By: Ling-Cohan, J.P., Gonzalez, Cooper, JJ.16-434. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, rep, v. GEORGE ACOSTA, def-app — Judgment of conviction (Melissa A. Crane, J. at plea; Kevin B. McGrath, J. at sentencing), rendered March 4, 2015, affirmed.Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v. California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v. Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to Anders, and, upon an independent review of the record, agree that there is no valid appealable issue that could be raised on appeal.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.September 19, 201816-258. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, res, v. BARBARA FISHER, def-app — Judgment of conviction (Richard M. Weinberg, J.), rendered November 18, 2015, affirmed.Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v. California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v. Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to Anders, and, upon an independent review of the record, agree that there is no valid appealable issue that could be raised on appeal.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.September 19, 201816-307. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, res v. EDWARD GADSON, def-app — Judgment of conviction (Lisa A. Sokoloff, J.), rendered December 22, 2015, affirmed.Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v. California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v. Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to Anders, and, upon an independent review of the record, agree that there is no valid appealable issue that could be raised on appeal.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.September 19, 201817-243. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, res, v. VICTOR GALINDO-FABIAN, def-app — Judgment of conviction (Ushir Pandit-Durant, J. at plea; Lyle E. Frank, J. at sentencing), rendered August 4, 2016, affirmed.Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v. California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v. Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to Anders, and, upon an independent review of the record, agree that there is no valid appealable issue that could be raised on appeal.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.September 19, 201818-155. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, rep, v. MICHAEL L., def-app — Judgment of conviction (Julio Rodriguez III, J.), rendered August 4, 2017, affirmed.Defendant made a valid and enforceable waiver of his right to appeal, foreclosing review of his claim that the sentence is excessive. The oral colloquy sufficiently ensured that defendant understood that the right to appeal is separate from the other trial rights automatically forfeited by pleading guilty, and it met or exceeded the minimum standards for such a colloquy (see People v. Bryant, 28 NY3d 1094 [2016]). Defendant also signed an appropriate written waiver, and the court confirmed that defendant had discussed the waiver with defense counsel. In any event, regardless of whether defendant made a valid waiver of the right to appeal, we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.September 19, 201816-249. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, res, v. KARL WANZER, def-app — Judgment of conviction (Richard M. Weinberg, J.), rendered November 5, 2015, affirmed.Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v. California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v. Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to Anders, and, upon an independent review of the record, agree that there is no valid appealable issue that could be raised on appeal.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.September 19, 2018
By: Shulman, P.J., Cooper, Edmead, JJ.18-196. WIN FENG LLC, pet-lan-res, v. JEFFREY ADAM LAWRENCE, res-ten-app, -and- “John Doe” and/or “Jane Doe,”, res-und — Order (Anne Katz, J.), entered December 15, 2016, affirmed, with $10 costs.Civil Court properly concluded that landlord was the prevailing party entitled to attorneys’ fees in this nonpayment proceeding, which was resolved via a so-ordered stipulation of settlement, whereby tenant withdrew his answer, consented to the entry of judgment for the rent arrears sought by landlord without setoff or abatement, and whose terms expressly reserved landlord’s right to seek attorneys’ fees (see Excelsior 57th Corp. v. Winters, 227 AD2d 146 [1996]; Peachy v. Rosenzweig, 215 AD2d 301 [1995]). The record discloses no manifest unfairness or bad faith by landlord that would justify a denial of its right to seek attorneys’ fees pursuant to the legal fees provision in the parties’ lease (see Matter of 251 CPW Hous. LLC v. Pastreich, 124 AD3d 401, 404 [2015]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.September 19, 2018
