Blaise Heid ap, v. Renwood Associates, Inc. res — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 25, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 2, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Wachel Masyr & Missry, LLP res, v. Laureen Harris, ap — Separate applications by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file their respective briefs on appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 22, 2017, and an order of the same court entered April 11, 2017, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the applications and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the applications are granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file their respective briefs is enlarged until January 5, 2018, and the respondents’ briefs shall be served and filed on or before that date.Joaquin Garcia res-ap, v. Peter Garcia, appellant-res — (Action No. 1)Peter J. Garcia, appellant-res, v. Michael Garcia res-ap, Brooklyn Properties 21, LLC ap — (Action No. 2)— Application by the respondents-appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until January 12, 2018, to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 1, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the applicants’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 28, 2017, the applicants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.PEOPLE, etc., res, ORDER ON APPLICATION v. Timothy M. Mahoney, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered August 3, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until December 29, 2017, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Guoping Wan res, v. Xiaochi Jiang ap — Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered February 2, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 29, 2017, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MATTER of Michael Matthew Mendez, res, v. Lesly Limas, ap — Appeal by Lesly Limas from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated May 18, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 9, 2018.By Dillon, J.P.; Balkin, Miller and Lasalle, JJ.Ana Ospina-Cherner, res, v. Daniel Cherner, ap — 2016-11736Ana Ospina-Cherner, respondent,v Daniel Cherner, appellant.(Index No. 2454/13) Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 29, 2016, in effect, on the ground that the appellant’s appendix and the appellant’s brief contains or refers to matter dehors the record, or, in the alternative, to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief. Cross motion by the appellant to consolidate the appeal from the order dated September 29, 2016, with an appeal from a judgment of the same court dated January 20, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the cross motion, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to dismiss the appeal from the order dated September 29, 2016, is denied on condition that on or before January 2, 2018, the appellant serve and file a replacement appellant’s appendix which contains the papers filed in connection with the motion that was determined by the order dated September 29, 2016, and does not contain motion papers which were not filed in connection with that motion, and serve and file a replacement brief which does not refer to matter dehors the record and raises issues only regarding the motion that was determined by the order dated September 29, 2016; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief in connection with the appeal from the order dated September 29, 2016, is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 1, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the cross motion is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeals will be calendared together and will be argued or submitted on the same date.DILLON, J.P., BALKIN, MILLER and LASALLE, JJ., concur.Fantasy Music & Entertainment, Inc., ap, v. Judy Abraham, res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 14, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 29, 2017, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America, res, v. Joseph Gluck appellants def — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 120-day enlargement of time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 20, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 13, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America, res, v. Joseph Gluck appellants def — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 120-day enlargement of time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 23, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 13, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.JNG Construction, Ltd., res, v. George Roussopoulos, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 106-day enlargement of time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, entered May 5, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 5, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Nicole J. Likos, res, v. William v. Likos, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered March 30, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 8, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Nicole J. Likos, res, v. William v. Likos, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered December 8, 2015.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 8, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Nicole J. Likos, res, v. William v. Likos, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered March 30, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 8, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Nicole J. Likos, etc., res, v. William v. Likos, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered August 11, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 8, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Yoram Gafni, ap, v. Deanna M. Huczel Gafni, a/k/a Deanna M. Huczel, res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a six-month enlargement of time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered March 1, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 22, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.One West Bank, FSB, ap, v. Susan Rosenberg, et al, res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered December 22, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 29, 2017, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Capital One, N.A., res, v. 1610 Avenue S, LLC appellants def — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 24, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 9, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Yolanda Lindo, plf-ap, v. Milton P. Lindo, Sr., res, The Virdone Law Firm, P.C., nonparty-ap — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 5, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 19, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Ioptimize Realty, Inc., formerly known as Dysal, Inc., res, v. Dealertrack Technologies, Inc., formerly known as Dealertrack Holdings, Inc., ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated April 28, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 23, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Rod Behren, Esq., res, v. Parker Waichman, LLP, appellant def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 17, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 9, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Bruce Mello, plf-res, v. Long Island Vitreo-Retinal Consultant, P.C. def-res, Opthalmic Consultants of Long Island ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 19, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 16, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Cheryl Gold, appellant plf, v. Neoland Kitchen Bath and Stone Freeport, Inc., doing business as Neoland Kitchen and Bath, a/k/a Neoland Kitchen Bath and Stone, Inc. respondents def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 90-day enlargement of time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 14, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 22, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America, res, v. Antoinette Fisher def, Paul Lewin, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated April 18, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 18, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Sam Stathis, plf-ap, v. The Estate of Donald Karas, by and through his heirs, Nancy Bloom and Charles Karas defendants third-party plaintiffs-res, Aries, LLC, third-party def-ap — Application by the plaintiff-appellant and the third-party defendants-appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated May 9, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the applicants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 17, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the applicants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Elia Rivera, ap, v. New York City Health and Hospital Corporation res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 3, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 29, 2017, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Kevin Edwards, ap — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 14, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 19, 2017, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Boanerges Melendez-Torres, ap — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered August 5, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarge until January 3, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be filed on or before that date.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Jerome A. Mack, ap — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.(8)(2) for an enlargement of time until January 27, 2018, to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered June 1, 2015.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and filed a brief is enlarged until December 20, 2017, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Bank of America, National Association, res, v. Susan Schwartz appellants def — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, both dated February 14, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until December 27, 2017, and the record or appendix on the appeals and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Nella Manko, ap, v. Bernard H. Broome res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until January 22, 2018, to perfect appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 8, 2017, and February 24, 2017, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until December 22, 2017, the record or appendix on the appeals and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Dianne Kusold, res, v. Joseph Kusold, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 4, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 18, 2017, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Andrew I. Rossnagel, plf-res, v. Edward Kelly, defendant third-party plaintiff- res, Stationery Engineers ap, Lincoln Electric Products Co., Inc., defendant- res, Jayesh K. Patel, third-party defendant- res — Application by the plaintiff-respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated September 15, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the applicant’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 20, 2017, and the applicant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, not in its individual capacity but solely as trustee of Primestar-H Fund I Trust, res, v. Margarita Carbal-Davis, appellant def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 22, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 2, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MATTER of Carolyn Anderson, pet-res, v. Board of Education of the Oyster Bay East Norwich Central School District appellants res — Application by the petitioner-respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 19, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the applicant’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 29, 2017, and the applicant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MATTER of Mia v. O. (Anonymous), a/k/a Mia H. (Anonymous). New York Foundling Hospital petitioners- res, Dora O. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Dora O. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated May 17, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 11, 2018.MATTER of Arjan Gazaferi pet-res, v. Eden Wilson, res-res — Appeal by Eden Wilson from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated March 16, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until December 27, 2017.MATTER of T. N. (Anonymous). Rockland County Department of Social Services, pet-res — Alec N. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Alec N. from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated June 14, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until December 21, 2017.MATTER of Pauline R. Cameron, res, v. Garry King, ap — Appeal by Garry King from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated January 17, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on November 27, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed within 30 days of the date of this order.Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee for Soundview Home Loan Trust 2006-OPT2, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-OPT2, res, v. Ronald v. Gallo, appellant def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered March 17, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 8, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Deborah Benjamin, res, v. Edward Assad ap — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 22, 2017, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MATTER of George Maragos, as Comptroller of the County of Nassau, res, v. Town of Hempstead, et al., ap — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 25, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 27, 2017, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Bank of New York Mellon, ap, v. Taramattie Bissessar, res, et al., def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 30-day enlargement of time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 31, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until December 15, 2017, the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Norma Evans, res, v. The City of Mt. Vernon, def, 120 East Prospect Avenue, LLC, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated February 21, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until December 14, 2017, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.HSBC, National Association, as trustee for Deutsche Bank ALT-A, etc., res, v. Joyce Maniatopoulos, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 30-day enlargement of time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 24, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until December 18, 2017, the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee on behalf of BCAP, LLC, Trust 2007-AA1, res, v. Romanie Abrahim, appellant def — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered November 14, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 10, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.By Eng, P.J.MATTER of Donna M. Stones, ap, v. Erick J. Vandenberge, res — Appeal by Donna M. Stones from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated August 8, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Courtney Voses, Esq., dated September 15, 2017, it isORDERED that pursuant to Family Court Act §1120, the following named attorney is assigned as the attorney for the child on the appeal:John M. Zenir, Esq.990 Westbury Road, Suite 202Westbury, NY 11590and it is further,ORDERED that Courtney Voses, Esq., is directed to turn over all papers in the proceeding to the new attorney for the child herein assigned.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Malkie Wiederman, ap, v. Isaac Halpert res — Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 3, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 26, 2017, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MATTER of Angelique Guerra, ap, v. Douglas Oakes, res — Appeal by Angelique Guerra from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated April 12, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until December 20, 2017.MATTER of City of Rye ap, v. Westchester County Board of Legislators, et al., res — Application by the respondents Westchester County Board of Legislators and Westchester County Planning Department pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 20, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the applicants’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 3, 2018, and the applicants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Juan Hernandez, ap — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered July 23, 2014.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 12, 2017, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Fern Gervasi res, v. Jackie Zorcik, ap — Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated September 5, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 5, 2018, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Thomas John, derivatively, on behalf of Dutchess Gardens Realty, LLC, ap, v. George Varughese, etc., res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 15, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 12, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Hector Luna, ap, v. 4300 Crescent, LLC, et al, res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered April 13, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 8, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Estate of Norman Perlman, ap, v. Peter J. Kelley, etc., res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until February 4, 2018, to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 22, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 3, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.MATTER of Michael M. L. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, MacThaddeus L. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeals by MacThaddeus L. from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, dated August 25, 2017, and September 5, 2017, respectively. By order on certification of this Court dated October 25, 2017, the following attorney was assigned as counsel for the appellant on the appeals:Ronna Gordon-Galchus, Esq.61-43 186th StreetFresh Meadows, NY 11365718-229-2628By letter dated November 28, 2017, the assigned counsel has informed this Court that the appellant wishes to proceed with the appeals. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeals in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeals; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcripts have been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcripts have not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order of this Court dated October 25, 2017, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeals is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcripts are expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeals; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeals to show cause why the appeals should or should not be dismissed.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Shelley R. Eaddy, ap, v. U.S. Bank National Association res — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the order on application of this Court dated November 27, 2017, in the above-entitled case is recalled and vacated, and the following order on application is substituted therefor:Application by the respondents Steven J. Baum, P.C., and Charles D. J. Case, and separate application by the respondents U.S. Bank National Association, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Hogan Lovells US, LLP, and Jordan Estes, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file their respective briefs on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated August 8, 2016, and September 13, 2016, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the applications and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the applications are granted, the applicants’ time to serve and file their respective briefs is enlarged until January 5, 2018, and the applicants’ briefs shall be served and filed on or before that date.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Hall, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Yehuda Michael, ap, v. Feixia Wei-Fisher, res — F-1160-15/16C) — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated July 3, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the children, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the children, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to Family Court Act §1120 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Andrew W. Szczesniak, Esq.222 Mamaroneck Avenue, Suite 104White Plains, NY 10605and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to 670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), within 30 days after the date of this decision and order on motion, the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that this decision and order on motion has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, the Clerk of the Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.BALKIN, J.P., HALL, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Lasalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Joseph Dixon, ap — Renewed motion by the appellant pro se on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 19, 2017, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel. By order to show cause dated October 17, 2017, the appellant was directed to show cause before this Court why the appeal should not be dismissed on the ground that the notice of appeal from the judgment was untimely, counsel was assigned to respond to the order to show cause, and the appellant’s motion was held in abeyance in the interim. Motion by the appellant pursuant to CPL 460.30 for an extension of time to take the appeal.Now, upon the order to show cause and the papers filed in response thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the motions and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s motions are granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s moving papers are deemed to constitute a timely notice of appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that, upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Austin, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Nicholas DeJesus, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se, in effect, to restore to active status an appeal from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County, imposed September 10, 2009, which was deemed abandoned pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(f), for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant is directed (1) to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appeal has been abandoned, by filing an affirmation or an affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court on or before February 2, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to respond to the order to show cause:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street, 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s motion is held in abeyance pending determination of this Court’s motion to dismiss the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court, or the trial court’s designee if that stenographer is no longer available, is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of the imposition of resentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9), unless the making of any of such transcripts is no longer possible, in which case the stenographer of the trial court, or the trial court’s designee, shall file with the clerk of the trial court an affidavit setting forth which proceeding(s) cannot be transcribed; and it is further,ORDERED that, with respect to the proceedings set forth above, the clerk of the trial court shall furnish to assigned counsel (1) one certified transcript of the proceedings, without charge (see CPL 460.70), and/or (2) a copy of the affidavit stating that the making of a transcript is no longer possible; assigned counsel is directed to turn over any such transcripts to the respondent when counsel files papers in response to this order to show cause; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that, upon service of a copy of this order to show cause upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s resentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in papers filed in response to this order to show cause, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to this Court and the respondent prior to the filing of such papers; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of responding to this order to show cause; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court or her designee is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the appellant at the appellant’s last known place of residence or, if the appellant is imprisoned, at the institution in which the appellant is confined, upon the attorney who last appeared for the appellant, upon the attorney named above, and upon the District Attorney, by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2).DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur. MATTER of Alexandria F. (Anonymous). Nassau County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, George R. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Adalila R. (Anonymous). Nassau County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, George R. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of George R. (Anonymous). Nassau County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, George R. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 3)MATTER of Adalila R.-S. (Anonymous), res-ap, v. George R. (Anonymous), appellant-res, Chastity M. (Anonymous), et al., res-res — (Proceeding No. 4) N-11060-12, N-10352-11, N-11061-12, N-10352, V-9379-13, V9380-13) — Appeal by George R., and cross appeal by Adalila R.-S., from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated August 30, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent-appellant Adalila R.-S. to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 5, 2018.MATTER of Malachi M. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Mark M. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Malique R. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Mark M. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by Mark M. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated May 18, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 2, 2018.MATTER of Maria T. Olivari, res, v. Alan R. Bianco, ap — Appeal by Alan R. Bianco from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated December 1, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 19, 2018.By Chambers, J.P.; Roman, Miller and Duffy, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Nicole L. Smith, ap — Renewed motion by the appellant pro se on an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered June 12, 2017, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied, with leave to renew upon proper papers, including the appellant’s affidavit setting forth the amount and source of counsel fees paid to retained counsel in the County Court.CHAMBERS, J.P., ROMAN, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Austin, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.Miguel Martinez, res, v. Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, ap — Motion by the appellant to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated May 15, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Austin, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.Avery Stone, res, v. Bloomberg L.P., ap, et al., def — Motion by the appellant to stay all discovery in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated May 11, 2017, or, in the alternative, for a preference in the calendaring of the appeal. Separate motion by the appellant to stay all proceedings in the above-entitled action, including discovery, pending determination of the appellant’s motion, inter alia, to stay all discovery.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion to stay all discovery or, in the alternative, for a preference in the calendaring of the appeal and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the motion to stay all proceedings and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to stay all discovery is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for a preference in the calendaring of the appeal is granted and the appeal will be calendared expeditiously after all of the briefs have been filed; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion to stay all proceedings is denied as academic.DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Hall, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Kenton Sherwood, ap — Motion by the appellant for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered November 17, 2014, as a poor person.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of any hearing held in connection with the judgment rendered November 17, 2014, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s retained counsel, Scott G. Cerbin, Esq., PLLC, 16 Court Street, Suite 2901, Brooklyn, New York 11241, without charge (see CPL 460.70); retained counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; the appellant’s counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the Clerk of the Court from which the appeal is taken.BALKIN, J.P., HALL, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Lasalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Daniel Cruz, ap — Motion by the appellant for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County, rendered September 19, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:James D. Licata, Esq.Office of the Public Defender11 New Hempstead RoadNew City, New York 10956-3664and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Lasalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Joel Fernandez, ap — Motion by Joel Fernandez pursuant to CPL 460.30 for an extension of time to take an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered August 28, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the moving papers are deemed to constitute a timely notice of appeal.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Miller, Hinds-Radix and Lasalle, JJ.Amelia Arcamone-Makinano, appellant- res, Bonifacio Aguja Makinano, res, v. Britton Property, Inc. respondents-ap — 2016-09760Amelia Arcamone-Makinano respondents,v Britton Property, Inc. appellants.(Index No. 32984/09)Motion by Amelia Arcamone-Makinano on an appeal and a cross appeal from a decision and order (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered April 18, 2016, and an appeal from a judgment of the same court entered July 27, 2016, to dismiss the appeal from the judgment for failure to timely perfect. Cross motion by Britton Property, Inc., and Tsan Chih Chou to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal from the judgment.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the cross motion, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal and cross appeal from the decision and order entered April 18, 2016, are consolidated with the appeal from the judgment entered July 27, 2016, and the joint appendix and the briefs filed in connection with the cross appeal from the decision and order are deemed also to be filed in connection with the appeal from the judgment; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion and the cross motion are denied as academic.CHAMBERS, J.P., MILLER, HINDS-RADIX and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Beverly Hayden, plf-res, v. James F. Flowers, def-res, Coling Medical Transport, Inc. ap — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 6, 2016.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated November 29, 2017, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Inna Karaseva res, v. EAN Holdings, LLC def, Edward J. Molloy, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw appeals from three orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, all dated May 3, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeals are marked withdrawn.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Erica M. Lenihan, ap, v. Solicito and Sons Contracting Corp. res — Application by the appellant for leave to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated May 9, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Robert Northrup res, v. LILCO, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 2, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.ZB, N.A., doing business as Zions Bank, res, v. JI and ED, LLC, a New York Limited Liability Company ap, et al., def — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 20, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Jonathan A. Korn, res, v. Richard Reinhardt, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated February 6, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, res, v. Jeffrey Spellman, ap — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 16, 2015.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated November 27, 2017, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Iannacci, J.PEOPLE, etc., plf, v. Steven Henderson, def — Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 22, 2017, which has been referred to me for determination.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is denied.Frasada, Inc. res, v. Chrisla Realty, Inc. ap — Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 21, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 26, 2017, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Violet Suk, res-ap, v. George Comfort and Sons, Inc. appellants-res, Excel Security Corp. res — Application by the respondent-appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 30-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 2, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the applicant’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 18, 2017, and the applicant’s brief, including the points of argument on the cross appeal (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]), shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Ellen Bohner, ap, v. Richard Bohner, Jr., res — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 45-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated September 21, 2016, and a judgment of the same court dated September 22, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 19, 2017, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Bank United, FSB, res, v. Larisa Verbitsky, ap, et al., def — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR670670.08(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 23, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 27, 2017, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Matter of Jennifer Lavin, res, v. Incorporated Village of Muttontown ap — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 16, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged, and the reply brief submitted to the Clerk of the Court is accepted for filing and deemed timely served.Michael Vorobeichik, ap, v. Greenpoint Goldman SM, LLC, res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 21, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until December 8, 2017, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.By Chambers, J.P.; Cohen, Maltese and Barros, JJ.Thomas Butterfield, ap, v. Huntington Union Free School District, res — Appeal by Thomas Butterfield from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated April 8, 2016. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated December 22, 2016, the respondent’s motion to dismiss the appeal was denied on condition that on or before February 6, 2017, the appellant serve and file a supplemental appellant’s appendix containing the papers submitted by the parties in connection with the motion that resulted in the order dated April 8, 2016. By order to show cause dated March 10, 2017, this Court directed the parties to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with the decision and order on motion of this Court dated December 22, 2016. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated June 12, 2017, the motion to dismiss the appeal was denied and the appellant’s time to serve and file the supplemental appendix was extended until July 12, 2017. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated September 1, 2017, the appellant’s time to serve and file the supplemental appendix was extended until October 30, 2017. The appellant has not filed the supplemental appendix.Now, on the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to comply with the decisions and orders on motion of this Court dated December 22, 2016, June 12, 2017, and September 1, 2017.CHAMBERS, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Jessica Teelucksingh, res, v. Peter Teelucksingh, ap — ORDERED that the of this Court dated November 16, 2017, in the above-entitled appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated September 8, 2015, and September 10, 2015, respectively, is amended by deleting from the second paragraph thereof the date “November 27, 2017,” and substituting therefor the date “December 4, 2017.”ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Leslie Gay, Jr., as administrator of the estate of Denise Gay, etc., respondent, v The City of New York, et al., appellants.Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 28-day enlargement of time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 24, 2017. .Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until December 18, 2017, the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Matter of Yolanda Ashkenazie, appellant, v The City of New York, et al., respondents.Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 4, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 28, 2017, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.By Hall, J.The People, etc., plaintiff, v Jonathan Elwell, defendant.Motion by the defendant pursuant to CPL 530.45 to be released on his own recognizance, or in the alternative, to fix bail after his conviction in the County Court, Rockland County, upon a jury verdict, on September 19, 2017, of assault in the second degree and vehicular assault in the second degree.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the motion is denied.
