By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Pison B. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Raleigh B. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Raleigh B. from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated March 28, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until April 30, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Roger W. Strnad, Jr., res, v. Lesley B. Stevens, ap — Appeal by Lesley B. Stevens from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated October 26, 2017. Pursuant to §670.9(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[a][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 1, 2018.MATTER of Avery M. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Carlina W. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Carlina W. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated February 9, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the respondent-appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the respondent-appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the respondent-appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the respondent-appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the respondent-appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Mia v. O. (Anonymous), etc. New York Foundling Hospital pet-res, Dora O. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Dora O. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated May 17, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the petitioners-respondents to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until April 30, 2018.MATTER of Kafayat N. D. (Anonymous). Childrens Aid Society, petitioner-res, Karlene N. D. (Anonymous), respondent- appellant res — Appeal by Kafayat N. D. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated November 8, 2017. By decision and order on certification of this Court dated March 12, 2018, the following attorney was assigned as counsel for the appellant on the appeal:Deana Balahtsis805 Third Avenue, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10022212-588-1002By letter dated March 26, 2018, the assigned counsel has informed this Court that the appellant wishes to proceed with the appeal. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcripts has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order on certification of this Court dated March 12, 2018, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Skylar M. (Anonymous). Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Heidi M. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Heidi M. from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated February 27, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the respondent-appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the respondent-appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the respondent-appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the respondent-appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the respondent-appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Madeline Garcia, ap, v. Maritza Lopez-Garcia res — V-7982-13, V-7983-13, V-7984-13, V-1985-13, V-7986-13, V7987-13, V-7988-13) — Appeal by Madeline Garcia from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated March 16, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Madeline Garcia, ap, v. Maritza Lopez-Garcia res — Appeal by Madeline Garcia from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated March 16, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Denise Brady, res, v. Raymond A. White, ap — Appeal by Raymond A. White from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated January 28, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Melvin A. M. R. (Anonymous), ap — Appeal by Melvin A. M. R. from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated February 7, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Jean Jumeau Estime, ap, v. Marie Suze Civil, res — Appeal by Jean Jumeau Estime from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated February 28, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Louis H. Saunders, Jr., ap, v. Latoy Scott, res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Latoy Scott, res, v. Louis Saunders, ap — (Proceeding No. 2) V-1316-17, V-1317-17) — Appeal by Louis H. Saunders, Jr., a/k/a Louis Saunders, from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated February 26, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Deya Alrahman Abdullah Ali Al-Dalali, res, v. Natalia A. Rivera, ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Natalia A. Rivera, ap, v. Deya Alrahman Abdullah Ali Al-Dalali, res — (Proceeding No. 2) V-885-09/15I, V-885-09/17J, V-7865-09/15J) — Appeals by Natalia A. Rivera from three orders of the Family Court, Queens County, all dated February 14, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeals in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeals; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeals, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeals as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeals; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeals to show cause why the appeals should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Emilienne McCook, res, v. Gregory McCook, ap — Appeal by Gregory McCook from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated March 8, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Chambers, J.P.; Austin, Miller and Maltese, JJ.Imelda Bitar, res, v. Yorkshire Realty, LLC, appellant-res, P.S. Convenience Store, res-res — Motion by P.S. Convenience Store to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered November 29, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the trial in the above-entitled action is stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal and cross appeal on condition that P.S. Convenience Store perfect its appeal on or before May 2, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the appeal is not perfected on or before May 2, 2018, the Court, on its own motion, may vacate the stay, without further notice, or the respondent may move to vacate the stay, on three days notice.CHAMBERS, J.P., AUSTIN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Yosepha K. (Anonymous), etc. Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Chana D. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Rivah K. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Chana D. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by Chana D. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated May 2, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the children to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until April 30, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ. MATTER of Taylor P. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Kevin R. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeals by Kevin R. from two orders of the Family Court, Richmond County, both dated September 20, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeals is enlarged until April 30, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Jamayla C. M. (Anonymous). New York Foundling Hospital, petitioner- res, Marcela A. C. (Anonymous), a/k/a Marcella C. (Anonymous), etc., res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Marcela C. R. (Anonymous). New York Foundling Hospital, petitioner- res, Marcela A. C. (Anonymous), a/k/a Marcella C. (Anonymous), etc., res-res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeals by Marcela A. C., a/k/a Marcela C., from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, both dated May 17, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the children to serve and file a brief on the appeals is enlarged until May 4, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Neal N. McKenzie, res, v. Kenika Williams, ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Kenika Williams, ap, v. Neal N. McKenzie, res — (Proceeding No. 2) V-01257-15/16B, V-01256-15/16C, V-01257-15/16C, V-01256-15/16C, V-01257-15/16C, V-01256-15/16E, V-01257-15/16E) — Appeal by Kenika Williams from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated August 17, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until April 30, 2018.Donna Athenas, appellant v. Simon Property Group, LP res, et al., def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated March 22, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged, and the reply brief submitted to the Clerk of the Court is accepted for filing and deemed timely served.MATTER of Nicole Haims, appellant-res, v. John Lehmann, res-res — Appeal by Nicole Haims and cross appeal by John Lehmann from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated December 18, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant-respondent’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant-respondent’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 3, 2018.MATTER of Julie Migliore, res, v. Marc Santiago, ap — Appeal by Marc Santiago from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated July 6, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until April 27, 2018.MATTER of Jennifer S. Loggia, res, v. Michael P. Verardo, ap — Appeals by Michael P. Verardo from two orders of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, (IDV Part), both dated July 5, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeals to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeals is enlarged until April 30, 2018.MATTER of Noely Diaz, ap, v. Gus Rodriguez, res — Appeal by Noely Diaz from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated January 17, 2018. The appellant’ brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on March 27, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the brief for the respondent in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.MATTER of Olivier Wright, res, v. Kashuana Perry, ap — V-12678-13/16F) — Appeals by Kashuana Perry from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, dated August 17, 2017, and September 20, 2017, respectively. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on March 27, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the child in the above-entitled appeals shall be served and filed.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Gricel R. (Anonymous), ap, v. Felix R. (Anonymous) res — Appeal by Gricel R. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated July 21, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until April 26, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Andrew S. (Anonymous), ap — Appeal by Andrew S. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated July 28, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on March 26, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the brief for the respondent in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.Michelle Levitin, res, v. Joshua Levitin, ap — Appeal by Joshua Levitin from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered September 20, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on March 26, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the children in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.MATTER of Kevin D. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner; Quran S. S. (Anonymous), res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Wilhelmenia D. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Quran S. S. (Anonymous), respondent- ap — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Charisma D. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Quran S. S. (Anonymous), respondent- ap — (Proceeding No. 3) — Appeals by Quran S. S. from two orders of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated October 5, 2017, and October 17, 2017, respectively. Pursuant to §670.9(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeals to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[a][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeals is enlarged until May 1, 2018.Daniel Cafferata, ap, v. Gerilyn Cafferata, res — Appeals by Daniel Cafferata from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated April 13, 2017, and a judgment of the same court dated July 26, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeals is enlarged until May 16, 2018.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Matthew D. (Anonymous), ap, v. Lisa D. (Anonymous), res — Appeal by Matthew D. from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated December 12, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Adam Paltrowitz, dated February 21, 2018, it isORDERED that pursuant to Family Court Act §1120, the following named attorney is assigned as the attorney for the child on the appeal:Kelley M. Enderley301 Manchester Road, Suite 203Poughkeepsie, NY 12603845-485-7530and it is further,ORDERED that Adam Paltrowitz, is directed to turn over all papers in the proceeding to the new attorney for the child herein assigned.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Matthew D. (Anonymous), ap, v. Lisa D. (Anonymous), res — Appeal by Matthew D. from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated December 12, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Anne E. Hunter, dated February 20, 2018, it isORDERED that the respondent is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to respond to the appeal:Warren S. Hecht118-21 Queens Blvd.Forest Hills NY 11375718-575-8712and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the respondent at the address provided by the Court, and shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal on or before April 16, 2018, in writing, that he has done so and that either(1) the respondent is interested in responding to the appeal, or(2) the respondent is not interested in responding to the appeal, or that he has beenunable to contact the respondent, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Alfred Lamce plf-res, v. Salmar Properties, LLC, appellant defendant third-party plaintiff-res, Allran Electric of NY, LLC, third-party def-res — Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 5, 2017.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until June 1, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Austin, Connolly and Iannacci, JJ.Wells Fargo Bank, res, v. Eric Armstead, appellant def — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated December 16, 2016, for failure to comply with a decision and order on motion of this Court dated December 13, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant’s time to comply with the decision and order on motion of this Court dated December 13, 2017, is extended and on or before April 15, 2018, the appellant serve and file a supplemental record on appeal which contains all of the motion papers, with annexed exhibits, that resulted in the order dated December 16, 2016, and that are not contained in the record previously filed; and it is further,ORDERED that no further extension of time to comply with the decision and order on motion of this Court dated December 13, 2017, shall be granted; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 7, 2018, and the respondent’s brief, if any, shall be served and filed on or before that date.RIVERA, J.P., AUSTIN, CONNOLLY and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Calvin Liriano, res, v. Natashia Jere Reed, ap — Appeal by Natashia Jere Reed from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated January 25, 2018.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party (see CPLR 5511).SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Karina Thior, res, v. Abdou Thior, ap — Appeal by Abdou Thior from a decision of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated January 11, 2018.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies from a decision (see Schicchi v. J.A. Green Constr. Co., 100 AD2d 509).SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Yolanda Powell, ap, v. Leona Burg, res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a clerk’s extract of the minutes of a jury verdict of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 25, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from a clerk’s extract of the minutes of a jury verdict (see CPLR 5512[a]; Rockman v. Brosnan, 280 AD2d 591); and it is further,ORDERED that the application is denied.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Leventhal, Sgroi and Cohen, JJ.MATTER of Cameron McC. (Anonymous). Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Alicia S. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Jade McC. (Anonymous). Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Alicia S. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Jonathan McC. (Anonymous). Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Alicia S. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 3) — Motion by the respondent-appellant pro se, inter alia, to recall and vacate a decision and order on motion of this Court dated August 27, 2014, which, inter alia, dismissed an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated December 15, 2011.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, SGROI and COHEN, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Cohen, Miller and Maltese, JJ.MATTER of Donna M. Stones, ap, v. Erick J. Vandenberge, res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated August 8, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 2, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.CHAMBERS, J.P., COHEN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Austin, J.P.; Cohen, Miller and Maltese, JJ.MATTER of Justin A. G. M. (Anonymous). Edwin Gould Services for Children and Families, petitioner-respondent petitioner; Richard G. v. (Anonymous), res-res — Motion by the petitioner-respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated May 2, 2017, for failure to timely perfect.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.AUSTIN, J.P., COHEN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.MATTER of Stefanie F. (Anonymous), res, v. Leon H. (Anonymous), ap — Appeal by Leon H. from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated July 25, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 16, 2018.By Chambers, J.P.; Austin, Miller and Maltese, JJ.MATTER of Raquel D. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Elizeth P. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Jonathan L. P. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Elizeth P. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Leonardo L. P. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Elizeth P. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 3) — Appeal by Elizeth P. from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated August 2, 2017. By order to show cause dated February 23, 2018, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings for failure to comply with a decision and order on motion of this Court dated January 2, 2018, issued pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).Now, upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to comply with the decision and order on motion of this Court dated January 2, 2018, issued pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).CHAMBERS, J.P., AUSTIN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Austin, Miller and Maltese, JJ.MATTER of Gerard P. Salvatore, res, v. Pamela C. Frawley, ap — Appeal by Pamela C. Frawley from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated June 12, 2017. By order to show cause dated February 23, 2018, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings for failure to comply with a of this Court dated August 21, 2017, issued pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).Now, upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to comply with the of this Court dated August 21, 2017, issued pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).CHAMBERS, J.P., AUSTIN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Austin, Miller and Maltese, JJ.MATTER of Cecile D. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Kassia D. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant; Cheryl v. (Anonymous), nonparty-res — (and another title) — Appeals by Kassia D. from two orders of the Family Court, Kings County, both dated November 15, 2017. By order to show cause dated February 23, 2018, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeals in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with a dated January 4, 2018, issued pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]). Motion by the appellant pro se for poor person relief and for the assignment of counsel.Now, upon the order to show cause and the papers filed in response thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the appellant’s motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeals is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s motion is denied, with leave to renew on or before May 2, 2018, upon proper papers, including the appellant’s affidavit setting forth the appellant’s full financial situation including all assets, both real and personal, as well as any and all sources of income and expenses; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), on or before May 2, 2018, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeals; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeals, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeals as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, as set forth above; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeals; and it is further,ORDERED that if the appellant fails to file the affidavit or affirmation on or before May 2, 2018, as set forth above, the Court will dismiss the appeals, without further notice.CHAMBERS, J.P., AUSTIN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.Robert Berger, ap, v. David O. Oweh res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 2, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Levites Family, L.P., plf-res, v. Rosa Perez defendants-res, John J. Li nonparty-ap — Application by the nonparty-appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated may 31, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Isabella J. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Ernesto J. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Abigail A. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Ernesto J. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by Ernesto J. from an unsigned transcript of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated February 22, 2018.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies from an unsigned transcript (see Ojeda v. Metropolitan Playhouse, Inc., 120 AD2d 717).SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Oleg Melnik, res-ap, v. Mikhail Unik, res, Corporate Design of America, PC, def, Alex & Tom Construction and Renovations, Inc., appellant-res — Application by the appellant-respondent on an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 21, 2017, to withdraw the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal by the appellant-respondent is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Markell W. (Anonymous), ap — Application by the appellant for leave to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated July 18, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Emma Daniels-Cooke, res, v. Derrick Murray ap — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 4, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated March 28, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Sgroi, Lasalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.MATTER of Younas Shahid, ap, v. State of New York, Division of Housing and Community Renewal res — Motion by the respondent State of New York, Division of Housing and Community Renewal to dismiss an appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered December 15, 2017, on the ground that no appeal lies from an order in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., SGROI, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Bednark Studios, Inc., plf-res, v. Advanced JAF Holding, LLC, defendant third-party plaintiff-appellant; Meyers & Howard Design, Inc., etc., third-party def-res — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 2, 2016.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated March 27, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Luis Herranz, appellant-res, v. Sandra Longa, res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Sandra Longa, res-ap, v. Luis Herranz, appellant-res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Application on an appeal and cross appeal from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, both dated January 3, 2018, to withdraw the cross appeal under Appellate Division Docket No. 2018-01880.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the cross appeal under Appellate Division Docket No. 2018-01880 is marked withdrawn.By Leventhal, J.P.; Sgroi, Lasalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Rebecca Geffner, etc., ap, v. Mercy Medical Center respondents def — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 8, 2017, for leave to serve and file an oversized reply brief of 11,950 words, and to strike the brief filed by the respondent Harte Placements, Inc., as well as stated portions of the briefs filed by the other respondents on the ground that they refer to matter dehors the record and contain offending statements.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until April 13, 2018, the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are for leave to serve and file an oversized reply brief of 11,950 words and to strike the brief filed by the respondent Harte Placements, Inc., as well as stated portions of the briefs filed by the other respondents, are denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., SGROI, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Sgroi, Lasalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, etc., res, v. Joel Sucher ap, et al., def — Motion by the appellants to strike the respondent’s brief or direct the respondent to serve and file a replacement brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated February 3, 2017, on the ground that the respondent’s brief refers to matter dehors the record, and to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to strike the respondent’s brief or direct the respondent to serve and file a replacement brief is granted to the extent that footnote 2 on page 10 and all references to the letter referred to in that footnote are stricken, on or before May 2, 2018, the respondent shall delete the stricken material from the copies of the respondent’s brief filed with the Clerk of this Court, and that branch of the motion is otherwise denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief is granted, the appellants’ time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until May 14, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.LEVENTHAL, J.P., SGROI, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Austin, Miller and Maltese, JJ.Irini Laskaratos, etc., ap, v. Bay Ridge Hoyt Lender, LLC res — Motion by the respondents to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 28, 2017, on the ground that the appellant’s appendix is inadequate, or to direct the appellant to serve and file a supplemental appellant’s appendix and to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to dismiss the appeal is denied on condition that on or before May 2, 2018, the appellant serve and file a supplemental appellant’s appendix containing the material listed in paragraph 16 of page 5 of the affirmation in support of the respondents’ motion; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until June 1, 2018, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.CHAMBERS, J.P., AUSTIN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Ronald Ackridge, ap — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the decision and order on motion of this Court dated August 14, 2018, which granted the appellant’s motion for leave to serve and file a pro se supplemental brief on an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered October 18, 2016, is recalled and vacated; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s motion for leave to serve and file a supplemental pro se brief is denied.The appellant has failed to file a supplemental pro se brief although afforded sufficient opportunity to do so.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Michael Shepard, ap — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 28, 2017, which granted the appellant’s motion for leave to serve and file a pro se supplemental brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 10, 2014, is recalled and vacated; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s motion for leave to serve and file a supplemental pro se brief is denied.The appellant has failed to file a supplemental pro se brief although afforded sufficient opportunity to do so.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Sgroi, Lasalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Cinthia Skura, ap, v. Richard T. Wojtlowski res — Motion by the respondents Jean Piedmonte-Lehman and Thomas C. Lehman to strike the brief filed by the respondents Richard T. Wojtlowski and Ricahrd Wojtlowski on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated September 5, 2017, and to preclude the respondents Richard T. Wojtlowski and Ricahrd Wojtlowski from participating in oral argument of the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the paper filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., SGROI, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.
