X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

DECISION AND ORDER INTRODUCTION   Ghazanfar Iqbal (“Plaintiff”) commenced this action on October 23, 2017, challenging the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service’s (the “USCIS”) denial of his naturalization application under the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. §1101 et seq. (the “INA”), and the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §701 et seq. (the “APA”). (Dkt. 1). Plaintiff claims that Defendants violated the INA and the APA by improperly concluding that he failed to maintain continuous residency in the United States for the statutorily required period and lacked the “good moral character” necessary for naturalization. (See Dkt. 1 at 12-13). Plaintiff requests that the Court order a plenary hearing, review his application for naturalization de novo, and grant him his request for naturalization. (Id. at 14). Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 15) and motion to amend/correct the motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 16). Because the Court concludes that the undisputed facts establish that Plaintiff failed to maintain continuous residency in the United States from the date of his naturalization application up to the time of admission to citizenship, summary judgment is granted in favor of Defendant without the Court reaching the issue concerning the determination as to Plaintiff’s good moral character. BACKGROUND Unless otherwise indicated, the following facts are taken from the parties’ Rule 56 statements. (See Dkt. 15-17; Dkt. 20). Plaintiff, a citizen of Pakistan, arrived in this country in 1996 and is a lawful permanent resident of the United States. (Dkt. 15-17 at

1-3; Dkt. 20 at

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
September 05, 2024
New York, NY

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.


Learn More
September 06, 2024
Johannesburg

The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.


Learn More
September 12, 2024
New York, NY

Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.


Learn More

Morristown, NJ; New York, NY Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in multiple offices for a Counsel in our Litigation Department. The ...


Apply Now ›

The Forest Preserves of Cook CountyIs seeking applicants forDeputy Chief Attorney The Forest Preserves of Cook County is seeking a detail-o...


Apply Now ›

PLEASE REVIEW THE ENTIRE POSTING TO ENSURE ALL REQUIRED DOCUMENTS ARE SUBMITTED. August 14, 2024 Notice of Job Vacancy #2024-05 An opp...


Apply Now ›
06/27/2024
The American Lawyer

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›
06/21/2024
Daily Business Review

Full Page Announcement


View Announcement ›