Appellate Division, Second Department: May 14, 2018

By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Michael E. Herskowitz, admitted as Michael Elliot Herskowitz, an attorney and counselor-at-law. Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts, petitioner; Michael E. Herskowitz, res — (Attorney Registration No. 4276903) — Motion by the Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts, pursuant to Judiciary Law §90(4)(f) to suspend the respondent from the practice of law based on his conviction of a serious crime as defined in Judiciary Law §90(4)(d), and to direct the respondent to immediately apprise the Court upon being sentenced and simultaneously file with the Court a certified record of the judgment of such conviction. The respondent was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on January 12, 2005, under the name Michael Elliot Herskowitz.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the respondent, Michael E. Herskowitz, admitted as Michael Elliot Herskowitz, is immediately suspended from the practice of law pursuant to Judiciary Law §90(4)(f) as a result of his conviction of a serious crime, continuing until further order of this Court; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondent, Michael E. Herskowitz, admitted as Michael Elliot Herskowitz, shall promptly comply with this Court’s rules governing the conduct of disbarred or suspended attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 1240.15); and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, during the period of suspension and until further order of this Court, the respondent, Michael E. Herskowitz, admitted as Michael Elliot Herskowitz, is commanded to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law and it is further,ORDERED that if the respondent, Michael E. Herskowitz, admitted as Michael Elliot Herskowitz, has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency and the respondent shall certify to the same in his affidavit of compliance pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1240.15(f); and it is further,ORDERED that the respondent, Michael E. Herskowitz, admitted as Michael Elliot Herskowitz, is directed to promptly advise the Court upon being sentenced (see Matter of Delaney, 87 NY2d 508).SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Balkin, Leventhal and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.MATTER of C. Robert Clemensen, admitted as Clement Robert Clemensen, an attorney and counselor-at-law. Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District, petitioner; C. Robert Clemensen, res — (Attorney Registration No. 1683754) — Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the respondent, C. Robert Clemensen, admitted as Clement Robert Clemensen, is immediately suspended from the practice of law pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1240.14(b) on the ground that he is incapacitated due to medical illness, for an indefinite period of time and continuing until further order of this Court; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondent, C. Robert Clemensen, admitted as Clement Robert Clemensen, shall promptly comply with this Court’s rules governing the conduct of disbarred and suspended attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 1240.15); and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, during the period of suspension and until further order of this Court, the respondent, C. Robert Clemensen, admitted as Clement Robert Clemensen, is commanded to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and it is further,ORDERED that if the respondent, C. Robert Clemensen, admitted as Clement Robert Clemensen, has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency and the respondent shall certify to the same in his affidavit of compliance pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1240.15(f).SCHEINKMAN, J.P., MASTRO, BALKIN, LEVENTHAL and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Paul Patscot, Jr., ap, v. Anna Fisco, res — Appeal by Paul Patscot, Jr., from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated August 21, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until June 19, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Michelle Levitin, res, v. Joshua Levitin, ap — Appeal by Joshua Levitin from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered September 20, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the children to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until July 2, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Scott Pinelli, ap, v. Erin Galt, res — Appeal by Scott Pinelli from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated February 8, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Olaitan K. Olawuyi, ap, v. Nadine A. Rollins, res — Appeal by Olaitan K. Olawuyi from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated July 12, 2017. By order dated November 13, 2017, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of this Court, within 30 days after the date of the  :(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript was expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.The appellant has failed to comply with the order. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with the order dated November 13, 2017, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before June 4, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties by regular mail.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. David Marine, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 14, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Seymour W. James, Jr.The Legal Aid Society199 Water Street – 5th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Tanya Warney, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 20, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Seymour W. James, Jr.The Legal Aid Society199 Water Street – 5th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Frederick Martinez, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 14, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Courtney Robinson, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 10, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Selena S. Barton, etc., res, v. Jimmy Montero, Jr., ap — Appeal by Jimmy Montero, Jr., from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated April 9, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Daniel Peura, ap, v. Shron Peura, res — Appeal by Daniel Peura from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated April 24, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.Joseph Paese, ap, v. Janamarie Paese, res — Appeal by Joseph Paese from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 7, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled action shall be perfected within 60 days after the appellant receives the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Supreme Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received. If there are no minutes to be transcribed, the appeal in the above-entitled action shall be perfected within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes in the Supreme Court action to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Joseph Paese, ap, v. Janamarie Paese, res — Appeal by Joseph Paese from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated February 13, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled action shall be perfected within 60 days after the appellant receives the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Supreme Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received. If there are no minutes to be transcribed, the appeal in the above-entitled action shall be perfected within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes in the Supreme Court action to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.Steven B. Schonfeld, res, v. Sidra Saucedo, ap — Appeal by Sidra Saucedo from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 16, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled action shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Supreme Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Supreme Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Rihana J. H. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-appellant; Quiana J. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Kaden J. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-appellant; Quiana J. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by Administration for Children’s Services from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated April 6, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Natasha Soo-Hon Bartholomew, res, v. Anthony Michael Marano, ap — Appeal by Anthony Michael Marano from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated March 5, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC, res, v. Gabriella Hurst appellants def — Motion by the appellants to stay the sale of the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 27, 2017, and a judgment of the same court also entered June 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the sale of the subject premises, located at 281 Mott Avenue, Lawrence, New York 11559, is stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeals.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Eligio Turcios, res, v. Elizabeth Cordero, ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Elizabeth Cordero, ap, v. Eligio Turcios, res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by Elizabeth Cordero from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated January 16, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Victor Guzman, dated February 21, 2018, it isORDERED that pursuant to Family Court Act §1120, the following named attorney is assigned as the attorney for the child on the appeal:Carl D. Birman235 Mamaroneck Avenue, Suite 300White Plains, NY 10605914-630-4680and it is further,ORDERED that Victor Guzman is directed to turn over all papers in the proceeding to the new attorney for the child herein assigned.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Stephanie Dimas, res, v. Philippe C. Fanfan, ap — Appeals by Philippe C. Fanfan from three orders of the Family Court, Queens County, all dated January 17, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Suzanne Blond, dated March 20, 2018, it isORDERED that the respondent is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeals, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to respond to the appeals:Carol Kahn225 Broadway, Suite 1510New York, NY 10007212-227-0206and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the respondent at the address provided by the Court, and shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeals on or before May 28, 2018, in writing, that she has done so and that either(1) the respondent is interested in responding to the appeals, or(2) the respondent is not interested in responding to the appeals, or that she has been unable to contact the respondent, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Enrique Rivera, ap — Motion by the appellant for leave to prosecute an appeal, by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 20, 2015, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of any hearing held in connection with the order dated October 20, 2015, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Georgia Barker, res, v. John T. Rohack, ap — Appeal by John T. Rohack from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated October 6, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until June 25, 2018.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Randy Turner, ap — (S.C.I. No. 7261/17) — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 6, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Ranly Torres, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 5, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Fausto Abreu, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 30, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Nialani T. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Elizabeth B. (Anonymous), respondent- ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Aarielis G. T. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Elizabeth B. (Anonymous), respondent- ap — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeals by Elizabeth B. from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, dated March 28, 2016, and June 9, 2017, respectively. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the appellant to serve and file a reply brief on the appeals is enlarged until May 21, 2018.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Harvens Brunache, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 3, 2018, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Maurice Lewis, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered July 20, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Gailson L. (Anonymous), ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 6, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Milana Korovina, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 5, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Ernest Tenemille, pet, v. Town of Ramapo res — Motion by the petitioner for leave to prosecute a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, which was transferred to this Court by an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated November 1, 2017, on the original papers and to enlarge the time to perfect the proceeding.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to prosecute the proceeding on the original papers is granted, and the proceeding will be heard on the original papers (including the transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the parties, who are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the proceeding is granted and the petitioner’s time to perfect the proceeding by causing the original papers constituting the record to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]), and by serving and filing a brief is enlarged until June 13, 2018.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.B. M., etc. res-ap, v. Warwick Valley Central School District, et al., def, Wayne Rossi, appellant- res — Motion by the respondents-appellants on an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated February 21, 2017, in effect, to extend their time to comply with so much of a decision and order on motion of this Court dated February 15, 2018, as directed them to file the notice of cross appeal, which was timely served, with the clerk of the Supreme Court, Orange County, and file proof of filing with this Court on or before March 1, 2018, and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal and cross appeal. Separate motion by the appellant-respondent to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motions are granted, the notice of cross appeal is deemed timely filed, the appellant-respondent’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until June 13, 2018, and the joint record or appendix on the appeal and cross appeal (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][1]) and the appellant-respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondents-appellants shall serve and file their answering brief, including their points of argument on the cross appeal, in accordance with the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]).SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.MATTER of Khamari S. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Keith S. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Keith S. from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated May 18, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the appellant to serve and file a reply brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 29, 2018.MATTER of Honesty M. M. M. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Taikeem L. W. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeals by Taikeem L. W. from two orders of the Family Court, Suffolk County, both dated January 25, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the petitioner-respondent and the attorney for the child to serve and file their respective briefs on the appeals is enlarged until June 15, 2018.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.Adam Wan, etc., res, v. Britton Property, Inc., appellant def — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 4, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until June 13, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.U.S. Bank National Association, etc., res, v. Jorge Mendez, appellant def — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 1, 2017, inter alia, on the ground that no appeal lies from a decision.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to dismiss the appeal on the ground that no appeal lies from a decision is granted (see Schicchi v. J.A. Green Constr. Co., 100 AD2d 509); and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied as academic.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.Adam Wan, etc., res, v. Britton Property, Inc., appellant def — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered June 19, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until June 13, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.Laura Esquivel, etc. plf, v. 2707 Creston Realty, LLC, defendant third-party plaintiff-res, Universal Elevators, Inc., third-party def-ap — Motion by the third-party defendant-appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 8, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until June 28, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the third-party defendant-appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.Cenlar (FSB), res, v. Isaac Tenenbaum ap — Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 29, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellants’ time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until June 13, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.Michael Grasso, etc., res-ap, v. Nassau County, def, Nassau County Police Department res, Nassau University Medical Center, etc. appellants-res — Motion by the respondents-appellants to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 24, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondents-appellants’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until June 13, 2018, and the respondents-appellants’ brief, including the points of argument on the cross appeal (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]), shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.Wells Fargo Bank National Association, etc., res, v. Sanjay Barot, etc., appellant def — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 8, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until June 13, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.US Bank N.A., etc., res, v. Chana Landau ap, et al., def — Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 30, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until June 28, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Fotma Odetallah Musleh, res, v. 948 Myrtle Ave. Corp. ap — Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 28, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until June 13, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.Fernando Barreiros, plf-res, v. Inter County Paving Associates, LLC, defendant third-party plf-ap, Kings Park Asphalt Corp. res, Sweet Hollow Management Corp., third-party def-res — Motion by the plaintiff-respondent, and separate motion by the third-party defendant-respondent, to enlarge the time to serve and file their respective briefs on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated March 13, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motions are granted, the time for the plaintiff-respondent and the third-party defendant-respondent to serve and file their respective briefs is enlarged until June 13, 2018, and the briefs of those parties shall be served and filed on or before that date.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Saloni Anand, etc. pet, v. New York State Department of Health res — Motion by the respondents New York State Department of Health, Howard A. Zucker, Samuel D. Roberts, and Richard L. Levechuck to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 which was transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated July 20, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the movants’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until June 13, 2018, and the movants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.Elia Rivera, ap, v. New York City Health and Hospital Corporation res — Motion by the respondents to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 3, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 30, 2018, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Cohen, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Hilary Best, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered June 28, 2016, in effect, to be provided with the transcripts of certain proceedings and to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief .Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to be provided with the transcripts of certain proceedings is denied as unnecessary as those transcripts have been provided to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until August 13, 2018, and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.SGROI, J.P., COHEN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Balkin, Austin and Hinds-Radix, JJ.Nella Manko, ap, v. David A. Gabay respondents def — Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 7, 2016. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 19, 2018, the branches of a motion by the respondents Aaronson Rappaport Feinstein & Deutsch, LLP, Elliot J. Zucker, and Mark J. Aaronson and a separate motion by the respondents Kaufman Borgeest & Ryan, LLP, and Tracey A. Reiser, which were to dismiss the appeal were denied on condition that on or before April 30, 2018, the appellant serve and file a replacement appellant’s appendix and a replacement appellant’s brief which does not contain matter dehors the record and which complies with the CPLR and rules of this Court. The appellant has not filed the replacement appellant’s appendix and the replacement appellant’s brief.Now, on the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the parties to the appeal are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal for failure to comply with the decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 19, 2018, by filing an affirmation or an affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court on or before June 6, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court or her designee is directed to serve a copy ofthis order to show cause upon the parties to the appeal by regular mail.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., BALKIN, AUSTIN and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.58-48 Catalpa Realty Corp. ap, v. S & S Medical Associates, P. C. res — (File No. 346220) — Motion by the respondents Sheflin Medical Group, P.C., and Craig Sheflin to direct the appellant to serve and file a supplemental record on an appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County, dated April 14, 2017, and to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief. Separate motion by the appellant to compel the respondents Sheflin Medical Group, P.C., and Craig Sheflin to furnish it with color reproductions of certain exhibits or, in the alternative, for leave to submit black and white copies of those exhibits.Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion by the respondents Sheflin Medical Group, P.C., and Craig Sheflin is granted, on or before June 13, 2018, the appellants shall serve and file a supplemental record containing the exhibits identified in the parties’ stipulation dated March 2018, and annexed to the motion papers, the time of the respondents Sheflin Medical Group, P.C., and Craig Sheflin to serve and file a brief is enlarged until July 13, 2018, and their brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellants’ motion is granted to the extent that the appellants shall file black and white copies of the subject exhibits in the supplemental record and the appellants’ motion is otherwise denied.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Joseph Paese, ap, v. Janamarie Paese, res — Appeal by Joseph Paese from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 20, 2017.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that the order is not appealable as of right (see Domestic Relations Law §70; CPLR 7011), and leave to appeal has not been granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.Professional Offshore Opportunity Fund, Ltd., res, v. Lloyd J. Braider, et al., def, Laura L. Braider, ap — Motion by the appellant on appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated November 13, 2017, and three orders of the same court, one dated October 7, 2016, and two dated January 26, 2017, in effect, to extend the time to comply with a decision and order on motion of this Court dated February 22, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and on or before June 28, 2018, the appellant shall serve and file a supplemental record containing the judgment, the notice of appeal from the judgment, and the papers and any transcripts necessary to consider the issues raised on the appeal from the judgment which are not contained in the record filed in connection with the orders, as well as a supplemental appellant’s brief solely addressing the issues raised in connection with the judgment which are not contained in the brief filed in connection with the orders; and it is further,ORDERED that no further extensions of time to file the supplemental record and supplemental brief shall be granted.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Nora Rosario, pet, v. New York City Department of Social Services res — Renewed motion by the petitioner pro se for the assignment of counsel in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, which was transferred to this Court by an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 19, 2017, and to enlarge the time to perfect the proceeding.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for the assignment of counsel is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the proceeding is granted, and the time to perfect the proceeding by causing the original papers constituting the record on the proceeding to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]), and by serving and filing the petitioner’s brief is enlarged until June 13, 2018.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Chad Campbell, ap, v. Tina M. Stanford, etc., res — Motion by the respondent on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated May 15, 2017, for leave to file certain exhibits under seal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and on or before June 6, 2018, the respondent shall file, under seal, for in camera review by the Justices assigned to hear the appeal, the presentence investigation report concerning the appellant, the letter from the District Attorney submitted for in camera review to the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, and the portion of the report of the New York State Board of Parole submitted for in camera review to the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, and those exhibits shall remain sealed upon filing.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, res, v. Carol A. Kelly, etc., appellants def — Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated July 7, 2017, to consolidate that appeal with an appeal from an order of the same court dated November 15, 2016, to deem the record and briefs filed in connection with the order to be filed in connection with the judgment, and, in effect, for leave to serve and file a supplemental record containing the judgment and notice of appeal from the judgment.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal from the judgment is enlarged, the appeals are consolidated, and on or before June 14, 2018, the appellants shall serve and file a supplemental record containing the judgment and notice of appeal from the judgment.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Roman, J.P.; Cohen, Miller and Maltese, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Rosendo Torres, ap — Renewed motion by the appellant for leave to prosecute and appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered December 11, 2014, as a poor person.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.ROMAN, J.P., COHEN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Nicholas Lewis, ap — Motion by the appellant’s assigned counsel on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered May 18, 2016, in effect, to be relieved on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal by failing to respond to communications by assigned counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant is directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal, by filing an affirmation or an affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court on or before June 14, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion by assigned counsel, in effect, to be relieved is held in abeyance in the interim; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court or her designee is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the appellant at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and upon the attorney who last appeared for him, and upon the District Attorney, by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2).SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Nicholas Lewis, ap — Motion by the appellant’s assigned counsel on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered May 17, 2016, in effect, to be relieved on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal by failing to respond to communications by assigned counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant is directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal, by filing an affirmation or an affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court on or before June 14, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion by assigned counsel, in effect, to be relieved is held in abeyance in the interim; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court or her designee is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the appellant at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and upon the attorney who last appeared for him, and upon the District Attorney, by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2).SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Richard Williams, ap, v. Avis Rental res — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 2, 2016.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated May 9, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Jonathan May, appellant-res, v. Patricia May, res-res — Application by the appellant-respondent to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated July 5, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.James D. Glascott, etc. appellants- res, v. J. Michele Rudolph, etc., et al., respondents-appellants def — Application by the respondents-appellants to withdraw cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 7, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the cross appeals are marked withdrawn.MATTER of Clifford Mickenberg, ap, v. 218 Thompson Street, LLC res — Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated November 9, 2016.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated April 26, 2018, it isORDERED that the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Chambers, J.P.; Austin, Miller and Maltese, JJ.Buttaffuoco & Associates, PLLC res, v. Delfina Urias, etc. ap — 2015-08795Delfina Urias, etc., appellant,v Daniel P. Buttafuoco & Associates, PLLC,et al., respondents.(Index No. 7186/11) ‌Delfina Urias, etc., appellant,v Daniel P. Buttafuoco & Associates, PLLC,et al., respondents.(Index No. 7186/11) ‌Delfina Urias, etc., plaintiff,v Daniel P. Buttafuoco & Associates, PLLC,et al., defendants.(Index No. 7186/11) ‌Motion by Delfina Urias and Marta Urias, inter alia, to renew and reargue their prior motion, inter alia, to recall and vacate so much of a decision and order on motion of this Court, dated July 5, 2017, as dismissed appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 10, 2015, and an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 24, 2015, for failure to timely perfect, which was determined by decision and order on motion of this Court dated April 6, 2018, to enlarge the time to perfect those appeals and appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated September 15, 2016, and August 21, 2017, respectively, to consolidate the appeals, for a preference in the calendaring of the appeal from the order dated September 15, 2016, and to stay all proceedings in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, pending hearing and determination of the appeals.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal from the order dated August 21, 2017, is granted, and the time to perfect that appeal is enlarged until June 14, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal from the order dated September 15, 2016, is denied as premature; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to consolidate the appeals from the orders dated September 15, 2016, and August 21, 2017, is denied as unnecessary as those appeals may be consolidated as of right (see 22 NYCRR 670.7[c][1]); and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for a preference in the calendaring of the appeal from the order dated September 15, 2016, is granted and the appeal will be calendared expeditiously after all briefs have been filed; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.CHAMBERS, J.P., AUSTIN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Roman, Duffy and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.US Bank National Association, etc., res, v. Susan Swanson, appellant def — Motion by the appellant to stay the sale of the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 7, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.MASTRO, J.P., ROMAN, DUFFY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Austin, Cohen and Duffy, JJ.Fabio Michael Lozano, Jr., res, v. Madga, Inc., appellant def — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered April 24, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 16, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant shall serve and file a reply brief, if any, on or before May 18, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that service of all briefs shall be effected pursuant to CPLR 2103(b)(1), or (3).CHAMBERS, J.P., AUSTIN, COHEN and DUFFY, JJ., concur.