PEOPLE, etc., plf, v. Vinod Patel, def — (S.C.I. No. 2473/06) — Motion by the defendant for leave to reargue his prior motion for leave to reargue his application pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 21, 2016. The prior motion for leave to reargue was determined by me in a decision and order on motion of this Court dated July 17, 2017, and his application was determined by me in decision and order on application of this Court dated April 10, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.By Eng, P.J.; Leventhal, Sgroi and Lasalle, JJ.Warren D. Spinner, appellant-res, v. Carol R. Spinner, res-res — Motion by Warren D. Spinner for leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated July 27, 2017, and to stay enforcement of stated portions of the order, pending hearing and determination of the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to appeal is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to stay enforcement of stated portions of the order is granted to the extent that enforcement of so much of the order as directed Warren D. Spinner to pay Carol R. Spinner the sum of $1,351,500 and 50 percent of the face value of the Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Policy is stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal on condition that Warren D. Spinner (1) perfect the appeal on or before January 2, 2018, and (2) pay the sum of $8,000 per month to Carol R. Spinner on or before the first of each month, and that branch of the motion is otherwise denied.ENG, P.J., LEVENTHAL, SGROI and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Austin, Roman and Connolly, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Johnny Ilagorre, ap — Motion by assigned counsel to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 16, 2013, and for the assignment of new counsel. The appellant’s motion for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for assignment of counsel was granted on March 8, 2016, and the following named attorney was assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Seymour W. James, Jr., Esq.The Legal Aid Society199 Water Street – 5th FloorNew York, New York 10038Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the former assigned counsel is directed to turn over all papers in the action to new counsel herein assigned; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Martin G. Goldberg, Esq.672 Dogwood Avenue, Suite 183Franklin Square, NY 11010516-292-0380and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., AUSTIN, ROMAN and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.Lehman Brothers Bank, plf, v. Cassandra Hickson respondents defendant; VVSI Corp., nonparty-ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 24, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 9, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as trustee for Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Series 2006-AF2, plf-res, v. Patti Scivoletti, ap, GE Money Bank, et al., defendants-respondents def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered October 28, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 27, 2017, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Eva Ordentlich res, v. State of New York, ap — (Claim No. M-89773) — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Court of Claims, dated March 17, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 9, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Marissa Brooks, res, v. Joseph Brooks, ap — Appeals by Joseph Brooks from two orders of the Family Court, Suffolk County, both dated August 8, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Hema J. Hermans, Esq., dated October 4, 2017, it isORDERED that the appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeals, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeals:Marina M. Martielli, Esq.15 Woodfield AvenueE. Quogue, NY 11942631-728-2654and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the appellant at the address provided by the Court, and on or before December 14, 2017, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeals, in writing, that she has done so and that either(1) the appellant is interested in prosecuting the appeals, or(2) the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeals, or that she has been unable to contact the appellant, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeals will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the child, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeals, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeals expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that the appellant is interested in proceeding with the appeals, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeals are taken.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Malgorzata Lengiewicz, res, v. Bogdan Lengiewicz, ap — Appeal by Bogdan Lengiewicz from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated September 11, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Tiffany Moseley, Esq., dated November 13, 2017, it isORDERED that the appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Abbe Shapiro, Esq.5507-10 Nesconset Highway, Suite 212Mount Sinai, NY 11766516-330-5490and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the appellant at the address provided by the Court, and on or before December 14, 2017, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal, in writing, that she has done so and that either(1) the appellant is interested in prosecuting the appeal, or(2) the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal, or that she has been unable to contact the appellant, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the children, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the children, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that the appellant is interested in proceeding with the appeal, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Jennifer Lallas Stillwell, res, v. Elizabeth Bolin, ap — V-20776-08/16F) — Appeal by Elizabeth Bolin from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated June 7, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 2, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Gail Arroyo, ap, v. Central Islip UFSD res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 29, 2015.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 15, 2017, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Jacqueline E. S. B. (Anonymous). Childrens Aid Society, pet-res, et al., petitioner; Daniel B. (Anonymous), a/k/a Daniel B. (Anonymous) III, respondent- appellant res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Laura O. B. (Anonymous). Childrens Aid Society, pet-res, et al., petitioner; Daniel B. (Anonymous), a/k/a Daniel B. (Anonymous) III, respondent- appellant res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeals by Daniel B., a/k/a Daniel B. III, from two orders of the Family Court, Kings County, both dated May 6, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the petitioner-respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeals is enlarged until January 5, 2018; and it is furtherORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Eva M. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Lindsey M. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Lindsey M. from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated September 22, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Catherine C. DeSanto, Esq., dated November 16, 2017, it isORDERED that the appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Glenn Gucciardo, Esq.256 Main Street, Suite 206Northport, NY 11768631-262-6911and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the appellant at the address provided by the Court, and on or before December 14, 2017, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal, in writing, that he has done so and that either(1) the appellant is interested in prosecuting the appeal, or(2) the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal, or that he has been unable to contact the appellant, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment;and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the child, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that the appellant is interested in proceeding with the appeal, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.PEOPLE, etc., respondent v. Nicholas Clark, ap — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, rendered January 3, 2017Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 15, 2017, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.US Bank National Association, as trustee for Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-HE3, res, v. Esther Wilson ap, et al., def — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered February 24, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 15, 2017, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Joel T. (Anonymous), res, v. Miriam T. (Anonymous), ap — O-5388-15, O-4592-16) — Appeal by Miriam T. from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated January 26, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 5, 2018; and it is furtherORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Esther M. Conroy, petitioner- res, v. Annemarie D. Conroy, ap, John R. Conroy, res-res — Appeal by Annemarie D. Conroy from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated November 21, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent Esther M. Conroy to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 5, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Tyrone P. Lee, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered April 6, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until December 15, 2017, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Laundry Management – N. 3rd Street, Inc., res, v. BFN Realty Associates, LLC, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until December 15, 2017, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Anthony Vaccaro, res, v. Town of Islip appellants def — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated February 1, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 15, 2017, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Robert Aiello, res, v. Chantelle Chaffatt, ap — O-14267-15/17D, O-14267-15/17C, O-14267-15/17B) — Appeals by Chantelle Chaffatt from two orders of the Family Court, Kings County, both dated September 11, 2017.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeals in the above-entitled proceedings on the ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party (see CPLR 5511), by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before December 21, 2017; and it is further,
