X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

By Austin, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Maltese and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Ricky Cowan, ap, v. Anthony Annucci, etc. res — (Index No. 2645/16)Del Atwell, East Hampton, NY, for appellant.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, NY (Anisha S. Dasgupta and David Lawrence III of counsel), for respondents.In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70 for a writ of habeas corpus, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Maria G. Rosa, J.), dated December 20, 2016. The judgment, after a hearing, denied the petition.ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.We agree with the Supreme Court’s determination that the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision properly declined to credit the petitioner with 100 days of jail time the petitioner served in the Nassau County Correctional Center with respect to two convictions rendered against him in August 2014. Contrary to the petitioner’s contentions, those 100 days of jail time had already been credited toward a period of postrelease supervision that had been imposed against the petitioner in connection with a 2008 conviction (see Penal Law §70.30[3]; Matter of Parker v. Annucci, 130 AD3d 1115, 1116).The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit.AUSTIN, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

By Balkin, J.P.; Chambers, Roman and Hinds-Radix, JJ.Michael Engelberg, etc., plf, v. Eliezer Perr def; Koffsky Schwalb, LLC, nonparty-ap — (Index No. 606919/14)In an action, inter alia, for an accounting, nonparty Koffsky Schwalb, LLC, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Stephen A. Bucaria, J.), entered March 1, 2018. The order denied the unopposed motion of nonparty Koffsky Schwalb, LLC, for leave to withdraw as counsel for the defendants Eliezer Perr and Milton Pollack.ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and the motion of nonparty Koffsky Schwalb, LLC, for leave to withdraw as counsel for the defendants Eliezer Perr and Milton Pollack is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this decision and order, the appellant shall (1) serve the defendants Eliezer Perr and Milton Pollack with a copy of this decision and order by certified mail, and by ordinary mail, which shall constitute notice to appoint another attorney pursuant to CPLR 321(c), and (2) serve the other parties who have appeared in this action with a copy of this decision and order either (a) by ordinary mail upon counsel or, if proceeding pro se, upon that party personally, or (b) by electronic filing of this decision and order with notice of entry with the NYSCEF site thus causing transmission by the site of notification of receipt of the documents and by ordinary mail of a hard copy of this decision and order with notice of entry, upon any exempt attorney or party; and it is further,ORDERED that upon filing proof of such service with the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, as set forth above and, if applicable, transmission of the notification, the appellant shall be relieved as counsel for the defendants Eliezer Perr and Milton Pollack; and it is further,ORDERED that all proceedings in this action are stayed until 30 days after service upon the defendants Eliezer Perr and Milton Pollack is complete.In its unopposed motion for leave to withdraw as counsel for the defendants Eliezer Perr and Milton Pollack (hereinafter together the defendants), the appellant established that the defendants were more than $70,000 in arrears in the payment of legal fees and had failed to cooperate in the representation by responding to telephone calls and written correspondence from the appellant. Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the appellant’s motion (see Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0] rule 1.16[c][5], [7]; Applebaum v. Einstein, 163 AD3d 905; Arogana v. Shaibani, 138 AD3d 649, 650).BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, ROMAN and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
November 27, 2024
London

Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.


Learn More
December 02, 2024 - December 03, 2024
Scottsdale, AZ

Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!


Learn More
December 11, 2024
Las Vegas, NV

This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.


Learn More

Ryan & Conlon, LLP, is a boutique firm specializing in insurance defense. We are a small eclectic practice with a busy and fast paced en...


Apply Now ›

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROSECUTION PARALEGAL - NEW JERSEY OR NEW YORK OFFICESProminent mid-Atlantic law firm with multiple regional office lo...


Apply Now ›

Experienced Insurance Defense Attorney.No in office requirement.Send resume to:


Apply Now ›