By Scheinkman, P.J.; Rivera, Dillon, Balkin and Austin, JJ.MATTER of Steven Hosseyn Salami, a suspended attorney. (Attorney Registration No. 3908472) — Motion by the respondent for leave to renew his opposition to a motion, initiated by order to show cause dated June 1, 2017, to impose discipline on him pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1240.13, based on an order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated March 29, 2017, which was determined by an opinion and order of this Court dated December 6, 2017, and to vacate the six-month suspension imposed by the opinion and order of this Court dated December 6, 2017, and impose a public censure. The respondent was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on March 7, 2001.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., RIVERA, DILLON, BALKIN and AUSTIN, JJ. ,concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Austin, Miller and Maltese, JJ.Financial Freedom Acquisition, LLC, res, v. Linda C. Braunsberg, etc. def, Michael P. Braunsberg, etc., nonparty-ap — 2017-03535Financial Freedom Acquisition, LLC, respondent,v Linda C. Braunsberg, etc. defendants,Michael P. Braunsberg, etc., nonparty-appellant.(Index No. 41334/10) Financial Freedom Acquisition, LLC, respondent,v Linda C. Braunsberg, etc. defendants,Michael P. Braunsberg, etc., nonparty-appellant.(Index No. 41334/10) Financial Freedom Acquisition, LLC, respondent,v Linda C. Braunsberg, etc. defendants,Michael P. Braunsberg, etc., nonparty-appellant.(Index No. 41334/10) Financial Freedom Acquisition, LLC, respondent,v Linda C. Braunsberg, etc. defendants,Michael P. Braunsberg, etc., nonparty-appellant.(Index No. 41334/10) Motion to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from four orders of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated July 27, 2015, August 17, 2015, April 11, 2017, and August 4, 2017, respectively, and a judgment of the same court dated July 27, 2015.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the parties to the appeals are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeals from the orders dated July 27, 2015, August 17, 2015, April 11, 2017, and the judgment in the above-entitled action on the ground that Michael P. Braunsberg is not aggrieved by those orders and judgment (see CPLR 5511; Matter of Tagliaferri v. Weiler, 1 NY3d 605; Scopelliti v. Town of New Castle, 92 NY2d 944), or that Michael P. Braunsberg lacked the authority to file a notice of appeal on behalf of the individual defendants, except Linda C. Braunsberg (see CPLR 321), by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before May 2, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is held in abeyance in the interim; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties to the appeals by regular mail.CHAMBERS, J.P., AUSTIN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Sgroi, Barros and Iannacci, JJ.MATTER of Ursula-Pearl Uchenna Nwabueze, res, v. Livinus Obinna Okafor, ap — V-31751-15) — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated July 20, 2017, inter alia, on the ground that the transcript was not properly settled or, in the alternative, to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the transcript was not properly settled is denied on condition that on or before May 29, 2018, the appellant settle the transcript and serve and file a supplemental record containing an errata sheet or advise the Court, in writing, that following settlement of the transcript no changes to the transcript contained in the record are necessary; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until June 28, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.MASTRO, J.P., SGROI, BARROS and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Cohen, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Duffy and Connolly, JJ.MATTER of Evelyn Hudis, etc., deceased. June E. Poyourow, appellant; Nancy Fischman res — (File Nos. 373813/13B, 373813/13D, 373813/13E, 373813/13F) — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a decision and order (one paper) of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County, dated August 15, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the grounds that so much of the decision and order as directs the appellant to file an account is not the result of a motion made on notice (see CPLR 5701), and leave to appeal has not been granted, the appellant is not aggrieved by so much of the decision and order as directs the Public Administrator to file an account (see CPLR 5511), and the remaining portion of the decision and order constitutes a decision from which no appeal lies (see Schicchi v. J.A. Green Constr. Co., 100 AD2d 509); and it is further,ORDERED that the application is denied as academic.COHEN, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Donnahue G. George, a disbarred attorney. — Motion by Donnahue G. George to recall and vacate an opinion and order of this Court dated December 16, 2008, which disbarred him, upon default, and to reinstate him to the Bar. Mr. George was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on May 19, 2004. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated December 8, 2016, Mr. George’s first motion for, inter alia, reinstatement was denied. By decision and order of this Court dated April 12, 2017, Mr. George’s motion for leave to reargue his prior motion was denied.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.We find that Donnahue G. George does not demonstrate the requisite character and fitness to practice law.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Daiyah D. F. F. (Anonymous). Graham Windham Services to Families and Children, petitioner-res, Darren S. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Darren S. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated April 10, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the petitioner-respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 7, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Kimberly Pluschau, res, v. Gary Pluschau, ap — Appeal by Gary Pluschau from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered July 3, 2017. Pursuant to §670.9(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[a][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 14, 2018.MATTER of Stefanie F. (Anonymous), res, v. Leon H. (Anonymous), ap — Appeal by Leon H. from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated July 25, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 16, 2018. MATTER of Alexandria F. (Anonymous). Nassau County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, George R. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Adalila R. (Anonymous). Nassau County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, George R. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of George R. (Anonymous). Nassau County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, George R. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 3)MATTER of Adalila R.-S. (Anonymous), res-ap, v. George R. (Anonymous), appellant-res, Chastity M. (Anonymous), et al., res-res — (Proceeding No. 4) N-11060-12, N-10352-11, N-11061-12, N-10352, V-9379-13, V9380-13) — Appeal by George R., and cross appeal by Adalila R.-S., from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated August 30, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the petitioner-respondent and the attorney for the children to serve and file their respective briefs on the appeal and cross appeal is enlarged until May 7, 2018.MATTER of Nurys N. Feliciano, res, v. Amine Elghouayel, ap — Appeal by Amine Elghouayel from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 30, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on April 6, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed within 30 days of the date of this .By Chambers, J.P.; Cohen, Duffy and Connolly, JJ.Idi Jewels, Inc., res, v. Joseph Abramov ap — Motion by the appellants to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered January 8, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the trial in the above-entitled action is stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal on condition that the appeal is perfected on or before May 11, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the appeal is not perfected on or before May 11, 2018, the Court, on its own motion, may vacate the stay, without further notice, or the respondent may move to vacate the stay, on three days notice.CHAMBERS, J.P., COHEN, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Cohen, Duffy and Connolly, JJ.Henry Abelesz, ap, v. Volf Krasilovskiy res — Motion by the appellant to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 2, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.CHAMBERS, J.P., COHEN, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Cohen, Duffy and Connolly, JJ.MATTER of Hang Kuen Leung , res, v. Liang Guo, ap — Appeal by Liang Guo from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated February 15, 2018.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from an order of a support magistrate before objections have been reviewed by a judge of the Family Court (see Family Ct Act §439[e]).CHAMBERS, J.P., COHEN, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Cohen, Duffy and Connolly, JJ.Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB, res, v. Xue Dong Qin, etc., ap, et al., def — Appeal by Xue Dong Qin from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered February 8, 2017.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to timely perfect in accordance with the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e]).CHAMBERS, J.P., COHEN, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Dillon, Duffy and Iannacci, JJ.MATTER of State of New York, petitioner- res, v. Ronald S. (Anonymous), res-res — Motion by the respondent-appellant on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 3, 2016, in effect, for summary reversal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied..RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, DUFFY and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.MATTER of Andrew E. (Anonymous) II, ap, v. Angela N. S. (Anonymous), res — Appeal by Andrew E. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated November 9, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until April 23, 2018.By Dillon, J.P.; Miller, Hinds-Radix and Lasalle, JJ.William F. Schimoler ap, v. Phyllis Newman, etc. res, et al., def — (Action No. 1)Phyllis Newman, etc. res, v. William F. Schimoler ap — (Action No. 2)(File Nos. 2269E/13, 2269D/13) — Motion by the respondents on an appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, dated December 22, 2016, for leave to renew and reargue their prior motion to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief, which was determined by decision and order on motion of this Court dated January 19, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.DILLON, J.P., MILLER, HINDS-RADIX and LASALLE, JJ., concur.MATTER of Edward W. Keller, ap, v. Claire Keller, res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Claire Keller, res, v. Edward W. Keller, ap — (Proceeding No. 2) V-08611-14/14B, V-08612-14/14B) — Appeal by Edward W. Keller from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated December 28, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Timothy B. Inniss, ap, v. Monique S. Morris, res — Appeal by Timothy B. Inniss from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated January 16, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Jennifer Chimienti, pet, v. Nicole Perperis, ap — V-11319-17) — Appeal by Nicole Perperis from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated March 5, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Emanuel C. Ferreira, ap, v. Goddess Santiago, res — Appeal by Emanuel C. Ferreira from an amended order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated January 31, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.Clifford Chu, res, v. Long Island Railroad ap — Application by the appellant Town of Oyster Bay on appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 29, 2017, to withdraw its appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal by the Town of Oyster Bay is marked withdrawn.Mary Jane Schudde, plf-res, v. Windsor Apartments, Inc. defendants third-party plf-res, Bertolini Architectural Works, D.P.C., defendant third-party defendant-appellant; Upgrade Contracting, Inc., third-party defendant- res — Application by Bertolini Architectural Works, D.P.C., to withdraw its appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated September 25, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal by Bertolini Architectural Works, D.P.C., is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.U.S. Bank National Association, etc., res, v. Anna Lo Oliva, etc. def, Victor Avelar, ap — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 23, 2016.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties dated January 24, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Primitiva Pizzo, plf-res, v. MTA Bus Company, def-res, Atlas SN, Inc., ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Slavina Gardella, res, v. Emil Remizov, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 19, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Mackenzie L. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- appellant; Lonnie R. (Anonymous), respondent- res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Makylie W. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- appellant; Lonnie R. (Anonymous), respondent- res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Shonnon W. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- appellant; Lonnie R. (Anonymous), respondent- res — (Proceeding No. 3) — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 14, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Lenore Zadok, res, v. 532 Neptune Associates, LLC, ap — Application by the appellant for leave to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 2, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application, and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Jose Pineda, ap, v. Karen Thompkins, etc., res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated March 16, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Cohen, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Duffy and Connolly, JJ.MATTER of Angel S. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Sedetiana J. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — Motion by the respondent-appellant to stay enforcement of an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 16, 2018, and to allow the subject child to remain in her care and custody in North Carolina, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from the order, or, in the alternative, for an expedited briefing schedule and a preference in the calendaring of the appeal, and to waive the filing fee.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition and in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to stay enforcement of the order dated March 16, 2018, and to allow the subject child to remain in the respondent-appellant’s care and custody in North Carolina pending hearing and determination of the appeal is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for an expedited briefing schedule and a preference in the calendaring of the appeal is denied as unnecessary (see CPLR 5521; Family Ct Act §1112; 22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to waive the filing fee is denied as unnecessary in light of an order on certification decided herewith.COHEN, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Dean Monaco, res, v. Gary Forbes ap — Application by the appellants for leave to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated December 21, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application, and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Angel S. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Sedetiana J. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — Appeal by Sedetiana J. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 16, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Lauren Shapiro, dated March 26, 2018, it isORDERED that the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Brooklyn Defender ServicesFamily Defense Practice195 Montague Street, 5th FloorBrooklyn, N.Y. 11201347-592-2500and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the petitioner-respondent, the respondent-appellant, and the attorney for the child, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the respondent-appellant’s assigned counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the respondent-appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall serve a copy of this order on certification upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this order on certification; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this order on certification, the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcripts have been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcripts have not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that this order on certification has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcripts are expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this order on certification, the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Thomas v. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Justyna Z.-V. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Anthony v. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Justyna Z.-V. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Andrew v. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Justyna Z.-V. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 3) — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated January 17, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Sean Harker res, v. St. Johns University, res-ap, Lessings, Inc., appellant-res — Application to withdraw an appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 8, 2016.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties dated November 27, 2017, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal and cross appeal are deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Michkye A. N. (Anonymous), ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated October 31, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Derek Goldstein, ap — Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 17, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the appellant and the attorneys for the respective parties dated April 9, 2018, it isORDERED that the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.614 Seaman Avenue Corp., res, v. New York Kali Mandir, Inc., ap, et al., def — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 18, 2012.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties dated April 5, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.614 Seaman Avenue Corp., res, v. New York Kali Mandir, Inc., ap, et al., def — Application to withdraw appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 10, 2013, and July 19, 2013, respectively.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties dated April 5, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeals are deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Robert Aiello, res, v. Chantelle Chaffatt, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw appeals from two orders of the Family Court, Kings County, dated August 16, 2017, and August 15, 2017, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeals are marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Robert W. Keller res, v. Douglas Kruger def, Lockwood, Kessler & Bartlett, Inc., defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent-appellant; Tully Construction Co., Inc., third-party defendant-appellant-res — Application to withdraw an appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 14, 2013.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties dated March 9, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal and cross appeal are deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Barros, Iannacci and Christopher, JJ.Allan Sevilla Romero, res, v. Diane M. Sacerdote ap — Motion by the appellants to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 22, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.BALKIN, J.P., BARROS, IANNACCI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.Capital One Bank, N.A., res, v. Barbara A. Colasuonno, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 2, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Thomas Iacone res, v. So. Lindy Products Company, LLC, et al., ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 6, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Hinds-Radix, Lasalle and Connolly, JJ.Ahmed Elnenaey, ap, v. Yoram Nachimovsky, etc. res — Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to stay certain proceedings in the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, Housing Part, pending hearing and determination of appeals from three orders dated September 18, 2017, January 10, 2018, and February 26, 2018, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., HINDS-RADIX, LASALLE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Barros, Iannacci and Christopher, JJ.Jesse Cole, res, v. Samantha Cole, ap — Motion by the respondent for poor person relief and the assignment of counsel on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated September 12, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 14, 2018, and the respondent’s brief, if any, shall be served and filed on or before that date.BALKIN, J.P., BARROS, IANNACCI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Barros, Iannacci and Christopher, JJ.John Valentina, res, v. Sophia Valentina, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 19, 2017, as a poor person, for the assignment of counsel, and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to prosecute the appeal on the original papers is granted, and the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including the transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the parties, who are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are to waive payment of the filing fee, for free transcripts, and for the assignment of counsel are denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is granted, and the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]), and by serving and filing a brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 29, 2018.BALKIN, J.P., BARROS, IANNACCI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Barros, Iannacci and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Wayne Wilmot, ap, v. Hlengiwie Wilmot, res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Hlengiwie Wilmot, res, v. Wayne Wilmot, ap — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeals by Wayne Wilmot from two orders of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (IDV Part), both dated November 1, 2017. By order to show cause dated March 7, 2018, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeals in the above-entitled proceedings for failure to comply with a dated January 18, 2018, issued pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).Now, upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeals is granted, and the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to comply with the dated January 18, 2018, issued pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).BALKIN, J.P., BARROS, IANNACCI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.Denny Geronimo, appellant-res, v. New York City Transit Authority defendants-respondents def, Industry Safety Consultants, LLC, res-res — Application by the respondent-appellant on an appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 11, 2017, to withdraw the cross appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the cross appeal is marked withdrawn.Hope E. Currie, plf-res, v. Oygul Ortikova, def-res, Ug Imperial, Inc., ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 7, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Natasha Yancy, ap — Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered July 14, 2016.Upon the stipulation of the appellant and the attorneys for the respective parties dated April 2, 2018, it isORDERED that the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.John S. Mega, ap, v. Joy A. Mega, res — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated March 9, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties dated April 4, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.William Roberts res-ap, v. Eklecco Newco, LLC, et al, appellants-res, HVAC Contractors, Inc. res — Application by the respondent-appellant Forza Contracting, LLC, on an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated November 1, 2017, to withdraw the cross appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the cross appeal by the respondent-appellant Forza Contracting, LLC is marked withdrawn.William Roberts res-ap, v. Eklecco Newco, LLC, et al, appellants-res, HVAC Contractors, Inc. res — Application by the respondents-appellants William Roberts and Jennifer Roberts on an appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated November 1, 2017, to withdraw the cross appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the cross appeal by the respondents-appellants William Roberts and Jennifer Roberts is marked withdrawn.By Balkin, J.P.; Barros, Iannacci and Christopher, JJ.Joan Klingsberg, ap, v. Council of School Supervisors and Administrators-Local 1, def, Charity Guerra, res — Motion by the Council of School Supervisors and Administrators-Local 1, in effect, to strike stated portions of the record and the appellant’s brief and to amend the caption on the appeal on the ground that it is not a respondent on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered February 3, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the record and the parties’ briefs are stricken, and on or before May 11, 2018, the appellant shall serve and file a replacement record that does not contain the order entered February 3, 2017, which granted the motion by the Council of School Supervisors and Administrators-Local 1 to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it and the motion papers filed in connection with that motion, and shall serve and file a replacement brief which does not raise points of argument concerning that order.BALKIN, J.P., BARROS, IANNACCI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Barros, Iannacci and Christopher, JJ.HSBC, res, v. Lien Thi Ngo, appellant def — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 2, 2017, as a poor person, for the assignment of counsel, and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to prosecute the appeal on the original papers is granted, and the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including the transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the parties, who are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are to waive payment of the filing fee, for free transcripts, and for the assignment of counsel are denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is granted and the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]), and by serving and filing a brief on the appeal is enlarged until June 11, 2018.BALKIN, J.P., BARROS, IANNACCI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.Beverly Lattimore, res-ap, v. Anita Thackurdeen respondents Christopher Thackurdeen, appellant-res — Application by the respondent-appellant on an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 3, 2017, to withdraw the cross appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the cross appeal by the respondent-appellant is marked withdrawn.By Dillon, J.P.; Chambers, Maltese and Barros, JJ.MATTER of Wayne R. Rose, res, v. Cristina Simon, ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Cristina Simon, ap, v. Wayne R. Rose, res — (Proceeding No. 2) — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 27, 2018, in the above-entitled matter, on an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated May 19, 2017, is amended by deleting from the second paragraph thereof the words “no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto” and substituting therefor the words “the papers filed in opposition and in relation thereto.”DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.
