MATTER of Jeffery Scot Sult, appellant v. Rachel Ellen Sult, res — Appeal by Jeffery Scot Sult from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated November 20, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on April 18, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isOrdered that within 30 days of the date of this order, the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the children in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.MATTER of Francine Tarpey, res, v. James A. Tarpey, ap — Appeal by James A. Tarpey from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated June 26, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isOrdered that the time for the appellant to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until May 4, 2018.MATTER of Alicia K. (Anonymous). Nassau County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Cain K. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Justin K. (Anonymous). Nassau County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Cain K. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Quadir K. (Anonymous). Nassau County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Cain K. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 3)MATTER of Sincere K. (Anonymous). Nassau County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Cain K. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 4)MATTER of Talib K. (Anonymous). Nassau County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Cain K. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 5)MATTER of Theresa K. (Anonymous). Nassau County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Cain K. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 6) B-223-17, B-224-17, B-225-17, B-226-17) — Appeal by Cain K. from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated July 7, 2017. Pursuant to §670.9(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isOrdered that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[a][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 23, 2018.MATTER of Kieara N. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Shasha F. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Keyana N. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Shasha F. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Nayquan N. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Shasha F. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No.3) — Appeals from two orders of the Family Court, Kings County, dated June 21, 2016, and August 8, 2017, respectively. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on April 19, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isOrdered that within 30 days of the date of this , the briefs forthe respondent and the attorney for the children in the above-entitled appeals shall be served and filed.By Rivera, J.P.; Dillon, Nelson and Christopher, JJ.Petric & Associates, Inc., res, v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, et al., def, KTA-Tator Engineering Services, P.C., ap — Motion by the appellant to stay all proceedings in the above-entitled action, including the trial, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered January 16, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isOrdered that the motion is granted to the extent that the trial in the above-entitled action is stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal on condition that the appeal is perfected on or before May 29, 2018, and the motion is otherwise denied; and it is further,Ordered that in the event the appeal is not perfected on or before May 29, 2018, the Court, on its own motion, may vacate the stay, without further notice, or the respondent may move to vacate the stay, on three days notice.RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Dillon, Nelson and Christopher, JJ.Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., etc., res, v. Cristian R. Rivero def, Helga Rivero, ap — Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to stay her eviction from the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered March 12, 2018,.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isOrdered that the motion is denied.RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Dillon, Nelson and Christopher, JJ.PNC Bank, National Association, res, v. Esther Lefkowitz, appellant def — Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to stay her eviction from the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated February 27, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isOrdered that the motion is denied.RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Dillon, Nelson and Christopher, JJ.11-01 36 Avenue, LLC, plf, v. Shehzad Quamar def — Motion by Shehzad Quamar and Roma Shukla for leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 14, 2018, and to stay discovery in the above-entitled action, pending hearing and determination of the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isOrdered that the branch of the motion which is for leave to appeal is denied; and it is further,Ordered that the motion is otherwise denied as academic.RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Dillon, Nelson and Christopher, JJ.Roberto Alvarez, plf, v. Century 21 Department Stores, LLC, defendant third-party plf, E.W. Howell Co., LLC, defendant third-party plaintiff-res, 5 Brothers, Inc., et al., third-party defendants/second third-party plaintiffs-res, Up Town Electric, second third-party def-ap — Motion by the second third-party defendant-appellant to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 6, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isOrdered that the motion is denied.RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Dillon, Nelson and Christopher, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Samuel Walton, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to serve and file a supplemental reply brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 23, 2014.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isOrdered that the motion is denied.RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Dillon, Nelson and Christopher, JJ.US Bank Trust N.A., etc., ap, v. Christie Baggee, etc., res, et al., def — Motion by the respondent to dismiss appeals from a decision of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated November 9, 2017, and a judgment of the same court entered November 27, 2017, respectively, as untimely taken.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isOrdered that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal from the decision is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies from a decision (see Schicchi v. J.A. Green Constr. Co., 100 AD2d 509); and it is further,Ordered that the branch of the motion which is to dismiss the appeal from the decision is denied as academic; and it is further,Ordered that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, to hear and report on the issue of whether the judgment dated November 27, 2017, was served upon the appellant’s counsel by counsel for the respondent with notice of entry, and, if so, when service was effected; the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, shall hold the hearing and file its report with all convenient speed; and it is further,Ordered that the branch of the motion which is to dismiss the appeal from thejudgment is held in abeyance in the interim.RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Dillon, Nelson and Christopher, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Balil G. Barnett, ap — Motion by the appellant’s assigned counsel on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered December 15, 2015, in effect, to be relieved on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal by failing to respond to communications by assigned counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isOrdered that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant is directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal, by filing an affirmation or an affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court on or before May 30, 2018; and it is further,Ordered that the motion by assigned counsel, in effect, to be relieved is held in abeyance in the interim; and it is further,Ordered that the Clerk of this Court or her designee is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the appellant at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and upon the attorney who last appeared for him, and upon the District Attorney, by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2).RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Dillon, Nelson and Christopher, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Balil S. (Anonymous), ap — Motion by the appellant’s assigned counsel on an appeal from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered December 15, 2015, in effect, to be relieved on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal by failing to respond to communications by assigned counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isOrdered that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant is directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal, by filing an affirmation or an affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court on or before May 30, 2018; and it is further,Ordered that the motion by assigned counsel, in effect, to be relieved is held in abeyance in the interim; and it is further,Ordered that the Clerk of this Court or her designee is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the appellant at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and upon the attorney who last appeared for him, and upon the District Attorney, by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2).RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Dillon, Nelson and Christopher, JJ.159-MP Corp., etc., appellant-res, v. CAB Bedford, LLC, res-ap, New York City Department of Buildings, res — Motion by respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 18, 2016, and an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the same court dated April 28, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isOrdered that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 29, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Dillon, Nelson and Christopher, JJ.Christian Nieto, res, v. City of New York, ap — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 15, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isOrdered that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 7, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Dillon, Nelson and Christopher, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Marcus A. Gross, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se to enlarge the time to serve and file a supplemental brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, rendered April 5, 2007,Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isOrdered that the motion is granted, and the appellant’s supplemental brief shall be served and filed on or before July 9, 2018; and it is further,Ordered that the appellant shall file nine copies of the supplemental brief and serve one copy on the District Attorney.RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Dillon, Nelson and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Rachel Clark, etc. ap, v. New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, etc. res — Motion by the appellants for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 18, 2017, as a poor person.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isOrdered that the branch of the motion which is for leave to prosecute the appeal on the original papers is granted, and the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including the transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the parties, who are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,Ordered that the branch of the motion which is to waive the filing fee is denied as unnecessary (see CPLR 1011[e]); and it is further,Ordered that the motion is otherwise denied; and it is further,Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]), and by serving and filing the appellants’ brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 29, 2018.RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Dillon, Nelson and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Gloria Rodriguez, res, v. Moises C. Mera, ap — Appeal by Moises C. Mera from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated January 8, 2018. By order to show cause dated March 15, 2018, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding on the ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party (see CPLR 5511).Now, upon the order to show cause and the papers filed in response thereto, it isOrdered that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted to the extent that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, except for the appeal from the portion of the order which brings up for review the denial of the request to adjourn the hearing (see CPLR 5511; James v. Powell, 19 NY2d 249, 256 n.3); and it is further,Ordered that pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), the appeal from the portion of the order which brings up for review the denial of the request to adjourn the hearing shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings which occurred in the Family Court concerning that issue, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,Ordered that pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal from the portion of the order which brings up for review the denial of the request to adjourn the hearing; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been Ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,Ordered that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal from the portion of the order which brings up for review the denial of the request to adjourn the hearing should or should not be dismissed.RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.MATTER of Georgia Barker, res, v. John T. Rohack, ap — Appeal by John T. Rohack from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated October 6, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on April 19, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isOrdered that within 30 days of the date of this order, the brief for the respondent in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.By Scheinkman, P.J.MATTER of Elijah L. J. (Anonymous). SCO Family of Services, petitioner-res, LaToya J. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Jeremiah L. J. (Anonymous). SCO Family of Services, petitioner-res, LaToya J. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Azariah J. (Anonymous). SCO Family of Services, petitioner-res, LaToya J. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 3) N-23295/16) — Appeal by LaToya J. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated February 23, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Richard Giacoma dated April 17, 2018, it isOrdered that the appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Tammi D. Pere24 New York AvenueWest Hempstead, NY 11552516-426-8700and it is further,Ordered that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the appellant at the address provided by this Court, and on or before May 9, 2018, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal, in writing, that she has done so and that either(1) the appellant is interested in prosecuting the appeal, or(2) the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal, or that she has been unable to contact the appellant, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment; and it is further,Ordered that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the children, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,Ordered that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s assigned counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the appellant’s assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the children, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,Ordered that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,Ordered that upon a determination that the appellant is interested in proceeding with the appeal, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Fatima Vera Melo, res, v. Bismark Zuniga, ap — Appeal by Bismark Zuniga from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated December 7, 2017. By order on certification of this Court dated March 15, 2018, the following attorney was assigned as counsel for the appellant on the appeal:Mark W. Brandys225 Broadway, Suite 1800New York, NY 10007646-266-2493By letter dated April 20, 2018, the assigned counsel has informed this Court that the appellant wishes to proceed with the appeal. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isOrdered that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,Ordered that within 30 days after the date of this , the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcripts has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order on certification of this Court dated March 15, 2018, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,Ordered that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Patrick M. (Anonymous). Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Patrick M. M. (Anonymous), res-ap, et al., res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Georgia M. (Anonymous). Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Patrick M. M. (Anonymous), res-ap, et al., res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Luke M. (Anonymous). Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Patrick M. M. (Anonymous), res-ap, et al., res — (Proceeding No. 3)MATTER of Liam M. (Anonymous). Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Patrick M. M. (Anonymous), res-ap, et al., res — (Proceeding No. 4) N-2560-16, N-2601-16) — Appeal by Patrick M. M. from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated August 29, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isOrdered that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 23, 2018.By Mastro, J.P.; Balkin, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.Michael Pallay, res, v. Sutton Hill Apartments ap — Motion by the appellants to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated January 11, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isOrdered that the motion is denied.MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.MATTER of Santos D. Interiano Argueta, ap, v. Reina E. Alvarenga Santos, res — Appeal by Santos D. Interiano Argueta from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated February 26, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isOrdered that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,Ordered that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been Ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,Ordered that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Leslie J. D. (Anonymous). Maria A. A. G. (Anonymous), petitioner-appellant; Silvia D. (Anonymous) res-res — Appeal by Maria A. A. G. from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated March 2, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isOrdered that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,Ordered that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been Ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,Ordered that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Michael C. Belmontes, res, v. Jasmin S. Harding, ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Jasmin S. Harding, ap, v. Michael C. Belmontes, res — (Proceeding No. 2) V-5294-15, V-5295-16, V-5296-16) — Appeal by Jasmin S. Harding from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated March 6, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isOrdered that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,Ordered that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been Ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,Ordered that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Swaran K. (Anonymous), ap, v. Surjit K. (Anonymous) res — Appeal by Swaran K. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated March 29, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isOrdered that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,Ordered that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been Ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,Ordered that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Qi Hu, ap, v. Shao Ru Pan, res — Appeal by Qi Hu from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated March 2, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isOrdered that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,Ordered that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been Ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,Ordered that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Jason A. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Maritza L. G. (Anonymous), res-ap, et al., res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Julio A. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Maritza L. G. (Anonymous), res-ap, et al., res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Jerrys A. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Maritza L. G. (Anonymous), res-ap, et al., res — (Proceeding No. 3) B13436-15, B-13437-15, B-13438-15) — Appeal by Maritza L. G. from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated March 16, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isOrdered that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,Ordered that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been Ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,Ordered that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Tabatha Foster, ap, v. Tyree Fisher, res — Appeal by Tabatha Foster from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 6, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isOrdered that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,Ordered that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been Ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,Ordered that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Justina M. Vega Rizzo, ap, v. Antoinette M. Pravato, res — Appeal by Justina M. Vega Rizzo from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 13, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Nazar Khan, dated April 11, 2018, it isOrdered that the appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal and following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Nazar Khan185 Montague Street, 10th FLBrooklyn, NY 11201and it is further,Ordered that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the child, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,Ordered that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s assigned counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the appellant’s assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,Ordered that assigned counsel shall serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken; and it is further,Ordered that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this order; and it is further,Ordered that within 30 days after the date of this order, the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcripts have been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcripts have not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that this order has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcripts are expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,Ordered that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this order, the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Dean Solomon, ap, v. Rebecca Blake, res — F-15597-14/17I&H, F-00361-15/17I&J) — Appeal by Dean Solomon from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated March 26, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isOrdered that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,Ordered that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been Ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,Ordered that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Priscilla Rivera Banks, res, v. Anthony Deleon, ap — Appeal by Anthony Deleon from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated March 15, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isOrdered that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,Ordered that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been Ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,Ordered that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Robert L. Werner, ap, v. Heather Mazzenga, etc., res — F-1222-09/17K, F-1282-09/17A, F-1282-09/17B, V-2133-17/17A, V-2133-17/17B, V-2133-17/17C) — Appeal by Robert L. Werner from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated February 28, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isOrdered that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,Ordered that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been Ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,Ordered that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Elizabeth Mondschein, ap, v. Craig Mondschein, res — V-07160-11/18I/J, V-16482-11/18E/F, V-16481-11/18D/E, V-16483-11/18D/E) — Appeal by Elizabeth Mondschein from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated March 28, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isOrdered that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,Ordered that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been Ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,Ordered that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.DiFerro Contracting Corp., ap, v. CPN Mechanical Inc. res — Application to withdraw appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 31, 2017 and June 9, 2017, respectively.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeals dated March 29, 2018, it isOrdered that the application is granted and the appeals are deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Francis P. Duggan, res, v. Kevin P. Michel, appellant def — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 10, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isOrdered that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Karen Phillips, res, v. Ridley-Lowell Business & Technical Institute, Inc. ap — Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated December 12, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated April 17, 2018, it isOrdered that the appeal is marked withdrawn.Niloufar Nahavandi, res, v. Kourosh Golyan, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 26, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isOrdered that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Frances Positano, res, v. Sun Star Industries Corporation, et al., ap — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 2, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated April 13, 2018, it isOrdered that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Zajadin Velovic, ap, v. Ana R. Lopez res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated February 16, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isOrdered that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Cohen, J.P.; Maltese, Iannacci and Christopher, JJ.John v. Muzio, Jr., etc., appellant plf, v. Maria Alfaro-Hardy, etc. res — Motion by John V. Muzio, Jr., inter alia, to recall and vacate so much of a decision and order on motion of this Court dated December 5, 2017, as dismissed an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 8, 2017, in effect, to correct the caption, and to stay enforcement of the order entered May 8, 2017. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated April 9, 2018, the branch of the motion which was, in effect, to correct the caption was remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, to determine, and the motion was otherwise held in abeyance in the interim. By order dated April 16, 2018, the Supreme Court, Nassau County, amended the caption of the order entered May 8, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 16, 2018, it isOrdered that the branch of the motion which is to recall and vacate so much of the decision and order on motion of this Court dated December 5, 2017, as dismissed the appeal is granted, that portion of the decision and order on motion of this Court dated December 5, 2017, is recalled and vacated, and the appeal is reinstated; and it is further,Ordered that motion is otherwise denied; and it is further,Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until June 25, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.COHEN, J.P., MALTESE, IANNACCI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Johnny Jara, ap — Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered November 2, 2015.Upon the stipulation of the appellant and the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated April 17, 2018, it isOrdered that the appeal is marked withdrawn.Harbour Trio Management, LLC, res, v. Overbay, LLC ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, both dated September 22, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isOrdered that the application is granted and the appeals are marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Elayne Altman ap, v. Stephanie Soohoo, etc. res — Application by the appellants for leave to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 31, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isOrdered that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Vanessa G. Brown, res, v. Theresa Renee Simone ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 5, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isOrdered that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.NYCTL 2014-A plf-res, v. Quadrozzi Realty Corporation, ap, City of New York Environmental Control Board, et al., def-res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 2, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isOrdered that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Malkie Wiederman, res, v. Isaac Halpert ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 19, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isOrdered that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Sophia Fu, res, v. I.FLY.LI, Inc., ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 14, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isOrdered that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Yi Jing Cao, appellant plf, v. Nestors Properties, LLC res, et al., defendant (and a third-party action). — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 21, 2016.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated April 18, 2018, it isOrdered that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Deborah Barthalt, plf-res, v. Sag Harbor Pooh, LLC defendants third-party plf-res, A.V.P. Exterminators, Inc., defendant-appellant; NRT New York, LLC., etc., third-party def-res — Application by the defendant-appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 18, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isOrdered that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Tanya M. Reid, ap, v. Entry Works, Inc., et al., res — Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 17, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated April 19, 2018, it isOrdered that the appeal is marked withdrawn.Esther Truccolo, plf-res, v. Kaal Rock Manor Apartments, defendant- res, Lakr Kaal Rock, LLC ap — Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated November 3, 2018.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated April 18, 2018, it isOrdered that the appeal is marked withdrawn.Kyung Eun Lee, ap, v. Stacy E. Meyerson res — Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 15, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated April 18, 2018, it isOrdered that the appeal is marked withdrawn.Bridget Myrick, ap, v. Serenity Limousine res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated December 20, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isOrdered that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Jessica Orellana ap, v. Poughkeepsie City School District, et al., res — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated October 13, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isOrdered that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Barbara Cline ap, v. King Kullen Grocery Co., Inc., res — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 31, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isOrdered that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Jimmy Cada, ap, v. Scandic Engineering, PLLC def, AMC United Inc., res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 5, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isOrdered that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Richard Conrad ap, v. Michael Rodgers, res — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 26, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isOrdered that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Renalto Amaral appellants-res, v. Kiska Construction, Inc. respondents- appellants (and a third-party action). — Application to withdraw appeals and cross appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 23, 2016 and March 30, 2016, respectively.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated April 19, 2018, it isOrdered that the application is granted and the appeals and cross appeals are deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.John Arnone, res-ap, v. Morton’s of Chicago/Great Neck, LLC appellants-res, Con-Kel Landscaping, Inc., respondent def — Appeals and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered September 20, 2017.On the Court’s own motion, it isOrdered that the order on application of this Court entitled “[i]n the Matter of Applications for Extensions of Time,” dated April 23, 2018, is amended by adding to the “Applicant name(s)” entry concerning the above-entitled matter the name “Morton’s of Chicago/Great Neck, LLC.”SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.
