PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Brian Powell, ap — Appeal by Brian Powell from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered December 8, 2008.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appellant is directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal, by filing an affirmation or an affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court on or before February 20, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court or her designee is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the appellant at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and upon the attorney who last appeared for him, and upon the District Attorney, by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2).SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Dawan Vinson, ap — Appeal by Dawan Vinson from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 6, 2006.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appellant is directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal, by filing an affirmation or an affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court on or before February 20, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court or her designee is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the appellant at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and upon the attorney who last appeared for him, and upon the District Attorney, by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2).SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, res, v. Tyrone Howard, ap — Appeal by Tyrone Howard from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered June 27, 2003.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appellant is directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal, by filing an affirmation or an affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court on or before February 20, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court or her designee is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the appellant at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and upon the attorney who last appeared for him, and upon the District Attorney, by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2).SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Tymel A. Smith, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered January 23, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant is directed either (1) to show cause before this Court why the appeal should not be dismissed on the ground that the notice of appeal from the judgment was untimely (see CPL 460.30) by filing an affirmation or an affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court on or before March 19, 2018, or (2), if so advised, to make a motion pursuant to CPL 460.30 to deem the notice of appeal timely filed, on or before March 19, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to respond to the order to show cause or to make a motion pursuant to CPL 460.30:Jan Murphy, Esq.6 Fenimore LaneHuntington, NY 11743and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s motion is held in abeyance pending determination of this Court’s motion to dismiss the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court or her designee is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the appellant at the appellant’s last known place of residence or, if the appellant is imprisoned, at the institution in which the appellant is confined, upon the attorney who last appeared for the appellant, upon the attorney named above, and upon the District Attorney, by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2).SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Maltese and Lasalle, JJ.Henry D. Zupnick, plf-res, v. City of New Rochelle ap, City of New Rochelle Department of Public Works defendants-respondents def — Separate motions by the appellants to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 23, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motions are granted, the time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the joint record or appendix on the appeals and the appellants’ respective briefs shall be served and filed on or before that date.DILLON, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Sgroi, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.Congregation Talmud Torah Ohev Sholom R. Morris Kevelson, res, v. Abraham Sorscher ap — Motion by the appellants Abraham Sorscher, Bronx Jewish Boys, Yeshiva Gedolah of Sheepshead Bay, and Bernice London on appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 15, 2016, to enlarge the time to perfect their appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the time of Liberty Hall Church of God Inc. and Evangelical Christian Credit Union to perfect its appeal is enlarged; and it is further,ORDERED that the time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until March 19, 2018, and the joint record or appendix on the appeals and the appellants’ respective briefs shall be served and filed on or before that date.CHAMBERS, J.P., SGROI, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Fran Stemmler pet, v. Axel Spring and Brake, Inc. res — Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 1, 2017.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal from the order dated November 1, 2017, in the above-entitled action on the ground that the description of the appealing parties as “the above named defendants” contained in the notice of appeal filed by Daniel Tanon, Esq., does not properly designate the parties taking the appeal (see CPLR 5515[1]), by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before February 8, 2018, or, if Fran Stemmler and Lorraine Parente, the parties represented by Daniel Tanon, Esq., be so advised, to make a motion to correct the notice of appeal to reflect that they are proper party appellants (see Matter of Tagliaferri, 1 NY3d 605; CPLR 2001), on or before February 8, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties by regular mail.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Chambers, Miller and Duffy, JJ.Donna Grosvenor, plf-res, v. Frankie Santiago def-res, Fitzpatrick Neil St. Hill Dodson, ap — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 21, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 5, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Chambers, Miller and Duffy, JJ.David Sutton res, v. Albert Houllou ap — Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 9, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until April 18, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Chambers, Miller and Duffy, JJ.Ridgewood Savings Bank, res, v. Robert Van Amerongen, ap, et al., def — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 27, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 13, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Chambers, Miller and Duffy, JJ.Shoshana Bilyavskiy ap, v. Manish Parikh res — Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 20, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 19, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Connolly and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.MATTER of Carole Palmieri, deceased. Patricia Palmieri, petitioner-appellant; Rosemary Bellinger, objectant-res — (File No. 1154/12) — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County, dated February 22, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, CONNOLLY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Connolly and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Gail Beth Rosen, res, v. Gordon Scott Rosen, ap — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated September 30, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, CONNOLLY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Chambers, Miller and Duffy, JJ.Joseph Becker, ap, v. 1711 Rear Lot Yorktown, LLC res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 12, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Chambers, Miller and Duffy, JJ.MATTER of Dorothy Francis, deceased. James Harrison, petitioner-res, Public Administrator of Kings County, res, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., etc., res-res — (File Nos. 2462/A-2013, 2462/B-2013) — Motion by the petitioner-respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, dated April 10, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the petitioner-respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 8, 2018, and the petitioner-respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Chambers, Miller and Duffy, JJ.Andrew James Rosa, etc. res, v. Lakey E. Harris def, Town of Brookhaven, ap — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated February 22, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until April 18, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Connolly and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Nicholas Petraglia, ap, v. Maria Angiuli Petraglia, res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 27, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, CONNOLLY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Chambers, Miller and Duffy, JJ.MATTER of Lisa Cradit, ap, v. Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals, res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated January 30, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until February 2, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Chambers, Miller and Duffy, JJ.MATTER of City of New York res, v. John Quadrozzi, Jr., etc., appellant def — Motion by the respondents to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 19, 2015, and a judgment of the same court dated March 8, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 1, 2018, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Chambers, Miller and Duffy, JJ.JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, res, v. Thomas Braunworth III def, Gustavia Home, LLC, ap — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered October 21, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Chambers, Miller and Duffy, JJ.Tarsheema M. Copeny, res, v. George T. Peters, PLLC ap — Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 16, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Chambers, Miller and Duffy, JJ.U.S. Bank, NA, etc., res, v. Mildred Boehm, ap — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 2, 2017, and, in effect, for leave to correct the copies of the record on appeal on file with the Clerk of this Court to include certain missing documents.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that on or before February 20, 2018, the respondent shall cause the missing documents, which are itemized in paragraph 7 of the affirmation of Geraldine A. Cherverko, to be inserted into the copies of the record on appeal on file with the Clerk of this Court.LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Chambers, Miller and Duffy, JJ.MATTER of Livingston Development Group, LLC, res, v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Village of Dobbs Ferry respondents-appellants; Anna-Lisa Corrales, et al., nonparty-ap — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered March 28, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Chambers, Miller and Duffy, JJ.Glenn Spinella, etc. ap, v. Finks Country Farm, Inc., res — Motion by Pontisakos & Brandman, P.C., for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellants on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated May 24, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in relation or opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and on or before February 1, 2018, Pontisakos & Brandman, P.C., shall serve its clients by one of the methods specified in CPLR 2103(c), with a copy of this decision and order on motion and shall file proof of such service with the Clerk of this Court; and it is further,ORDERED that no further proceedings shall be taken against the appellants, without leave of the Court, until the expiration of 30 days after service upon them of a copy of this decision and order on motion; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until April 2, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Chambers, Miller and Duffy, JJ.NYCTL 2008-A Trust ap, v. Theresa June Livingston res, et al., def — Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 29, 2011, and to enlarge the record to include certain documents.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 19, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Chambers, Miller and Duffy, JJ.Bank of America, NA, res, v. Marie Mathieu, ap — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered October 20, 2016, and for an attorney’s fee.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 19, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Connolly and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Lev Ryskin, ap, v. Judy A. Corniel, res — Motion by the respondent, inter alia, to enlarge the record on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered January 17, 2017, to include certain motion papers and to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief. Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief and the application for that relief are granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, CONNOLLY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Duffy and Lasalle, JJ.Diane Ruggerio, etc., ap, v. Giovanni Ruggerio, res — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 5, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.CHAMBERS, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Duffy and Lasalle, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. James Sandford, III, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se to enlarge the time to serve and file a supplemental brief on an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered March 22, 2011.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the appellant’s supplemental brief shall be served and filed on or before March 5, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant shall file nine copies of the supplemental brief and serve one copy on the District Attorney.CHAMBERS, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Duffy and Lasalle, JJ.Michal Cohen, res, v. Guy Cohen, ap — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, dated July 22, 2016, and a judgment of the same court entered June 5, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.CHAMBERS, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Duffy and Lasalle, JJ.Stephen Ward, res, v. April Leithleiter Ward, ap — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated January 26, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.CHAMBERS, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Maltese and Lasalle, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Severiano Martinez, ap — Motion by the appellant’s assigned counsel on an appeal from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County, imposed June 10, 2014, in effect, to be relieved on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal by failing to respond to communications by assigned counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant is directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal, by filing an affirmation or an affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court on or before February 20, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion by assigned counsel, in effect, to be relieved is held in abeyance in the interim; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court or her designee is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the appellant at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and upon the attorney who last appeared for him, and upon the District Attorney, by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2).DILLON, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Priscilla Hall, J.P.; Austin, Sgroi and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Maria Costello, ap, v. South Bay Diner, res — Motion by Steven D. Dollinger & Associates for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, June 16, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in relation or opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and on or before January 26, 2018, Steven D. Dollinger & Associates shall serve its client by one of the methods specified in CPLR 2103(c), with a copy of this decision and order on motion and shall file proof of such service with the Clerk of this Court; and it is further,ORDERED that no further proceedings shall be taken against the appellant, without leave of the Court, until the expiration of 30 days after service upon her of a copy of this decision and order on motion; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 27, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.HALL, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Maltese and Lasalle, JJ.Nationwide Mortgage, LLC, etc., res, v. Nanielle Russo, etc., appellant def — Motion by the appellant on appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 24, 2016, and a judgment of the same court entered March 9, 2016, to extend the time to serve and file a supplemental record containing the judgment and the notice of appeal for the judgment. Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the application, and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and on or before February 20, 2018, the appellant shall serve and file a supplemental record containing the judgment and the notice of appeal for the judgment; and it is further,ORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 15, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.DILLON, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Maltese and Lasalle, JJ.MATTER of James Hill, pet, v. Robert F. Cunningham, etc., res — Motion by the petitioner pro se for leave to prosecute a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, which was transferred to this Court by an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated June 14, 2017, as a poor person.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to prosecute the proceeding on the original papers is granted, and the proceeding will be heard on the original papers (including the transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the parties, who are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to waive payment of the filing fee is denied as unnecessary as no filing fee is payable in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 that was transferred to this Court by an order of the Supreme Court; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, time to perfect the proceeding by causing the original papers constituting the record to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]), and by serving and filing a brief is enlarged until March 19, 2018.DILLON, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Austin, Roman and Sgroi, JJ.Kerry Kennedy, res, v. Marshall Hubsher, etc., ap, et al., def — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 8, 2016, as a poor person, for the assignment of counsel, and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Maltese and Lasalle, JJ.M&T Bank, res, v. Frank Biordi, appellant def — Motion by the appellant, in effect, to consolidate appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered February 8, 2017, and a judgment of the same court entered September 8, 2017, and deem the record and briefs filed in connection with the appeal from the order to be filed in connection with the appeal from the judgment, and for leave to serve and file a supplemental record containing the judgment and notice of appeal from the judgment.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the appellant shall serve and file a supplemental record containing the judgment and notice of appeal from the judgment on or before February 20, 2018.DILLON, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Hinds-Radix, J.P.; Maltese, Lasalle and Barros, JJ.Audrey G. Pierot, etc appellants-res, v. Michael A. Marom, res, Naomi Marom, res-res — Motion by the respondent-appellant on an appeal and cross appeal from a money judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated November 15, 2016, to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief. Cross motion by the appellants-respondents to dismiss the cross appeal on the ground that the respondent-appellant has failed to pay her share of the cost of the joint record and for an award of costs and an attorney’s fee.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the cross motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that motion is granted, the respondent-appellant’s time to serve and file its answering brief, including its points of argument on the cross appeal (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]) is enlarged until March 5, 2018, and the respondent-appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that branch of the cross motion which is to dismiss the cross appeal is denied on condition that the respondent-appellant pay her one-half share of the cost of the joint record and file proof of payment with this Court on or before March 5, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the cross motion is otherwise denied.HINDS-RADIX, J.P., MALTESE, LASALLE and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Austin, Roman and Sgroi, JJ.Bank of America, N.A., res, v. Frederick Vordermeier, ap, et al., def — 2017-02985Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, respondent,v Frederick Vordermeier, appellant,et al., defendants.(Index No. 8342/12)Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered December 15, 2016. Cross motion by the respondent Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, to consolidate the appeal from the judgment with appeals from two orders of the same court dated June 24, 2015, and January 27, 2016, respectively. Separate motion by the respondent Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, to dismiss the appeals from the orders on the ground that the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated upon entry of the judgment.Upon the papers filed in support of the appellant’s motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the cross motion and the motion by the respondent Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the appellant’s motion is granted, and the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal from the judgment is enlarged until February 20, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the cross motion is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion by the respondent Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, is held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeals from the orders for determination upon the argument or submission thereof.BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.Jeanette Sternberg-Kennedy, res, v. Douglas Kennedy, ap — Appeal by Douglas Kennedy from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (IDV Part), dated September 15, 2017.Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent and the attorney for the children to serve and file their respective briefs on the appeal is enlarged until February 13, 2018.MATTER of Angelo R. v. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant-child. SCO Family Services, petitioner-res, Jose v. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant- res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Cynthia M. v. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant-child. SCO Family Services, petitioner-res, Jose v. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant- res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Jose v. (Anonymous), appellant- res, v. SCO Family Services res, Angelo R. v. (Anonymous) nonparty-ap — (Proceeding No. 3) V-20163/12) — Appeals by Jose V., and cross appeals by Angelo R. V. and Cynthia M. V., from two orders of the Family Court, Kings County, dated February 28, 2017, and March 20, 2017, respectively. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant-respondent’s time to perfect the appeals by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeals and cross appeals to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeals is enlarged until March 5, 2018.MATTER of Igor Vaysman, res, v. Amy Conroy, ap — V-902-13) — Appeal by Amy Conroy from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 4, 2016.Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 14, 2018.MATTER of Roger W. Strnad, Jr., res, v. Lesley B. Stevens, ap — Appeal by Lesley B. Stevens from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated October 26, 2017.By decision and order on certification of this Court dated December 18, 2018, the following attorney was assigned as counsel for the appellant on the appeal:Carol Kahn, Esq.225 Broadway, Suite 1510New York, NY 10007212-227-0206By letter dated January 8, 2018, the assigned counsel has informed this Court that the appellant wishes to proceed with the appeal. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcripts has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order on certification of this Court dated December 18, 2017, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Benjamin S. S. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner-res, Randy S. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Randy S. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated March 7, 2017.The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on January 11, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this , the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the child in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.MATTER of Michael M. (Anonymous), Jr., ap — Appeal by Michael M., Jr., from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated June 29, 2016.The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on January 11, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed within 30 days of the date of this .By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Mia v. O. (Anonymous), a/k/a Mia H. (Anonymous). New York Foundling Hospital pet-res, Dora O. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Dora O. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated May 17, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 27, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Austin, Connolly and Iannacci, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Stheven Rosado, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se pursuant to CPL 460.30 for an extension of time to take an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered May 18, 2017, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s moving papers are deemed to constitute a timely notice of appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.RIVERA, J.P., AUSTIN, CONNOLLY and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Miller, Nelson and Iannacci, JJ.Century 21 Fulton, LLC, ap, v. Albee Development, LLC res — Motion by Century 21 Fulton, LLC, for leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 30, 2017, and, in effect, to stay enforcement of the order pending hearing and determination of the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to appeal is denied as unnecessary as the order is appealable as of right (see CPLR 5701); and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is, in effect, to stay enforcement of the order is granted, and enforcement of the order is stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal on condition that the appeal is perfected on or before February 20, 2018, and on condition that the undertaking posted pursuant to the order to show cause of this Court dated December 18, 2017, is continued; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the appellant does not comply with the foregoingprovisions, the Court, on its own motion, may vacate the stay, without further notice, or the respondents may move to vacate the stay, on three days notice.RIVERA, J.P., MILLER, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Miller, Nelson and Iannacci, JJ.Jose Villata, plf-res, v. Jerry Kokkinos defendants- respondents defendants; Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, LLP, nonparty-appellant; Dimitrios Komninos, nonparty-res — Motion by the appellant to stay all proceedings in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered October 26, 2017, and for a preference in the calendaring of the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to stay all proceedings is granted and all proceedings in the above-entitled action are stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal on condition that the appeal is perfected on or before February 20, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the appeal is not perfected on or before February 20, 2018, the Court, on its own motion, may vacate the stay, without further notice, or the respondents may move to vacate the stay, on three days notice; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.RIVERA, J.P., MILLER, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Austin, Roman and Sgroi, JJ.MATTER of State of New York, res, v. Karl M. (Anonymous), ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 3, 2017, as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to statute (CPLR 1102[b]) the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify and file two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, of the trial or hearing and shall deliver one copy to the appellant’s attorney and file the other with the Clerk of this Court; assigned counsel is directed to turn over said transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant Mental Hygiene Law §10.13(c) and County Law article 18-B, the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Craig Leeds, Esq.350 5th Avenue, Suite 5901New York, NY 10118212-736-2870and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Naphtali A. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Winifred A. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Yahchannah A. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Winifred A. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Noah A. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Winifred A. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 3)MATTER of Samach A. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Winifred A. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 4)MATTER of Nathanael A. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Winifred A. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 5)MATTER of Asher A. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Winifred A. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 6) N-27274-15, N-27275-15, N-27276-15) — Appeals by Winifred A. from three orders of the Family Court, Kings County, one dated January 23, 2017, and two dated March 20, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent and the attorney for the child Nathanael A. to serve and file their respective briefs on the appeals is enlarged until February 20, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Baby Boy I. (Anonymous), a/k/a Ethan I. (Anonymous). Edwin Gould Services for Children and Families, petitioner-res, Edna I. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by the Edna I. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated October 27, 2017. By order on certification of this Court dated January 8, 2018, the following attorney was assigned as counsel for the appellant on the appeal:Kenneth M. Tuccillo, Esq.591 Warburton Avenue, # 576Hastings on Hudson, NY 10706914-439-4843By letter dated January 11, 2018, the assigned counsel has informed this Court that the appellant wishes to proceed with the appeal. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order on certification of this Court dated January 8, 2018, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Leventhal, J.P.; Miller, Hinds-Radix and Duffy, JJ.MATTER of Deborah D. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner- res, Elliot Dabah, res-res — MATTER of Isaac D. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner- res, Elliot Dabah, res-res — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated October 24, 2017, as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to prosecute the appeal on the original papers is denied as unnecessary (see Family Ct Act §1116), and the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the children, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are to waive the filing fee, for free transcripts, and for the assignment of counsel are denied; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this decision and order on motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), within 30 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4), above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, the Clerk of the Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.LEVENTHAL, J.P., MILLER, HINDS-RADIX and DUFFY, JJ., concur.MATTER of Neleh B. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Quincy J. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Winter B. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Quincy J. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeals by Quincy J. from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, dated April 20, 2017, and July 19, 2017, respectively. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and a brief on the appeals is enlarged until February 13, 2018.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Donna M. Stones, ap, v. Erick J. Vandenberge, res — Appeal by Donna M. Stones from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated August 8, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 16, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Ivan S. (Anonymous), ap, v. Monique M. (Anonymous), res — Appeal by Ivan S. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated June 12, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 16, 2018.MATTER of Georgia Barker, appellant- res, v. John T. Rohack, respondent- ap — V-1796-16/16A, V-1797-16/16A, V-2094-16/16A, V-2095-16/16A, V-2096-16/16A) — Appeal by Georgia Barker and cross appeal by John Rohack from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated October 11, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the cross appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the respondent-appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the respondent-appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the respondent-appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the cross appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the cross appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the cross appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Georgia Barker, res, v. John T. Rohack, ap — Appeal by John T. Rohack from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated October 6, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Nicholas Petraglia III, ap, v. Maria Petraglia, res — Appeal by Nicholas Petraglia III from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated November 29, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Denise Brady, res, v. Raymond White, ap — Appeal by Raymond White from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated November 6, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Jeffery Scot Sult, appellant v. Rachel Ellen Sult, res — Appeal by Jeffery Scot Sult from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated November 20, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Gurvinder Singh Jagdev, res, v. Amy Marie Singh, ap — Appeal by Amy Marie Singh from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated November 16, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Arthur Adinolfi, Jr., ap, v. Colleen Callanan, res — Appeal by Arthur Adinolfi, Jr., from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated October 24, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Gina Slavik, ap, v. Glen Deegan, res — Appeal by Gina Slavik from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated November 3, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Julie Rodriguez, etc., ap, v. Lynette M. Thompson, res — Appeal by Julie Rodriguez from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated November 17, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Richard Lopez, petitioner- res, v. Griceley Reyes, respondent- res, Emily L. (Anonymous) nonparty-ap — Appeal by Emily L. and Kaylee L. from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated November 29, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the nonparty-appellants of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the nonparty-appellants shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the nonparty-appellants shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Emanuel Ferreira, ap, v. Goddess Santiago, res — Appeal by Emanuel Ferreira from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated November 3, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Maryel Broncano, ap, v. Jorge Mario Mendez, res — Appeal by Maryel Broncano from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated October 17, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Peter T. (Anonymous), Jr. Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Shay S. P. (Anonymous), a/k/a Shay S. T. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — Appeal by Shay S. P., a/k/a Shay S. T., from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated October 31, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Krishna K. Snowden, res, v. Curtis D. Snowden, ap — Appeal by Curtis D. Snowden from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated March 24, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 16, 2018.MATTER of Yu Wei, res, v. Robert Mathews, ap — Appeal by Robert Mathews from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (IDV Part), dated December 7, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Supreme Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Supreme Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Jonah B. (Anonymous). Administration of Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Riva v. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Adele S. (Anonymous). Administration of Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Riva v. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Talia Benyaminova S. (Anonymous). Administration of Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Riva v. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 3) — Appeal by Riva V. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated November 9, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 20, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Edison Mancellari, ap, v. Church of Ascension, def, Preserv Building Restoration Management Incorporated, res — Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 14, 2016.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 16, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Tyquan Terry, res, v. Elaysia Ortiz, ap — Appeal by Elaysia Ortiz from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated March 24, 2017. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated November 15, 2017, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the Court, within 30 days after the date of the order:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript was expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.The appellant has failed to comply with the decision and order on motion of this Court dated November 15, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings for failure to comply with the decision and order on motion of this Court dated November 15, 2017, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before February 9, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties by regular mail.MATTER of Nicholas DePalma, Sr., ap, v. Victoria Cordaro, res — Appeal by Nicholas DePalma, Sr., from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated August 14, 2017. The transcripts were received by the appellant on or about November 6, 2017, and, pursuant to a of this Court dated October 4, 2017, the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding was to be perfected within 60 days of the date of the receipt of the transcripts. The appeal has not been perfected. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with the dated October 4, 2017, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before February 9, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties by regular mail.MATTER of Katerina L. Segreto, res, v. Michael S. Segreto, ap — V-5174-16/16A, V-5174-16/16B, V-5175-16/16A, V-5175-16/16B) — Appeal by Michael S. Segreto from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated May 16, 2017. By dated July 19, 2017, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the Court, within 30 days after the date of the :(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript was expected; or(4) if the appellant was indigent and could not afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.The appellant has failed to comply with the . Pursuant to §670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings for failure to comply with the dated July 19, 2017, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before February 9, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties by regular mail.MATTER of Jose Dimas Salmeron, ap, v. Jocelyn B. Zelaya, res — Appeal by Jose Dimas Salmeron from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated August 31, 2017. By dated November 29, 2017, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the Court, within 30 days after the date of the :(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript was expected; or(4) if the appellant was indigent and could not afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.The appellant has failed to comply with the . Pursuant to §670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with the dated November 29, 2017, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before February 9, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties by regular mail.MATTER of Una-Bellelinda Alexandrice Titus, res, v. Aaron Garth Evans, ap — Appeals by Aaron Garth Evans from two orders of the Family Court, Nassau County, both dated September 14, 2017. By dated November 30, 2017, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the Court, within 30 days after the date of the :(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeals; or(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript was expected; or(4) if the appellant was indigent and could not afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeals, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeals as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeals.The appellant has failed to comply with the . Pursuant to §670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeals in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with the dated November 30, 2017, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before February 9, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties by regular mail.MATTER of Rebecca Blake, res, v. Dean Solomon, ap — F-361-15/16F, F-361-15/17H, F-15597-14/16F, F-15597-14/16F, F-14622-14/16G, F-16150-14/17D, F-14622-14/16F, F-361-15/16G, F-15597-14/17G) — Appeal by Dean Solomon from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated October 13, 2017. By dated November 29, 2017, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the Court, within 30 days after the date of the :(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript was expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.The appellant has failed to comply with the . Pursuant to §670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings for failure to comply with the dated November 29, 2017, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before February 9, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties by regular mail.MATTER of Kelvin Tavarez Urena, res, v. Nidia Altagracia Disen de Mejia, ap — Appeal by Nidia Altagracia Disen de Mejia from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated June 26, 2017. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated November 24, 2017, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the Court, within 30 days after the date of the order:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript was expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.The appellant has failed to comply with the decision and order on motion of this Court dated November 24, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with the decision and order on motion of this Court dated November 24, 2017, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before February 9, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties by regular mail.MATTER of Jiheen Hutchinson, ap, v. Turkana Smith, res — V-22367-16, V-22801-16) — Appeal by Jiheen Hutchinson from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated August 16, 2017. By dated October 30, 2017, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the Court, within 30 days after the date of the :(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript was expected; or(4) if the appellant was indigent and could not afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.The appellant has failed to comply with the . Pursuant to §670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings for failure to comply with the dated October 30, 2017, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before February 9, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties by regular mail.MATTER of Patrick P. v. (Anonymous). SCO Family of Services petitioners- res, Thanh T. K. v. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — Appeal by Thanh T. K. V. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 20, 2017. By order on certification of this Court dated May 31, 2017, the following attorney was assigned as counsel for the respondent-appellant on the appeal, and was directed, inter alia, to contact the respondent-appellant and determine the respondent-appellant’s interest in perfecting the appeal:Lisa Lewis, Esq.1130 Bedford Avenue, #44Brooklyn, NY 11216718-857-0247By letter dated January 10, 2018, assigned counsel notified the Court that she has been unable to contact the respondent-appellant.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered relieving the assigned counsel for the respondent-appellant and dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before February 9, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties or their attorneys, and upon the respondent-appellant, by regular mail.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Vahed Bazeli, ap, v. Tamer Azaz, et al., def, Jennifer J. Azaz, res — Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated January 19, 2017.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 16, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Maltese and Barros, JJ.U.S. Bank, National Association, etc., res, v. Lori Ehrlich, appellant def — Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to stay the foreclosure sale of the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of appeals from three orders of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, two dated January 24, 2017, and one dated September 8, 2017, and a judgment of the same court also dated September 8, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Maltese and Barros, JJ.Wilson Yancha, res, v. 2 Herald Owner, LLC defendants third-party plaintiffs- appellants; Rite-Way Internal Removal, Inc., third-party def-res — Motion by the defendants third-party plaintiffs-appellants to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition and in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Maltese and Barros, JJ.MATTER of Alexis B. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Julie K. (Anonymous), respondent- appellant res — Motion by Julie K. for leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated December 19, 2017, and to stay enforcement of the order, pending hearing and determination of the appeal, and for a preference in the calendaring of the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to appeal is denied as unnecessary as the order is appealable as of right (see Family Ct Act §1112); and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to stay enforcement of the order is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for a preference in the calendaring of the appeal is denied as unnecessary (see Family Ct Act §1112).LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Miller, Nelson and Iannacci, JJ.U.S. Bank National Association, etc., res, v. Stuart Bienenstock appellants def — Motion by the appellants on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 10, 2017, to stay enforcement of a judgment dated December 10, 2013, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from the order.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and enforcement of the judgment dated December 10, 2013, is stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal from the order entered April 10, 2017, on condition that the appeal is perfected on or before February 20, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the appeal is not perfected on or before February 20, 2018, the Court, on its own motion, may vacate the stay, without further notice, or the respondent may move to vacate the stay, on three days notice.RIVERA, J.P., MILLER, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Maltese and Barros, JJ.Thomas J. Aiken, Jr. res, v. Patrick Liotta, appellant (and a third-party action). — Motion by the appellant to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 3, 2015.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the trial in the above-entitled action is stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Maltese and Barros, JJ.MATTER of Azimjon A. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Adolat K. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Aziza A. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Adolat K. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Motion by the attorney for the child to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated February 24, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the brief for the attorney for the child shall be served and filed on or before that date.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Maltese and Barros, JJ.MATTER of Alana H. (Anonymous). Dutchess County Department of Community and Family Services, petitioner-res, Caitlin M. (Anonymous) respondents-ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Sophia H. (Anonymous). Dutchess County Department of Community and Family Services, petitioner-res, Caitlin M. (Anonymous) respondents-ap — (Proceeding No. 2) N-6440-15, N-6441-15) — Motion by the appellant Javier H. on appeals from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated January 20, 2017, to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the appellant Javier H.’s time to serve and file his brief is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the brief of the appellant Javier H. shall be served and filed on or before that date.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Maltese and Barros, JJ.MATTER of Thornan Wilson, res, v. Crystal Brown, ap — Motion by the attorney for the child to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated March 1, 2017, on the ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Maltese and Barros, JJ.MATTER of Kazel Wagner, petitioner- res, v. John Villegas, respondent-appellant; Karissa v. (Anonymous) nonparty-ap — V-4556-04/17M, V-4557-04/17M) — Motion by the petitioner-respondent to direct the respondent-appellant to provide the transcripts on appeals from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated April 12, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied as academic, as the transcripts have been provided to the petitioner-respondent.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.MATTER of Wesley LeJuan Harris, ap, v. Royisha Schnell Knowles Bryant, res — Appeal by Wesley LeJuan Harris from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated November 8, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Justice L. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Jessica L. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Alaysia L. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Jessica L. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Zamahri L. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Jessica L. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 3)MATTER of Samiyah L. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Jessica L. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 4)MATTER of Tyriek L. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Jessica L. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 5) N-5154-17, N-5148-17, N-5149-17, N-5150-17, N-5158-17, N-5160-17) — Appeal by Jessica L. from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated December 8, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the respondent-appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the respondent-appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the respondent-appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the respondent-appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the respondent-appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Maria Tarasco, v. Joseph Tarasco, ap — Appeal by Joseph Tarasco from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated December 6, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Andrew John Matos, res, v. Melissa Ann Leland, ap — Appeal by Melissa Ann Leland from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated October 6, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Wayne Wilmot, ap, v. Hlengiwie Wilmot, res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Hlengiwie Wilmot, res, v. Wayne Wilmot, ap — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeals byWayne Wilmot from two orders of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (IDV Part), both dated November 1, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeals in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the appellant receives the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Supreme Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received. If there are no minutes to be transcribed, the appeals in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes in the Supreme Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeals; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeals; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeals to show cause why the appeals should or should not be dismissed.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Luis Noblesilla ap, v. T-C 470 Park Avenue South Owner, LLC respondents def — Application by the appellants for leave to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 20, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Zarin Khan, res, v. Muzamil Gufran, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated September 7, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Toni Ann Minerva, res, v. Eric Johansmeyer, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated September 11, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Bryant Lassiter, ap, v. City of New York, et al., res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 19, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Michael Stacknick, res, v. Urias A. Moreno, def, C.A. Rothmeier ap — Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated September 1, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated January 9, 2018, it isORDERED that the appeal is marked withdrawn.Shannida Letellier, res, v. Amity Shuttle, Inc. ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 31, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Jerome August, res, v. Steinway Realty, LLC def, BMFE, LLC, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 3, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Jerome August, res, v. Steinway Realty, LLC def, BMFE, LLC, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 7, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Mastro, J.P.; Balkin, Cohen and Duffy, JJ.Ronald Friedman, res, v. FBP Trucking, LLC ap — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 16, 2016.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated January 11, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, COHEN and DUFFY, JJ., concur.Carlos Benitez plf-res, v. Tritec Hospitality, LLC, defendant third-party plaintiff-appellant-res, Mack-Cali So. West Realty Associates, LLC, defendant second third-party plf-res, Robert Martin Company, LLC, defendant second third-party def-res, Yonkers Lodging Partners, LLC, defendant second third-party defendant- respondent-appellant; Lea-Rome, Inc., third- party defendant-res-res — Application by the third-party defendant respondent-appellant Lea-Rome, Inc., on an appeal and cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated December 18, 2018, to withdraw its cross appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the cross appeal by the third-party defendant-respondent-appellant Lea-Rome, Inc., is marked withdrawn.Barbara Thill, plf, v. Cruz Correa def, Marshall & Bellard, et al. ap, Levine & Slavitt, PLLC res — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 21, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Jadwiga Sawczuk, appellant-res, Nina Jachimowicz res, Tribute, Inc., res-res — Application by the respondent-appellant on an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 31, 2017, to withdraw the cross appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the cross appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Rudy Ramsahai res, Cumberland Packing Corp., ap — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 29, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated December 12, 2017, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.1414 Utica Avenue Lender, LLC, res, v. Cort & Medas Associates, LLC appellants def — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 14, 2016.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated January 10, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Garendean Realty Corp., res, v. Osbourne Walker, appellant def — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 19, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.NYCTL 2013-A Trust, et al, res, v. 66 Tehama, LLC, etc., appellant def — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 4, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Beir Cleghorne, ap, v. Ime A. Nelson, res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 26, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Lana Kaye, ap, v. Harry Triantis, res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Harry Triantis, res, v. Lana Kaye, ap — (Proceeding No. 2) V-23370-13/15B, V-23371-13/15B) — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated October 12, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Sabali M. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-appellant; Samuel M. (Anonymous), et al., res-res — Application by the petitioner-appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated October 2, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Wendy Duke, etc.,, plf-res, v. Village of Tarrytown defendants- res, Charles A. Manganaro Consulting Engineers ap — Application by the appellant Summit Construction Services Group on appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 27, 2016, for leave to withdraw its appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal by the appellant Summit Construction Services Group is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Cynthia Tuttle, etc., plf-res, v. Village of Tarrytown defendants- res, Charles A. Manganaro Consulting Engineers ap, et al., def — Application by the appellant Summit Construction Services Group on appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 27, 2016, for leave to withdraw its appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal by the appellant Summit Construction Services Group is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Dillon, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Frances Carlisle, Michael Hershberg, Steven Jupiter, and Jennifer Jupiter, etc., ap, v. Oxford Fine Properties, Inc., res — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 21, 2016.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated January 10, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., DILLON, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.Board of Managers of the 20 Henry Street Condominium, etc., res, v. CJUF III 20 Henry Property, LLC defendant third-party plaintiffs-appellants; Leviathan Construction Management Services, et al., third-party def — Application by the defendants third-party plaintiffs-appellants to withdraw an appeal insofar as taken by the defendants third-party plaintiffs-appellants K. Robert Turner, Janine Getler, Marcus Neupert, and Daniel Millman from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 6, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal by the defendants third-party plaintiffs-appellants K. Robert Turner, Janine Getler, Marcus Neupert, and Daniel Millman is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Applications for Extensions of Time — Parties in the following causes have filed applications pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to extend the time to perfect or to serve and file a brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the applications, it isORDERED that the applications are granted and the following parties in the following causes are granted the specified extensions of time:Title Docket No. Applicant Name(s) Extended DeadlineAlliance National Insurance2017-05310Alliance National InsuranceCompany v. LandaCompanyFebruary 8, 2018Bank of America v. Mcalpin2017-08025Andy McalpinMarch 7, 2018Bowen-Hooks v City of2017-10523Sylvia Bowen-HooksNew YorkMarch 26, 2018Deutsche Bank National2016-10408Deutsche Bank NationalTrust Company v. DennisTrust CompanyFebruary 1, 2018Diner v. Halevi2017-07875Avraham DinerBay Street Auto Center Inc.H & D Automotive Corp.Richmond Auto Center Inc.830 Bay St. Service, Inc.Victory Service Station Inc.March 19, 2018Eastfield Glass Co., Inc. 2017-08261Avanti Systems USA, Inc.v Avanti Systems USA, Inc.February 13, 2018Empire National Bank2017-08123Empire National Bankv Genard Group, Inc.February 16, 2018Title Docket No. Applicant Name(s) Extended DeadlineFloyd v. Thomas2017-08160Susan FloydKrystal TaylorMarch 27, 2018Fuentes v. City of New York2017-08626Elizabeth FuentesMarch 20, 2018Harrison v. Toyloy2017-13276Theodora Renee HarrisonFebruary 20, 2018HSBC Bank, N.A. v. 2016-08317Danny VaswaniVaswaniFebruary 1, 2018HSBC Bank, USA v. Willis2016-12704 HSBC Bank, USA+1January 25, 2018Levanovsky v. Two-Twenty2017-03839Avishay LevanovskyRecords Management, LLCMarch 16, 2018Long Island Medical 2017-07769Rosenberg Fortuna & Laitman,Anesthesiology, P.C.LLPv Rosenberg Fortuna & David I. RosenbergLaitmanBrett ZinnerMarch 5, 2018Mackey v. Nicole Kelly Pub2017-05835Derek MackeyInc.February 13, 2018Matter of Gershow2017-08382Town of RiverheadRecycling of Riverhead, Inc. Zoning Board ofv Town of RiverheadAppeals of the Town ofRiverheadJefferon MurphreePlanning Board of theTown of Riverhead March 5, 2018Mears v. Long 2017-07698Christopher LongSteven LongChristopher IsazaSouth 2nd Realty Corp.March 12, 2018Mutual Aid Association of 2017-07164Mutual Aid Associationthe Paid Fire Department of the Paid Fireof the City of Yonkers Department of thev City of YonkersCity of Yonkers February 20, 2018Title Docket No. Applicant Name(s) Extended DeadlineNationstar Mortgage, LLCv Shivers2016-13279Nationstar Mortgage, LLCJanuary 19, 2018People v. Hassan, Bilal2016-10215People of State of New YorkFebruary 7, 2018People v. Martinez, Adelby2015-12668People of State of New YorkFebruary 13, 2018People v. Perez, Jarrell D.2015-09370People of State of New YorkJanuary 30, 2018RTT Holdings, LLC v. Nacht2017-03800Pearl NachtFebruary 1, 2018Sovereign Bank v. Broome2017-05653Sovereign Bank February 9, 2018Townsend v. City of New 2016-08363New York City Health andYork Hospitals CorporationJanuary 29, 2018U.S. Bank N.A. 2017-08031Leroy Francev FranceFebruary 9, 2018U.S. Bank National2017-08076Elida NellisAssociation v. Nellis+1March 12, 2018US Bank v. Spence2017-04014Jaystone, LLCFebruary 7, 2018Wachovia Bank, NationalAssociation v. Greenberg2017-07267Daniel GreenbergJanuary 30, 2018Wan v. Britton Property Inc.2017-06759Britton Property Inc.February 9, 2018Wells Fargo v. Soetan2017-02451Wells FargoFebruary 13, 2018By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Tymel A. Smith, ap — (S.C.I. No. 1606N/16) — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered January 23, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant is directed either (1) to show cause before this Court why the appeal should not be dismissed on the ground that the notice of appeal from the judgment was untimely (see CPL 460.30) by filing an affirmation or an affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court on or before March 19, 2018, or (2), if so advised, to make a motion pursuant to CPL 460.30 to deem the notice of appeal timely filed, on or before March 19, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to respond to the order to show cause or to make a motion pursuant to CPL 460.30:Jan Murphy, Esq.6 Fenimore LaneHuntington, NY 11743and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s motion is held in abeyance pending determination of this Court’s motion to dismiss the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court or her designee is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the appellant at the appellant’s last known place of residence or, if the appellant is imprisoned, at the institution in which the appellant is confined, upon the attorney who last appeared for the appellant, upon the attorney named above, and upon the District Attorney, by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2).SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Duffy, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.Katherine Vuksanaj, etc., plf-res, v. Taylor B. Abbott, def-res, Todd M. Diederich ap — Motion by the appellants to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, dated November 11, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the trial in the above-entitled action is stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal.DILLON, J.P., DUFFY, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Robert Tutaj, etc., res-ap, v. Seaford Union Free School District appellants-res — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the order on application of this Court dated January 16, 2018, in the above-entitled case on an appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered January 26, 2017, is amended by deleting from the decretal paragraph thereof the words “respondents-appellants” and substituting therefor the words “appellants-respondents.”SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.
