OPINION & ORDER Defendant Paul Elmowsky (“Defendant” or “Elmowsky”) is charged by Indictment on one count of knowingly receiving and possessing a firearm that was not registered to him in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record, in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§5845(a)(4) and 5861(d). (Indictment, ECF No. 8.) Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Suppress a firearm seized from his home on December 31, 2018 as well as statements that Defendant made to law enforcement that same day (the “Motion”). (Motion to Suppress, ECF No. 22; Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant’s Pretrial Motions, (“Def. Mem.”), ECF No. 24.) On November 14, 2019, the Court issued an Opinion and Order, granting in part and denying in part Defendant’s Motion. (ECF No. 27.) The Court granted the Motion insofar as Defendant sought an evidentiary hearing, and denied it insofar as Defendant sought to dismiss the Indictment and suppress the firearm and any statements, reserving decision on those issues until after the hearing. (Id.) Subsequently, on December 16, 2019, the Court held a hearing to assess the outstanding Fourth Amendment and Miranda issues raised by the Motion. (See ECF Docket Entry dated 12/16/2019.) For the following reasons, Defendant’s Motion is DENIED in its entirety. BACKGROUND The following factual findings are based on the parties’ briefings, the undisputed testimony presented at the hearing, and the Court’s credibility determinations. On or about late December 2018, law enforcement in Las Vegas, Nevada were alerted to several firearms that had been left in hotel rooms by Elmowsky in violation of hotel policy. (Palazolo Tr. at 9.) Consequently, on December 28, 2018, the Rockland County Sheriff’s Department petitioned for the suspension of Elmowsky’s pistol permit. (Compl. 4(a).) On December 31, 2018, Rockland Supreme Court Justice Thomas E. Walsh issued a “Notice of Suspension,” which invalidated Elmowsky’s pistol permit (“Suspension Notice”). (See GX-01.) The Suspension Notice stated that Elmowsky’s pistol permit was “suspended,” and directed Elmowsky to surrender his permit and weapons “immediately to the Rockland County Sheriff’s Department.” (Id.) That same day, December 31, 2018, the Rockland County Sheriff’s Office (“RCSO”), New York City Police Department (“NYPD”) and Orangetown Police Department (“OPD”) met at the OPD’s office to brief the background regarding the Suspension Notice and coordinate service on Elmowsky. (Palazolo Tr. at 31-33.) In the officers’ assessment, the circumstances surrounding this Suspension Notice warranted heightened concern, given the sheer number of firearms expected to be in Elmowsky’s possession, as well as Elmowsky’s behavior during a prior encounter at his home during which he appeared to be intoxicated.1 (Id. at 10, 37, 50-51; Garrison Tr. at 63; Sullivan Tr. at 105.) I. Initial Encounter and Entry into Defendant’s Home Officers from those three law enforcement agencies went to Elmowsky’s home in Nyack, NY to serve the Suspension Notice at approximately 3:15pm.2 (Palazolo Tr. at 11; Garrison Tr. at 64; Sullivan Tr. at 96; Baisley Tr. at 121.) OPD Officers Matthew Sullivan (“Officer Sullivan”) and Greg Baisley (“Officer Baisley”), who were both in uniform, approached the house, while OPD Sergeant Anthony Palazolo (“Sergeant Palazolo”) parked in a marked patrol unit on the street opposite the Elmowsky’s residence, with additional officers staged down the road. (Palazolo Tr. at 57; Garrison Tr. at 63, 65; Sullivan Tr. at 106; Baisley Tr. at 120-21.) Officer Sullivan knocked on the door, which had glass windows such that it was possible to see a man through the glass. (Sullivan Tr. at 96-97; Baisley Tr. at 121.) Officer Sullivan verbally identified himself, and the man behind the door pointed to his left toward the garage. (Sullivan Tr. at 97; Baisley Tr. at 121.) The garage door then opened. (Sullivan Tr. at 97.) As Officer Sullivan and Officer Baisley stood in the driveway, Officer Sullivan again stated he was Officer Sullivan from the Orangetown Police and that the officers needed to talk to Elmowsky. (Id. at 97.) At this point, Elmowsky asked Officer Sullivan to see his police identification, but Officer Sullivan explained that he did not carry such identification. (Id. at 97; Baisley Tr. at 121-22.) Instead, Officer Sullivan replied that Elmowsky could call the police station to verify their presence. (Sullivan Tr. at 97; Baisley Tr. at 121-22.) Officer Sullivan then asked Elmowsky to see his identification, to which Elmowsky replied, “Okay, come on in.” (Sullivan Tr. at 98; Baisley Tr. at 122.) Elmowsky then began walking inside the garage and Officers Sullivan and Baisley followed. (Sullivan Tr. at 97.) Elmowsky entered a doorway from the garage into the kitchen pantry and said, “I’m getting my I.D., follow me.” (Id. at 98, 110.) After Sergeant Palazolo saw Officer Baisley and Officer Sullivan enter the garage, Sergeant Palazolo followed. (Palazolo Tr. at 11-12.) When Elmowsky again asked for Officer Sullivan’s identification, Officer Sullivan suggested that Elmowsky could speak with Sullivan’s supervisor, and gestured to Sergeant Palazolo. (Palazolo Tr. at 12, 40-41; Sullivan Tr. at 97-98.) Sergeant Palazolo asked Elmowsky if he could enter Elmowsky’s home, and Elmowsky said he could. (Palazolo Tr. at 12.) Sergeant Palazolo asked Elmowsky if he had any weapons on his person and if he could check, to which Elmowsky responded that he could check. (Id. at 12-13.) Sergeant Palazolo testified that he conducted a pat-down and felt a bulge in Elmowsky’s back pocket that seemed to be a phone. (Id. at 13.) Sergeant Palazolo asked Elmowsky if they could go sit down and talk somewhere, and Elmowsky proceeded to the living room. (Id. at 13.) II. Service of Pistol Permit Suspension Notice At this time, Sergeant Paul Garrison (“Sergeant Garrison”) of the RCSO was stationed at a cross-street down the block from Elmowsky’s residence. (Garrison Tr. at 65.) The OPD officers notified Sergeant Garrison over their radio that the scene was safe and secure. (Id.) Sergeant Garrison proceeded to pull into Elmowsky’s driveway and entered the living area of the home. (Id.) He identified himself and read the Suspension Notice aloud to Elmowsky, pausing several times to ask if Elmowsky understood. (Id. at 66, 80.) After conveying its sum and substance, Sergeant Garrison stopped reading the Suspension Notice, provided Elmowsky with a copy of the notice, and asked Elmowsky if he understood and was willing to comply. (Id. at 66-68; Palazolo Tr. at 14.) Elmowsky responded in the affirmative. (Garrison Tr. at 68, 86; Palazolo Tr. at 14; Sullivan Tr. at 99.) Sergeant Garrison testified that he did not record in his notes that he had read the Suspension Notice out loud. (Garrison Tr. at 80-83.) III. Recovery of Firearms and Defendant’s Arrest As the search for the guns began, there were approximately 8-10 officers in Elmowsky’s residence. (Garrison Tr. at 85; Baisley Tr. at 126, 135.) Officer Sullivan asked Elmowsky if he could search the couch for firearms. (Sullivan Tr. at 99.) Officer Sullivan testified that Elmowsky agreed, and “was being cooperative.” (Id. at 99-100.) Officer Sullivan did not locate any firearms on the couch. (Id. at 100.) Sergeant Garrison explained that he would need Elmowsky’s assistance to track down the firearms listed in Elmowsky’s permit, and Elmowsky explained that he had guns scattered throughout the house and that the officers were welcome to go look for them. (Garrison Tr. at 68; Palazolo Tr. at 14; Baisley Tr. at 123.) Elmowsky mentioned that he believed he had a Glock pistol in one of the bedrooms. (Palazolo Tr. at 14.) Sergeant Palazolo asked for permission to retrieve it, and Elmowsky consented. (Id. at 14.) Upon a search of the room Sergeant Palazolo did not locate a Glock but did retrieve a revolver. (Id. at 15.) Elmowsky suggested Sergeant Palazolo check one of the drawers at the end table next to the bed, where Sergeant Palazolo recovered a Glock 27 pistol. (Id. at 16-17.) In the meantime, after Elmowsky had invited the officers to search for the firearms in the house, Officer Baisley entered a bedroom and lifted the foot of the mattress, where he found an AR-15 silver handgun. (Baisley Tr. at 124.) Officer Baisley surveyed the rest of the room but did not found any other guns. (Id. at 125.) Elmowsky also went on to state that he had a safe in his bedroom that contained the keys to other safes where pistols might be found. (Palazolo Tr. at 17.) Sergeant Palazolo and Officer Sullivan followed Elmowsky to the bedroom, where Elmowsky tried unsuccessfully to open the safe in the bedroom. (Id. at 17.) They then proceeded to the garage, where they were also unsuccessful at opening the safes there. Elmowsky stated that the pin code to the safes might be obtained from his brother-in-law, Mike, who might have changed the codes. (Palazolo Tr. at 18; Garrison Tr. at 69-70; Sullivan Tr. at 101.) Sergeant Palazolo subsequently asked if he could try getting into the bedroom safe himself. Elmowsky gave him the key for that safe, and Sergeant Palazolo was able to open it and obtain its contents: a plastic bag with two keys. (Palazolo Tr. at 19; Sullivan Tr. at 101.) As Sergeant Palazolo went out to the garage with the two keys, Elmowsky and Officer Sullivan returned to the living room. (Sullivan Tr. at 102.) Elmowsky and Officer Sullivan then had a conversation about Elmowsky’s personal interest in photography and the artwork in his home. (Id.) Once in the garage, Sergeant Palazolo used the two keys obtained from the bedroom safes to open the safes in the garage. (Palazolo Tr. at 19.) Inside the garage safes, the officers found a number of firearms, including a short-barrel rifle, an Uzi 9-millimeter firearm (the “Uzi”), a weapon not registered to Elmowsky in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record. (Id. at 20, 24-25.) (Compl.
