PER CURIAM — On October 29, 2019, the Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts served the respondent with a notice of petition and a verified petition, both dated October 15, 2019, and duly filed those papers with this Court together with an affidavit of service. The petition contains one charge, which alleges that the respondent failed to cooperate with the Grievance Committee’s investigation of two complaints of professional misconduct, in violation of rule 8.4(d) and (h) of the Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR 1200.0). The notice of petition directed the respondent to serve and file her answer to the verified petition within 20 days after service upon her of the notice of petition and the verified petition. To date, the respondent has neither served nor filed an answer to the verified petition, as directed. The Grievance Committee now moves to deem the charge against the respondent established, and to impose such discipline upon her as this Court deems appropriate, based upon her default. Although the motion papers were served, by mail, upon the respondent on February 26, 2020, she has neither opposed the motion nor interposed any other response thereto. By separate motion, the Grievance Committee moves, inter alia, to immediately suspend the respondent from the practice of law pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1240.9(a)(2) and (5), upon a finding that she is guilty of professional misconduct immediately threatening the public interest. To date, the respondent has failed to submit papers in response to this motion. Accordingly, the Grievance Committee’s motion to deem the charge in the verified petition dated October 15, 2019, established is granted, the charge in the verified petition is deemed established, and, effective immediately, the respondent is disbarred and her name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law. The separate motion seeking to immediately suspend the respondent from the practice of law is denied as academic. All concur. ORDERED that the Grievance Committee’s motion to deem the charge in the verified petition dated October 15, 2019, established is granted, and the Grievance Committee’s separate motion to immediately suspend the respondent, Irina Kogan, from the practice of law is denied as academic; and it is further, ORDERED that, pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, the respondent, Irina Kogan, is disbarred, and her name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further, ORDERED that the respondent, Irina Kogan, shall comply with the rules governing the conduct of disbarred or suspended attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 1240.15); and it is further, ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, the respondent, Irina Kogan, is commanded to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding herself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and it is further, ORDERED that if the respondent, Irina Kogan, has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency, and the respondent shall certify to the same in her affidavit of compliance pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1240.15(f). ENTER: Aprilanne Agostino Clerk of the Court
