Appellate DivisionSecond DepartmentMotion List released on:January 19, 2018 Matter of Fourth Garden Park, respondent- ap, v. Board of Assessors, etc., appellant-res — 20319/12, 61885/13, 65374/14, 607447/15, 609766/16) — Separate applications pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated May 19, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the applications and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the applications are granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant-respondent’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 13, 2018, the joint record or appendix on the appeal and cross appeal (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][1]) and the appellant-respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondent-appellant shall serve and file the answering brief, including the points of argument on the cross appeal, in accordance with the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]).Lofty Rashed Ahmed, res, v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC, appellant def — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until March 22, 2018, to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered March 1, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 5, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.MATTER of Oscar Rezzolla, deceased. Lois Rosenblatt, petitioner-res, John P. Reinhardt respondents-ap — (File No. 3649/13) — Application by the petitioner-respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 30-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County, dated May 4, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the petitioner- respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 2, 2018, the petitioner-respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.By Balkin, J.P.; Austin, Roman and Sgroi, JJ.NYCTL 2014-A plf-res, v. Quadrozzi Realty Corporation, ap, City of New York Environmental Control Board, et al., def-res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 2, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Austin, Roman and Sgroi, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Vincent P. Repka, ap — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered January 27, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Austin, Roman and Sgroi, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Gregory Bynum, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se to enlarge the time to serve and file a supplemental brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 29, 2014.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the appellant’s supplemental brief shall be served and filed on or before March 19, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant shall file nine copies of the supplemental brief and serve one copy on the District Attorney.BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Austin, Roman and Sgroi, JJ.MATTER of Richard Gleason, ap, v. Town of Carmel, res — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, dated June 27, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 29, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Austin, Roman and Sgroi, JJ.Diana Lajara ap, v. Jerzy Macura res, et al., def — Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 1, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellants’ time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until February 2, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Austin, Roman and Sgroi, JJ.Ludmila Chtchannikova, plf-res, v. City of New York def, Verizon New York, Inc., def-res, v. N. A. Utility Contracting Co., Inc., appellant (and a third-party action). — Motion by the plaintiff-respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 31, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the plaintiff-respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the plaintiff-respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Austin, Roman and Sgroi, JJ.MATTER of Zoltan Sabel, a/k/a Zolten Sabel, deceased. Jacob Sabel, petitioner-res, Judith Kupferstein, objectant-ap — (File No. 209/15) — Motion by the objectant-appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Rockland County, dated December 13, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the objectant-appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the objectant-appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Austin, Roman and Sgroi, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Edgar Wilson, ap — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered June 1, 2015.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.Steven Novick, res-ap, v. Adrienne Novick, appellant-res — Application pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 15, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant-respondent’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 14, 2018, the joint record or appendix on the appeal and cross appeal (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][1]) and the appellant-respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondent-appellant shall serve and file the answering brief, including the points of argument on the cross appeal, in accordance with the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]).By Balkin, J.P.; Austin, Roman and Sgroi, JJ.MATTER of Nella Manko, ap, v. Lenox Hill Hospital, res — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 20, 2016, and September 16, 2016, respectively, as a poor person, for the assignment of counsel, and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to waive the motion filing fee is denied as unnecessary (see CPLR 8022[b]); and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeals is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until March 19, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.Nancy Rosen res-ap, v. Fabian D. Bitan, etc. def, Jean-Pierre Claude Farcy, etc., appellant- res — Applications pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated May 19, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the applications and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the applications are granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant-respondent’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 12, 2018, the joint record or appendix on the appeal and cross appeal (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][1]) and the appellant-respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondents-appellants shall serve and file the answering brief, including the points of argument on the cross appeal, in accordance with the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]).By Balkin, J.P.; Hall, Austin and Roman, JJ.Khadija Abouelhassan, res, v. Hisham Almehdawi, ap — Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 23, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 19, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the motion is otherwise denied.BALKIN, J.P., HALL, AUSTIN and ROMAN, JJ., concur.Citimortgage, Inc., res, v. Anthony M. Canonico, appellant def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, both dated May 22, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until March 9, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeals and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.By Priscilla Hall, J.P.; Austin, Sgroi and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Regan U. Lally, ap, v. Richard E. Aebly, res — 2017-07150, 2017-07151Richard E. Aebly, respondent,v Regan Lally, appellant.(Index Nos. 202114/08) Motion by the appellant to consolidate an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated March 22, 2017, with appeals from an order of the same court dated April 14, 2017, and an unsigned transcript of the same court dated February 2, 2017, to enlarge the time to perfect the appeals, and for poor person relief.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal from the unsigned transcript is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see Ojeda v. Metropolitan Playhouse, Inc., 120 AD2d 717); and it is further,ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are to consolidate the appeal from unsigned transcript with the appeal from the order dated March 22, 2017, and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal from unsigned transcript are denied as academic; and it is furtherORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to consolidate the appeals from the orders is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeals from the orders will be calendared together and will be argued or submitted on the same date; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeals from the orders is granted and the time to perfect those appeals is enlarged until March 19, 2018; and it is furtherORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.HALL, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.MATTER of Christiane Pacheco, ap, v. Hugo Pacheco, res — F-10844-08/15H, F-10844-08/15I) — Appeal by Christiane Pacheco from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated June 7, 2017.The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on January 11, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed within 30 days of the date of this .MATTER of Abigail Long, ap, v. Francis M. Donoghue res — Appeal by Abigail Long from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated October 12, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 16, 2018.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Maltese and Barros, JJ.MATTER of Benton C. Bainbridge, res, v. Katherine Powers, ap — V-10513-06/16D, V-10513-06/16C) — Motion by Katherine Powers for leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated December 14, 2017, and to stay enforcement of the order, pending hearing and determination of the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition and in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that enforcement of the order dated December 14, 2017, is stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Miller, Nelson and Iannacci, JJ.MATTER of George C. S. (Anonymous), res, v. Kerry-Ann B. (Anonymous), res, Kyaire B. (Anonymous), nonparty-appellant; Susan S. (Anonymous), nonparty-res — Motion by Kyaire B. for leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated October 30, 2017, and to stay enforcement of the order or, in the alternative, in the event that the testing directed by that order has occurred, to stay the disclosure of the test results, pending hearing and determination of the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to appeal is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to stay enforcement of the order or, in the event that the testing directed by that order has occurred, to stay the disclosure of the test results, is granted and enforcement of the order and disclosure of any test results are stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal.RIVERA, J.P., MILLER, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Maltese and Barros, JJ.Amtrust – NP SFR Venture, LLC, ap, v. Sylvia Thompson def, Mary Harris, res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered January 5, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Maltese and Barros, JJ.Sophie Kapassakis, ap, v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority, et al., respondents def — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 7, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Maltese and Barros, JJ.Wilmington Trust, National Association, etc., res, v. Jeffrey Singer, ap, et al., def — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, both dated November 1, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Lasalle, J.P.; Cohen, Maltese and Barros, JJ.LaSalle Bank, N.A., res, v. Wayne Lawrence, ap, et al., def — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 10, 2015.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Miller, Nelson and Iannacci, JJ.Henny Bochner, plf-res, v. Town of Monroe, def-res, Village of Kiryas Joel, ap — Motion by the plaintiff-respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated April 24, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the plaintiff-respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 5, 2018, and the plaintiff-respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.RIVERA, J.P., MILLER, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Miller, Nelson and Iannacci, JJ.Geraldine Schwartz, res, v. Peter Schwartz, ap — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 13, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 30, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.RIVERA, J.P., MILLER, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Miller, Nelson and Iannacci, JJ.Salvatore Sanchez Robles, res, v. Kirit Patel ap — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 24, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.RIVERA, J.P., MILLER, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Maltese and Barros, JJ.Thomas Shannon, res, v. Ifeyinwa Ifemesia, ap — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 16, 2016, and September 7, 2016, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Maltese and Barros, JJ.Flagstar Bank, FSB, res, v. Camille Davis, appellant def — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated December 21, 2015.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 20, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Maltese and Barros, JJ.HSBC Bank USA, National Association, etc., res, v. Antoine Y. Cherestal, appellant def — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 6, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until January 30, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Harmonee B. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Roy B. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Roy B. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated February 2, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 20, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Kathleen M. Dennis, ap, v. Marjorie Davis-Schloemer, et al., res — Appeal by Kathleen M. Dennis from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated October 3, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 16, 2018.Natalya Gendler, res, v. Semen Guendler, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 8, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 12, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MATTER of Dupree M. (Anonymous), ap — Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Samantha Q. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Dupree M. from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated February 10, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the appellant to serve and file a reply brief on the appeal is enlarged, and the brief submitted to the Clerk of this Court is accepted for filing and deemed timely served.MATTER of Symphani F. G. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Otis G. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeals by Otis G. from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, dated November 17, 2016, and May 30, 2017, respectively. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 20, 2018.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Maltese and Barros, JJ.MP res, v. Daniel Davidsohn, ap — Motion by the appellant to stay all proceedings in the above-entitled action, including depositions, pending hearing and determination of appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 23, 2017, and October 25, 2017, respectively, and for a preference in the calendaring of the appeals.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.MATTER of Ursula-Pearl Uchenna Nwabueze, res, v. Livinus Obinna Okafor, ap — V-31751-15) — Appeal by Livinus Obinna Okafor from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated July 20, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on January 12, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the brief for the respondent in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. David Taylor, ap — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the decision and order on motion of this Court dated October 3, 2017, which granted the appellant’s motion for leave to serve and file a pro se supplemental brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 1, 2014, is recalled and vacated; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s motion for leave to serve and file a supplemental pro se brief is denied.The appellant has failed to serve and file a supplemental pro se brief although afforded sufficient opportunity to do so.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Naphtali A. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Winifred A. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Yahchannah A. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Winifred A. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Noah A. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Winifred A. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 3)MATTER of Samach A. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Winifred A. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 4)MATTER of Nathanael A. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Winifred A. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 5)MATTER of Asher A. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Winifred A. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 6) N-27273-15, N-27274-15, N-27275-15, N-27276-15) — Appeals by Winifred A. from three orders of the Family Court, Kings County, one dated January 23, 2017, and two dated March 20, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child Samach A. to serve and file a brief on the appeals is enlarged until February 20, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, res, v. Lover B. Arnold, Jr., ap, et al., def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 18, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.33-37 Farrington, LLC, res, v. Global Universal Group, Ltd., ap, et al., def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered December 23, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 5, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.SDF Linden, LLC, res, v. Global Universal Group, Ltd., ap, et al., def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 21, 2016, and an order of the same court dated October 24, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until March 5, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeals and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MATTER of Applications for Extensions of Time — Parties in the following causes have filed applications pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to extend the time to perfect or to serve and file a brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the applications, it isORDERED that the applications are granted and the following parties in the following causes are granted the specified extensions of time:Title Docket No. Applicant Name(s) Extended DeadlineBoard of Managers of Oceana Condominium No. Two v. Medianik, 2017-08520, Board of Managers of Oceana Condominium No. Two, March 29, 2018Bursky v. Gerratano, 2017-06208, Emanuel Gerrantano, Susie Gerratano, February 15, 2018Cantey v. City of New York2017-10690Five Star Electric Corp., February 8, 2018CCJ, LLC v. Shiel Holdings,2017-10955, Shiel Holdings, LLC, LLCFresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc., Spectra Laboratories, Inc., February 26, 2018Demonte v. Selden Wings Inc., 2017-08143, Selden Wings, Inc., March 19, 2018Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Burgois, 2017-08111,Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, March 13, 2018Diaz v. Dadabo, 2017-08929, Angel Diaz, March 26, 2018Globe Trade Capital, LLC v Hoey, 2017-08054, Wendy Hoey, Thomas Hoey, January 26, 2018H&R Block Bank v Liles, FSB2017-05477 +1, Jon Liles, February 13, 2018Landano v. Karp, 2017-07958North Shore University Hospital, February 13, 2018Mastr Adjustable Rate Mortgages Trust 2007-1 v Joseph, 2017-07593, Mastr Adjustable Rate Mortgages Trust 2007-1, February 26, 2018Matter of Horowitz v. Foster, 2017-07599, Stacey Horowitz, February 6, 2018Matter of R. (Anonymous), 2017-08882, Stephen R. Milton April 9, 2018One West Bank v. Schiffman, 2017-04928, One West Bank, March 7, 2018Padilla v. Chung, 2017-07671William Chung, Yin Cheung, March 12, 2018People v. Joseph, Kethlie, 2015-10384, Kethlie Joseph, January 25, 2018Pinnock v. Mercy Medical Center, 2016-13403+1, Shanique Pinnock, January 26, 2018Rodriguez v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 2017-08304, Jose Luis Rodriguez, March 19, 2018Santiago v. Riccelli Enterprises, Inc., 2017-07675, Riccelli Enterprises, Inc., Riccelli Enerprises, LLC, Martin E. Fergusion, March 13, 2018Schlapa v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., 2017-05627, Thomas Schlapa, February 9, 2018Singh v. Sukhu, 2017-03121, DNJC Contracting, Inc. DNJC, Inc., February 6, 2018Stofko v. St. Stephen’s Roman Catholic Church, 2017-11432, Martin Stofko, Svetlana Stofko, March 8, 2018Thomas v. Messemer Chesters Recovery Services, Inc. 2017-08657, Michael Messemer, March 21, 2018Torres v. Board of Education of the City of New York, 2017-06229, Anthony Torres, February 21, 2018U.S. Bank National Association v. Beckles, 2016-11015+1, Steve Beckles, February 8, 2018U.S. Bank National Association v. Coleman, 2017-05757U.S. Bank National Association, February 20, 2018Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Gross, 2016-13427Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., February 21, 2018Wilson v. New York City Housing Authority, 2017-05009, Jahmere Wilson, Nyoka Watson, February 15, 2018Zhigue v. Lexington Landmark Properties, LLC, 2017-01812, Dover Street Market New York, LLC February 1, 2018By Rivera, J.P.; Miller, Nelson and Iannacci, JJ.Globe Trade Capital, LLC, res, v. Thomas J. Hoey, Jr. ap, et al., def — 2018-00393, 2018-00394Globe Trade Capital, LLC, respondent, v Thomas J. Hoey, Jr. appellants, et al., defendants.(Index No. 70272/14) Motion by the appellants on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 1, 2017, and November 13, 2017, respectively, and a judgment of the same court dated December 8, 2017, inter alia, to stay the disposition of the subject real property, pending hearing and determination of the appeals.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.RIVERA, J.P., MILLER, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Balkin, Hall and Lasalle, JJ.Community National Bank, res, v. Hollis Care Group, Inc. ap — Motion by the appellants for leave to reargue an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered January 30, 2015, which was determined by decision and order of this Court dated November 1, 2017, or, in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the decision and order of this Court.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied, with $100 costs.DILLON, J.P., BALKIN, HALL and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Miller, Nelson and Iannacci, JJ.Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., res, v. Kevin Tuminski, appellant def — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated April 21, 2017, as untimely taken.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.RIVERA, J.P., MILLER, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Miller, Nelson and Iannacci, JJ.MATTER of Margaret Franchi, petitioner- res, v. Israel Adoram, appellant res — Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to deem the notice of appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated February 4, 2016, to be an application pursuant to CPLR 5704 to review the order, and upon review, to vacate the order.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies from an order that is issued ex parte (see Family Ct. Act §1112, CPLR 5704).RIVERA, J.P., MILLER, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Austin, Sgroi and Lasalle, JJ.Keith Bierman, appellant-res, v. Rosemarie Limoncelli, res-res — Motion by the appellant-respondent for leave to reargue an appeal and cross appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 14, 2015, which were determined by decision and order of this Court dated October 25, 2017, or, in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the decision and order of this Court.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Maltese and Barros, JJ.Mark Lew, res, v. Gail Sobel ap — 2017-13327, 2017-13328Mark Lew, respondent,v Gail Sobel appellants.(Index No. 15524/12) 2017-13329Mark Lew, respondent,v Gail Sobel appellants.(Index No. 15524/12) Motion by the appellants on appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered February 21, 2017, a decision of the same court dated November 2, 2017, a money judgment of the same court entered December 1, 2017, and a judgment of the same court dated November 22, 2017, to stay enforcement of the decision, the money judgment, and the judgment pending hearing and determination of appeals therefrom, and to consolidate the appeals from the decision and the money judgment with the appeal from the judgment, in effect, for poor person relief, and to waive the motion filing fee.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal from the order is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated upon entry of the judgment (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241); the issues raised on the appeal from the order may be brought up for review and raised on the appeal from the judgment; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal from the decision is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies from a decision (see Schicchi v. J.A. Green Constr. Co., 100 AD2d 509); and it is further,ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are to consolidate the appeal from the decision with the appeal from the judgment and for poor person relief with respect to the appeal from the decision are denied as academic; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to waive the motion filing fee is denied as unnecessary (see CPLR 8022[b]); and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to consolidate the appeals from the money judgment and the judgment is denied as unnecessary as those appeals may be consolidated as of right (see 22 NYCRR 670.7[c][1]); and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.Michael Sorger, ap, v. Clinton Plume, res — Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated July 3, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated January 10, 2018, it isORDERED that the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Joanne Anselmo, ap, v. Estate of Ingeborg Christy, etc., res — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 16, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated January 9, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.J.G., etc. res, v. William Davis, Jr. ap — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated May 12, 2016.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated December 21, 2017, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Kathleen Gonda-Pecorino plaintiffs- res, v. Wilder Balter Partners, Inc., def, Griffon Associates, Inc., ap, Northbrook Contracting Corp., defendant- res — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 13, 2016.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated December 18, 2017, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Hing Piu Wong, res, v. Southern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA), ap — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 4, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated January 4, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Garvin Clarke, res, v. 750-760 Pelham Pkwy Owner, LLC. ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 21, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Miguel Martinez, res, v. Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, ap — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated May 15, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated January 16, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Young S. Park, res, v. Cowan Transport Holding ap, Vinit Jani, def — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 14, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Sung Man Park, plf-res, v. Young M. Huynh, def-res, Michael Todd Cole ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 26, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Nino C. (Anonymous), Jr. Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Nino C. (Anonymous), et al., respondents-ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Giavanna C. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Nino C. (Anonymous), et al., respondents-ap — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Jonathan D. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Nino C. (Anonymous), et al., respondents-ap — (Proceeding No. 3)MATTER of Amanda H. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Nino C. (Anonymous), et al., respondents-ap — (Proceeding No. 4) N-1705-14, N-1704-14) — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the of this Court dated January 16, 2018, in the above-entitled matters, on appeals from three orders of the Family Court, Richmond County, all dated April 3, 2017, is amended by deleting from the decretal paragraph thereof the date “February 2, 2018,” and substituting therefor the date “March 2, 2018.”SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Anonymous 1, etc., ap, v. Green Chimneys Childrens Services, res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated May 18, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Elizabeth Kasavana, ap, v. Christine Vela, res — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until February 12, 2018, to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated March 31, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 26, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.PEOPLE, etc., res, ORDER ON APPLICATION v. Timothy M. Mahoney, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered August 3, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged, and the reply brief submitted to the Clerk of the Court is accepted for filing and deemed timely served.By Dillon, J.P., Miller, Hinds-Radix, Lasalle, JJ.ORDER ON MOTION. William F. Schimoler, et al., appellants, v Phyllis Newman, etc., et al., respondents, et al., defendants.(Action No. 1)Phyllis Newman, etc., et al., respondents, v William F. Schimoler, et al., appellants.(Action No. 2)(File Nos. 2269E/13, 2269D/13) Motion by the respondents to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, dated December 22, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.DILLON, J.P., MILLER, HINDS-RADIX and LASALLE, JJ., concur.
