By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Frank Golio, ap, v. Joseph Picone res — Appeal by Frank Golio from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated January 23, 2018.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the order is not appealable as it was issued ex parte (see CPLR 5704), or on the ground that no appeal lies as of right from a nondispositional order in proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, part 3 (see Family Ct Act §1112), and leave to appeal has not been granted, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before May 1, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties by regular mail.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, Pj.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Cristo A. Sauri, ap — Motion by the appellant pursuant to CPL 460.50 for a stay of execution of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered February 27, 2017, and to fix reasonable bail.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon hearing the attorneys for the respective parties, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and execution of the judgment is stayed by the giving of an insurance company bail bond in the amount of $25,000 or by depositing the sum of $25,000 as a cash bail alternative; and it is further,ORDERED that this stay shall terminate and be of no further effect 120 days from the date hereof and the appellant shall thereafter surrender to serve the sentence imposed, unless the appeal shall have been brought to argument or submitted to this Court, or unless this Court shall have extended this order; and it is further,ORDERED that upon the termination of this stay as provided above, this order shall constitute authorization to any peace officer to arrest and deliver the appellant to the sentencing court to begin the execution of sentence; and it is further,ORDERED that upon receipt of a copy of this decision and order on motion together with proof that the appellant has given an insurance company bail bond in the amount of $25,000 or has deposited the sum of $25,000 as a cash bail alternative, the Warden of the facility at which the defendant is incarcerated, or his or her agent, is directed to immediately release the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that counsel for the appellant shall serve a copy of this order, by mail, on the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ALAN D. SCHEINKMANPresiding JusticeBy Dillon, J.P.; Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, ap, v. Mark Barasch res, et al., def — Motion by the respondents to dismiss appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated April 3, 2017, and April 10, 2017, respectively, on the ground that the record is inadequate and for failure to properly settle the transcript and to dismiss the appeal from the order dated April 10, 2017, on the further ground that no appeal lies as of right from an order that is not the result of a motion made on notice and leave to appeal has not been granted, or, in the alternative, to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief. Separate motion by the appellant, in effect, for leave to serve and file a supplemental record.Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the appellant’s motion is granted to the extent that on or before May 25, 2018, the appellant shall serve and file a supplemental record containing a transcript of the proceedings which occurred on February 16, 2017, properly settled pursuant to CPLR 5525, and the motion is otherwise denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the respondents’ motion which is to dismiss the appeals on the ground that the record is inadequate and for failure to properly settle the transcript is denied on condition that the appellant complies with the foregoing paragraph; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the respondents’ motion which is to dismiss the appeal from the order dated April 10, 2017, on the ground that no appeal lies as of right from an order that is not the result of a motion made on notice and leave to appeal has not been granted is held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeals for determination upon the argument or submission thereof; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the respondents’ motion which is to enlarge the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is denied as unnecessary as the respondents’ brief was timely served and filed.DILLON, J.P., SGROI, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.MATTER of Alexandria P. (Anonymous), ap — Appeals by Alexandria P. from two orders of the Family Court, Dutchess County, both dated August 1, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeals is enlarged until May 7, 2018.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Daiyah D. F. F. (Anonymous). Graham Windham Services to Families and Children, petitioner-res, Darren S. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Darren S. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated April 10, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 7, 2018; and it is furtherORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Matthew Maldonado, ap, v. Nicole Maldonado, res — Appeal by Matthew Maldonado from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated August 17, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 7, 2018.MATTER of Anali L. Vela, res, v. Ronald Land-Wheatley, ap — Appeal by Ronald Land-Wheatley from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated June 8, 2016. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on April 4, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the brief for the respondent in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.MATTER of Kieara N. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Shasha F. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Keyana N. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Shasha F. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Nayquan N. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Shasha F. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No.3) — Appeals from two orders of the Family Court, Kings County, dated June 21, 2016, and August 8, 2017, respectively. Pursuant to §670.9(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeals to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[a][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeals is enlarged until May 7, 2018.By Dillon, J.P.; Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Nestor I, LLC, ap, v. Cathy Moriarty-Gentile, etc. res — Motion by the Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation for leave to serve and file an amici curiae brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated April 13, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the amici curiae brief shall be served on the parties, and nine copies filed in this Court, on or before April 25, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no oral argument by the amici curiae shall be permitted; and it is further,ORDERED that the parties, if they be so advised, may file reply briefs to the amici curiae brief within 10 days after service upon them of the amici curiae brief.DILLON, J.P., SGROI, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Allen Goldmeier res, v. Mark Worksman, appellant def — Motion by the appellant pro se on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 2, 2017, to waive compliance with the requirements of 22 NYCRR 670.10.2(f) regarding certification of the appendix on appeal. Application by the respondents, in effect, to strike the appendix on the ground that it is inadequate and includes matter dehors the record.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the application is dismissed without prejudice to making a motion for the relief requested.DILLON, J.P., SGROI, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., ex rel. Jose Ortiz, pet, v. Warden Bealiue, etc., res — Application by the petitioner for a writ of habeas corpus and for poor person relief.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the application which is for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and that branch of the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the application which is for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.DILLON, J.P., SGROI, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Anne Marie Foley, ap, v. Art P. Jarit, etc., res — Motion by the appellant for a preference in the calendaring of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 13, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.DILLON, J.P., SGROI, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Leventhal, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.Patricia Rhoda, ap, v. James W. Rhoda, Jr., res — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated April 17, 2017, on the ground that the notice of appeal is defective and for failure to properly settle the transcript, or, in the alternative, to strike the record and the appellant’s brief for failure to comply with the rules of this Court, to impose a sanction upon the appellant and the appellant’s counsel, and for an award of costs. Cross motion by the appellant, inter alia, in effect, to deem the notice of appeal to reflect that the appeal has been taken to this Court rather than the Appellate Term, Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts, to deem the transcript to contain certain corrections, to impose a sanction upon the respondent, and for an award of costs. Separate motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, inter alia, to dismiss the appeal and the cross motion, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the motion to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion, inter alia, to dismiss the appeal is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the cross motion which is, in effect, to deem the notice of appeal to reflect that the appeal has been taken to this Court rather than the Appellate Term, Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts, is granted (see CPLR 2001); and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the cross motion which is to deem the transcript to contain certain corrections is granted to the extent that on or before April 25, 2018, the appellant shall serve and file an errata sheet containing the corrections to the record referenced in the respondent’s letter dated October 25, 2017, annexed to the affirmation in support of the cross motion as Exhibit D; and it is further,ORDERED that the cross motion is otherwise denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion to enlarge the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 25, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.MATTER of Norma Parra, res, v. Victor Ponce, ap — Appeal by Victor Ponce from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated November 29, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 29, 2018.By Dillon, J.P.; Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Suhair Marji, res, v. Khalid Marji, ap — Motion by the respondent pro se on an appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 5, 2017, inter alia, for poor person relief and the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies from a decision (see Schicchi v. J.A. Green Constr. Co., 100 AD2d 509); and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is denied as academic.DILLON, J.P., SGROI, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Homevest, Inc., ap, v. Venera Kaneeva, as administrator of the estate of Roustam Kaneev res — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the decision and order on application of this Court dated March 27, 2018, in the above-entitled matter, on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 5, 2017, is amended by deleting from the caption the name “Venera Kaneev,” and substituting therefor the name “Venera Kaneeva,” and by deleting from the caption the name “Roustam Kaneeva,” and substituting therefor the name “Roustam Kaneev.”SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.U.S. Bank National Association, etc., res, v. Kyaw Htyte, appellant def — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 17, 2017, for failure to timely perfect.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e]).DILLON, J.P., SGROI, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Leventhal, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.Wells Fargo Bank, NA, res, v. Charles P. Arroyo ap, et al., def — Motion by the respondent to dismiss appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, both dated April 17, 2017, for failure to timely perfect.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e]).BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Citimortgage, Inc., res, v. Daisy Charles def, Jacqueline Charles, ap — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 8, 2017, for failure to timely perfect.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e]).DILLON, J.P., SGROI, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Bank of New York Mellon, etc., res, v. Michael Penso appellants def — Motion by the respondent to dismiss appeals from an order and a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, both dated June 27, 2017, for failure to timely perfect.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e]).DILLON, J.P., SGROI, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., etc., res, v. Robert B. Marcus, etc. ap, et al., def — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated July 7, 2017, for failure to timely perfect.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e]).DILLON, J.P., SGROI, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Leventhal, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.HSBC Bank, USA, etc., plf-res, v. Todd Tabacco, ap, New York City Transit Adjudication Bureau defendants-respondents def — Motion by the plaintiff-respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated December 19, 2016, for failure to timely perfect.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e]).BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Yesenia Hidalgo Quintero, ap, v. City of New York def, Cemusa NY, LLC , et al. res — Motion by the respondents to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 8, 2017, on the ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of an appealing party.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see CPLR 5511).DILLON, J.P., SGROI, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.United Financial Casualty Company, plaintiff- res, v. Mitchell Lewis defendants- res, Vezandio Contracting Corp. appellants def — Separate motions by the plaintiff-respondent and the defendant-respondent Alterra Excess & Surplus Insurance Company on appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered December 20, 2017, to dismiss the appeal by the appellants John Staropoli and Jack Mangum on the ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of an appealing party. Application by the appellants John Staropoli and Jack Mangum to withdraw their appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and the papers filed in relation thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal by the appellants John Staropoli and Jack Mangum is deemed withdrawn; and it is further,ORDERED that the motions are denied as academic.DILLON, J.P., SGROI, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Rivera, Austin and Lasalle, JJ.Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., etc., plf, v. Michael Joseph Merlo, et al., def, Maria Merlo, appellant; Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, nonparty-res — Motion by the nonparty-respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 10, 2017, for failure to timely perfect.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e]).MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, AUSTIN and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Rivera, Austin and Lasalle, JJ.Jose Alfredo Velasco Hernandez, res, v. Giovanni Florian, ap — Motion by the appellant to stay all proceedings in the above-entitled action, including discovery, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 9, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, AUSTIN and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Rivera, Austin and Lasalle, JJ.Teresa M. Ferrero, etc., plf-res, v. Golden Touch Transportation of NY, Inc., et al., appellants (and a third-party action). — Motion by the appellants to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 7, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, AUSTIN and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Rivera, Austin and Lasalle, JJ.Antoinette Gravagna, res, v. Joseph Gravagna, ap — 2018-02915Antoinette Gravagna, respondent,v Joseph Gravagna, appellant.(Index No. 53/16) Motion by the appellant on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (IDV Part), both entered March 8, 2018, to stay enforcement of stated portions of the order under Index No. 53/16, to stay a certain hearing on the issue of custody for the subject children, and to grant him “daily access” to the subject children, pending hearing and determination of the appeals, to vacate “[a]ll decisons and orders” in the above-entitled actions, and to consolidate the appeals.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, AUSTIN and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Rivera, Austin and Lasalle, JJ.Santander Bank, National Association, etc., plf, v. Katica Cvjeticanin, appellant et al., def — Motion by Katica Cvjeticanin for leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 13, 2018, and to stay the sale of the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to appeal is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied as academic.MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, AUSTIN and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Rivera, Austin and Lasalle, JJ.Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., res, v. Gregory J. Boyd, etc., ap — Motion by the appellant to stay the foreclosure sale of the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated December 18, 2017, and a judgment of the same court entered December 28, 2017, and to consolidate the appeals.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to stay the foreclosure sale of the subject premises is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to consolidate the appeals is denied as unnecessary as the appeals may be consolidated as of right (see 22 NYCRR 670.7[c][1]).MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, AUSTIN and LASALLE, JJ., concur.Ruth Poshnansky ap, v. 5023 15th Avenue Associates, LLC, respondents def — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 17, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Moshe Simpson res, v. 1147 Dean, LLC ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 23, 2016, and June 30, 2017, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeals are marked withdrawn.Antoinette Gravagna, res, v. Joseph Gravagna, ap — Appeal by Joseph Gravagna from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (IDV Part), entered March 8, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled action shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Supreme Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Supreme Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.Antoinette Gravagna, res, v. Joseph Gravagna, ap — Appeal by Joseph Gravagna from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (IDV Part), entered March 8, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled action shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Supreme Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Supreme Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Precious L. M. (Anonymous). Forestdale, Inc., petitioner-res, Angel M. (Anonymous), res-res — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the decision and order on motion of this Court dated October 17, 2017, in the above-entitled matter, on an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated May 3, 2016, is amended by deleting from the first paragraph thereof the date “July 31, 2017,” and substituting therefor the date “May 3, 2016.”SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.
