X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Lipsitz Green Scime Cambria LLP, Buffalo (John A. Collins of Counsel), for Plaintiff-Appellant.Barclay Damon LLP, Syracuse (Julie M. Cahill of Counsel), for Defendants-Respondents.Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Gregory R. Gilbert, J.), entered April 5, 2017. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted those parts of the motion of defendants seeking summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 200 claim and common-law negligence cause of action against defendants City of Syracuse and Hueber-Breuer Construction Co., Inc.It is hereby ORDERED that the order insofar as appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is denied in part, and the Labor Law § 200 claim and common-law negligence cause of action against defendants City of Syracuse and Hueber-Breuer Construction Co., Inc. are reinstated.Memorandum: This Labor Law and common-law negligence action arises from injuries sustained by Michael W. Parkhurst (decedent) when he slipped and fell on plastic sheeting covering newly-laid carpet after descending a ladder while performing drywall finishing work. Defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and Supreme Court granted that motion. As limited by her brief, plaintiff contends that the court erred in granting those parts of the motion with respect to the Labor Law § 200 claim and common-law negligence cause of action against the City of Syracuse, which owned the building on which the work was being performed, and Hueber-Breuer Construction Co., Inc. (Hueber), which was the general contractor (collectively, defendants). We agree with plaintiff and therefore reverse the order insofar as appealed from.Where, as here, “the worker’s injuries result from a dangerous  condition at the work site rather than from the manner in which the work is performed, the general contractor or owner may be liable in common-law negligence and under Labor Law § 200 if it has control over the work site and [has created or has] actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition” (Steiger v. LPCiminelli, Inc., 104 AD3d 1246, 1248 [4th Dept 2013] [internal quotation marks omitted]). “Thus, [d]efendants, as the parties seeking summary judgment dismissing those claims, were required to establish as a matter of law that they did not exercise any supervisory control over the general condition of the premises or that they neither created nor had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition on the premises” (id. [internal quotation marks omitted]), and defendants failed to meet that burden here.We reject defendants’ contention that decedent’s injuries resulted from his own methods of work rather than a dangerous condition at the work site (cf. McCormick v. 257 W. Genesee, LLC, 78 AD3d 1581, 1582 [4th Dept 2010]). The evidence submitted by defendants in support of their motion established that the plastic sheeting was not placed there by decedent or his employer, and the deposition testimony of various witnesses supported the inference that it was placed there by Hueber. Thus, while the placement of the plastic sheeting may have been part of Hueber’s method of work, it was not a part of decedent’s method of work. We reject defendants’ further contention that the plastic sheeting constituted an open and obvious hazard inherent in decedent’s work, which cannot serve as a basis for liability. “‘The issue whether a condition was readily observable impacts on [decedent's] comparative negligence and does not negate . . . defendant[s'] duty to keep the premises reasonably safe’” (Landahl v. City of Buffalo, 103 AD3d 1129, 1130 [4th Dept 2013]). Defendants’ reliance on Gasper v. Ford Motor Co. (13 NY2d 104, 110-111 [1963], mot to amend remittitur granted 13 NY2d 893 [1963]) is misplaced because “[t]hat case stands for the proposition that an open and obvious hazard inherent in the injury-producing work is not actionable, but here the defect complained of lies in the condition of the [floor] in question, not in the [drywall finishing] work [decedent] was assigned to perform” (Landahl, 103 AD3d at 1131).

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
October 24, 2024
Georgetown, Washington D.C.

The National Law Journal honors attorneys & judges who've made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in the D.C. area.


Learn More
October 29, 2024
East Brunswick, NJ

New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.


Learn More
November 07, 2024
Orlando, FL

This event shines a spotlight on the individuals, teams, projects and organizations that are changing the financial industry.


Learn More

With bold growth in recent years, Fox Rothschild brings together 1,000 attorneys coast to coast. We offer the reach and resources of a natio...


Apply Now ›

About Us:Monjur.com is a leading provider of contracts-as-a-service for managed service providers, offering tailored solutions to streamline...


Apply Now ›

Dynamic Boutique law firm with offices in NYC, Westchester County and Dutchess County, is seeking a mid level litigation associate to work ...


Apply Now ›