By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Nicholas A. Pellegrini, a suspended attorney. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, petitioner; Nicholas A. Pellegrini, res — (Attorney Registration No. 2243962) — The respondent was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on March 22, 1989. By opinion and order of this Court dated April 3, 2012 (Matter of Pellegrini, 95 AD3d 179), the respondent was suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years, commencing May 3, 2012, in a prior disciplinary proceeding, under Appellate Division Docket No. 2010-03357, and he never moved for reinstatement. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 31, 2016, under Appellate Division Docket No. 2016-00374, the respondent’s suspension was continued based on his conviction of a serious crime, and he was directed to apprise the Court upon being sentenced for this offense. On August 30, 2018, the respondent was sentenced on his conviction of conspiracy to commit bank fraud pursuant to 18 USC §1349 and 1344, as reflected in a judgment in a criminal case of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.Upon the papers filed with the Court, it isORDERED that pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1240.12(c)(2)(i), the respondent, Nicholas A. Pellegrini, is directed to show cause why a final order of suspension, censure, or disbarment should not be made based on his conviction of a serious crime, by filing an affidavit with the Clerk of this Court, with proof of service upon the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, on or before November 19, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court, or her designee shall serve a copy of this order to show cause by regular mail.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.
By Leventhal, J.P.; Sgroi, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Queens Theater Owner, LLC, res, v. WR Universal, LLC, ap — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered November 1, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until November 1, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.LEVENTHAL, J.P., SGROI, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.
