Second, Eleventhand ThirteenthJudicIal DistrictsCases released on:November 16, 2018
By: Pesce, P.J., Aliotta, Elliot, JJ.Gary Tsirelman, P.C. (Irena Golodkeyer, of counsel), for appellant.Foley, Smit, O’Boyle & Weisman (Aaron Meyer of counsel), for respondent.2015-1245 Q C. SHIROM ACUPUNCTURE, P.C. v. NYCTA-MABSTOA — Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Larry Love, J.), entered February 11, 2015. The judgment, entered pursuant to an order of that court entered March 6, 2013 granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) and denying plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment, dismissed the complaint.ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with $25 costs.In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant moved, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5), to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the action had been commenced after the expiration of the three-year limitation period of CPLR 214 (2), which, defendant contended, was applicable to self-insurers such as defendant. Plaintiff cross-moved for summary judgment and argued, among other things, that the action is subject to a six-year statute of limitations. By order entered March 6, 2013, the Civil Court granted defendant’s motion and implicitly denied plaintiff’s cross motion. On February 11, 2015, a judgment was entered dismissing the complaint.For the reasons stated in Contact Chiropractic, P.C. v. New York City Tr. Auth. (31 NY3d 187 [2018]), the judgment is affirmed.November 9, 2018