By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Adam Gonzalez, ap, v. Rachel Santiago, res — Appeals by Adam Gonzalez from two orders of the Family Court, Orange County, both dated October 27, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeals is enlarged until April 26, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Dennis P.-A. (Anonymous), ap — Appeal by Dennis P.-A. from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated September 20, 2017. Pursuant to §670.9(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[a][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 15, 2018.MATTER of Olaitan K. Olawuyi, ap, v. Nadine A. Rollins, res — Appeal by Olaitan K. Olawuyi from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated December 11, 2017. By dated February 23, 2018, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the Court, within 30 days after the date of the :(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript was expected; or(4) if the appellant was indigent and could not afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.The appellant has failed to comply with the . Pursuant to §670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with the dated February 23, 2018, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before April 26, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties by regular mail.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Jacob P. E. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Gustavo P. S. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Gustavo P. S. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated June 12, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 2, 2018; and it is furtherORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.MATTER of Skylar M. (Anonymous). Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Heidi M. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Heidi M. from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated February 27, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Randy I. Siper, dated March 15, 2018, it isORDERED that the appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Alex Smith6 North StreetMiddeltown, NY 10940845-344-4322and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the appellant at the address provided by this Court, and on or before April 18, 2018, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal, in writing, that he has done so and that either(1) the appellant is interested in prosecuting the appeal, or(2) the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal, or that he has been unable to contact the appellant, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the child, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s assigned counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the appellant’s assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that the appellant is interested in proceeding with the appeal, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Tanika H. (Anonymous), res, v. Travaris E. M. (Anonymous), Sr., ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Travaris E. M. (Anonymous), Sr., ap, v. Tanika H. (Anonymous), res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by Travaris E. M. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 10, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 2, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Thomas R. K. (Anonymous), res, v. Tamara S. K. (Anonymous), ap — O-2222-16) — Appeal by Tamara S. K. from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated October 6, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 2, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Latasha Goldsmith, ap, Westchester County Department of Social Services, res — Appeal by Latasha Goldsmith from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated February 8, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Joseph Z. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Yola L.- Z. (Anonymous), respondent- appellant res — Appeal by Yola L.- Z. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 14, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the respondent-appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the respondent-appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the respondent-appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the respondent-appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the respondent-appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Mastro, J.P.; Sgroi, Barros and Iannacci, JJ.Emigrant Bank, etc., res, v. Richard P. Wade, appellant def — 2018-02708Emigrant Bank, etc., respondent,v Richard P. Wade, appellantdefendants.(Index No. 14599/13) Motion by the appellant on appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 20, 2016, and a judgment of the same court dated December 5, 2017, to stay enforcement of the judgment and the sale of the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of the appeals.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and enforcement of the judgment and the sale of the subject premises, located at 639 Madison Street, Brooklyn, New York, are stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeals on condition that the appeal from the judgment is perfected on or before May 4, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the appeal from the judgment is not perfected on or before May 4, 2018, the Court, on its own motion, may vacate the stay, without further notice, or the respondent may move to vacate the stay, on three days notice.MASTRO, J.P., SGROI, BARROS and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Sgroi, Barros and Iannacci, JJ.Ricky Daeira plaintiffs-res-ap, v. Genting New York, LLC, etc. res, DAmato Builders & Advisors, LLC, defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent-appellant; A.F.I. Glass & Architectural Metal, Inc., third-party defendant-appellant-res — Motion by the defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent-appellant to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal and cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered April 14, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the trial in the above-entitled action is stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal and cross appeals.MASTRO, J.P., SGROI, BARROS and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.MATTER of Mitzi C. Kao, ap, v. Chung Siung Kao, res — Appeals by Mitzi C. Kao from three orders of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated February 1, 2017, March 17, 2017, and May 23, 2017, respectively. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeals to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeals is enlarged until April 23, 2018.By Leventhal, J.P.; Sgroi, Lasalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.James J. Loughlin, Jr., res-ap, v. Mohsin Y. Meghji, appellant-res — Motion by James J. Loughlin, Jr., on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered October 13, 2016, and appeals and cross appeals from a judgment and an amended judgment of the same court entered December 4, 2017, and December 21, 2017, respectively, to dismiss the appeal from the order on the ground that the right of direct appeal terminated upon entry of the amended judgment. Cross motion by Mohsin Y. Meghji to consolidate the appeals and cross appeals.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the cross motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeals and cross appeals for determination upon the argument or submission thereof; and it is further,ORDERED that the cross motion is granted, and on or before May 2, 2018, Mohsin Y. Meghji shall correct the covers of the record and the appellant’s brief and reply brief filed in connection with the appeal from the order entered October 13, 2016, to reflect the proper caption for the appeals and cross appeals, serve and file a supplemental joint record containing the papers comprising the record on the appeals and cross appeals from the judgment entered December 4, 2017, and the amended judgment entered December 21, 2017, which are not contained in the record filed in connection with the appeal from the order, and serve and file a supplemental brief raising points of argument in connection with the appeals and cross appeals from the judgment and the amended judgment; and it is further,ORDERED that on or before June 6, 2018, James J. Loughlin, Jr., shall serve and file supplemental brief raising points of argument in connection with the appeals and cross appeals from the judgment and the amended judgment and responding to the supplemental brief filed by Mohsin Y. Meghji, and correct the covers of the respondent’s brief filed in connection with the appeal from the order entered October 13, 2016, to reflect the proper caption for the appeals and cross appeals; and it is further,ORDERED that the parties may serve and file supplemental reply briefs in accordance with the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]).LEVENTHAL, J.P., SGROI, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.MATTER of Khamari S. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Keith S. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Keith S. from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated May 18, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the petitioner-respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 7, 2018.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Reshell Benn, res, v. Ernest J. Robinson, ap — Appeal by Ernest J. Robinson from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated February 22, 2018.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party (see CPLR 5511).SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Eric O. B. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Lorraine H. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated April 12, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated March 29, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Sgroi, Lasalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Natural Therapy Acupuncture, P.C., etc., plf, v. OMNI Indemnity Company, def — (Appellate Term Docket No. 2017-00008KC; Civil Court Index No. 41630-15) — Motion by Natural Therapy Acupuncture, P.C., for leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Appellate Term, Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts, dated August 18, 2017, which denied its motion to vacate an order of the same court dated May 22, 2017, which dismissed an appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, entered September 13, 2016, for failure to timely perfect, and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition or thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., SGROI, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Cohen, Miller and Duffy, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., ex rel. Victor McKeever, pet, v. Warden, Nassau County Jail, res — Motion by the petitioner for leave to reargue his application for a writ of habeas corpus and for poor person relief, which was determined by decision and order on application of this Court dated November 20, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.RIVERA, J.P., COHEN, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. James Capeles, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County, rendered November 15, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:James LicataOffice of the Public Defender11 New Hempstead RoadNew City, New York 10956-3664and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Sgroi, Lasalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Services, etc., plf, v. GEICO General Insurance Co., def — (Appellate Term Docket No. 2016-03168KC; Civil Court Index No. 63862/13) — Motion by Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Services for leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Appellate Term, Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts, dated August 18, 2017, which denied its motion to vacate an order of the same court dated May 22, 2017, which dismissed an appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, entered June 5, 2015, for failure to timely perfect, and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., SGROI, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Maximo Vera, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered December 18, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Laurette MulryLegal Aid Society of Suffolk County – Appeals Bureau300 Center DrivePO Box 1697Riverhead, New York 11901-3398and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Roman, Maltese and Lasalle, JJ.Frank Demartino ap, v. Concetta Lomonaco res, et al., def — Motion by the appellants for leave to reargue an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered September 28, 2015, which was determined by decision and order of this Court dated November 8, 2017, or, in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the decision and order of this Court.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied, with $100 costs.RIVERA, J.P., ROMAN, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Austin, Miller and Maltese, JJ.Suntrust Bank, etc., res, v. Charles W. Howard, ap — Motion by the appellant for a preference in the calendaring of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered December 12, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.CHAMBERS, J.P., AUSTIN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Sgroi, Lasalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.MATTER of Joseph Striplin, pet, v. Thomas Griffin, Supt. G.H.C.F., res — Motion by the petitioner to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 which was transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated June 12, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted the petitioner’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged, and the reply brief submitted to the Clerk of the Court is accepted for filing and deemed timely served.LEVENTHAL, J.P., SGROI, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Austin, Miller and Maltese, JJ.Kimball Brooklands Corporation, ap, v. State of New York, res — (Claim No. 122734) — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Court of Claims, dated January 31, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 2, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.CHAMBERS, J.P., AUSTIN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Sgroi, Lasalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, res, v. Dylan Levy, etc., appellant def — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 15, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 4, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.LEVENTHAL, J.P., SGROI, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Austin, Miller and Maltese, JJ.Gabriel Raymond Falco, ap, v. Laura Ann Bowery Falco, res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 30, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]), and by serving and filing a brief on the appeal is enlarged until June 4, 2018.CHAMBERS, J.P., AUSTIN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Sgroi, Lasalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Lourdes Marie Dorce, ap, v. Family Dollar Stores of New York, Inc. res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 7, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until May 4, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.LEVENTHAL, J.P., SGROI, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Austin, Miller and Maltese, JJ.Mitchell Fein, ap, v. Julie Fein, res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 22, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until May 4, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.CHAMBERS, J.P., AUSTIN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Hall, Miller and Maltese, JJ.Alliance National Insurance Company, ap, v. David Landa, etc. respondents def — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 10, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until May 4, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.CHAMBERS, J.P., HALL, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Austin, Miller and Maltese, JJ.Roseann Mandel, plf, v. 15 Power Drive, LLC, defendant third-party plf-res, et al., defendants; Nursing Sisters Home Visiting Services, etc., third-party def-ap — Motion by 15 Power Drive, LLC, to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated November 30, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the time for 15 Power Drive, LLC, to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 4, 2018, and the brief of 15 Power Drive, LLC, shall be served and filed on or before that date.CHAMBERS, J.P., AUSTIN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Austin, Miller and Maltese, JJ.Margarita Puello De Zapata, ap, v. City of New York res — Motion by the respondents to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 2, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 4, 2018, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.CHAMBERS, J.P., AUSTIN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Sgroi, Lasalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.BH 263, LLC, res, v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, ap — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, both dated June 2, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until April 16, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.LEVENTHAL, J.P., SGROI, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Roman, Sgroi and Duffy, JJ.E. v. (Anonymous), plf-ap, v. R. v. (Anonymous), res, G. v. (Anonymous), nonparty-ap — 2017-10910E. V. (Anonymous), plaintiff-appellant,v R. V. (Anonymous), respondent;G. V. (Anonymous), nonparty-appellant.(Index No. 10602/07) Appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated February 26, 2016, and February 29, 2016, respectively, and separate appeals from a decision of the same court dated September 20, 2017. By decision and order of this Court dated August 2, 2017, the appeal from the order dated February 26, 2016, was determined and the appeals from the order dated February 29, 2016, were held in abeyance pending a report by the Supreme Court, Westchester County. Motion by G. V., inter alia, to consolidate the appeals from the order dated February 29, 2016, with the appeals from the decision, to deem a joint supplemental appendix filed in connection with the appeals from the order dated February 29, 2016, to be filed in connection with the decision, and to make the caption on the appeals from the decision anonymous.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to make the caption on the appeals from the decision anonymous is granted, and the caption is amended accordingly; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeals from the decision are dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeals lie from a decision (see Schicchi v. J.A. Green Constr. Co., 100 AD2d 509); and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied as academic.BALKIN, J.P., ROMAN, SGROI and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, res, v. Michael Eason, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 1, 2016, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Dejuan Smart, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute appeals from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County, both rendered August 30, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeals will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeals:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeals expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeals; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeals are taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Sgroi, Lasalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.John Stanescu, ap, v. Catherine Stanescu, res — 2018-01859John Stanescu, appellant,v Catherine Stanescu, respondent.(Index No. 13707/2011) Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered August 14, 2017, and to consolidate that appeal with an appeal from an order of the same court dated January 10, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal from the order entered August 14, 2017, is granted, and the appellant’s time to perfect that appeal is enlarged until June 4, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to consolidate the appeals is denied as unnecessary as the appeals may be consolidated as of right (see 22 NYCRR 670.7[c][1]).LEVENTHAL, J.P., SGROI, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Sgroi, Lasalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Anne Crowley Weight, ap, v. Joseph Weight, res — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County, entered May 9, 2017, on the original papers and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including the transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the parties, who are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]), and by serving and filing a brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 21, 2018.LEVENTHAL, J.P., SGROI, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Austin, Miller and Maltese, JJ.Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, res, v. Dolly Kassabi, appellant def — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 5, 2017, for failure to timely perfect. Application by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until May 4, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.CHAMBERS, J.P., AUSTIN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Austin, Miller and Hinds-Radix, JJ.First American Title Insurance Company, etc., res, v. Marie Chavannes, etc, def, Marvin Comond, ap — Motion by the appellant on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 4, 2017, to waive payment of the filing fee, for free transcripts, and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branches of the motion which are to waive payment of the filing fee and for free transcripts are denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is granted, and the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]), and by serving and filing a brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 4, 2018.CHAMBERS, J.P., AUSTIN, MILLER and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Austin, Miller and Maltese, JJ.Wells Fargo Bank, NA, etc., res, v. Rita A. Pelt, appellant def — Motion by the respondent to dismiss appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered October 6, 2016, and February 14, 2017, respectively, for failure to timely perfect. Application by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect the appeals.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until June 4, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeals and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.CHAMBERS, J.P., AUSTIN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Austin, Miller and Maltese, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., plf, v. Binod Singh, res, New York State Division of Parole, nonparty-ap — Application by the nonparty-appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated May 25, 2017. By order to show cause dated February 6, 2018, the nonparty-appellant was directed to show cause before this Court why the appeal should not be dismissed on the ground that the order was neither appealable as of right nor by permission.Now, upon the order to show cause and the papers filed in response thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the application is granted and the time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until May 4, 2018.CHAMBERS, J.P., AUSTIN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Sgroi, Lasalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.OneWest Bank N.A., plf, v. Kathryn Muller, etc. appellants defendants; CIT Bank, National Association, nonparty-res — Motion by Andrew D. Brodnick on appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 26, 2017, for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellants Kathryn Muller, Mark Zander, Margaret Orling, and Jane Sussman.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in relation or opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and on or before April 19, 2018, Andrew D. Brodnick shall serve the appellants Kathryn Muller, Mark Zander, Margaret Orling and Jane Sussman, by one of the methods specified in CPLR 2103(c), with a copy of this decision and order on motion and shall file proof of such service with the Clerk of this Court; and it is further,ORDERED that no further proceedings shall be taken against the appellants Kathryn Muller, Mark Zander, Margaret Orling, and Jane Sussman, without leave of the Court, until the expiration of 30 days after service upon them of a copy of this decision and order on motion; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until June 18, 2018.LEVENTHAL, J.P., SGROI, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Austin, Miller and Maltese, JJ.James Macinness ap, v. Chao Wang def, Wai Man Wilda Cheung res — Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered February 23, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until May 4, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.CHAMBERS, J.P., AUSTIN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.MATTER of Yehuda Michael, ap, v. Feixia Wei-Fisher, res — F-1160-15/16C) — Appeal by Yehuda Michael from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated July 3, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on March 30, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed within 30 days of the date of this .MATTER of Tomer T. Levin, res, v. Efrat Blum, ap — Appeal by Efrat Blum from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated November 17, 2017. By dated February 23, 2018, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the Court, within 30 days after the date of the :(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript was expected; or(4) if the appellant was indigent and could not afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.The appellant has failed to comply with the . Pursuant to §670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with the dated February 23, 2018, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before April 26, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties by regular mail.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Galbel Feliz res, v. Citnalta Construction Corp., appellant-res, STV Construction, Inc. respondents- ap — Application by the respondent-appellant STV Construction, Inc., on an appeal and cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 27, 2017, for leave to withdraw its cross appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the cross appeal by STV Construction, Inc., is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Christopher J. Menekou, etc., plf-res, v. Our Lady of Consolation Nursing Home, appellant; Kerri Ann Zeiris, etc., nonparty-res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 3, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Steven Wildstein, ap, v. Pacific Production and Marketing Company, res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated November 1, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Sabrina S. Pettway, ap — Appeal from an order of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered January 4, 2018.Upon the stipulation of the appellant and the attorneys for the respective parties dated March 14, 2018, it isORDERED that the appeal is marked withdrawn.HSBC, res, v. A. Y. Deng, ap, et al., def — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 9, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Heather Porter, res, v. Louhal Properties, Inc. ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Daniel Alvarez, res, v. Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp. ap, et al., def — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 20, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Leventhal, J.P.; Sgroi, Lasalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Rochelle Colindres, plf-res, v. Mario Carpenito, Jr., ap, White Plains Department of Parking def-res — Motion by the appellant to stay the trial in the above-entitled action, inter alia, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, December 13, 2017. Separate motion by the appellant, in effect, to enlarge the record to include certain material.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion to stay the trial and the papers filed in opposition and in relation thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the motion to enlarge the record to include certain material and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motions are denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., SGROI, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.Beverly Lattimore, res-ap, v. Anita Thackurdeen appellants- res, Christopher Thackurdeen, res — Application by the appellant-respondent Anita Thackurdeen to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 3, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal by Anita Thackurdeen is marked withdrawn.Jason Cohen, res, v. Nafis Z. Sabir, appellant def — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 24, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Young Dong Chang, ap, v. Helen Kalich, res — Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 6, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties dated March 28, 2018, it isORDERED that the appeal is marked withdrawn.John Dash, ap, v. Laura Tiongson, res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 18, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Anthony Scalia, res, v. Alan Sloyer, etc. ap — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated December 5, 2016.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties dated March 26, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Cecilia Brown, res, v. South Nassau Communities Hospital, ap — Application by the appellant for leave to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 28, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application, and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Bank of America, N.A., res, v. Ruby Wood, appellant def — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 2, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged, and the respondent’s brief submitted to the Clerk of the Court is accepted for filing and deemed timely served.By Balkin, J.P.; Leventhal, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.James A. Spilbor plf-res, v. Stuart T. Styles, etc. defendants-respondents , et al., def, Simon H. Chin. ap — Motion by the appellants to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated July 25, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Leventhal, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.Carlos Zambrano, etc., res, v. St. Mel School ap — Motion by the appellant to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 29, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Emigrant Bank, etc., res, v. Mohammed Muzibur Rahman, et al., appellants def — Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered April 4, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until April 9, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.DILLON, J.P., SGROI, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.
