Motion List released on:April 16, 2018
By Mastro, J.P.; Dillon, Maltese and Lasalle, JJ.Lawrence Gugliara, res, v. Stefanie Veras, ap — Motion by the appellant on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 13, 2016, to “settl[e] the judgment roll” to include the trial exhibits, to enlarge the record to include a printout of a temporary spousal maintenance guidelines calculator and the written posttrial summations of the parties and the attorney for the children, and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the record to include written posttrial summations of the parties and the attorney for the children is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is granted, and the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 31, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.MASTRO, J.P., DILLON, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.C., Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Joseph Z. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Yola L.- Z. (Anonymous), respondent- appellant res — Appeal by Yola L.- Z. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 14, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Robert J. Epstein dated April 2, 2018, it isORDERED that the respondent-appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Melissa Chernosky155-03 Jamaica AvenueJamaica, New York 11432516-736-5935and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the respondent-appellant at the address provided by this Court, and on or before April 30, 2018, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal, in writing, that she has done so and that either(1) the respondent-appellant is interested in prosecuting the appeal, or(2) the respondent-appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal, or that she has been unable to contact the respondent-appellant, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment;and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the respondent-appellant, the petitioner-respondent, and the attorney for the child, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the respondent-appellant’s assigned counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the respondent-appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that the respondent-appellant is interested in proceeding with the appeal, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of George Leon, res, v. Melissa Quinones, ap — V-28525-12, V-28526-12) — Appeal by Melissa Quinones from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated September 29, 2016. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Lance Kramer dated March 30, 2018, it isORDERED that the respondent is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to respond to the appeal:Yasmin Daley Duncan386 Parkside AvenueBrooklyn, New York 11226866-565-3441and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the respondent at the address provided by the Court, and shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal on or before April 30, 2018, in writing, that she has done so and that either(1) the respondent is interested in responding to the appeal, or(2) the respondent is not interested in responding to the appeal, or that she has been unable to contact the respondent, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.MATTER of Jaire C. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Lucinda J. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Jekiah C. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Lucinda J. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by Lucinda J. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 7, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Gerard P. Nolan dated March 31, 2018, it isORDERED that the respondent-appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Anthony DeGuerre25 Hyatt Street, Suite 201Staten Island, New York 10301347-495-7554and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the respondent-appellant at the address provided by this Court, and on or before April 30, 2018, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal, in writing, that he has done so and that either(1) the respondent-appellant is interested in prosecuting the appeal, or(2) the respondent-appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal, or that he has been unable to contact the respondent-appellant, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment;and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the respondent-appellant, the petitioner-respondent, and the attorney for the children, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the respondent-appellant’s assigned counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the respondent-appellant’s assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the children, if any, when counsel serves the respondent-appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that the respondent-appellant is interested in proceeding with the appeal, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Nicole Fitzgerald, res, v. David Fitzgerald, ap — Appeal by David Fitzgerald from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated March 8, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Bennett Goodman dated March 30, 2018, it isORDERED that the appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Helene M. Greenberg45 Knollwood Road, Suite 502Elmsford, New York 10523914-347-1250and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the appellant at the address provided by this Court, and on or before April 30, 2018, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal, in writing, that she has done so and that either(1) the appellant is interested in prosecuting the appeal, or(2) the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal, or that she has been unable to contact the appellant, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment;and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the child, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s assigned counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the appellant’s assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that the appellant is interested in proceeding with the appeal, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Cohen, Duffy and Connolly, JJ.Klara Vizelter, ap, v. Emilia Strogov, etc. res — Motion by the respondent Emilia Strogov, and separate motion by the respondent Jessica B. Gallina, to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 22, 2016, on the ground that the appellant’s appendix is inadequate or, in the alternative, to enlarge the time to serve and file their respective briefs.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branches of the motions which are to dismiss the appeal are denied on condition that on or before May 15, 2018, the appellant serve and file a supplemental appellant’s appendix which contains the exhibits contained in the papers filed by the respondents in opposition to the appellant’s motion that was determined by the order dated September 22, 2016; and it is further,ORDERED that the branches of the motions which are to enlarge the respondents’ time to serve and file their respective briefs are granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file their respective briefs is enlarged until June 15, 2018, and the respondents’ briefs shall be served and filed on or before that date.CHAMBERS, J.P., COHEN, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.C., Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Fernando Seoane, respondent- ap, v. Martha Nunez, appellant-res, Juan Nunez, res — V-13206-15; O-22682-14) — Appeal by Martha Nunez, and cross appeal by Fernando Seoane, from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated February 16, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Matthew J. Kazansky dated April 3, 2018, it isORDERED that Martha Nunez is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Elliot Green32 Court Street, Suite 404Brooklyn, New York 11201718-260-8668and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact Martha Nunez at the address provided by this Court, and on or before April 30, 2018, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal, in writing, that he has done so and that either(1) Martha Nunez is interested in prosecuting the appeal, or(2) Martha Nunez is not interested in prosecuting the appeal, or that he has been unable to contact her, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment;and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal and cross appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the parties. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to Martha Nunez’s assigned counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves a brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that Martha Nunez is interested in proceeding with the appeal, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal and cross appeal are taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Cohen, Duffy and Connolly, JJ.U.S. Bank National Association, etc., res, v. Robert Nicosia appellants def — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 19, 2017, for failure to timely perfect.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation or relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e]).CHAMBERS, J.P., COHEN, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Leventhal, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Tinkita Smith, ap — Motion by the appellant for leave to dispense with printing on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 20, 2017, and for a copy of the typewritten transcripts of the stenographic minutes, without charge.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that that branch of the motion which is for leave to dispense with printing is denied as unnecessary (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][viii]); and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify and file two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); retained counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for retained counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that, upon service of a copy of this order upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide counsel with a copy of the pre-sentence report prepared in connection with the defendant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that retained counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged. Retained counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions.BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Leventhal, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.Brooklyn Union Gas Company, res, v. Platinum Plus Energy Resources, Inc., et al., ap — Motion by the respondent to direct the appellants to serve and file a supplemental record containing certain documents on appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated May 1, 2017, and a judgment of the same court entered August 25, 2017. Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 29, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Leventhal, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.Anthony Hill, ap, v. Edgar Turrico, res — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated July 28, 2016, as untimely taken.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see CPLR 5513[a]).BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Rivera, Austin and Lasalle, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Charles P. Edward, ap — Motion by the appellant for leave to to withdraw an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County, rendered July 21, 2014.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn.MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, AUSTIN and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Leventhal, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, res, v. Salvatore Nicolosi, ap, et al., def — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated June 16, 2017, for failure to timely perfect. Application by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e]).BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Cohen, Duffy and Connolly, JJ.US Bank, National Association, etc., res, v. Toshiba Carter def, Andrea Robinson, ap — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 6, 2017, for failure to timely perfect. Application by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e]).CHAMBERS, J.P., COHEN, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Hinds-Radix, Lasalle and Connolly, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Wesley Erickson, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se, inter alia, to relieve counsel assigned to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered June 23, 2016, and for the assignment of new counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied without prejudice to the appellant seeking leave to serve and file a pro se supplemental brief.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., HINDS-RADIX, LASALLE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Roman, J.P.; Sgroi, Maltese and Iannacci, JJ.Cach, LLC, res, v. Sarah Bruck, ap — Motion by the appellant to recall and vacate so much of a decision and order on motion of this Court, entitled “MATTER of the Dismissal of Causes for Failure to Perfect,” dated September 19, 2016, as dismissed an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated November 18, 2015, in the above-entitled action, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(e) for failure to timely perfect.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is dismissed for failure to provide proof of service of the motion upon the respondent’s attorney of record.ROMAN, J.P., SGROI, MALTESE and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Maria Caro, ap — (S.C. I. No. N10261-10) — Motion by the appellant’s assigned counsel on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered June 17, 2011, in effect, to be relieved of the assignment on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal by failing to respond to communications by assigned counsel. By order to show cause dated February 15, 2018, the appellant was directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant had abandoned the appeal, and assigned counsel’s motion was held in abeyance in the interim.Now, upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of assigned counsel’s motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel’s motion is granted.DILLON, J.P., SGROI, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Citimortgage, Inc., res, v. Everette Weaver, ap, et al., def — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 7, 2016. By order to show cause dated February 22, 2018, the parties to the appeal were directed to show cause why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal, inter alia, on the ground that no appeal lies as of right from an order that is not the result of a motion made on notice and leave to appeal has not been granted, and the appellant’s motion was held in abeyance in the interim.Now, upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted to the extent that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies as of right from an order that is not the result of a motion made on notice and leave to appeal has not been granted (see CPLR 5701), and the motion is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s motion is denied as academic.DILLON, J.P., SGROI, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Blake A. M. (Anonymous). SCO Family of Services, petitioner- res, Marisa L. (Anonymous), etc., respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Brittny A. M. (Anonymous). SCO Family of Services, petitioner- res, Marisa L. (Anonymous), etc., respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeals by Marisa M. from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, both dated September 8, 2017. Pursuant to §670.9(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the respondent-appellant’s time to perfect the appeals by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeals to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[a][2]) and by serving and filing the respondent-appellant’s brief on the appeals is enlarged until May 14, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Izaneiryd Valera, plf-res, v. Adelaida R. Martinez defendants- res, Cranesville Block Co., Inc., et al., ap — (Action No. 1)Gloria Gordon, plf-res, v. Adelaida R. Martinez defendants- res, Felix A. Smith ap — (Action No. 2)Michael J. Hogan, plf-res, v. Carlos A. Pedrozo defendants- res, Felix A. Smith ap — (Action No. 3)Jhirette Vega, plf-res, v. Carlos A. Pedrozo defendants- res, Felix A. Smith ap — (Action No. 4)Sabeli Rodriguez, plf-res, v. Carlos A. Pedrozo defendants- res, Felix A. Smith ap — (Action No. 5)Jennifer Florian, plf-res, v. Adelaida R. Martinez defendants- res, Felix A. Smith ap — (Action No. 6)Carlos A. Pedrozo, plf-res, v. Michael Hogan, defendant third-party plaintiff-res, Felix A. Smith, et al., third-party defendants ap — (Action No. 7)— Motion by the plaintiff-respondent Jennifer Florian to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 25, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is dismissed for failure to provide proof of service of the motion in accordance with the terms of the order to show cause.DILLON, J.P., SGROI, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Cohen, Duffy and Connolly, JJ.MATTER of Terry Daum, ap, v. Brian Fischer, etc., res — Motion by the appellant to recall and vacate so much of a decision and order on motion of this Court, entitled “MATTER of the Dismissal of Causes for Failure to Perfect,” dated February 19, 2013, as dismissed an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated August 5, 2009, in the above-entitled matter for failure to timely perfect, and to reinstate the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.CHAMBERS, J.P., COHEN, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Hinds-Radix, Lasalle and Connolly, JJ.MATTER of Saloni Anand, etc. pet, v. New York State Department of Health res — Motion by the respondent John F. O’Neill to dismiss, insofar as asserted against him, a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 which was transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated July 20, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the proceeding is dismissed insofar as asserted against the respondent John F. O’Neill, without costs or disbursements (see LoBlanco v. Hansell, 83 AD3d 1072).SCHEINKMAN, P.J., HINDS-RADIX, LASALLE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.C., Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Deya Alrahman Abdullah Ali Al-Dalali, res, v. Natalia A. Rivera, ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Natalia A. Rivera, ap, v. Deya Alrahman Abdullah Ali Al-Dalali, res — (Proceeding No. 2) V-885-09/15I, V-885-09/17J, V-7865-09/15J) — Appeals by Natalia A. Rivera from three orders of the Family Court, Queens County, all dated February 14, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Anthony Augustus dated April 9, 2018, it isORDERED that the appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeals, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeals:Lewis S. Calderon155-03 Jamaica AvenueJamaica, New York 11432718-883-1560and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the appellant at the address provided by this Court, and on or before April 30, 2018, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeals, in writing, that he has done so and that either(1) the appellant is interested in prosecuting the appeals, or(2) the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeals, or that he has been unable to contact the appellant, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment;and it is further,ORDERED that the appeals will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the child, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s assigned counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeals, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeals expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that the appellant is interested in proceeding with the appeals, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeals are taken.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Trischa Williams, res, v. Claude Jenkins, ap — V-457-12/15C) — Appeal by Claude Jenkins from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (IDV Part), dated March 3, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 18, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.R. K., appellant-res, v. R. G., res-res — Appeal by R. K., and cross appeal by R. G., from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated June 28, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant-respondent’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal and cross appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant-respondent’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 11, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Frady Zeidman, res, v. Natan Zeidman, ap — Appeal by Natan Zeidman from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 21, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect those portions of the appeal which concern issues other than custody and visitation is enlarged until May 9, 2018.By Balkin, J.P.; Barros, Iannacci and Christopher, JJ.Parmanan Rupnarain, ap, v. Atim Khan, Jr. res — Motion by the respondent Atim Khan, Jr., to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 11, 2017, for failure to timely perfect. Application by the appellant to withdraw the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the application, and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is denied.BALKIN, J.P., BARROS, IANNACCI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Barros and Iannacci, JJ.American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., ap, v. Angela P. Carnegie respondents def — 2017-11955American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.,appellant, v. Angela P. Carnegie, respondents defendant.(Index No. 936/11) Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated December 21, 2016, and September 21, 2017, respectively, and to consolidate the appeals. Separate motion by the respondents to dismiss the appeal from the order dated September 21, 2017, for failure to timely perfect.Upon the papers filed in support of the appellant’s motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the respondents’ motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the appellant’s motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeals is granted, and the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until May 16, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the appellant’s motion which is to consolidate the appeals is denied as unnecessary as the appeals may be consolidated as of right (see 22 NYCRR 670.7[c][1]); and it is further,ORDERED that the respondents’ motion is denied.BALKIN, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, BARROS and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.MATTER of Kristy Murphy, res, v. Mark Murphy, ap — Appeal by Mark Murphy from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated July 13, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on April 10, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the brief for the respondent in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.MATTER of Karin Wolf, ap, v. Edward Crane, res — V-12570-17/17A) — Appeal by Karin Wolf from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated November 8, 2017. By order on certification of this Court dated March 5, 2018, the following attorney was assigned as counsel for the appellant on the appeal:Maria Joy Frank2648 Windmill DriveYorktown, Heights, NY 10598914-962-5802By letter dated April 9, 2018, the assigned counsel has informed this Court that the appellant wishes to proceed with the appeal. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcripts has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order on certification of this Court dated March 5, 2018, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Luis Herranz, ap, v. Sandra Longa, res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Sandra Longa, res, v. Luis Herranz, ap — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeals by Luis Herranz from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, both dated January 3, 2018. By order on certification of this Court dated March 19, 2018, the following attorney was assigned as counsel for the appellant on the appeals:Kenneth M. Tuccillo591 Warburton Avenue, #576Hasting on Hudson, NY 10706914-439-4843By letter dated April 11, 2018, the assigned counsel has informed this Court that the appellant wishes to proceed with the appeals. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeals in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeals; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order on certificaiton of this Court dated March 19, 2018, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeals are taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeals; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeals to show cause why the appeals should or should not be dismissed.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Hinds-Radix, Lasalle and Connolly, JJ.U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., etc., res, v. Claudette Matthews ap, et al., def — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 31, 2017, on the ground that it has been rendered academic.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied as academic as the appeal was marked withdrawn by order on application of this Court dated February 27, 2018.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., HINDS-RADIX, LASALLE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.C., Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Luis Herranz, ap, v. Sandra Longa, res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Sandra Longa, res, v. Luis Herranz, ap — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeals by Luis Herranz from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, both dated January 3, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Susan Gerner dated March 13, 2018, it isORDERED that the respondent is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeals, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to respond to the appeals:Richard L. Herzfeld112 Madison Avenue, 8th FloorNew York, New York 10016212-818-9019and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the respondent at the address provided by the Court, and shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeals on or before April 30, 2018, in writing, that he has done so and that either(1) the respondent is interested in responding to the appeals, or(2) the respondent is not interested in responding to the appeals, or that he has been unable to contact the respondent, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Barros, Iannacci and Christopher, JJ.Onewest Bank, FSB, res, v. Melecia D. Edwards, etc., ap, et al., def — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 2, 2016, for failure to timely perfect.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e]).BALKIN, J.P., BARROS, IANNACCI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Jazmine P. (Anonymous), etc. Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Shay S. P.-T. (Anonymous), etc., respondent-appellant res — Appeal by Shay S. P.-T., from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated March 30, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of George E. Reed, Jr., dated April 9, 2018, it isORDERED that the respondent-appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:George E. Reed, Jr.222 Mamaroneck Avenue, Suite 303White Plains, NY 10605914-946-5000and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the respondent-appellant, the petitioner-respondent, and the attorney for the child, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the respondent-appellant’s assigned counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the respondent-appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this order; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this order, the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcripts have been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcripts have not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that this order has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcripts are expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Barros, Iannacci and Christopher, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Jordan Laws, ap — Motion by the appellant’s assigned counsel on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered March 24, 2016, in effect, to be relieved on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal by failing to respond to communications by assigned counsel. By order to show cause dated March 2, 2018, the appellant was directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant had abandoned the appeal, and assigned counsel’s motion was held in abeyance in the interim.Now, upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of assigned counsel’s motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel’s motion is granted.BALKIN, J.P., BARROS, IANNACCI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Barros, Iannacci and Christopher, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Keno Young, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered September 27, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel. By order to show cause dated March 2, 2018, the appellant was directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the order entered September 27, 2017, is neither appealable as of right nor by permission.Now, upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the appellant’s motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s motion is denied as academic.BALKIN, J.P., BARROS, IANNACCI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.MATTER of Joel S. (Anonymous), res, v. Heidi S. L-S. (Anonymous), ap — Appeal by Heidi S. L-S. from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated April 26, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until April 23, 2018.By Dillon, J.P.; Austin, Miller and Hinds-Radix, JJ.MATTER of Riyanna N. F. (Anonymous), a/k/a Riyanna F. (Anonymous). Forestdale, Inc., petitioner-res, Crystal M. S. (Anonymous), res-ap, et al., res — Motion by the respondent-appellant for a reconstruction hearing with respect to the proceedings which occurred on December 22, 2016, on an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated May 30, 2017, and, in effect, to extend the time to comply with a of this Court dated November 13, 2017, or, in the alternative, for a new trial. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated January 26, 2018, the branch of the motion which is for a reconstruction hearing was granted and the motion was otherwise held in abeyance in the interim. The Family Court, Queens County, conducted the reconstruction hearing on March 19, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for a new trial is denied; and it isfurther,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is, in effect, to extend the time to comply with the of this Court dated November 13, 2017, is granted and pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), within 30 days after the date of this decision and order on motion, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcripts have been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcripts have not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above,has been taken within 30 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, MILLER and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Alexandra Detore, res, v. Brian Detore, ap — Appeals by Brian Detore from two orders of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated October 6, 2017, and November 27, 2017, respectively. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeals to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeals is enlarged until May 11, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Suzanne Greenwald, res, v. Brian Greenwald, ap — Appeal by Brian Greenwald from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated December 11, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of William C. Hoffman dated April 11, 2018, it isORDERED that the appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Heath J. Goldstein90-50 Parsons Blvd., Suite 216Jamaica, New York 11432646-436-1052and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the appellant at the address provided by this Court, and on or before April 30, 2018, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal, in writing, that he has done so and that either(1) the appellant is interested in prosecuting the appeal, or(2) the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal, or that he has been unable to contact the appellant, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment;and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the children, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s assigned counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the children, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that the appellant is interested in proceeding with the appeal, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Jonathan Yepez, ap — (S.C.I. Nos. 2738/17, 10325/17) — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute appeals from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County, both rendered December 20, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeals will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeals:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeals expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeals; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeals are taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Melchor Cortes, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered December 15, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. David Gordon, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered December 12, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. David Robinson, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered November 27, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Michael Waight, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered December 4, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Demetrius Blackwell, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered December 19, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Andres Grisales, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered November 27, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Austin, J.P.; Roman, Miller and Connolly, JJ.Naeco S. Harris, ap, v. Deanna Young, res — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the record on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated July 19, 2016, to include the report of Alan J. Zimmerman dated December 5, 2013. Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 5, 2018, the matter was remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, to report on whether that court considered the report of Alan J. Zimmerman dated December 5, 2013, in connection with the motion that was determined by the order dated July 19, 2016, and the motion and the application were held in abeyance in the interim. The Supreme Court, Suffolk County, has issued its report dated April 9, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, and upon the report of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated April 9, 2018, it isORDERED that the motion is denied as unnecessary as the report of Alan J. Zimmerman dated December 5, 2013, is properly part of the record; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, on or before May 7, 2018, the appellant shall serve and file a supplemental record containing the report of Alan J. Zimmerman dated December 5, 2013; and it is further,ORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until June 7, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.AUSTIN, J.P., ROMAN, MILLER and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.Magda Mansour-Mohamed, ap, v. State of New York, res — (Claim No. 126382) — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a decision of the Court of Claims, dated September 11, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies from a decision (see Schicchi v. J.A. Green Constr. Co., 100 AD2d 509); and it is further,ORDERED that the application is denied as academic.MATTER of Joan E. LaCasse, res, v. Donald J. Kennedy, ap — Appeal by Donald J. Kennedy from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated March 5, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Lauren Gottfried, res, v. Daniel Gottfried, ap — Appeal by Daniel Gottfried from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated September 1, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on April 11, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this , the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the child in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.By Austin, J.P.; Roman, Cohen and Barros, JJ.Patricia Rooney, res, v. Jonathan Garberg, def, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., ap — Motion by Paul Vincent Kaulas to be admitted pro hac vice to represent the appellant on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 3, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted.AUSTIN, J.P., ROMAN, COHEN and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Hinds-Radix, Lasalle and Connolly, JJ.Hilda Hutchinson, ap, v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC res — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the decision and order on motion of this Court dated April 13, 2018, in the above-entitled matter, on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 8, 2017, is amended by deleting from the first paragraph thereof the date “June 14, 2017,” and substituting therefor the date “November 8, 2017.”SCHEINKMAN, P.J., HINDS-RADIX, LASALLE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.
