By Leventhal, J.P.; Chambers, Austin and Iannacci, JJ.MATTER of William F. Koegel, etc., deceased. John B. Koegel, petitioner-res, Irene Lawrence Koegel, res-res — (File No. 452/14) — Motion by the respondent-appellant for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from an opinion and order of this Court dated February 7, 2018, which determined an appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County, dated June 23, 2015.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHAMBERS, AUSTIN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Austin, Sgroi and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Hesham Taha, res, v. Abier Elzemity, ap — Motion by the respondent for leave to reargue an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated December 31, 2014 , which was determined by decision and order of this Court dated January 10, 2018, or, in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the decision and order of this Court.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied, with $100 costs.BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Duffy, JJ.Zafar Mir, ap, v. Mohamed Eid, res — Motion by the respondent, inter alia, to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 27, 2017, on the ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see CPLR 5511); and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied as academic.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Austin, J.P.; Roman, Cohen and Barros, JJ.MATTER of Mikhail Onefater pet, v. Ildiko Nyari, res — (Appellate Term Docket No. 2017-1022KC; Civil Court Index No. LT-86641-16/KI) — Motion by Ildiko Nyari for leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Appellate Term, Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts, dated January 4, 2018, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, entered March 7, 2017, as untimely taken.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.AUSTIN, J.P., ROMAN, COHEN and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Duffy, JJ.Gina Vaccaro ap, v. American Transit Insurance Company, res — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered December 21, 2016, for failure to timely perfect.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e]).DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Duffy, JJ.Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, etc., res, v. Iris Flores, ap, et al., def — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered August 15, 2017, on the ground that no appeal lies from a decision.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see Schicchi v. J.A. Green Constr. Co., 100 AD2d 509).DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Austin, Lasalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Kenneth Purvis, ap, v. Rodney Veeney res — (Claim No. 125751) — Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to recall and vacate so much of a decision and order on motion of this Court dated August 15, 2017, as dismissed an appeal from an order of the Court of Claims, dated November 20, 2015.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.RIVERA, J.P., AUSTIN, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Miller, Barros and Christopher, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Michael A. Cerasaro, ap — (S.C.I. Nos. 80/07, 209/15) — Motion by the appellant pro se on appeals from an amended judgment and a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, both rendered October 14, 2015, for leave to reargue his prior motion to be provided with additional documents. Separate motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief in response to the appellant’s pro se supplemental brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the appellant pro se’s motion and the papers filed in opposition and in relation thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the respondent’s motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the appellant’s motion is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondent’s motion is granted and the respondent’s brief in response to the appellant’s pro se supplemental brief is accepted for filing and deemed timely served.DILLON, J.P., MILLER, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Sgroi, Maltese and Connolly, JJ.Tina Esposito, res-ap, v. Sophronia Larig appellants- res — Motion by the respondent-appellant to direct the appellants-respondents to pay her the sum of $3,000 monthly use and occupancy for the subject premises pending hearing and determination of an appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 2, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.CHAMBERS, J.P., SGROI, MALTESE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Sgroi, Maltese and Connolly, JJ.Alyssa Kenney, res, v. Anastasio Koukalenios ap — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated December 5, 2017, as untimely taken.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see CPLR 5513[a]).CHAMBERS, J.P., SGROI, MALTESE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Sgroi, Maltese and Connolly, JJ.CP-SRMOF II 2012-A Trust, etc., res, v. Pamela Bryan, appellant def — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 19, 2017, for failure to timely perfect.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e]).CHAMBERS, J.P., SGROI, MALTESE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Sgroi, Maltese and Connolly, JJ.Cactus Paper, LLC, res, v. Nur Nobi, appellant def — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 15, 2016, for failure to timely perfect.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e]).CHAMBERS, J.P., SGROI, MALTESE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Sgroi, Maltese and Connolly, JJ.Citimortgage, Inc., res, v. Marcia Merritt, appellant def — Motion by the respondent to dismiss appeals from three orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, two entered January 11, 2016, and one entered June 19, 2017, for failure to timely perfect.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e]).CHAMBERS, J.P., SGROI, MALTESE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Hinds-Radix, Lasalle and Connolly, JJ.MATTER of Saloni Anand, etc. pet, v. New York State Department of Health res — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the decision and order on motion of this Court dated April 16, 2018, in the above-entitled matter, on a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 which was transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated July 20, 2017, is amended by deleting from the second paragraph the words “and no papers having been filed in opposition or relation thereto,” and substituting therefor the words “and the papers filed in opposition thereto.”SCHEINKMAN, P.J., HINDS-RADIX, LASALLE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Dillon, Nelson and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Kerwin Johnson, pet, v. New York State Division of Parole, res — Motion by Kerwin Johnson for leave to appeal to this Court from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 5, 2018, and for poor person relief.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to appeal is denied as unnecessary as the judgment is appealable as of right (see CPLR 5701) without prejudice to filing a notice of appeal in accordance with CPLR 5513; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied without prejudice to renew after the notice of appeal has been filed.RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Dillon, Nelson and Christopher, JJ.Heleen Mees, ap, v. Willem H. Buiter, res — 2018-02918Heleen Mees, appellant,v Willem H. Buiter, respondent.(Index No. 9579/14) Motion by the respondent to strike stated portions of the appellant’s brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 1, 2016, on the ground that they refer to matter dehors the record. Motion by the appellant to consolidate the appeal from the order dated June 1, 2016, with an appeal from an order of the same court dated February 23, 2018, in effect, to deem the appellant’s appendix and briefs filed in connection with the appeal from the order dated June 1, 2016, to be filed in connection with the appeal from the order dated February 23, 2018, and for leave to serve and file a supplemental appendix and a supplemental brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the respondent’s motion is held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeals for determination upon the argument or submission thereof; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the appellant’s motion which is to consolidate the appeals is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s motion is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeals will be calendared together and will be argued or submitted on the same date.RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Gina Slavik, ap, v. Glen Deegan, res — Appeal by Gina Slavik from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated November 3, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 23, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Balkin, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.Robert Lugo, ap, v. Larissa Torres, res — Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to stay enforcement of stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered March 13, 2018, pending hearing and determination of an appeal therefrom.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Balkin, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.Bank of New York Mellon, etc., res, v. Clement Register appellants def — Motion by the appellants, inter alia, to stay the sale of the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 2, 2015.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.MATTER of Quwanda Law, ap, v. Adrian Lalsa, res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Adrian Lalsa, ap, v. Quwanda Law, res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeals by Quwanda Dee Law from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, both dated January 12, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeals in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeals; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeals, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeals as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeals; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeals to show cause why the appeals should or should not be dismissed.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Zhuoya Luo, res, v. Wensheng Wang, ap — Appeal by Wensheng Wang from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated March 9, 2018.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party (see CPLR 5511).SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Robert Lugo, ap, v. Larissa Torres, res — Appeal by Robert Lugo from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered March 13, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has beentaken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Dillon, J.P.; Chambers, Duffy and Connolly, JJ.159 MP Corp. ap, v. Redbridge Bedford, LLC, res — Motion by the appellants for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals pursuant to CPLR 5602(a) from an opinion and order of this Court dated January 31, 2018, which affirmed an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 29, 2015.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the following question is certified to the Court of Appeals: Was the opinion and order of this Court dated January 31, 2018, properly made?Questions of law have arisen, which, in our opinion, ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals (see CPLR 5713).DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Todd Ruffalo, ap, v. Sebastian Contarino, res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an unsigned transcript of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated August 29, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from an unsigned transcript (see Ojeda v. Metropolitan Playhouse, 120 AD2d 717); and it is further,ORDERED that the application is denied as academic.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Balkin, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.MATTER of Scott Mitchell Unger, ap, v. Koren Ha, res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Koren Ha, res, v. Scott Mitchell Unger, ap — (Proceeding No. 2) — Motion by Jerome A. Scharoff, P.C., to be relieved as counsel for the appellant on an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated October 23, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and on or before May 10, 2017, Jerome A. Scharoff, P.C., shall serve its client by one of the methods specified in CPLR 2103(c), with a copy of this decision and order on motion and shall file proof of such service with the Clerk of this Court; and it is further,ORDERED that no further proceedings shall be taken against the appellant, without leave of the Court, until the expiration of 30 days after service upon him of a copy of this decision and order on motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), on or before May 25, 2018, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4), above has been taken on or before May 25, 2018, the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Rivera, Dillon, Balkin, and Chambers, JJ.MATTER of Avery M. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Carlina W. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Carlina W. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated February 9, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Charles Lawson, dated April 20, 2018, it isORDERED that the appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Charles Lawson147 Prince StreetBrooklyn, NY 11201and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the child, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s assigned counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this order; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this order, the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcripts have been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcripts have not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that this order has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcripts are expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Marina Veen, res, v. Nikolai Golovanoff, ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Nikolai Golovanoff, ap, v. Marina Veen, res — (Proceeding No. 2) Docket Nos. V-27764-17/17A, V-27765-17/17A — Appeals by Nikolai Golovanoff from two orders of the Family Court, Kings County, dated February 20, 2018, and February 21, 2018, respectively. By order on certification of this Court dated March 30, 2018, the following attorney was assigned as counsel for the appellant on the appeals:Catherine S. Bridge1110 South Avenue, Suite 402Staten Island, New York 10314718-448-9600By letter dated April 20, 2018, the assigned counsel has informed this Court that the appellant wishes to proceed with the appeals. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeals in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeals; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order on certification of this Court dated March 30, 2018, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeals are taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeals; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeals to show cause why the appeals should or should not be dismissed.By Mastro, J.P.; Balkin, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.County of Nassau, etc. ap, v. Expedia, Inc. res — Motion by Travelocity.com, L.P., Site59.com, LLC, Priceline.com, Incorporated, and Travelweb, LLC, for leave to file certain documents under seal on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated November 24, 2016, and March 22, 2017, respectively, and a judgment of the same court entered June 1, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted to the extent that the documents filed under seal as part of the motion papers pursuant to the order to show cause of this Court dated April 9, 2018, shall remain sealed in connection with this motion, and the motion is otherwise denied without prejudice to renew upon proper papers including a copy of the stipulation between the parties referenced in the motion papers.MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.MATTER of Naphtali A. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Winifred A. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Yahchannah A. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Winifred A. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Noah A. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Winifred A. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 3)MATTER of Samach A. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Winifred A. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 4)MATTER of Nathanael A. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Winifred A. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 5)MATTER of Asher A. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Winifred A. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 6) N-27274-15, N-27275-15, N-27276-15) — Appeals by Winifred A. from three orders of the Family Court, Kings County, one dated January 23, 2017, and two dated March 20, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the appellant to serve and file a reply brief on the appeals is enlarged until May 11, 2018.MATTER of Sarah M. Gallousis, res, v. Christopher Gallousis, ap — Appeals by Christopher Gallousis from two orders of the Family Court, Orange County, both dated March 21, 2018. By order on certification of this Court dated April 17, 2018, the following attorney was assigned as counsel for the appellant on the appeals;Richard L. Herzfeld112 Madison Avenue, 8th FloorNew York, New York 10016212-818-9019By letter dated April 23, 2018, the assigned counsel has informed this Court that the appellant wishes to proceed with the appeals. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeals in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeals; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order on certification fo this Court dated April 17, 2018, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeals were taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeals; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeals to show cause why the appeals should or should not be dismissed.By Mastro, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Duffy and Iannacci, JJ.Kenneth Breslin, etc. ap, v. Wendy Frankel res — Motion by the appellants for a preference in the calendaring of appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered November 30, 2017, and March 20, 2018, respectively, and to consolidate the appeals.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for a preference in the calendaring of the appeals is granted and the appeals will be calendared expeditiously after all of the briefs have been filed; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to consolidate the appeals is denied as unnecessary as the appeals may be consolidated as of right (see 22 NYCRR 670.7[c][1]).MASTRO, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, DUFFY and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.MATTER of Antonio T. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Franklin T. (Anonymous), respondent- appellant res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Quincy J. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Franklin T. (Anonymous), respondent- appellant res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Diamond J. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Franklin T. (Anonymous), respondent- appellant res — (Proceeding No. 3)MATTER of Emani T. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Franklin T. (Anonymous), respondent- appellant res — (Proceeding No. 4)MATTER of Xavier J. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Franklin T. (Anonymous), respondent- appellant res — (Proceeding No. 5)MATTER of Anisha J. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Franklin T. (Anonymous), respondent- appellant res — (Proceeding No. 6)MATTER of Destiny J. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Franklin T. (Anonymous), respondent- appellant res — (Proceeding No. 7)MATTER of Omari T. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Franklin T. (Anonymous), respondent- appellant res — (Proceeding No. 8) N-6691-16, N-6692-16, N-6693-16, N-6694-16, N-15169-16) — Appeals by Franklin T. from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, dated September 18, 2017, and October 11, 2017, respectively. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeals to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeals is enlarged until May 23, 2018.By Mastro, J.P.; Balkin, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.MATTER of Quadir C. B. (Anonymous). SCO Family of Services, petitioner-res, Emmanuel D. (Anonymous), res-res — Motion by the respondent-appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated February 10, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 17, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Balkin, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.MATTER of Gregg Allen Thompson, ap, v. Christine Nelson, res — Appeal by Gregg Allen Thompson from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated September 19, 2017. By order to show cause dated March 22, 2018, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with a dated February 1, 2018, issued pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).Now, upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to comply with the dated February 1, 2018, issued pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Balkin, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.MATTER of Christiana Stahl, ap, v. Gregory F. Channing, res — V-12453-17/17A/17B) — Appeal by Christiana Stahl from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated December 18, 2017. By order to show cause dated March 22, 2018, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with a dated February 1, 2018, issued pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).Now, upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to comply with the dated February 1, 2018, issued pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Balkin, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.MATTER of Miriah S. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Jimmy S. (Anonymous), Jr., respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Jimmy S. (Anonymous) III. Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Jimmy S. (Anonymous), Jr., respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 2) N-8452-16, N-8453-16) — Motion by the appellant’s assigned counsel on an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated May 2, 2017, in effect, to be relieved on the ground that the appeal has been rendered academic.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in relation or in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the parties to the appeal are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appeal has been rendered academic (see CPLR 5511) and/or as abandoned, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before May 17, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion by assigned counsel, in effect, to be relieved is held in abeyance in the interim; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties to the appeal by regular mail.MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Balkin, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.MATTER of Tracey-Ann Codrington, res, v. Darryl Neal, ap — Appeal by Darryl Neal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated March 7, 2017. By order to show cause dated March 27, 2018, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding on the ground that the appeal has been rendered academic by the death of Darryl Neal.Now, upon the order to show cause and the papers filed in response thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see Matter of Charles C. E., 129 AD3d 721).MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Balkin, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.MATTER of Latasha Goldsmith, ap, v. Westchester County Department of Social Services, respondent-res, John Doe, nonparty-res — Motion by John Doe to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated February 8, 2018, on the ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon the appellant’s default.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see CPLR 5511).MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Leventhal, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.MATTER of Christina Araya, res, v. Richard S. Monzone, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se to waive the filing fee, for free transcripts, and for the assignment of counsel on appeals from two orders of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated August 4, 2017, and October 10, 2017, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.Timothy Cerniglia, plf, v. 8202 Seventh Avenue, LLC, defendant third-party plf-res, One Stop 86 St. Inc., et al., defendants-res, Island Pump & Tank Corp., third-party def-ap, Getty Realty Corp., etc., third-party defendant- res — Application by the third-party defendant-appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER Roberto M. (Anonymous). Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Jessica S. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Brooklyn B. (Anonymous). Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Jessica S. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Aiyanna B. (Anonymous). Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Jessica S. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding Nos. 3) — Appeals by Jessica S. from two orders of the Family Court, Orange County, both dated August 14, 2017. Pursuant to §670.9(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeals to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[a][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeals is enlarged until May 30, 2018.By Mastro, J.P.; Balkin, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Justin Sarkodie, ap — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered February 11, 2015.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 10, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.MATTER of Megan Helen McGorman, res, v. Patrick M. McGorman, ap — Appeal by Patrick M. McGorman from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated May 25, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the children to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 25, 2018.Scott Zieselman, etc., ap, v. Forest Manor Care Center, Inc., etc. res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 25, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Roman, J.P.; Cohen, Miller and Maltese, JJ.Starr Witty, ap, v. 1725 Fifth Avenue Corp. res — Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to stay the sale of the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated December 12, 2017, and for a preference in the calendaring of the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for a preference in the calendaring of the appeal is granted and the appeal will be calendared expeditiously after all of the briefs have been filed; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.ROMAN, J.P., COHEN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.MATTER of Patrick M. (Anonymous). Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Patrick M. M. (Anonymous), res-ap, et al., res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Georgia M. (Anonymous). Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Patrick M. M. (Anonymous), res-ap, et al., res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Luke M. (Anonymous). Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Patrick M. M. (Anonymous), res-ap, et al., res — (Proceeding No. 3)MATTER of Liam M. (Anonymous). Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Patrick M. M. (Anonymous), res-ap, et al., res — (Proceeding No. 4) N-2560-16, N-2601-16) — Appeal by Patrick M. M. from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated August 29, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the children to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 23, 2018.Bank of America, National Association, res, v. Roman Mavashev appellants def — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 3, 2015.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Joseph Perdichizzi appellants-res, v. NYC School Construction Authority respondents-ap — Application to withdraw appeals and cross appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, both dated February 16, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal and cross appeals, dated April 19, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeals and cross appeals are deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Barros, J.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Darryl Williams, ap — Motion by the appellant, pursuant to CPL 460.20, for a certificate granting leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from a decision and order of this Court dated November 8, 2017, which determined an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered June 12, 2014.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.MATTER of Dina Cappa, ap, v. Eric James Vihinen, res — Appeal by Dina Cappa from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated March 19, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Saadia Aminuddin, ap, v. Sherin Mohamed, res — Appeal by Saadia Aminuddin from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 9, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Morgan A. H. (Anonymous). New Alternatives For Children, Inc., petitioner-res, Ta-Mirra J. H. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Ta-Mirra J. H. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated December 28, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Shaphan Parker, ap, v. Sean Tomlinson, res — Appeal by Shaphan Parker from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 22, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Jonathan M. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Janine T. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — Appeal by Janine T. from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated March 26, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Isabella J. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, pet-res, Ernesto J. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Abigail A. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, pet-res, Ernesto J. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Glinis S. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, pet-res, Ernesto J. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 3) — Appeal by Ernesto J. from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated April 16, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Philip Castellano, Jr., dated April 18, 2018, it isORDERED that the appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Marina M. Martielli15 Woodfield AvenueE. Quogue, NY 11942631-728-2654and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the appellant at the address provided by this Court, and on or before May 10, 2018, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal, in writing, that she has done so and that either(1) the appellant is interested in prosecuting the appeal, or(2) the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal, or that she has been unable to contact the appellant, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the children, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s assigned counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the appellant’s assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the children, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that the appellant is interested in proceeding with the appeal, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Jose Z. G. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Jose Z. (Anonymous), respondent- ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Daniela P. G. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services petitioner- res, Jose Z. (Anonymous), respondent- ap — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by Jose Z. from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated February 1, 2018. By order on certification of this Court dated February 28, 2018, the following attorney was assigned as counsel for the appellant on the appeal, and was directed, inter alia, to contact the appellant and determine the appellant’s interest in perfecting the appeal:David Laniado411 Westminster Rd., Suite 2Cedarhurst, NY 11516516-599-8999By letter dated April 19, 2018, assigned counsel notified the Court that he has been unable to contact the appellant.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered relieving the assigned counsel for the appellant and dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before May 17, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties or their attorneys, and upon the appellant, by regular mail.MATTER of Allison G. (Anonymous). Dutchess County Department of Community and Family Services, petitioner-res, Howard I. (Anonymous), Jr., res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Sarah G. (Anonymous). Dutchess County Department of Community and Family Services, petitioner-res, Howard I. (Anonymous), Jr., res-res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Howard I. (Anonymous). Dutchess County Department of Community and Family Services, petitioner-res, Howard I. (Anonymous), Jr., res-res — (Proceeding No. 3)MATTER of Thomas I. (Anonymous). Dutchess County Department of Community and Family Services, petitioner-res, Howard I. (Anonymous), Jr., res-res — (Proceeding No. 4) N-471-16) — Appeal by Howard I. from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated March 16, 2017. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 8, 2018, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of this Court, within 30 days after the date of the order:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript was expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.The appellant has failed to comply with the decision and order on motion dated March 8, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings for failure to comply with the decision and order on motion dated March 8, 2018, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before May 17, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties by regular mail.By Mastro, J.P.; Balkin, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.Collier, Halpern, Newberg & Nolletti, ap, v. Christian Na, res — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated November 29, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 11, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Balkin, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.K. A., etc. ap, v. City of New York res — Motion by the respondents City of New York, New York City Department of Education, and Board of Education of the City of New York to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 10, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the time of the respondents City of New York, New York City Department of Education, and Board of Education of the City of New York to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 29, 2018, and brief of the respondents City of New York, New York City Department of Education, and Board of Education of the City of New York shall be served and filed on or before that date.MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Roman, J.P.; Cohen, Miller and Maltese, JJ.MATTER of Denise v. E. J. (Anonymous), ap — Westchester Department of Social Services, petitioner- res, Latonia J. (Anonymous), respondent- res, John A. Pappalardo, nonparty-res — (and another title). N-7121-05/14L, N-7124-05/14L, N-11424-14/14B) — Motion by the respondent-respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on appeals from two orders of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated March 27, 2017, and August 21, 2017, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent-respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 11, 2018, and the respondent-respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.ROMAN, J.P., COHEN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Roman, J.P.; Cohen, Miller and Maltese, JJ.Susan Boreshesky, res-ap, v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., etc., appellant- res — Motion by the appellant-respondent to enlarge the record on an appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated July 5, 2017, to include the papers filed in connection with an appeal and cross appeal from an order of the same court dated October 16, 2017. Separate motion by the appellant-respondent to consolidate the appeals, to enlarge the time to perfect the appeals, and to enlarge the time to serve and file the answering brief and the reply briefs.Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeals is granted, the time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until June 25, 2018, and the joint record or appendix and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondent-appellant shall serve and file her answering brief, including her points of argument on the cross appeals, in accordance with the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]); and it is further,ORDERED that the motion to enlarge the record and the branch of the motion which is to consolidate the appeals are denied as unnecessary; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to serve and file the answering brief and the reply briefs is denied as premature.ROMAN, J.P., COHEN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Roman, J.P.; Cohen, Miller and Maltese, JJ.U.S. Bank, National Association, etc., res, v. Shakeel Shahzad, ap, et al., def — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 22, 2017, as untimely taken, on the ground that it is without merit, and on the ground that consideration of the issues presented by the appeal are precluded by the dismissal of two prior related appeals. Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until June 25, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.ROMAN, J.P., COHEN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.T. Mina Supply, Inc., appellant-res, v. Clemente Bros. Contracting Corp. def, New York City Department of Design and Construction respondents- ap, International Fidelity Insurance Company, respondent plaintiffs. — Application by the respondents-appellants on an appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 16, 2017, to withdraw their cross appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the cross appeal is marked withdrawn.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Felipe Robles, ap — Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered July 11, 2016.Upon the stipulation of the appellant and the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated April 15, 2018, it isORDERED that the appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Dominick Ippolito III, ap, v. Marisa Uriarte, res — Appeals by Dominick Ippolito III from two orders of the Family Court, Richmond County, both dated August 10, 2017. By affirmation dated January 26, 2018, counsel for the appellant notified the Court that he had ordered the transcripts and that he expected to receive the transcripts no later than February 5, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that within 60 days of the date of this , the appellant shall either perfect the appeals, or submit an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeals; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant is directed to provide copies of the transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeals, including the attorney for the child, if any, when the appellant’s brief is served upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that if the appeals have not been perfected or withdrawn within 60 days of the date of this , the appeals shall be dismissed, without further notice.Jennifer M. Wiesner plf-res, v. SP Plus Corporation, etc., ap, 44 South Broadway Property LLC def-res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 20, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Roman, J.P.; Cohen, Miller and Maltese, JJ.MATTER of Neil Marcus, ap, v. Planning Board of the Village of Wesley Hills res — Motion by the respondents IJJ Corporation and Rockland Tree Expert, Inc., to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated April 7, 2017, on the ground that the appeal is without merit.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until May 29, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.ROMAN, J.P., COHEN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Angella J. Pusey, ap, v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., res — Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered January 24, 2017.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 30, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Balkin, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.Dianne Hutchinson, etc., ap, v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation respondents def — 2017-11398Dianne Hutchinson, etc., appellant,v New York City Health and HospitalsCorporation respondentsdefendant.(Index No. 500700/11) Dianne Hutchinson, etc., appellant,v New York City Health and HospitalsCorporation respondentsdefendant.(Index No. 500700/11) Motion by Brooklyn Nephrology Group, P.C., and separate motion by the respondents Utica Avenue Dialysis Clinic, Davita, Inc., and Empire State DC, Inc., to strike the appellant’s reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 26, 2016, on the ground that it refers to matter dehors the record. Cross motion by the appellant to hear the appeal from the order dated July 26, 2016, together with appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 22, 2017, and a judgment of the same court dated October 23, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and the cross motion, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motions are granted, the reply brief is stricken, and on or before May 18, 2018, the appellant shall serve and file serve and file a replacement reply brief which does not refer to matter dehors the record; and it is further,ORDERED that cross motion is granted, and the appeals will be calendared together and will be argued or submitted on the same date.MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.Lucy Estela Tapia, plf-res, v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., defendant- res, Aarons Parking, LLC, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 15, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., res, v. Kevin Tuminski, appellant def — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated April 21, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Serena Copeland, res, v. Personal One Fitness, LLC ap, 460 Mineola Realty, LLC res — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 21, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated March 20, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.PEOPLE, etc., plf, v. Hector Lopez, def — Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 5, 2018, which has been referred to me for determination.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is denied.By Dillon, J.P.; Miller, Barros and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Jaylen R. B. (Anonymous). Catholic Guardian Services petitioners- res, Lisa G. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Sarah M. B. (Anonymous). Catholic Guardian Services petitioners- res, Lisa G. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 2) — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 16, 2018, in the above-titled matter, on an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, entered December 19, 2016, is amended by deleting from the first decretal paragraph the date “April 16, 2018,” and substituting therefor the date “April 26, 2018.”DILLON, J.P., MILLER, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Miller, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ.Mark Stern ap, v. Firemans Fund Insurance Company, res — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 2, 2018, in the above-entitled matter, on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated October 3, 2017, is amended by deleting from the second paragraph thereof the words “no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto” and substituting therefor the words “the papers filed in opposition thereto.”RIVERA, J.P., MILLER, HINDS-RADIX and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Chambers, Duffy and Lasalle, JJ.MATTER of Jennifer S. Solomon, res, v. Marc H. Fishman, ap — Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to stay enforcement of an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated March 2, 2018, pending hearing and determination of an appeal therefrom.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies as of right from a nondispositional order in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8 (see Family Ct Act §1112), and leave to appeal has not been granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is denied as academic.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., CHAMBERS, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Chambers, Duffy and Lasalle, JJ.MATTER of Jennifer S. Solomon, res, v. Marc H. Fishman, ap — V-8188-14/15B, V-8189-14/15B) — Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to stay enforcement of two orders of the Family Court, Westchester County, both dated March 30, 2018, pending hearing and determination of appeals therefrom.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeals lie as of right from nondispositional orders in proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, part 3 (see Family Ct Act §1112), and leave to appeal has not been granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is denied as academic.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., CHAMBERS, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.
