OPINION & ORDER On February 15, 2016, Plaintiff Donald Felix (“Plaintiff’) commenced this action asserting violations of his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights under 42 U.S.C. §1983, and state law claims sounding in false arrest, malicious prosecution, intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, and negligent hiring, retention, training and supervision, by filing the Complaint with the Court. (ECF No. 1.) Since that date, no summons has been issued or served upon any of Defendants. Presently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Complaint, pursuant to, inter alia, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), 12(b)(5), and 12(b)(6).1 (ECF No. 17.) For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED. BACKGROUND I. Factual Background2 On September 6, 2014, Plaintiff was working as the owner and operator of a Taxi and Limousine company called Lane Changers, Inc. (Am. Compl. 21.) At approximately 1:19 a.m., Plaintiff was at a residence located at 1 Hammersley Avenue, Apt. #1, Poughkeepsie, New York (“1 Hammersley Avenue”). (Id.) Plaintiff asserts that he had entered 1 Hammersley Avenue to pick up a client and that his car was parked in front of the building. (Id.) Shortly after his arrival, police officers employed by the City of Poughkeepsie (the “City”) Police Department (“CPPD”) forcibly entered 1 Hammersley Avenue in execution of a warrant that did not contain Plaintiff’s name. (Id. 22.) The CPPD officers seized Plaintiff, handcuffed him, and made him lie on the ground as they searched 1 Hammersley Avenue. (Id. 23.) They also removed Plaintiff’s clothing and performed a cavity search on Plaintiff. (Id.) Plaintiff and six other individuals at 1 Hammersley Avenue were arrested and accused of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree. (Id. 24.) At the CPPD precinct, Plaintiff voluntarily spoke in a taped interview with Defendant CPPD Officers John Douglas and Bradley Sukeena. (Id. 25.) During the interview, Plaintiff explained that he had no prior association with the other arrestees at 1 Hammersley Avenue because he had been recently released from incarceration on August 29, 2014, the date the CPPD officers’ search warrant had been signed. (Id.) Plaintiff also provided proof of his identification, ownership of his vehicle, and ownership of his taxi company. (Id.) According to Plaintiff, Officers Douglas and Sukeena stated during the interview that they believed that he had nothing to do with the drugs or guns found at 1 Hammersley Avenue, but that since the other arrestees did not admit that such drugs and guns were theirs, Plaintiff would be “held and charged.” (Id. 26.) Thereafter, Plaintiff was arraigned and charged with one count of criminal possession of a narcotic drug with intent to sell it, N.Y. Penal Law §220.16(1), and one count of criminal possession of one or more preparations, compounds, mixtures or substances weighing, in aggregate, one half ounce or more, containing a narcotic drug, N.Y. Penal Law §220.16(12). (Id. 27.) Plaintiff was not released on bail and remained incarcerated at the Dutchess County Jail. (Id.
