X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The following papers were read on this motion: Motion Sequence 001 Notice of Motion, Affirmation and Exhibits     1 Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Law         2 Motion Sequence 002 Notice of Cross-Motion, Affirmation and Exhibits          1 Defendant’s Memorandum of Law    2 Reply Affirmation in Support and Exhibits      3 Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Law in Support and Opposition to Cross Motion             4 DECISION AND ORDER PRELIMINARY STATEMENT   In Motion Sequence 001, Plaintiff, Inwood Land Holdings, Inc., brings this application for an order pursuant to CPLR §3212(a) and §3211(b) granting Plaintiff summary judgment declaring that Plaintiff possesses the absolute right to ingress and egress to and from its property over certain property owned by Defendant located in Inwood, New York, and dismissing Defendant’s affirmative defenses, and together with such other and further relief as the Court deems just, proper and equitable. In Motion Sequence 002, Defendant, The State of New York, brings this application for an order granting summary judgment in the defendant State of New York’s favor pursuant to CPLR §3212, and together with such other and further relief as may seem just and proper to the Court. Opposition and reply have been submitted. DISCUSSION This action on behalf of the owner of 10.4 of 11.3 acres of land, formerly owned by Nassau County for a sewage treatment plant. Plaintiff acquired the land by deed dated December 15, 2009 (Exh. “F”), with .9 acres retained by the County for a sewer pump station. The litigation arises from the actions of the New York State Department of Transportation (“NYSDOT”) having taken land in the immediate vicinity of plaintiff’s property connection with the development of the Nassau County Expressway. Plaintiff’s parcel abuts the westerly boundary of Parcel 734, as depicted in Exh. “D”. Parcel 723 appears on Exh. “C”. They constituted a Right of Way between Bay Boulevard and he County’s land, so as to provide access to and from Bay Boulevard to the sewage treatment plant. NYSDOT acquired Parcels 723 in fee and contains the language “Fee W/A”, which means “fee with access to abutting owners” (Regan v. Lanze, 40 N.Y.2d 475, 484 [1976]). Parcel 734 was acquired by the filing of Map 639 (Exh. “D”) and is labeled “fee”, with no indication that it was “without access”. Where an appropriation map is not labeled “without access”, a right of access is not denied by the appropriation (Serf Realty Co. v. State of New York, 5 A.D.3d 584 [2d Dept. 2004]). Together, Parcels 723, and 734 form a continuous 48 to 54 foot wide right of way, running approximately 922 feet from Bay Boulevard to the former County property. Where no access by abutting owners is intended, the taking map is labeled a “Controlled Access Taking”. Such is the case in this matter, where the boundary line between Parcel 734, and Parcel 724 to its east is so labeled, and thus parcel 724 was taken in fee without the right of access to the abutting property (Affidavits of Martin Oliner and Martin Read, Annexed to the Notice of Motion). Thus, as opposed to plaintiff’s parcel, Parcel 724 does not enjoy access to Parcel 734. Defendants’ contention that the State is the owner in fee of Parcels 723 and 734 is correct. But they were acquired by the filing of the acquisition maps, specifically giving access to the property to the west, formerly Nassau County, and now Inwood Land Holdings, Inc. The fact that they are not public highways, and have been obstructed by the State by storing rock and debris, are irrelevant to the right afforded plaintiff by virtue of taking the Parcels with the explicit right of access to plaintiff’s premises. The motion by plaintiff for summary judgment declaring that it has the absolute right to ingress and egress to and from its property over land owned by defendant, identified as Parcels 723 and 734 on Exhs. “C” and “D”, for access to and from Bay Boulevard to the north, is granted. The Cross-motion by defendants is in all respects denied. To the extent that requested relief has not been granted, it is expressly denied. This constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court. Dated: August 13, 2019 Mineola, New York

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
November 27, 2024
London

Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.


Learn More
December 02, 2024 - December 03, 2024
Scottsdale, AZ

Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!


Learn More
December 11, 2024
Las Vegas, NV

This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.


Learn More

Role TitleAssociate General Counsel, Global EmploymentGrade F13Reporting ToSenior Legal Counsel, Global EmploymentProgram/Tool/ Department/U...


Apply Now ›

Ryan & Conlon, LLP, is a boutique firm specializing in insurance defense. We are a small eclectic practice with a busy and fast paced en...


Apply Now ›

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROSECUTION PARALEGAL - NEW JERSEY OR NEW YORK OFFICESProminent mid-Atlantic law firm with multiple regional office lo...


Apply Now ›