By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, res, v. Robert Smith, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 12, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person is denied as unnecessary, as the appellant was granted leave to proceed as a poor person in the Supreme Court and, pursuant to Correction Law 168-n (3), his status as a poor person continues on appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any hearing held in connection with the order dated July 12, 2017, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that the clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPLR 1102[b]); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to assign counsel is granted and pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with or considered by the trial court in connection with the appellant’s risk level determination, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that the filing fee is waived (see CPLR 1102[d]); and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Stefano E. W. (Anonymous). Seaman’s Society for Children and Families, petitioner-res, Stephen J. W. (Anonymous), et al., respondents-ap — Separate appeals by Stephen J. W. and Janet L. J. G. from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated April 16, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the respondent-appellant Janet L. J. G. shall perfect her appeal in the above-entitled proceeding within 60 days after the receipt of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the respondent-appellant Janet L. J. G. shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeals; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if she is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect her appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute her appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by her affidavit, stating either that she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that her financial status has not changed since that time, or that she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing her appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeals to show cause why the appeal by the respondent-appellant Janet L. J. G. should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Shivaun Williams, ap, v. Cassandra Bryson, res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Cassandra Bryson, res, v. Shivaun Williams, ap — (Proceeding No. 2) V-8618-16) — Appeal by Shivaun Williams from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated August 18, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on May 4, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the children in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.MATTER of Glory C. Espinal, res, v. Dwayne A. Burton, ap — Appeal by Dwayne A. Burton from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated November 20, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until June 13, 2018.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Jacquelyn Quatrochi, res, v. Terry Simmons, ap — Appeal by Terry Simmons from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated January 30, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Maurice D. Williams, dated May 4, 2018, it isORDERED that the appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Peter D. Herger399 Knollwood Road, Suite 204White Plains, NY 10603914-325-9179and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the appellant at the address provided by this Court, and on or before May 24, 2018, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal, in writing, that she has done so and that either(1) the appellant is interested in prosecuting the appeal, or(2) the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal, or that he has been unable to contact the appellant, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the children, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s assigned counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the children, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that the appellant is interested in proceeding with the appeal, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Melissa Straight, ap, v. Donovan Schrouter, respodent. — Appeal by Melissa Straight from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 12, 2018. By order on certification of this Court dated May 2, 2018, the following attorney was assigned as counsel for the appellant on the appeal:Marion C. Perry8232 18th AvenueBrooklyn, NY 11214347-674-8716By letter dated May 4, 2018, the assigned counsel has informed this Court that the appellant wishes to proceed with the appeal. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order on certification of this Court dated May 2, 2018, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Kyle L. (Anonymous), ap — Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Salome T. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Kyle L. from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated March 15, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Lydia Antoncic, dated May 3, 2018, it isORDERED that pursuant to Family Court Act §1120, the following named attorney is assigned as the attorney for the child on the appeal:Andrew W. Szczesniak222 Mamaroneck Avenue, Suite 104White Plains, NY 10605914-682-9282and it is further,ORDERED that Lydia Antoncic, is directed to turn over all papers in the proceeding to the new attorney for the child herein assigned; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the attorney for the child and the respondent(s). The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the attorney for the child, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the attorney for the child. The attorney for the child is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, when the attorney for the child serves a brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that attorney for the child shall serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the attorney for the child of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the attorney for the child shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this order, the attorney for the child shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcripts have been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcripts have not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that this order has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcripts are expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Isabella J. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, pet-res, Ernesto J. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Abigail A. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, pet-res, Ernesto J. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Glinis S. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, pet-res, Ernesto J. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 3) — Appeal by Ernesto J. from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated April 16, 2018. By order on certification of this Court dated April 26, 2018, the following attorney was assigned as counsel for the appellant on the appeal:Marina M. Martielli15 Woodfield AvenueE. Quogue, NY 11942631-728-2654By letter dated May 7, 2018, the assigned counsel has informed this Court that the appellant wishes to proceed with the appeal. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order on certification of this Court dated April 26, 2018, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, res, v. Eric Jones, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 19, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person is denied as unnecessary, as the appellant was granted leave to proceed as a poor person in the Supreme Court and, pursuant to Correction Law 168-n (3), his status as a poor person continues on appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any hearing held in connection with the order dated July 19, 2017, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that the clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPLR 1102[b]); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to assign counsel is granted and pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with or considered by the trial court in connection with the appellant’s risk level determination, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that the filing fee is waived (see CPLR 1102[d]); and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Dillon, Lasalle and Connolly, JJ.MATTER of Dominika Joanna Radetzki , ap, v. Moises Rodriguez II, res — Appeal by Dominika Joanna Radetzki from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated April 23, 2018.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party (see CPLR 5511).MASTRO, J.P., DILLON, LASALLE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Dillon, Lasalle and Connolly, JJ.MATTER of Christina Lyons, res, v. Kenric Clifford Lever, ap — Appeal by Kenric Clifford Lever from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated February 25, 2015. By dated March 7, 2018, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal was enlarged until March 29, 2018. The appellant has failed to perfect the appeal.Now, on the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to timely perfect in accordance with the rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2],[4]) and prior order of the Court.MASTRO, J.P., DILLON, LASALLE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Dillon, Lasalle and Connolly, JJ.MATTER of Abigail Long, ap, v. Francis M. Donoghue res — Motion by the attorney for the children to enlarge the record on an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated October 12, 2017, to include the transcript of a certain in camera interview which occurred on June 1, 2017, in related proceedings under Orange County Family Court Docket Nos. V-5429/32-08/17E, O-273-17/17A, V-5429/32-08/16D, and V-5429/32-08/16C, to direct the filing of the transcript of the in camera interview, under seal, to enlarge the record to include the transcript of proceedings which occurred on June 29, 2017, in the related proceedings, and to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that on or before May 24, 2018, the attorney for the children shall file the transcripts of the in camera interview which occurred on June 1, 2017, and the proceedings which occurred on June 29, 2017, and shall serve the appellant and the respondent with a copy of the transcript of the proceedings which occurred on June 29, 2017; and it is further,ORDERED that the transcript of the in camera interview which occurred on June 1, 2017, shall be filed, under seal, for in camera review by the panel of Justices assigned to hear the appeal, and shall remain sealed upon delivery; and it is further,ORDERED that the attorney for the children shall serve and file a brief on the appeal, on or before June 14, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until June 14, 2018, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MASTRO, J.P., DILLON, LASALLE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, res, v. Virgilio Rosario, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 7, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person is denied as unnecessary, as the appellant was granted leave to proceed as a poor person in the Supreme Court and, pursuant to Correction Law 168-n (3), his status as a poor person continues on appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any hearing held in connection with the order dated June 7, 2017, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that the clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPLR 1102[b]); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to assign counsel is granted and pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with or considered by the trial court in connection with the appellant’s risk level determination, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that the filing fee is waived (see CPLR 1102[d]); and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Rysheek Dixon, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered December 19, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Leila Aquino, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered December 20, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. David Rodriguez, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute appeals from two judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, both rendered November 17, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeals will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeals, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeals:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeals expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeals; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeals are taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.Morequity, Inc., res, v. Centennial Insurance Company defendants; 158-11 96th Street, LLC, nonparty-ap — Motion by the appellant to stay the sale of the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered January 29, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.M. L., etc, res, v. I C Bus, Inc., et al., ap — Motion by the appellants to stay an inquest in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated March 6, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.Roslyn Tauber, respondent plf, v. Scott Ellis, etc. ap — Motion by the appellants to stay enforcement of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 16, 2018, and to stay the trial in the above-entitled action, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from the order.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.MATTER of Francis Spano, ap, v. Jade Spano, res — Motion by the appellant to stay enforcement of stated portions of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated March 14, 2018, pending hearing and determination of an appeal therefrom.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.MATTER of Eldert Lane Development, LLC, ap, v. Congress Construction Corp., res — Motion by the appellant to stay a certain arbitration proceeding pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 14, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.Xaverian High School, plf, v. Mariluz Carmona, def — (Appellate Division Docket No. 2016-1430KC; Kings County Index No. 44325/05) — Motion by Xaverian High School for leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Appellate Term, Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts, dated January 26, 2018, which determined an appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, entered November 17, 2015, and to stay a traverse hearing in the above-entitled action, pending hearing and determination of the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to appeal is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied as academic.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.MATTER of Phyllis Siciliano, res, v. Aniello Strocchia, ap — Motion by the appellant on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 26, 2018, to stay enforcement of certain child support orders, pending hearing and determination of the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.MATTER of Phyllis Siciliano, res, v. Aniello Strocchia, ap — Appeal by Aniello Strocchia from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 26, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.MATTER of Amaryah D. (Anonymous), ap — Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Ivree D. (Anonymous), respondent- res — Motion by the respondent-respondent pro se for leave to defend an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated February 8, 2018, as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or relation thereto; it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to Family Court Act §1120 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel for the respondent to defend the appeal:Linda C. Braunsberg370 Powell Street, Apt. 2Staten Island, NY 10312718-637-4479and it is further,ORDERED that counsel in the Family Court is relieved, and is directed to turn over all papers in the action to new counsel herein assigned.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Austin, Roman and Sgroi, JJ.MATTER of Ferncliff Cemetery Association, ap, v. Town of Greenburgh res — Motion by the appellant on an appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated November 15, 2016, to extend the time to comply with a decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 23, 2018, and for leave to serve and file a replacement Volume I of the record on appeal to correct certain pagination problems.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to comply with the decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 23, 2018, is enlarged until June 11, 2018, and the appellant shall serve and file a replacement Volume I of the record on appeal on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant shall serve and file a replacement brief on or before June 11, 2018, in the event that the references to Volume I do not correspond to the replacement Volume I; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until July 11, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.Hong Yan Liang, ap, v. Chelsea Enterprises, LLC res — Motion by the respondents Chelsea Enterprises, LLC, and Fitzroy O. Myers, and separate motion by the respondent Devin Zhang, to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 25, 2017, as untimely taken.Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party (see CPLR 5511); and it is further,ORDERED that the motions are denied as academic.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By of The State of New York, Second Judicial Department, Mastro, J.P.; Dillon, Connolly and Iannacci, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Minguel C. Demello, ap — Motion by the appellant for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered January 11, 2018, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Thomas N. N. AngellPublic Defender22 Market StreetPoughkeepsie, NY 12601and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.MASTRO, J.P., DILLON, CONNOLLY and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., ex rel. Corey Reid, pet, v. Warden Matthews, etc., res — Application by the petitioner for a writ of habeas corpus and for poor person relief.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the application which is for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and that branch of the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the application which is for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., ex rel. Jermaine Barnes, pet, v. Jamie Lamanna, etc., res — Application by the petitioner for a writ of habeas corpus and for poor person relief.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the application which is for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and that branch of the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the application which is for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Erik D. Ferguson, ap — Motion by the appellant on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, rendered September 2, 2015, for leave to withdraw his excessive sentence motion and to serve and file a replacement motion.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.MATTER of Esther Masri, res, v. Joseph Masri, ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Joseph Masri, ap, v. Esther Masri, res — (Proceeding No. 2) O-3079-15, O-3323-15) — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated April 18, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until June 11, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.MATTER of Agam S. B.-L. (Anonymous). SCO Family Services, petitioner-res, Janna W. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant; Richard P. (Anonymous), nonparty-res — Motion by the respondent-appellant for a preference in the calendaring of appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 10, 2017, and an order of the same court dated March 8, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Chambers, Maltese and Barros, JJ.Wenger Construction Co., Inc., respondent- ap, v. City of Long Beach, appellant- res — Motion by the respondent-appellant for leave to reargue an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered February 24, 2015, which were determined by decision and order of this Court dated July 19, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied, with $100 costs.RIVERA, J.P., CHAMBERS, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.Andy Wong, res, v. Long Island Raceway, etc., ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Chambers, J.P.; Sgroi, Maltese and Connolly, JJ.Esther Pinto, res, v. John E. Kehoe, etc., ap, et al., def — Motion by the appellant for leave to reargue his prior motion to stay enforcement of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 6, 2018, which was determined by decision and order on motion of this Court dated April 20, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.CHAMBERS, J.P., SGROI, MALTESE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.Deborah Martin, plf-res, v. Nikosa S. Francis defendants- res, Mikhail Tomashpolskiy, et al., ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 28, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.Nella Manko, ap, v. David A. Gabay, etc. res — Motion by the appellant pro se to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 31, 2017, for poor person relief, for the assignment of counsel, and to waive the motion filing fee.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until July 10, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to waive the motion filing fee is denied as unnecessary (see CPLR 8022[b]); and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.Xander Corp., ap, v. Sinclair Haberman res — (Action No. 1)Sinclair Haberman res, v. Xander Corp. defendants third-party plaintiffs-appellants defendants; Michael G. Zapson third-party defendants- ap — (Action No. 2)MATTER of Sinclair Haberman petitioners- res, v. Zoning Board of Appeals of City of Long Beach res, City of Long Beach res-res, Xander Corp., ap — (Action No. 3)— Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 11, 2016.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated April 4, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Nelson and Iannacci, JJ.Mitchell P. Lieberman res, v. David Green, ap — Motion by Denlea & Carton , LLP, for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 1, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in relation or opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and on or before May 24, 2018, Denlea & Carton, LLP, shall serve its client by one of the methods specified in CPLR 2103(c), with a copy of this decision and order on motion and shall file proof of such service with the Clerk of this Court; and it is further,ORDERED that no further proceedings shall be taken against the appellant, without leave of the Court, until the expiration of 30 days after service upon him of a copy of this decision and order on motion; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until July 11, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.LEVENTHAL, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.Xander Corp., ap, v. Sinclair Haberman res — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 7, 2016.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated April 4, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Rivera, Miller and Hinds-Radix, JJ.Carlos Villada, appellant-res, v. IDB Group, Property & Building Corp., def, 452 Fifth Owners, LLC respondents-appellants res — Motion by the appellant-respondent on an appeal and cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 1, 2016, to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal. Separate motion by the respondents-appellants to dismiss the appeal and to enlarge the time to perfect the cross appeals.Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the appellant-respondent’s motion is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondents-appellants’ motion is granted, the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e]), and the respondents-appellants’ time to perfect the cross appeals is enlarged until June 14, 2018.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., RIVERA, MILLER and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.Philip Luisi, res, v. Carol Jolly, def, Philip Como, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated March 17, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.German Alejandro Zhungo, ap, v. Jose Murchan, res-ap, G. OReilly Contracting, Inc., appellant- res, M.A.M. Contracting, Inc., res — Application by the respondent-appellant on appeals and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 8, 2018, to withdraw the cross appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the cross appeal is marked withdrawn.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Jose Pereyra, ap — Motion by the appellant on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered November 2, 2016, to be furnished with the transcript of the proceedings which occurred on October 19, 2016, in the above entitled matter.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the decision and order on motion of this Court dated October 10, 2017, which granted poor person relief to the appellant, is amended to include a direction to the court reporter to make, certify and file two transcripts of the stenographic minutes of the proceedings which occurred on October 19, 2016, in the above-entitled action; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer is directed to make, certify and file such transcripts within 45 days of the date of this decision and order on motion and the clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings to the appellant’s counsel, Joseph DeFelice, 125-10 Queens Boulevard, Suite 302, Kew Gardens, NY 11415, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the transcripts for a codefendant, then the clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Norma Taddeo ap, v. 7-Eleven, Inc., res — Application to withdraw appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 22, 2017, and September 27, 2017, respectively, and a judgment of the same court entered April 14, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeals dated April 10, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeals are deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, res, v. Patricia Wilson def, Russell Carbone, ap — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated May 24, 2017, for failure to timely perfect. Application by the appellant to withdraw the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the application, and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application to withdraw the appeal is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is denied as academic.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc.., res, v. Keith Meyn, ap — Application to withdraw an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, rendered August 31, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the appellant and the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated April 24, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Mary Rhodehouse, res, v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 11, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Sheldon Goldgrab, res, v. City of New York, ap — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 3, 2016.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated May 3, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Jamal Campbell, ap — Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered December 9, 2016.Upon the stipulation of the appellant and the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated April 30, 2018, it isORDERED that the appeal is marked withdrawn.Block 3592, LLC, res, v. Bare Krcista ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated February 22, 2018, and a judgment of the same court entered February 23, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeals are marked withdrawn.Anita Halvatzis, res, v. Joseph Application to Withdraw Appeal Perrone ap — Application on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 27, 2017, to withdraw the appeal insofar as taken by the defendant Joan Perrone.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal by the defendant Joan Perrone is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Nikolaos Kanterakis, ap, v. Emily Kanterakis, res — 2015-12372Nikolaos Kanterakis, appellant,v Emily Kanterakis, defendant-respondent;Salvatore A. Lecci, nonparty-respondent.(Index No. 200615/12) Nikolaos Kanterakis, respondent-appellant,v Emily Kanterakis, defendant-appellant-respondent;Salvatore A. Lecci, nonparty-appellant-respondent.(Index No. 200615/12) Appeal by Nikolaos Kanterakis from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 12, 2015. Separate appeal by Nikolaos Kanterakis, by permission, from so much of a decision and order (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated November 13, 2015, as directed him to pay counsel fees to Emily Kanterakis in the sum of $45,000. Separate appeals by Emily Kanterakis and Salvatore A. Lecci, and cross appeal by Nikolaos Kanterakis, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered July 12, 2016.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the order to show cause of this Court dated February 23, 2018, in the above-entitled matter, is amended by deleting from the decretal paragraphs thereof the date “March 19, 2018,” and substituting therefor the date “May 31, 2018.”SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.
