Appellate DivisionSecond DepartmentMotion List released on:August 23, 2018By Austin, J.P.; Cohen, Iannacci and Christopher, JJ.HSBC Bank USA, National Association, etc., res, v. Soraya Campbell ap, et al., def — Motion by the appellants, inter alia, to stay the sale of the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 3, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the parties to the appeal are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal insofar as taken on behalf of Soraya Campbell, on the ground that Edgar Campbell, who is not an attorney licensed to practice law in New York, was without authority to take an appeal on her behalf (see CPLR 321; Vitiello v. Merwin, 130 AD3d 609) and/or on the ground that Soraya Campbell is not aggrieved by the order entered May 3, 2018 (see CPLR 5511), by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before September 13, 2018.AUSTIN, J.P., COHEN, IANNACCI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.MATTER of Margaret Comoletti, res, v. Rocco Papapietro, Jr., ap — Appeal by Rocco Papapietro, Jr., from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated July 9, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Azriel Madmoni, ap, v. Odelia Madmoni, res — Appeal by Azriel Madmoni from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated July 24, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Adonnis M. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner- res, Kenyetta M. (Anonymous), respondent- appellant; Rising Ground Agency, nonparty- res — Appeals by Kenyetta M. from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, both dated July 31, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeals in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the respondent-appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the respondent-appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the respondent-appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeals; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the respondent-appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeals, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeals as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the respondent-appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeals; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeals to show cause why the appeals should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Dunia Y. Ochoa Vasquez, ap, v. Carlos A. Cruz Mejia, res — Appeal by Dunia Y. Ochoa Vasquez from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated July 6, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Mario H.-M. (Anonymous), ap — Appeal by Mario H.-M. from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated July 3, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.Stacy A. Rosenblatt, res, v. James David Ritter, ap — Appeal by James David Ritter from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 16, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled action shall be perfected within 60 days after the appellant receives the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Supreme Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received. If there are no minutes to be transcribed, the appeal in the above-entitled action shall be perfected within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes in the Supreme Court action to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) abovehas been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Amparo Narvaez, ap, v. Jose Luis Sigala, res — Appeal by Amparo Narvaez from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated June 26, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Oscar L. G. (Anonymous), ap, v. Ana M. C. H. (Anonymous), res — Appeal by Oscar L. G. from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated July 18, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Ruben D. L. (Anonymous), ap, v. Sonia M. L. C. (Anonymous), et al., res — Appeal by Ruben D. L. from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated July 25, 2018. to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Amanda Feliciano, res, v. Orlando Cooper, ap — Appeal by Orlando Cooper from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated January 8, 2018. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on August 17, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this , the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the children in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.By Scheinkman, P.C., Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of David Kalantarov, res, v. Marina Priyeva, ap — V-14562-15, V-9950-15, V-9951-15, V-9952-15) — Appeal by Marina Priyeva from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated June 4, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Glenn Kaplan, dated August 18, 2018, it isORDERED that pursuant to Family Court Act §1120, the following named attorney is assigned as the attorney for the children on the appeal:Carol Lipton800 Greenwood Avenue, #3LBrooklyn, NY 11218718-436-5359and it is further,ORDERED that Glenn Kaplan is directed to turn over all papers in the proceeding to the new attorney for the children herein assigned.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of David Parsons, res, v. Kristin Kapp, ap — Appeal by Kristin Kapp from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated May 14, 2018. By order on certification of this Court dated July 16, 2018, the following attorney was assigned as counsel for the appellant on the appeal:Thomas ButlerP.O. Box 665Melville, NY 11747877-847-1896By letter dated August 19, 2018, the assigned counsel has informed this Court that the appellant wishes to proceed with the appeal. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order on certification of this Court dated July 16, 2018, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Scheinkman, P.C., Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of David Parsons, res, v. Kristin Kapp, ap — Appeal by Kristin Kapp from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated May 14, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Margaret Schaefler, dated August 17, 2018, it isORDERED that pursuant to Family Court Act §1120, the following named attorney is assigned as the attorney for the child on the appeal:Jordan Freundlich3000 Marcus Avenue, Suite 1E9Lake Success, NY 11042516-437-4385 (ext. 142) and it is further,ORDERED that Margaret Schaefler, is directed to turn over all papers in the proceeding to the new attorney for the child herein assigned.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Christine Fleming, res, v. Darren Robert McCloskey, ap — Appeal by Darren Robert McCloskey from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated September 27, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on August 17, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the brief for the respondent in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Norma U. (Anonymous), ap, v. Herman T. R. F. (Anonymous), et al., res — Appeals by Norma U. from two orders of the Family Court, Nassau County, both dated June 22, 2018.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appeals are consolidated; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), the appeals in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeals; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeals; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeals to show cause why the appeals should or should not be dismissed.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Leon Malekan, res, v. Leah Malekan, ap — Appeal by Leah Malekan from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated June 28, 2018.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies from an order that is issued ex parte (see Family Ct. Act §1112, CPLR 5704).SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Teresa Lester, ap, v. Mark H. Miller, res — Appeal by Teresa Lester from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated June 29, 2018.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding on the ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon the consent of the appealing party (see CPLR 5511), and/or no appeal lies from an order of a support magistrate before objections have been reviewed by a judge of the Family Court (see Family Ct Act §439[e]), by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before September 13, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties by regular mail.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Rivera, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ.MATTER of Heather ONeill, ap, v. GEICO Insurance Company, res — Motion by the appellant for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from a decision and order of this Court dated June 13, 2018, which determined an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 22, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Cohen, J.P.; Miller, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.Re/Max of New York, Inc., plaintiff-appellant- res, v. Henry Weber, defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent-appellant; Pierre Titley third-party defendants-appellants-res — Motion by Law Offices of Thomas F. Liotti, LLC, inter alia, for leave to withdraw as counsel for the defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent-appellant on appeals and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered December 6, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in relation or opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is dismissed without prejudice to moving for the relief sought upon proper papers, including proof of service of all of the motion papers upon counsel for the plaintiff-appellant-respondent and the third-party defendants-appellants-respondents, and upon the defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent-appellant.COHEN, J.P., MILLER, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Sgroi, Miller and Maltese, JJ.MATTER of Michael A. Deem, pet, v. Lorna M. Deem, res — Motion by Michael M. Deem for leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated July 12, 2018, and, in effect, to stay enforcement of the order pending hearing and determination of the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to appeal is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied as academic.DILLON, J.P., SGROI, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Roman, Maltese and Christopher, JJ.Grace Rugen, ap, v. Mid-Hudson Civic Center res — (Action No. 1) Grace Rugen, ap, v. Mid-Hudson Protective Services, LLC, res — (Action No. 2) — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated July 18, 2017, and to consolidate that appeal with an appeal from an order of the same court dated February 26, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition and in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and on or before September 4, 2018, the appellant shall be file 10 copies of the record or appendix on the appeals and the appellant’s brief and serve 2 copies of the record or appendix on the appeals and the appellant’s brief on each counsel for the respondents; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.DILLON, J.P., ROMAN, MALTESE and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.MATTER of Aryelle L. F. (Anonymous). Forestdale, Inc., res, Esperanza F. F. (Anonymous), etc., appellant res — Appeal by Esperanza F. F. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated May 4, 2018. By order on certification of this Court dated August 8, 2018, the following attorney was assigned as counsel for the appellant on the appeal:Tennille Michelle Tatum-Evans316 W. 116th St. Ste, 3BNew York, NY 10026347-645-6660By letter dated August 20, 2018, the assigned counsel has informed this Court that the appellant wishes to proceed with the appeal. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order on certification of this Court dated August 8, 2018, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Sarah M. Gallousis, res, v. Christopher Gallousis, ap — Appeals by Christopher Gallousis from two orders of the Family Court, Orange County, both dated March 21, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeals is enlarged until September 19, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Joseph H. (Anonymous), ap, v. Westchester County Department of Social Services, etc., res — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the order on certification of this Court dated August 17, 2018, in the above-entitled case is recalled and vacated, and the following order on certification is substituted therefor:Appeal by Joseph H. from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated October 25, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Gregory A. Salant, dated August 8, 2018, it isORDERED that the respondent is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to respond to the appeal on behalf of Ayisha M.:Daniel Lawrence Pagano2649 Strang Blvd. Ste 303Yorktown Heights, NY 10598(914) 734-1915and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the respondent Ayisha M. at the address provided by the Court, and shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal on or before September 6, 2018, in writing, that he has done so and that either(1) the respondent Ayisha M. is interested in responding to the appeal, or(2) the respondent Ayisha M. is not interested in responding to the appeal, or that he has been unable to contact her, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Ashantewa P. W. L. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Doris J. L. (Anonymous), res-res — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the order on certification of this Court dated August 15, 2018, and the decision and order on motion of this Court dated August 20, 2018, in the above-entitled case are recalled and vacated, and the following order on certification is substituted therefor:Appeal by Doris J. L. from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated March 29, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Christina T. Hall, dated August 8, 2018, it isORDERED that the appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Carl D. Birman235 Mamaroneck Avenue, Suite 300White Plains, NY 10605914-630-4680and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the appellant at the address provided by this Court, and on or before September 6, 2018, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal, in writing, that he has done so and that either(1) the appellant is interested in prosecuting the appeal, or(2) the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal, or that he has been unable to contact the appellant, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the child, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s assigned counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that the appellant is interested in proceeding with the appeal, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Melissa Disisto, res, v. Francis Dimitri, ap — Appeal by Francis Dimitri from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated December 15, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until September 17, 2018.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Kelly Ann Forman, res, v. Herman Maurice Wilcher, ap — Appeal by Herman Maurice Wilcher from an order of the Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial District, Lee County, Florida, dated May 25, 2018, Florida Case No. 06-DR-3723.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies to this Court from the order of the Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial District, a court of the State of Florida (see Noghrey v. Town of Brookhaven, 305 AD2d 474; see generally CPLR 5702; Family Ct Act §1112; Fla R App P rule 9.030 [b]).SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Stephanie Dimas, res, v. Philippe C. Fanfan, ap — Appeals by Philippe C. Fanfan from three orders of the Family Court, Queens County, all dated January 17, 2018. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on August 20, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed within 30 days of the date of this .Shlome Krausz, etc., res, v. Kalmen Weiss ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated March 28, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Walter Conway, ap, v. G. Varughese, et al., res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 16, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Fradie Katz, ap, v. Camp Bnoseinu, etc., res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 16, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Robert Valentin, plf-res, v. New Docs, LLC, etc., appellant-res, New York Loft, LLC, res-ap, Superb Plumbing & Heating, Inc., defendant- res — Application by New York Loft, LLC, on an appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered June, 5, 2018, to withdraw the cross appeal.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal and cross appeal dated August 16, 2018, it isORDERED that the cross appeal of New York Loft, LLC, is marked withdrawn.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Avia Forrester, ap — (S.C.I. No. 302/16) — Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, rendered March 9, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the appellant and the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated August 1, 2018, it isORDERED that the appeal is marked withdrawn.Julio Prince, res, v. Zulfiqar Ali, et al., ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 8, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Joseph Garay, plf-res, v. City of White Plains defendants third-party plaintiffs-appellants-res, New England Fire Equipment & Apparatus Corp., defendant- respondent defendant; American Test Center, Inc., third-party defendant-respondent- ap — Appeal and cross appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 23, 2016.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal and cross appeal dated August 17, 2018, it isORDERED that the appeal and cross appeal are marked withdrawn.Amy DAntonio, ap, v. Little Flower Children & Family Services of New York, et al., res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated September 12, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Bryan L. Salamone, P.C., res, v. Nancy Cave, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated December 4, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Jacquelyn Powell, res, v. John Hendriks, ap — Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 11, 2018.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated August 15, 2018, it isORDERED that the appeal is marked withdrawn.Qiang Li ap, v. Moving Right Along Service res — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 5, 2018Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Gregory Garcia res, v. Village of Pelham ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 9, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.HSBC Bank USA, etc., ap, v. Celeste E. Beatty, etc., res — Application by the appellant for leave to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 22, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Donnell T. Mack, ap, v. Amber Al Husseini, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 30, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, etc., res, v. Sandra L. Chan, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, both dated May 16, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeals are marked withdrawn.William Edwards, et al. res, v. 50 North First Partners, LLC, appellant- res, Bayport Construction Company, et al., respondents-ap — Separate applications by the appellant-respondent and respondents-appellants on an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 9, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the applications and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the applications are granted and the appeal and cross appeal are marked withdrawn.William Edwards, res, v. 50 North etc., appellant-res, Bayport Construction Company respondents-ap — Separate applications by the appellant-respondent and the respondents-appellants on an appeal and cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 14, 2018, to withdraw the appeal and cross appeals.Upon the papers filed in support of the applications and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the applications are granted and the appeal and cross appeals are marked withdrawn.MATTER of Flor Graznow, ap, v. Scott Granzow, res — Appeal by Flor Graznow from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated October 6, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on August 21, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the Rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this , the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the child in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.MATTER of Jason Lawrence, ap, v. Brittany J. Mattry, res — Appeal by Jason Lawrence from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated August 3, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, res, v. Jonathan Austern, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, both dated October 25, 2016, and a judgment of the same court dated January 9, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged, and the reply brief submitted to the Clerk of the Court is accepted for filing and deemed timely served.By Austin, J.P.; Cohen, Iannacci and Christopher, JJ.Lorraine Marcone, ap, v. Joseph Marcone, res — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the decision and order on motion of this Court dated August 16, 2018, in the above-entitled case is recalled and vacated, and the following decision and order is on motion substituted therefor:Renewed motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated January 13, 2017, as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, in effect, with respect to issues of custody and visitation.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and pursuant to Judiciary Law §35, the appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, with respect to issues of custody and visitation, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal with respect to issues of custody and visitation:Susan A. DeNatale982 Montauk Highway, Suite 6Bayport, NY 11705631-772-1246and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the parties. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9), with respect to issues of custody and visitation; in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Supreme Court, and the clerk of the Supreme Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s assigned counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Supreme Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the children, if any, when assigned counsel serves a brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County.AUSTIN, J.P., COHEN, IANNACCI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.Ren Yao plf-ap, v. World Wide Travel of Greater New York Ltd., et al., def-ap, Sunflower Express, et al., respondents def — Applications by pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 20, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the applications and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the applications are granted, the time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until October 22, 2018, and the joint record or appendix on the appeals and the appellants’ respective briefs shall be served and filed on or before that date.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Peter T. (Anonymous), Jr. Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Shay S. P. (Anonymous), a/k/a Shay S. T. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the decision and order on motion of this Court dated August 21, 2018, in the above-entitled matter, on an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated June 27, 2018, is amended by deleting from the first paragraph thereof the date “March 6, 2018″ and substituting therefor the date “June 27, 2018.”SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.
Order on Application released on: August 23, 2018IN MATTER of Applications for Extensions of Time — Parties in the following causes have filed applications pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to extend the time to perfect or to serve and file a brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the applications, It is ORDERED that the applications are granted and the following parties in the following causes are granted the specified extensions of time:Ahmetaj v. Mountainview Condominium, 2018-00239, Mountainview Condominium Association, September 11, 2018Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. Matles, 2017-10301, Stella M. Matles, August 27, 20181Bank of New York Mellon v. Singh, 2018-03781, Gurdip Singh, October 19, 2018Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Guarino, 2018-00457, Joseph Guarino, Rosebeth Guarino, September 19, 2018Christiana Trust v. Tiwana, 2018-00938, Parvinder S. Tiwana, Jasvir Tiwana, September 20, 2018Citibank, N.A. v. Espinoza, 2018-00815, Lizabeth Espinoza, September 19, 20181Commodore Factors Corp. v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, 2018-03212, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, September 13, 2018Cooper v. City of New York, 2017-11543, Advanced Medical Group, P.C., September 6, 20181Cortes v. City of New York, 2017-1082, Adam Cortes, September 10, 20181D. Gangi Contracting Corp. v. City of New York, 2018-02885, City of New York, New York City Department of Parks and Recreation, October 22, 2018Eyya Realty Corp. v. Cohen, 2018-01186, Shahar Cohen, Fulton Wonder, LLC, September 26, 2018Federal National v. Cassis, 2018-01983, Madeleine Cassis, September 19, 2018Fonck v. City of New York, 2017-13291, Charles Fonck, Olivia Fonck, September 4, 2018Fountoukis v. Marathon Healthcare Corp., 2018-00294, Christopher Fountoukis, August 24, 2018HSBC Bank, USA v. Gibatov, 2018-00922, Yevgeniy Gibatov, Viktar Yedzinovich, September 19, 20182Hall v. Long Island Mobile Home Leasing Corp., 2018-07064, Mary Hall, October 1, 2018Isnady v. Walden Preservation, L.P., 2018-00268, Will Isnady, September 21, 2018Kerolle v. Nicholson, 2017-07503, Theophile Kerolle, Nicole Kerolle, September 7, 2018Leader v. Steinway, Inc., 2018-04457, Queens County Carting and Demolition, November 2, 2018MLB Sub I, LLC v. Clark, 2018-03892, Michael Clark, September 19, 2018Mandel v. 15 Power Drive, LLC, 2017-12805, Rising Sons Maintenance, Inc., September 17, 2018Matter of Duke v. Westchester Medical Center, 2018-03275, Westchester Medical Center, Westchester County Health Care Corporation, October 22, 2018Matter of S. (Anonymous), Ruth, 2018-00853, Judith Nelson, Sharon Stein, September 19, 20182PHH Mortgage Corporation v. Shouela, 2018-01087, Isaac Shouela, September 19, 2018People v. Anglin, Yohannes, 2015-05042, People of State of New York, October 26, 2018People v. Baez, Mark, 2013-08549, People of State of New York, September 27, 2018People v. Brown, Sheron, 2015-11640, People of State of New York, September 14, 2018People v. Brown, Trevor, 2015-01356, People of State of New York, October 5, 2018People v. Butts, Jermaine, 2016-01617, People of State of New York, October 26, 2018People v. Farray, Jeffrey, 2012-06554, People of State of New York, September 21, 2018People v. Jones, Richard, 2015-10141, People of State of New York, October 26, 2018People v. Juarez, Miguel, 2014-07706, People of State of New York, September 21, 2018People v. Robles, Saul, 2016-00276, People of State of New York, September 26, 2018People v. Thelismond, Belende, 2015-04726, Belende Thelismond, September 14, 2018Pirrone v. News 12 Interactive, LLC, 2017-12878, News 12 Interactive, LLC, News 12 Westchester, LLC, August 30, 2018Romero v. Zezo Food Services, LLC, 2018-03867, Zezo Food Services, LLC, October 29, 2018SK Industries, LLC v. Jackson, 2018-03739, Melvin Jackson, October 19, 2018U.S. Bank National Association v. Alverna, 2018-03602, Frerot Alverna, October 19, 2018U.S. Bank National Association v. Cadoo, 2017-10171, Donmackimber Cadoo, David Cohen, Criminal Court of The City of New York, New York City Department of Finance, City of New York Department of Transportation Parking, City of New York Environmental Control Board, City of New York Transit Adjudication Bureau, Department of Housing Preservation and DevelopmentSeptember 6, 2018Washington v. County of Nassau2017-03425County of Nassau, Nassau Inter-County Express, Veolia Transportation Services, Inc., Clarence D. Edwards, October 9, 2018Webster v. City of New York, 2018-01977, Mark Webster, September 20, 2018Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Altholz, 2018-01406, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., September 4, 2018Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Roberts, 2018-03737, Godwin Roberts, Deka D. Jama, October 19, 2018Wilmington Savings Fund v. Mitchell, 2018-03729, Nadia Mitchell, October 22, 2018Wise v. Classon Village, L.P., 2018-03176, Vanessa Wise, October 29, 20181
