X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER   In this civil action by the United States (the “Government”) seeking various forms of relief related to unpaid tax liabilities, Defendant Shaindy Lax (“Shaindy”) moves to dismiss all claims asserted against her pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (See ECF No. 96).1 For the reasons that follow, the motion is denied. BACKGROUND The following facts are alleged in the amended complaint (Am. Compl., ECF No. 106) and are viewed in the light most favorable to the Government. Familiarity with the extensive factual allegations contained in the amended complaint is presumed, and they are recited here only insofar as necessary to dispose of the pending motion. Chaim Lax (“Chaim”) was a diamond merchant and real estate developer who, through numerous business entities, owned parcels of real estate throughout Brooklyn, New York. (See id. 27). In or around November 2006, he was diagnosed with stomach cancer. (See id. 31). He died on or around November 3, 2008. (See id. 35). The executors of his estate (the “Estate”) are his son, Moshe Lax (“Moshe”), and his daughter, Zlaty Schwartz (“Zlaty”). (See id. 37). In addition, Moshe and Zlaty are the trustees of the Lax Family Trust (the “Trust”), an irrevocable trust Chaim had established in 2003, of which Chaim’s children (including Moshe and Zlaty) and grandchildren are beneficiaries. (See id.

61-62). Shaindy is Moshe’s wife. (See id. 74). Moshe and Zlaty have been named as Defendants in this action, in addition to Shaindy and numerous other individuals and business entities. Prior to his death, Chaim knew that he was being audited by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and that he owed substantial income taxes. (See id. 258). He also knew that his Estate would owe substantial estate taxes following his death. (See id.). The Government alleges that, “[k]nowing of his negative health prognosis, and that he owed millions in income taxes and would owe millions more upon his death, Chaim undertook a series of sham transactions designed to shield his assets from collection by the Internal Revenue Service.” (Id. 32). The Government further alleges that Moshe and Zlaty “continued that effort after his death in order to avoid paying the taxes he owed.” (Id.). As of April 25, 2018, the Estate had unpaid federal tax liabilities of over $60 million. (See id. 41). In this action, the Government seeks various forms of relief related to these unpaid tax liabilities. As relevant to the pending motion, the Government asserts that Moshe and Zlaty orchestrated a series of sham transactions to hide the Estate’s assets from the IRS by conveying them to assorted business entities held in Shaindy’s name. The Government describes three such schemes in the amended complaint, denoted as “Scheme 2″, “Scheme 3″, and “Scheme 4″. Scheme 2 was essentially a continuation of an earlier scheme, denoted as “Scheme 1″. The Government alleges that each of these Schemes “was part of a series of transfers…designed…to place Chaim’s assets beyond the reach of his creditors, including the IRS.” (Id.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
September 04, 2025
New York, NY

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.


Learn More
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More
March 24, 2025
New York, NY

Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.


Learn More

Search for the President and Dean California Western School of Law San Diego, California California Western School of Law (California ...


Apply Now ›

Duane Morris LLP has an opening for an associate with 2-3 years of experience with strong capital markets and corporate transactional backgr...


Apply Now ›

Our client, an established provider of professional liability insurance, has engaged us to identify a highly-qualified Senior Bad Faith Tria...


Apply Now ›