim; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court or her designee is directed to serve a copy of this upon the parties to the appeals by regular mail.CHAMBERS, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, LASALLE and BARROS, JJ., concur.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Octavious D. Wilborn, ap — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.(8)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered May 26, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 16, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Anthony Troy, ap, v. Joseph Grosso respondents def — Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated May 31, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 26, 2018, the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.By Chambers, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Duffy and Lasalle, JJ.Vladimir Sudit, etc., res, v. Sara Roth, etc. ap, et al., def — 2017-12963Vladimir Sudit, etc., respondent, v. Sara Roth, etc. appellants, et al., defendants. (Index No. 34598/08)Motion by the appellants to stay the foreclosure sale of the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 20, 2013, and January 26, 2015, respectively, and a judgment of the same court dated September 28, 2017, and for a preference in the calendaring of the appeals.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.CHAMBERS, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.MATTER of Dolores Feliciano, ap, v. Andrew King, res — Appeal by Dolores Feliciano from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated January 12, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 19, 2018.MATTER of Elizabeth N. Moore, formerly known as Elizabeth Newkom Moore, deceased. Michele Moore, petitioner-appellant; Frank Moore III, res-res — (File No. 340/07) — Application by the petitioner-appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk County, dated March 31, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the petitioner-appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 5, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the petitioner-appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.By Chambers, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Duffy and Lasalle, JJ.Dannie Walton, plf-res, v. 1004 Montgomery Street Realty Corp., et al., def, 1004 Realty, LLC, appellant-res, Solid State Elevator Corp., res-ap, Affordable Housing Real Estate Corporation, def-res — Motion by the appellant-respondent and the defendant-respondent to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 14, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition and in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.CHAMBERS, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Duffy and Lasalle, JJ.Martin Stofko res, v. St. Stephens Roman Catholic Church, ap — Motion by the appellant to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated September 25, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.CHAMBERS, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.Zafar Mir, ap, v. Mohamed Eid, res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until March 2, 2018, to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 1, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Suntrust Mortgage, Inc., res, v. Maurice Foster, appellant def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 28, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 2, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Yangchen Dolkar res, v. Princess Tours, Inc. def, Pandora Travel, Inc., ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement until March 3, 2018, to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 31, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 2, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Raees T. B. (Anonymous), — Appeal by Raees T. B. from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated September 27, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of David J. Peck, Esq., dated October 23, 2017, it isORDERED that pursuant to Family Court Act §1120, the following named attorney is assigned as the attorney for the child on the appeal:Keith G. Ingber, Esq.P.O. Box 66Thompson Ridge, NY 10985845-361-4659and it is further,ORDERED that David J. Peck, Esq., is directed to turn over all papers in the proceeding to the new attorney for the child herein assigned; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the attorney for the child and the respondent(s). The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the attorney for the child, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the attorney for the child. The attorney for the child is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, when the attorney for the child serves a brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that attorney for the child shall serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the attorney for the child of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the attorney for the child shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this order, the attorney for the child shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcripts have been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcripts have not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that this order has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcripts are expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Vishwa Nabi, ap — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.(8)(2) for an enlargement of time until February 28, 2018, to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered April 2, 2015.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 25, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.MATTER of George Maragos, Comptroller of the County of Nassau, res, v. Town of Hempstead, et al., ap — Application pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 25, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 28, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ respective briefs shall be served and filed on or before that date.By Balkin, J.P.; Chambers, Austin and Sgroi, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., ap, v. Sunday Medina, res — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the decision and of this Court dated December 28, 2017, in the above-entitled case is recalled and vacated, and the following decision and is substituted therefor:Motion by Queens Law Associates, 118-21 Queens Blvd., Suite 212, Forest Hills, NY 11375, in effect, to be relieved as counsel for the respondent on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 26, 2017, and for the assignment of new counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the respondent’s former counsel is directed to turn over all papers MATTER to new counsel assigned herein; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to respond to the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocate111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, AUSTIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Paul Justiniano, ap — Appeal by Paul Justiniano from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, rendered November 15, 2017. By order dated November 15, 2017, Supreme Court, Richmond County, granted an application pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law §380.55 for poor person relief.Now, upon the order dated November 15, 2017, it isORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Seymour W. James, Jr., Esq.The Legal Aid Society199 Water Street – 5th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Larry Hill, ap — Appeal by Larry Hill from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered November 16, 2017. By order dated December 4, 2017, the Supreme Court, Queens County, granted an application pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law §380.55 for poor person relief.Now, upon the order dated December 4, 2017, it isORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Seymour W. James, Jr., Esq.The Legal Aid Society199 Water Street – 5th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Misael Henriquez, ap — (S.C.I. No. 1463N/17) — Appeal by Misael Henriquez from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered November 20, 2017. By order dated November 20, 2017, the Supreme Court, Nassau County, granted an application pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law §380.55 for poor person relief.Now, upon the order dated November 20, 2017, it isORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Jillian S. Harrington, Esq.P.O. Box 131621Staten Island, NY 10313and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Frank Rondon, ap — Appeal by Frank Rondon from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 3, 2017. By order dated November 3, 2017, the Supreme Court, Kings County, granted an application pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law §380.55 for poor person relief.Now, upon the order dated November 3, 2017, it isORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Seymour W. James, Jr., Esq.The Legal Aid Society199 Water Street – 5th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.HSBC Bank USA, etc., res, v. Harold P. Brown ap, et al., def — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until February 7, 2017 to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 28, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 22, 2018, the respondent’s brief must be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Jose Garcia-Tejada, ap, v. George S. A. Khan, res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 22, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Fernando B. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Jomaris J. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated October 25, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Shmuel Vasser pet-ap, v. City of New Rochelle respondents-res, Harry Stone nonparty-ap — Application by the nonparty-appellants on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 14, 2017, for leave to withdraw the appeal insofar as taken by them.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal insofar as taken by the nonparty-appellants is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Nationstar Mortgage, res, v. Rhonda Wright, appellant def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 10-day enlargement of time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 23, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until January 16, 2018, the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.PEOPLE, etc., ex rel. Jeffrey Madison, res, v. Superintendent, Fishkill Correctional Facility, etc. ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated May 16, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Blanche Cincotta, res, v. Brooks Range Contract Services, Inc., ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated November 14, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Aalco Transportation & Storage, Inc., res, v. Joseph DeGuara appellants defendants (and a third-party action). — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 16, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Michael Moran, ap, v. County of Suffolk res — Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 30-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated April 12, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 22, 2018, the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Connie Rosato res, v. Patrick J. Rosato, etc., ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated June 29, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Suzanne Ames, ap, v. New York State Insurance Fund, res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 25, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Margaret McPadden ap, v. Thomas McPadden, res — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated December 8, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Frank Meak plf-res, v. Properties Pursuit, Inc., ap, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance def-res, et al., defendants; John Franco, nonparty- res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, rendered April 14, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 23, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Hugo Orellana, res, v. 500 Rock, LLC ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 3, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Kenneth Waluyn ap, v. New York City Transit Authority res — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 5, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.James Wilmer, ap, v. FMV Smithtown Associates, res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated July 17, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Gregory Mazzola, etc., res, v. Village Housing Associates, LLC, ap — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated March 23, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged, and the brief submitted to the Clerk of the Court is accepted for filing and deemed timely served.Stephen Coyle, plf-res, v. Miele Sanitation Company def-res, En-Tech Corporation, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated July 14, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, res, v. Jean Dorsin, etc., appellant def — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 30-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 11, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 22, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Constance Weber, ap, v. Incorporated Village of Freeport, res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 13, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Elizabeth Morris, res, v. K.M. Tighe- Schwegler, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated July 12, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Dawei Wang, etc., ap, v. County of Nassau respondents def — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 24, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Marie Pamphile plf-res, v. Queens-Long Island Medical Group, P.C., et al., def-res, Michael Kennedy, etc. ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 29, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Joaquin Perez, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered November 21, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Bank of New York Mellon, etc., ap, v. Alberto Aquino res — Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until February 7, 2018, to serve and file a brief on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 15, 2016, and May 22, 2017, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 26, 2018, the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Raymond Velez, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered August 22, 2017, as a poor person, and for the .Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Brendan O’Meara, Esq.200 East Post Rd.White Plains, NY 10601and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Gerson Sosa, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County, rendered August 22, 2017, as a poor person, and for the .Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:James LicataOffice of the Public Defender11 New Hempstead RoadNew City, New York 10956and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.PEOPLE, etc., plf, v. Franklin Hernandez, def — Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 3, 2017, which has been referred to me for determination.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is denied.By Mastro, J.PEOPLE, etc., plf, v. Juan Manuel Vinas, def — Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 6, 2017, which has been referred to me for determination.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is denied.By Mastro, J.201 7-10953 PEOPLE, etc., plf, v. Manuel Cuellar, def — Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 30, 2017, which has been referred to me for determination.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is denied.By Roman, J.PEOPLE, etc., plf, v. Tyrone Houston, def — Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 26, 2017, which has been referred to me for determination.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is denied.By Cohen, J.PEOPLE, etc., plf, v. Melvin Green, def — Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the County Court, Orange County, dated September 19, 2017, which has been referred to me for determination.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is denied.By Cohen, J.PEOPLE, etc., plf, v. Terell Viera, def — Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 15, 2017, which has been referred to me for determination.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is denied.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Frasada, Inc. res, v. Chrisla Realty, Inc. ap — Application by the appellants for leave to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 21, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Jose L. Diaz, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute appeals from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, both rendered September 9, 2016, as a poor person, and for the .Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeals will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeals:Del Atwell, Esq.39 5th StreetEast Hampton, NY 11937and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeals expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and upon the clerk of the court from which the appeals are taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Julio C. Herrejon, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered July 24, 2017, as a poor person, and for the .Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Heather M. Abissi, Esq.317 Clocktower CommonBrewster, New York 10509and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Jose Garcia, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute appeals from two judgments of the County Court, Orange County, both entered June 20, 2017, as a poor person, and for the .Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeals will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeals:Thomas R. Villecco, Esq.366 North Broadway, Suite 410Jericho, NY 11753and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and upon the clerk of the court from which the appeals are taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Brathwaite Nelson, J.PEOPLE, etc., plf, v. Shamel Hollenquest, def — Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 4, 2016, which has been referred to me for determination.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is denied.By Brathwaite Nelson, J.PEOPLE, etc., plf, v. David Walser, def — Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 22, 2016, which has been referred to me for determination.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is denied.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Donovan Hassell, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered October 31, 2017, as a poor person, and for the .Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Leon H. Tracy, Esq.366 N. BroadwaySuite 410, #D9Jericho, New York 11753and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Applications for Extensions of Time — Parties in the following causes have filed applications pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to extend the time to perfect or to serve and file a brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the applications, it isORDERED that the applications are granted and the following parties in the following causes are granted the specified extensions of time:Title Docket No. Applicant Name(s) Extended DeadlineBAC Home v. Herbst2017-08498Gitty HerbstYecheskel Y. HerbstMarch 12, 2018Barry v. SHS Erasmus, LLC2017-07879Sempy BarryFebruary 5, 2018Cerrato v. La Nueva Vega 2017-02398La Nueva Vega Corp.Corp.January 19, 2018Citimortgage, Inc. v. Mitchell2017-08107Debra MitchellMarch 12, 2018D. Gangi Contracting Corp.2017-08750City of New York v. City of New YorkNew York City Departmentof Parks and RecreationApril 2, 2018Donnellan v. Village of 2017-08016Village of NyackNyack Village of Nyack ParkingAuthorityMarch 26, 2018Frankl v. Costco Wholesale2017-07997Regina FranklCorporationFebruary 6, 2018Gelaj v. Gelaj2017-04893Maria Gelaj+1January 16, 2018Title Docket No. Applicant Name(s) Extended DeadlineHeins v. Vanbourgondien2017-01885Erick HeinAbigail L. HeinsFebruary 19, 2018Hudson v. Hudson2017-03469Gaelle HudsonFebruary 8, 2018Ibragimov v. Town of2017-01748Town of North HempsteadNorth HempsteadFebruary 2, 2018Kolotova v. Beach Haven2017-00538City of New YorkApartments Associates, LLCFebruary 1, 2018Lyakhovich v. Vernov2016-12270Alexander VernovHector VazquezRobert VaiselbergMaimonides Medical CenterFebruary 13, 2018Liberty Dabar Associates 2017-10282Liberty Dabar Associates v. MohammedJanuary 26, 2018Marks-Barcia v. Village of2017-03681Village of Sleepy HollowSleepy Hollow AmbulanceAmbulance Corps.Corps.Village of Sleepy HollowPolice DepartmentVillage of Sleepy HollowFebruary 9, 2018Matter of McDevitt2017-06539Michael W. McDevitt v. Suffolk CountyFebruary 5, 2018Matter of Rada Corp. 2017-07604Rada Corp v. GluckmanMarch 7, 2018Matter of State of New York 2017-02202State of New York v. L. (Anonymous)January 31, 2018McManamon v. Rockland2017-08011Stacey McManamonCounty Ancient Order ofHibernians February 28, 2018Mid Island Mortgage Corp.2017-07886Cordella Johnson v. JohnsonMarch 6, 2018People v. Harris, Kenneth2011-01515People of State of New YorkFebruary 1, 2018Title Docket No. Applicant Name(s) Extended DeadlinePeople v. Joseph, Kethlie2015-10384Kethlie JosephJanuary 18, 2018RMNY Incubator 2017-07858Henry WeberMerrick, LLC v. WeberJoanna WeberCarmichael Real Property, Inc.March 12, 2018Santiago v. Boyer2017-07583Terry A. BoyerMarch 14, 2018Schleger v. Jurcsak2017-08055Michael F. Jurcsak, Jr.Michael G. JurcsakFebruary 26, 2018Socci v. Socci2016-11279Rosalie SocciFebruary 13, 2018TD Bank, N.A. v. Roberts2017-06764TD Bank, N.A.+1February 14, 2018U.S. Bank National2017-06893Muthiah SaravananAssociation v. SaravananFebruary 5, 2018Wilmington Trust, National2017-07547Elliott ShashoAssociation v. Shasho+1March 6, 2018By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., res, v. Yvonne Starr, appellant def — Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated March 27, 2017.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the of this Court entitled “[i]n the Matter of Applications for Extensions of Time,” dated January 10, 2018, is amended by deleting from the “Extended Deadline” entry concerning the above-entitled matter the date “January 18, 2018,” and substituting therefor the date “February 20, 2018.”SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.
