X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

OPINION & ORDER   Plaintiff Judon McLeod, proceeding prose, filed this action under 42 U.S.C. §1983 against Defendants Deputy Warden Hellen Smith, Commissioner Cynthia Brann, and Correction Officer Janet Williams, alleging that Defendants violated his constitutional rights while he was detained at the Anna M. Kross Center on Rikers Island by depriving him of the ability to attend the Jumu’ah service on November 10, 2017. Now before the Court is Defendant Williams’ motion for summary judgment.1 For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion is granted. BACKGROUND2 On November 10, 2017, Plaintiff was detained at the Anna M. Kross Center (“AMKC”), a New York City Department of Correction facility on Rikers Island. Def. 56.1 1. He was housed specifically in “housing area W 19U” of the facility. Def. 56.1 2. Plaintiff identifies as Muslim and, as part of his Muslim faith, attends a religious service known as “Jumu’ah” on Fridays. See Def. 56.1 4; Pl. Opp’n 1(iv). Jumu’ah services are usually held between 1:00 p.m. and 1:20 p.m. on Fridays. See Kalmbach Decl. Ex. A (“Pl. Tr.”) at 32. On November 10, 2017, AMKC, including housing area W19U, was “placed on lockdown from 8:00 a.m. until 3:00 p.m.” Def. 56.1 3. During a lockdown, inmates are “generally not allowed to move around the facility.” Def. 56.1 5. Plaintiff testified that he does not recall ever attending the Jumu’ah service while the facility was on lockdown. See id.; see also Pl. Tr. at 32 (“If the facility is on lockdown you cannot leave unless it’s for medical purposes only[.]“). Nonetheless, despite the lockdown at AMKC, a Jumu’ah service was held on November 10, 2017. See Def. 56.1 7; Pl. Opp’n 3. At 1:20 p.m., “all housing areas in AMKC were notified that Jumu’ah would take place during the lockdown.” Def. 56.1 6; see also Pl. Opp’n 1 (v) (stating that the “Juma Services Logbook” entries “clearly show[] that all housing units, including W 19U[,] at AKMC were notified to prepare for Juma Services.”); Pl. Opp’n 3 (“There is no factual dispute that despite the lockdown the Tour Commander authorized Juma Services on November 10, 2017 and that all housing units were notified well in advance to prepare inmates for the services.”). Plaintiff did not attend the Jumu’ah service on November 10, 2017. Def. 56.1 7. Plaintiff asserts that no other inmates from his housing unit, W19U, attended the service that day either, even though there are “at least eight (8) men who regularly attended the weekly Jumu’ah Services from the housing unit.” Pl. Opp’n 3. The record is not entirely clear as to why Plaintiff missed the Jumu’ah service on November 10, 2017. On the one hand, Plaintiff contends that “he did not hear an announcement regarding Jumu’ah on November 10, 2017.” Def. 56.1 8; see also Pl. Tr. at 34. He claims that, specifically, Defendant Williams did not announce the service, and therefore denied him and other Muslim inmates from Wl9U “the opportunity to attend services” that day. See Pl. Opp’n 4.3 On the other hand, however, Plaintiff testified at his deposition that he had asked a correction officer — during the lockdown and prior to the Jumu’ah service-if he could attend it, and was told that he could not because the facility was on lockdown. See Def. 56.1

9-10; Pl. Tr. at 36-37. Plaintiff filed a grievance regarding his alleged inability to attend the November 10, 2017 service. See Def. 56.1 12; see also Kalmbach Deel. Ex. D (Nov. 10, 2017 Grievance). He did not, however, attend a hearing or receive any type of decision as to that grievance. See Def. 56.1

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
December 02, 2024 - December 03, 2024
Scottsdale, AZ

Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!


Learn More
December 11, 2024
Las Vegas, NV

This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.


Learn More
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More

We are seeking two attorneys with a minimum of two to three years of experience to join our prominent and thriving education law practice in...


Apply Now ›

Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the New York office for a Real Estate Litigation Associate with three to six years of commerci...


Apply Now ›

Downtown NY property and casualty defense law firm seeks a Litigation Associate with 3+ years' experience to become a part of our team! You ...


Apply Now ›