PER CURIAM — On August 14, 2019, the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District personally served the respondent with a notice of petition and a verified petition, both dated July 31, 2019, and thereafter, duly filed those papers with this Court together with an affidavit of service. The verified petition contains four charges of professional misconduct, which allege, inter alia, that the respondent, a suspended attorney, failed to cooperate with the Grievance Committee in its investigation of a complaint of professional misconduct, and failed to re-register as an attorney with the Office of Court Administration for two consecutive registration periods, thereby engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice and engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness as a lawyer. The notice of petition directed the respondent to serve and file his answer to the verified petition within 20 days after service upon him of the verified petition. To date, the respondent has neither served nor filed an answer to the verified petition, as directed, nor requested additional time in which to do so. The Grievance Committee moves to deem the charges against the respondent established based upon his default, and to impose such discipline upon him as this Court deems appropriate. Although the motion papers were served by the Grievance Committee, by mail, upon the respondent on September 19, 2019, he has neither opposed the instant motion nor interposed any other response thereto. Accordingly, the Grievance Committee’s motion is granted, the charges in the verified petition dated July 31, 2019, are deemed established, and, effective immediately, the respondent is disbarred, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law. All concur. ORDERED that the Grievance Committee’s motion to deem the charges in the verified petition dated July 31, 2019, established is granted; and it is further, ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, the respondent, Irving Singer, a suspended attorney, is disbarred, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further, ORDERED that the respondent, Irving Singer, shall continue to comply with the rules governing the conduct of disbarred or suspended attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 1240.15); and it is further, ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, the respondent, Irving Singer, is commanded to continue to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and it is further, ORDERED that if the respondent, Irving Singer, has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency and the respondent shall certify to the same in his affidavit of compliance pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1240.15(f). ENTER: Aprilanne Agostino Clerk of the Court
