By Scheinkman, P.J., Mastro, Rivera, Dillon, Leventhal, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF EVAN LOUIS GREEBEL, A SUSPENDED ATTORNEY. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE FOR THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, pet; EVAN LOUIS GREEBEL, res — The respondent was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on June 20, 2001. On December 27, 2017, the respondent was convicted of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of 18 USC § 1349, and conspiracy to commit securities fraud, in violation of 18 USC § 371 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, and on August 17, 2018, he was sentenced, inter alia, to 18 months imprisonment on each offense, to be served concurrently, followed by a three-year period of supervised release. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated January 3, 2019, the respondent was immediately suspended from the practice of law pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(f) as a result of his conviction of serious crimes, further disciplinary proceedings were held in abeyance pending the respondent’s release from incarceration, and he was directed to promptly advise the Court upon his release from incarceration. By letter dated February 11, 2020, the respondent advised the Court that he had been released from incarceration. Now, on the Court’s own motion, and upon the papers filed with this Court, it is ORDERED that pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1240.12(c)(2)(iii), the respondent, Evan Louis Greebel, is directed to show cause at a hearing why a final order of suspension, censure, or disbarment should not be made based on his conviction of serious crimes; and it is further, ORDERED that the matter is referred to John J. Halloran, Jr., c/o John J. Halloran, Jr., P.C., 50 Main St. Ste. 1000, Westchester Financial Center, White Plains, NY 10606-1900, as Special Referee, to hear and report, with the hearing to be conducted within 60 days of the date of this decision and order on motion or as soon thereafter as practicable, and the report, which contains his findings on any mitigating or aggravating factors, and a recommendation as to whether the respondent has demonstrated why a final order of public discipline should not be made, to be submitted within 60 days after the conclusion of the hearing or the submission of post-hearing memoranda. SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and LEVENTHAL, JJ., concur. CECILIA BRANDEL, res, v. WILLIAM BRANDEL, app — Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated July 9, 2019. Pursuant to § 670.3(b) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.3[b]), it is ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript regarding issues other than custody or visitation has been received and indicating the date that it was received, or, if the transcript concerning issues other than custody and visitation has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; and it is further, ORDERED that if none of the actions described in prior paragraph has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to show cause why the appeal concerning issues other than custody and visitation should or should not be dismissed. IN THE MATTER OF ANDREW ALVAREZ, app, v. KATHLEEN KOEHLER, res — (V-15150-18/18B) — Appeal by Andrew Alvarez from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated December 9, 2019. Pursuant to § 670.3(b) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.3[b]), it is ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further, ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following: (1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or (2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or (3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or (4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further, ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed. ASHLEY SCRONIC, res, v. MICHAEL SCRONIC, app — Appeal by Michael Scronic from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 13, 2020. Pursuant to § 670.3(b) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.3[b]), it is ORDERED that the appeal concerning issues involving visitation between the appellant and the subject child in the above-entitled action shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant’s assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Supreme Court, and the appellant’s assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further, ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the appellant’s assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following: (1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Supreme Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal concerning issues involving visitation between the appellant and the subject child; or (2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or (3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that assigned counsel served a copy of the decision and order on motion of this Court dated May 6, 2020, granting poor person relief to the appellant and assigning counsel concerning issues involving visitation between the appellant and the subject child upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or (4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal concerning issues involving visitation between the appellant and the subject child; and it is further, ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to show cause why the appeal concerning issues involving visitation between the appellant and the subject child should or should not be dismissed. ASHLEY SCRONIC, res, v. MICHAEL SCRONIC, app — Appeal by Michael Scronic from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 13, 2020. Pursuant to § 670.3(b) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.3[b]), it is ORDERED that the appeal concerning issues not involving visitation between the appellant and the subject child in the above-entitled action shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Supreme Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further, ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following: (1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Supreme Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal concerning issues not involving visitation between the appellant and the subject child; or (2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or (3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or (4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal not involving visitation between the appellant and the subject child; and it is further, ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to show cause why the appeal concerning issues not involving visitation between the appellant and the subject child should or should not be dismissed. IN THE MATTER OF MARC FISHMAN, app, v. JENNIFER SOLOMON, res — (F-14064-12/19U, F-14064-12/19P, F-14064-12/19T, F-14064-12/19Q, F-14064-12/19S) — Appeal by Marc Fishman from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (IDV Part), dated January 29, 2020. Pursuant to § 670.3(b) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.3[b]), it is ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Supreme Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further, ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following: (1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Supreme Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or (2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or (3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or (4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further, ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.
By Dillon, J.P., Cohen, Miller, Barros, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF SHANNON PASCARELLA, res, v. DARREN PASCARELLA, app — (V-1742-18) — Appeal by Darren Pascarella from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated February 7, 2020. On the Court’s own motion, it is ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appal lies as of right from a nondispositional order in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, part 3 (see Family Ct Act § 1112), and leave to appeal has not been granted. DILLON, J.P., COHEN, MILLER and BARROS, JJ., concur. IN THE MATTER OF SABRINA M. A. (ANONYMOUS). ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN’S SERVICES, pet-res; YANA A. (ANONYMOUS), res; MARCUS S. (ANONYMOUS), nonparty-app — (N-17967-17) — Appeal by Marcus S. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated February 21, 2020. The nonparty-appellant’s assigned counsel has advised this Court that assigned counsel possesses the transcripts of the proceedings. Pursuant to § 670.3(b) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.3[b]), it is ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the date of this scheduling order and the nonparty-appellant shall cause the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 1250.9[a][5]) and serve and upload a digital copy of the brief, with proof of service thereof, through the digital portal on this Court’s website, and file an original and five hard copies of the brief in accordance with any applicable administrative order or other order to be issued by the Court on or before that date.
