X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

ADDITIONAL CASESStephen Vinson, Plaintiff v. William Tobin, Matthew Spano, and Michael Delaney, in their individual capacities and in their official capacities, Defendants; 16-CV-06934MEMORANDUM AND ORDER On March 19, 2015, Plaintiff Stephen Vinson (“Vinson” or “Plaintiff”) brought 42 U.S.C. §1983 claims against the City of New York (the “City”), Victor Eng, Igor Bondarenko, and “John Doe” # 1-3, (collectively, “Vinson I Defendants”) alleging false imprisonment, delay in arraignment, unreasonable seizure, denial of due process, federal and common law malicious prosecution, and municipal liability under Monell (“Vinson I”). (ECF No. 1, “Vinson I Compl.”). Plaintiff withdrew all claims in Vinson I except for malicious prosecution and delay in arraignment. (ECF No. 44 at 1). On December 15, 2016, the day discovery closed in Vinson I, Vinson brought a second action asserting a Section 1983 claim against Defendants William Tobin, Matthew Spano, and Michael Delaney, (collectively, “Vinson II Defendants”), for delay in arraignment (“Vinson II”). (ECF No. 1, “Vinson II Compl.”). On February 28, 2017, the two actions were consolidated. (Vinson I ECF No. 25; Vinson II ECF No. 11). Pending before the Court is Vinson I Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, (ECF No. 36), and Vinson II Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 19), pursuant to Rules 56 and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, respectively. For the reasons explained below, Vinson I Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED and Vinson II Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.BACKGROUNDUnless otherwise noted, the following facts are undisputed.All Defendants are police officers employed by the New York City Police Department. (Vinson I Compl.

9-13; Vinson II Compl.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
September 04, 2025
New York, NY

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.


Learn More
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More
March 24, 2025
New York, NY

Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.


Learn More

Search for the President and Dean California Western School of Law San Diego, California California Western School of Law (California ...


Apply Now ›

Duane Morris LLP has an opening for an associate with 2-3 years of experience with strong capital markets and corporate transactional backgr...


Apply Now ›

Our client, an established provider of professional liability insurance, has engaged us to identify a highly-qualified Senior Bad Faith Tria...


Apply Now ›