Motion List released on: June 27, 2018By Roman, J.P.; Maltese, Lasalle and Barros, JJ.HSBC Bank USA, N.A., res, v. Arlene B. Thomas, a/k/a Arlene Vaterpool ap — Application by the appellant Leonard L. Miles, Jr., pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect his appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated November 9, 2016, and for an enlargement of time to perfect a purported appeal by Arlene B. Thomas, a/k/a Arlene Vaterpool, from the same order. By order to show cause dated August 28, 2017, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal by Leonard L. Miles, Jr., on the ground that he was not aggrieved by the order and dismissing the purported appeal by Arlene B. Thomas, a/k/a Arlene Vaterpool, on the ground that Leonard L. Miles, Jr., who filed the notice of appeal on her behalf, was not authorized to file a notice of appeal on her behalf, and the application was held in abeyance in the interim. Motion by the appellants to stay their eviction from the subject premises.Now, upon the order to show cause and the papers having been filed in response thereto, upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the appellants’ motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal by Leonard L. Miles, Jr., and the purported appeal by Arlene B. Thomas, a/k/a Arlene Vaterpool, are dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see CPLR 5511; CPLR 321[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that the application and the appellants’ motion are denied as academic.ROMAN, J.P., MALTESE, LASALLE and BARROS, JJ., concur.MATTER of Alex v. (Anonymous). Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Dennis v. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — Appeals by Dennis V. from two orders of the Family Court, Orange County, dated October 13, 2017, and November 13, 2017, respectively. Pursuant to §670.9(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeals to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeals is enlarged until July 25, 2018.
By Scheinkman, P.J.; Rivera, Dillon, Balkin and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Russell Richard Kaiser, a suspended attorney. (Attorney Registration No. 4024055) — Motion by Russell Richard Kaiser for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor-at-law. Mr. Kaiser was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on March 13, 2002. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 30, 2015, Mr. Kaiser was immediately suspended from the practice of law pursuant to Judiciary Law §§90(2) and 468-a, for failure to comply with attorney registration requirements.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that, effective immediately, Russell Richard Kaiser is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to restore the name of Russell Richard Kaiser to the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., RIVERA, DILLON, BALKIN and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.
