By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Jerry Adams, ap, v. Kenneth Thompson, res — Motion by Jerry Adams for leave to appeal to this Court from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 24, 2018, and to stay enforcement of the order, pending hearing and determination of the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied without prejudice to moving in the Supreme Court, Kings County, to substitute the proper party respondent.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Victoria Anna Foltz, an attorney and counselor-at-law. (Attorney Registration No. 5391941) — Application by Victoria Anna Foltz, who was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on January 13, 2016, to change her name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law to Victoria Anna Foltz Cordova.Upon the papers filed in support of the application, it isORDERED that the application is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall change the applicant’s name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law from Victoria Anna Foltz to Victoria Anna Foltz Cordova, effective immediately.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Diana Xiang Lin, an attorney and counselor-at-law. (Attorney Registration No. 4292447) — Application by Diana Xiang Lin, who was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on March 30, 2005, to change her name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law to Diana Lin Peng.Upon the papers filed in support of the application, it isORDERED that the application is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall change the applicant’s name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law from Diana Xiang Lin to Diana Lin Peng, effective immediately.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Cassandra M. Lindenberger, an attorney and counselor-at-law. (Attorney Registration No. 2588853) — Application by Cassandra M. Lindenberger, who was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on March 23, 1994, to change her name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law to Cassandra M. Rothman.Upon the papers filed in support of the application, it isORDERED that the application is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall change the applicant’s name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law from Cassandra M. Lindenberger to Cassandra M. Rothman, effective immediately.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Lena Davydan, an attorney and counselor-at-law. (Attorney Registration No. 4677738) — Application by Lena Davydan, who was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on May 27, 2009, to change her name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law to Yelena Graves.Upon the papers filed in support of the application, it isORDERED that the application is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall change the applicant’s name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law from Lena Davydan to Yelena Graves, effective immediately.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Vassiliki Eliza Economides, an attorney and counselor-at-law. (Attorney Registration No. 5092804) — Application by Vassiliki Eliza Economides, who was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on March 20, 2013, to change her name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law to Vassiliki Economides Farrior.Upon the papers filed in support of the application, it isORDERED that the application is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall change the applicant’s name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law from Vassiliki Eliza Economides to Vassiliki Economides Farrior, effective immediately.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Dominique Murray, an attorney and counselor-at-law. (Attorney Registration No. 4387320) — Application by Dominique Murray, who was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on June 21, 2006, to change her name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law to Dominique Myers.Upon the papers filed in support of the application, it isORDERED that the application is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall change the applicant’s name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law from Dominique Murray to Dominique Myers, effective immediately.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Sofya Slepak, an attorney and counselor-at-law. (Attorney Registration No. 5359146) — Application by Sofya Slepak, who was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on September 16, 2015, to change her name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law to Sofya Gulyako.Upon the papers filed in support of the application, it isORDERED that the application is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall change the applicant’s name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law from Sofya Slepak to Sofya Gulyako, effective immediately.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Jessalyn Ruth Garvey, admitted as Jessalyn Ruth Davis, an attorney and counselor-at-law. (Attorney Registration No. 4774204) — Jessalyn Ruth Garvey has submitted an affidavit dated January 30, 2018, wherein she voluntarily resigns from the New York State Bar. Ms. Garvey was admitted to the Bar in the State of New York at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on March 3, 2010, under the name Jessalyn Ruth Davis. There are no complaints or charges of professional misconduct pending against her. Ms. Garvey presently resides in Illinois, does not practice law in New York, and, under these circumstances, does not wish to pay the biennial registration fee.Upon the papers submitted in support of the resignation, it isORDERED that the voluntary resignation of Jessalyn Ruth Garvey is accepted and directed to be filed; and it is further,ORDERED that the name of Jessalyn Ruth Garvey is removed from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, without prejudice to an application for reinstatement; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, Jessalyn Ruth Garvey is commanded to desist and refrain from (l) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another in the State of New York, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority in this State, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto in this State, and (4) holding herself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York; and it is further,ORDERED that if Jessalyn Ruth Garvey has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.MATTER of William Mark Nossen, admitted as William Nossen, an attorney and counselor-at-law. (Attorney Registration No. 2881555) — William Mark Nossen has submitted an affidavit dated December 14, 2017, wherein he voluntarily resigns from the New York State Bar. Mr. Nossen was admitted to the Bar in the State of New York at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on April 29, 1998, under the name William Nossen. There are no complaints or charges of professional misconduct pending against him. Mr. Nossen presently resides in Virginia, does not practice law in New York, and, under these circumstances, does not wish to pay the biennial registration fee.Upon the papers submitted in support of the resignation, it isORDERED that the voluntary resignation of William Nossen is accepted and directed to be filed; and it is further,ORDERED that the name of William Nossen is removed from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, without prejudice to an application for reinstatement; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, William Nossen is commanded to desist and refrain from (l) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another in the State of New York, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority in this State, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto in this State, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York; and it is further,ORDERED that if William Nossen has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.MATTER of William Badillo, admitted as William Joseph Badillo, an attorney and counselor-at-law. (Attorney Registration No. 1065309) — William Badillo has submitted an affidavit dated February 8, 2018, wherein he voluntarily resigns from the New York State Bar. Mr. Badillo was admitted to the Bar in the State of New York at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on February 28, 1979, under the name William Joseph Badillo. There are no complaints or charges of professional misconduct pending against him. Mr. Badillo presently resides in Florida, does not practice law in New York, and, under these circumstances, does not wish to pay the biennial registration fee.Upon the papers submitted in support of the resignation, it isORDERED that the voluntary resignation of William Joseph Badillo is accepted and directed to be filed; and it is further,ORDERED that the name of William Joseph Badillo is removed from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, without prejudice to an application for reinstatement; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, William Joseph Badillo is commanded to desist and refrain from (l) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another in the State of New York, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority in this State, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto in this State, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York; and it is further,ORDERED that if William Joseph Badillo has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.MATTER of Elliot Julius Wiesner, an attorney and counselor-at-law. (Attorney Registration No.4165890) — Elliot Julius Wiesner has submitted an affidavit dated February 16, 2018, wherein he voluntarily resigns from the New York State Bar. Mr. Wiesner was admitted to the Bar in the State of New York at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on April 21, 2004. There are no complaints or charges of professional misconduct pending against him. Mr. Wiesner presently resides in New Jersey, does not practice law in New York, and, under these circumstances, does not wish to pay the biennial registration fee.Upon the papers submitted in support of the resignation, it isORDERED that the voluntary resignation of Elliot Julius Wiesner is accepted and directed to be filed; and it is further,ORDERED that the name of Elliot Julius Wiesner is removed from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, without prejudice to an application for reinstatement; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, Elliot Julius Wiesner is commanded to desist and refrain from (l) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another in the State of New York, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority in this State, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto in this State, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York; and it is further,ORDERED that if Elliot Julius Wiesner has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.MATTER of Nancy N. Stassinopoulos, admitted as Nancy Nickerson Stassinopoulos, an attorney and counselor-at-law. (Attorney Registration No. 1441963) — Nancy N. Stassinopoulos has submitted an affidavit dated March 2, 2018, wherein she voluntarily resigns from the New York State Bar. Ms. Stassinopoulos was admitted to the Bar in the State of New York at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on May 8, 1975, under the name Nancy Nickerson Stassinopoulos. There are no complaints or charges of professional misconduct pending against her. Ms. Stassinopoulos presently resides in California, does not practice law in New York, and, under these circumstances, does not wish to pay the biennial registration fee.Upon the papers submitted in support of the resignation, it isORDERED that the voluntary resignation of Nancy Nickerson Stassinopoulos is accepted and directed to be filed; and it is further,ORDERED that the name of Nancy Nickerson Stassinopoulos is removed from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, without prejudice to an application for reinstatement; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, Nancy Nickerson Stassinopoulos is commanded to desist and refrain from (l) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another in the State of New York, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority in this State, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto in this State, and (4) holding herself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York; and it is further,ORDERED that if Nancy Nickerson Stassinopoulos has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.MATTER of Kevin J. Bristow, an attorney and counselor-at-law. (Attorney Registration No. 1935493) — Kevin J. Bristow has submitted an affidavit dated March 6, 2018, wherein he voluntarily resigns from the New York State Bar. Mr. Bristow was admitted to the Bar in the State of New York at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on July 11, 1984. There are no complaints or charges of professional misconduct pending against him. Mr. Bristow presently resides in Rhode Island, does not practice law in New York, and, under these circumstances, does not wish to pay the biennial registration fee.Upon the papers submitted in support of the resignation, it isORDERED that the voluntary resignation of Kevin J. Bristow is accepted and directed to be filed; and it is further,ORDERED that the name of Kevin J. Bristow is removed from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, without prejudice to an application for reinstatement; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, Kevin J. Bristow is commanded to desist and refrain from (l) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another in the State of New York, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority in this State, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto in this State, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York; and it is further,ORDERED that if Kevin J. Bristow has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.MATTER of Robert Ellis Frey, an attorney and counselor-at-law. (Attorney Registration No. 1176213) — Robert Ellis Frey has submitted an affidavit dated March 9, 2018, wherein he voluntarily resigns from the New York State Bar. Mr. Frey was admitted to the Bar in the State of New York at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on February 24, 1971. There are no complaints or charges of professional misconduct pending against him. Mr. Frey presently resides in Maryland, does not practice law in New York, and, under these circumstances, does not wish to pay the biennial registration fee.Upon the papers submitted in support of the resignation, it isORDERED that the voluntary resignation of Robert Ellis Frey is accepted and directed to be filed; and it is further,ORDERED that the name of Robert Ellis Frey is removed from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, without prejudice to an application for reinstatement; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, Robert Ellis Frey is commanded to desist and refrain from (l) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another in the State of New York, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority in this State, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto in this State, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York; and it is further,ORDERED that if Robert Ellis Frey has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.MATTER of Douglas I. Friedman, admitted as Douglas Ian Friedman, an attorney and counselor-at-law. (Attorney Registration No. 1699073) — Douglas I. Friedman has submitted an affidavit dated March 7, 2018, wherein he voluntarily resigns from the New York State Bar. Mr. Friedman was admitted to the Bar in the State of New York at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on November 26, 1980, under the name Douglas Ian Friedman. There are no complaints or charges of professional misconduct pending against him. Mr. Friedman presently resides in Alabama, does not practice law in New York, and, under these circumstances, does not wish to pay the biennial registration fee.Upon the papers submitted in support of the resignation, it isORDERED that the voluntary resignation of Douglas Ian Friedman is accepted and directed to be filed; and it is further,ORDERED that the name of Douglas Ian Friedman is removed from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, without prejudice to an application for reinstatement; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, Douglas Ian Friedman is commanded to desist and refrain from (l) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another in the State of New York, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority in this State, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto in this State, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York; and it is further,ORDERED that if Douglas Ian Friedman has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.MATTER of Elaine M. Stewart, admitted as Elaine Marie Stewart, an attorney and counselor-at-law. (Attorney Registration No. 2170561) — Elaine M. Stewart has submitted an affidavit dated March 19, 2018, wherein she voluntarily resigns from the New York State Bar. Ms. Stewart was admitted to the Bar in the State of New York at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on February 24, 1988, under the name Elaine Marie Stewart. There are no complaints or charges of professional misconduct pending against her. Ms. Stewart presently resides in New Jersey, does not practice law in New York, and, under these circumstances, does not wish to pay the biennial registration fee.Upon the papers submitted in support of the resignation, it isORDERED that the voluntary resignation of Elaine Marie Stewart is accepted and directed to be filed; and it is further,ORDERED that the name of Elaine Marie Stewart is removed from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, without prejudice to an application for reinstatement; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, Elaine Marie Stewart is commanded to desist and refrain from (l) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another in the State of New York, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority in this State, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto in this State, and (4) holding herself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York; and it is further,ORDERED that if Elaine Marie Stewart has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Ted Byung Kwon, an attorney and counselor-at-law. (Attorney Registration No. 4797882) — Ted Byung Kwon has submitted an affidavit dated March 16, 2018, wherein he voluntarily resigns from the New York State Bar. Mr. Kwon was admitted to the Bar in the State of New York at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on March 3, 2010. There are no complaints or charges of professional misconduct pending against him. Mr. Kwon presently resides in Illinois, does not practice law in New York, and, under these circumstances, does not wish to pay the biennial registration fee.Upon the papers submitted in support of the resignation, it isORDERED that the voluntary resignation of Ted Byung Kwon is accepted and directed to be filed; and it is further,ORDERED that the name of Ted Byung Kwon is removed from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, without prejudice to an application for reinstatement; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, Ted Byung Kwon is commanded to desist and refrain from (l) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another in the State of New York, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority in this State, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto in this State, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York; and it is further,ORDERED that if Ted Byung Kwon has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.MATTER of Shannon Christine Ledford, an attorney and counselor-at-law. (Attorney Registration No. 3951019) — Shannon Christine Ledford has submitted an affidavit dated March 23, 2018, wherein she voluntarily resigns from the New York State Bar. Ms. Ledford was admitted to the Bar in the State of New York at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on June 20, 2001. There are no complaints or charges of professional misconduct pending against her. Ms. Ledford presently resides in North Carolina, does not practice law in New York, and, under these circumstances, does not wish to pay the biennial registration fee.Upon the papers submitted in support of the resignation, it isORDERED that the voluntary resignation of Shannon Christine Ledford is accepted and directed to be filed; and it is further,ORDERED that the name of Shannon Christine Ledford is removed from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, without prejudice to an application for reinstatement; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, Shannon Christine Ledford is commanded to desist and refrain from (l) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another in the State of New York, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority in this State, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto in this State, and (4) holding herself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York; and it is further,ORDERED that if Shannon Christine Ledford has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Jkwon Rodney, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute appeals from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County, both rendered September 27, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeals are consolidated; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeals will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeals, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeals:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeals expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeals; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeals are taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Chambers, Roman and Iannacci, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., ex rel. Cory Reid, pet, v. Robin Beauliue, etc., res — Motion by the petitioner for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from a decision and order on application of this Court dated February 22, 2018, as amended March 23, 2018, which determined his application for a writ of habeas corpus and for poor person relief.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.RIVERA, J.P., CHAMBERS, ROMAN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Sgroi, Maltese and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of John OLoughlin, ap, v. Anna Cyburt, formerly known as Anna Sweetland, res — Appeal by John O’Loughlin from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated April 12, 2018.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies as of right from a nondispositional order in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, part 3 (see Family Ct Act §1112), and leave to appeal has not been granted.BALKIN, J.P., SGROI, MALTESE and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Jessica Grady, res, v. John Consolazio, ap — Appeal by John Consolazio from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated December 28, 2017. By order to show cause dated April 13, 2018, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with a dated February 23, 2018, issued pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).Now, upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to comply with the dated February 23, 2018, issued pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Janemarie T. Davis, res, v. Lamar D. Nicks, ap — Appeal by Lamar D. Nicks from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated November 3, 2017. By order to show cause dated April 9, 2018, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with a dated February 23, 2018, issued pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).Now, upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to comply with the dated February 23, 2018, issued pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Frank Golio, ap, v. Joseph Picone res — Appeal by Frank Golio from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated January 23, 2018. By order to show cause dated April 10, 2018, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the order was not appealable as it was issued ex parte or on the ground that no appeal lies as of right from a nondispositional order in proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, part 3 and leave to appeal had not been granted. Application by the appellant to withdraw the appeal.Now, upon the order to show cause and the papers filed in response thereto, and the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements; and it is furtherORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied as academic.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Andrew Krivak, ap — Motion by Innocence Network, Innocence Project, Exoneration Initiave, and Office of the Appellate Defender for leave serve and file an amici curiae brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, dated December 19, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the amici curiae brief shall be served on the parties, and nine copies filed in this Court, on or before May 25, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no oral argument by the amici curiae shall be permitted; and it is further,ORDERED that the parties, if they be so advised, may file reply briefs to the amici curiae brief within 10 days after service upon them of the amici curiae brief.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Georgia Barker, appellant- res, v. John T. Rohack, respondent- ap — V-1796-16/16A, V-1797-16/16A, V-2094-16/16A, V-2095-16/16A, V-2096-16/16A) — Appeal by Georgia Barker and cross appeal by John T. Rohack from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated October 11, 2017. Pursuant to §670.9(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant Georgia Barker’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[a][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief is enlarged until May 29, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., ex rel. Mark Henry, pet, v. New York City Department of Corrections res — Application by the petitioner for a writ of habeas corpus and for poor person relief.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the application which is for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and that branch of the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the application which is for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, res, v. Frank Taddeo, appellant def — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated December 11, 2017, as a poor person.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.John Krupa, res, v. Jamila Crawford, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated January 19, 2018, as a poor person.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to prosecute the appeal on the original papers is granted, and the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including the transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the parties, who are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are to waive payment of the filing fee and for free transcripts are denied.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Anthony Massimo, etc., deceased. Lionel Markee, petitioner-appellant; John Bartolini objectants-res, William Greenspan, guardian ad litem, res — (File No. 370/13) — Motion by the objectant-respondent John Bartolini, inter alia, to dismiss an appeal from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County, dated August 15, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Mary Louie, ap, v. Ian Plissner, res — Appeals by Mary Louie from two orders of the Family Court, Richmond County, both dated August 10, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeals is enlarged until May 30, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Elquan Jones, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered December 12, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.U.S. Bank National Association, etc., res, v. Bissoondial Sirjoo appellants def — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 3, 2017, for failure to timely perfect.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e]).SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Michelle Levitin, res, v. Joshua Levitin, ap — Appeal by Joshua Levitin from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered September 20, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until July 2, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Thomas Reilly, res, v. Cheryl Lynn Hager-Reilly, ap — Appeals by Cheryl Lynn Hager-Reilly from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered September 1, 2017, and an order of the same court dated August 24, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeals is enlarged until June 14, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Kimberly Pluschau, res, v. Gary Pluschau, ap — Appeal by Gary Pluschau from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered July 3, 2017. Pursuant to §670.9(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[a][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until June 14, 2018; and it is furtherORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Adrianna Feery, ap, v. Kevin J. Fuery, res — Appeal by Adrianna Feery from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated November 24, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on May 9, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this , the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the child in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Junathan S. McNeil, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County, rendered October 31, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:James LicataOffice of the Public Defender11 New Hempstead RoadNew City, New York 10956-3664and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Tyrone Burch, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered February14, 2018, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Michael Ciaffa333 Earle Ovington Blvd., Suite 1010Uniondale, NY 11553and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Wilson Toro, ap, v. Tekoa Williams, res — Appeal by Wilson Toro from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated January 29, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until June 13, 2018.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.Bank of New York, ap, v. C and L Interiors, Inc. def, Oronzo Sguera, res — Motion by the appellant to vacate any stay in effect as a result of the death of Maria Sguera on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 8, 2010, to restore the appeal to active status, and, in effect, to amend the caption pursuant to CPLR 1015(b) to reflect that Maria Sguera is no longer a respondent on the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the caption is amended accordingly.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Elquan Jones, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered December 12, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Francelina Fenton, ap — (S.C.I. No. 89N/18) — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered February 20, 2018, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:N. Scott BanksAttorney in Charge, Criminal Div.Legal Aid Society of Nassau County40 Main Street, 3rd FloorHempstead, New York 11550and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Marvin W. Yanez, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered January 25, 2018, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Kristina HeuserP.O. Box 672Locust Valley, NY 11560and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Reginald Thornton, ap — S.C.I. 1701N/17) — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute appeals from three judgments of the County Court, Nassau County, all rendered February 7, 2018, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeals will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeals, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeals:Leon H. Tracy366 N. Broadway. Suite 410, #D9Jericho, NY 11753and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeals expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeals; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeals are taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Manuel Sosa-Marquez, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered December 15, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Virginia Boccio266 Main StreetFarmingdale, NY 11735and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.P.; Maltese, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.Esther York, res, v. Donald Frank ap — Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered June 6, 2017. Cross motion by the respondent to dismiss the appeal for failure to timely perfect. Application by the appellants to withdraw the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the cross motion, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion and the cross motion are denied as academic.SGROI, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.MATTER of Samira Mrsic, appellant- res, v. Kwak Yen Kwan, respondent- ap — V-27961/09, V-27962/09) — Appeal by Samira Mrsic, and cross appeal by Kwak Yen Kwan, from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated December 9, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the appellant-respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until June 11, 2018.MATTER of Josephine Rodriguez, ap, v. ACS-Kings, res — V-22353-17, V-22354-17) — Appeal by Josephine Rodriguez from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated November 28, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until June 11, 2018.MATTER of Leslie T. (Anonymous), Jr. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Naomi S. (Anonymous), res, Unkechaug Indian Nation, nonparty- appellant; Leslie T. (Anonymous), Sr., nonparty- res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Kylen K. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Naomi S. (Anonymous), res, Unkechaug Indian Nation, nonparty- appellant; Leslie T. (Anonymous), Sr., nonparty- res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by Unkechaug Indian Nation from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated September 21, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the children to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until June 6, 2018.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Zarif Shabazz, ap — Motion by assigned counsel to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County, rendered October 3, 2017, and for the assignment of new counsel. The appellant’s motion for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for assignment of counsel was granted on March 14, 2018, and the following named attorney was assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:James LicataOffice of the Public Defender11 New Hempstead RoadNew City, New York 10956-3664Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the former assigned counsel is directed to turn over all papers in the action to new counsel herein assigned; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Mark DiamondBox 287356Yorkville StationNew York, NY 10128and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Austin, Duffy and Barros, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Stephen F. Leed, ap — Motion by assigned counsel to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered June 6, 2017, and for the assignment of new counsel. The appellant’s motion for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for assignment of counsel was granted on February 6, 2018, and the following named attorney was assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Thomas N. N. AngellPublic Defender22 Market StreetPoughkeepsie, NY 12601Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the former assigned counsel is directed to turn over all papers in the action to new counsel herein assigned; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Yasmin Daley Duncan386 Parkside AvenueBrooklyn, NY 11226and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.LEVENTHAL, J.P., AUSTIN, DUFFY and BARROS, JJ., concur.MATTER of Rebecca Blake, res, v. Dean Solomon, ap — F-361-15/16F, F-361-15/17H, F-15597-14/16F, F-15597-14/16F, F-14622-14/16G, F-16150-14/17D, F-14622-14/16F, F-361-15/16G, F-15597-14/17G) — Appeal by Dean Solomon from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated October 13, 2017. On April 10, 2018, the appellant notified the Court that the transcripts in the above-entitled appeal had been received. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that within 60 days of the date of this order, the appellant shall perfect the appeal or submit an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant is directed to provide copies of the transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, when the appellant’s brief is served upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that if the appeal has not been perfected or withdrawn within 60 days of the date of this order, the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Leventhal, J.P.; Austin, Duffy and Barros, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Gregory P. Tietje, ap — (S.C.I. No. 278S/16) — Motion by assigned counsel to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered March 31, 2017, and for the assignment of new counsel. The appellant’s motion for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for assignment of counsel was granted on October 6, 2017, and the following named attorney was assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Thomas N. N. AngellPublic Defender22 Market StreetPoughkeepsie, NY 12601Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the former assigned counsel is directed to turn over all papers in the action to new counsel herein assigned; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Steven A. Feldman626 RXR PlazaWest Tower, 6th FloorUniondale, NY 11566and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.LEVENTHAL, J.P., AUSTIN, DUFFY and BARROS, JJ., concur.Manal Eishatshat, res, v. Town of Brookhaven, appellant def — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated December 20, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Teresa M. Ferrero, etc., plf-res, v. Golden Touch Transportation of NY, Inc., et al., appellants (and a third-party action). — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 7, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated May 8, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Faith Gottlieb, res, v. Kevin Gottlieb, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated November 9, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Leventhal, J.P.; Austin, Duffy and Barros, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Gregory P. Tietje, ap — (S.C.I. No. 27S/17) — Motion by assigned counsel to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered March 31, 2017, and for the assignment of new counsel. The appellant’s motion for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for assignment of counsel was granted on October 6, 2017, and the following named attorney was assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Thomas N. N. AngellPublic Defender22 Market StreetPoughkeepsie, NY 12601Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the former assigned counsel is directed to turn over all papers in the action to new counsel herein assigned; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Steven A. Feldman626 RXR PlazaWest Tower, 6th FloorUniondale, NY 11566and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.LEVENTHAL, J.P., AUSTIN, DUFFY and BARROS, JJ., concur.Richard Rios, res, v. Lincoln Comfy Shop, Inc. appellants def — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 5, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Beatriz Pogo, res-ap, v. Dcal, LLC, appellant-res, Village of Pelham, res — Application by the appellant-respondent to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated February 23, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Duffy, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Julio Acevedo, ap — Motion by the appellant to relieve assigned counsel on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 13, 2015, to substitute retained counsel, and to continue his status as a poor person. The appellant’s motion to dispense with printing and for assignment of counsel was granted on August 17, 2015, and the following named attorney was assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto; it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and said assigned counsel is directed to turn over all papers in the action to retained counsel:Jonathan I. Edelstein501 Fifth Avenue, Suite 514New York, NY 10017and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s poor person status is continued; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide retained counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if retained counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged. Retained counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.MATTER of No Name Given D. (Anonymous). New York Foundling Hospital, petitioner- res, Melissa D. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Melissa D. from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated December 12, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on May 9, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the child in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.MATTER of Kayla B. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Irina B. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Rebekah B. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Irina B. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Joseph B. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Irina B. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 3)MATTER of Esther B. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Irina B. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 4)MATTER of Hannah B. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Irina B. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — (Proceeding No. 5) N-14353-15, N-14354-15, N-14355-15) — Appeal by Irina B. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated August 25, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on May 9, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the briefs for the petitioner-respondent and the attorneys for the children in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.By Mastro, J.P.; Balkin, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Zenas R. Gordon, ap — Motion by the appellant, in effect, for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered February 15, 2018, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Thomas R. Villecco366 North Broadway, Suite 410Jericho, NY 11753and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Saad A. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Umda M. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — Appeal by Umda M. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated October 11, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the petitioner-respondent and the attorney for the child to serve and file their respective briefs on the appeal is enlarged until June 14, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Roman, J.PEOPLE, etc., plf, v. Sean Ward, def — Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the County Court, Westchester County, dated July 20, 2017, which has been referred to me for determination.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is denied.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Rivera, Miller and Lasalle, JJ.Francisco Ozoria, res, v. Tyrone C. Perkins ap — Motion by the appellants to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 2, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., RIVERA, MILLER and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Rivera, Miller and Lasalle, JJ.Hbjobaron Associates, res, v. Sophia Leahing ap, et al., def — Motion by the appellants, inter alia, to stay the sale of the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 11, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., RIVERA, MILLER and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Rivera, Miller and Lasalle, JJ.PA Package Associates, LLC, plf, v. Yong Cha Chong, def — Motion by Yong Cha Chong and Chol Hyon Chong, a/k/a Thomas Chong, for leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 26, 2018, and, inter alia, to stay their eviction from the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to appeal is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied as academic.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., RIVERA, MILLER and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Rivera, Miller and Lasalle, JJ.Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., etc., res, v. Merlene A. Campbell, etc., ap, et al., def — Motion by the appellant to stay all proceedings in the above-entitled action, to stay the sale of the subject premises, and to stay enforcement of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 11, 2018, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from the judgment.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, all proceedings in the above-entitled action, the sale of the subject premises, located at 624 East 89th Street, Brooklyn, New York, and enforcement of the judgment are stayed, pending hearing and determination of the appeal on condition that the appeal is perfected on or before June 14, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the appeal is not perfected on or before June 14, 2018, the Court, on its own motion, may vacate the stay, without further notice, or the respondent may move to vacate the stay, on three days notice.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., RIVERA, MILLER and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Rivera, Miller and Lasalle, JJ.MATTER of Stephen Olivieri, res, v. Lauren Olivieri, ap — V-34690-17, V-34691-17) — Motion by the appellant for leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 13, 2018, to stay enforcement of the order, pending hearing and determination of the appeal, and for a preference in the calendaring of the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition and in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to appeal is denied as unnecessary as the order is appealable as of right (see Family Ct Act §1112); and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to stay enforcement of the order dated March 13, 2018, is granted, and enforcement of the order is stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal ; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for a preference in the calendaring of the appeal is denied.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., RIVERA, MILLER and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Balkin, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.PEOPLE, res, v. Glen Beazer, ap — Motion by the appellant for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the County Court, Dutchess County, dated December 22, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied as unnecessary, as the appellant was granted leave to proceed as a poor person in the County Court and, pursuant to Correction Law §168-n (3), his status as a poor person and the representation by counsel assigned in the County Court, Dutchess County, continues on appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of any hearing held in connection with the order dated December 22, 2017, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that the clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of any hearing to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPLR 1102[b]); assigned counsel is directed to turn over that transcript to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with or considered by the trial court in connection with the appellant’s risk level determination, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1 et seq.) and written directions, and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that the filing fee is waived (see CPLR 1102[d]); and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Rivera, Miller and Lasalle, JJ.JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, res, v. Michelle G. Gershfeld, etc., ap, et al., def — Motion by the appellant to stay enforcement of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated April 28, 2017, and a judgment of the same court dated January 31, 2018, and to stay the sale of the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of appeals from the order and the judgment, to consolidate the appeals, to deem the record and briefs filed in connection with the order to be filed in connection with the judgment, and for leave to serve and file a supplemental record containing the judgment and the notice of appeal from the judgment.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that enforcement of the order and the judgment, and the sale of the subject premises, located at 153 Salem Road, Pound Ridge, New York 10576, are stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeals; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeals are consolidated, the record and briefs filed in connection with the order are deemed to be filed in connection with the judgment, and on or before June 13, 2018, the appellant shall serve and file a supplemental record containing the judgment and the notice of appeal from the judgment.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., RIVERA, MILLER and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.PEOPLE, res, v. Hector Sancho-Hernandez, ap — Motion by the appellant for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the County Court, Dutchess County, dated December 8, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied as unnecessary, as the appellant was granted leave to proceed as a poor person in the County Court and, pursuant to Correction Law §168-n (3), his status as a poor person and the representation by counsel assigned in the County Court, Dutchess County, continues on appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of any hearing held in connection with the order dated December 8, 2017, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that the clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of any hearing to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPLR 1102[b]); assigned counsel is directed to turn over that transcript to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,
