X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

DECISION/ORDER In this summary holdover proceeding, petitioner claims that the apartment is unregulated and that it has terminated the respondent’s month to month tenancy by a proper thirty day notice. Respondent claims that the apartment is rent stabilized and that the petition must therefore be dismissed. A motion by petitioner to strike defenses and a cross-motion by respondent to dismiss the proceeding were held in abeyance by a stipulation dated January 27, 2020. In that stipulation, petitioner also consented to produce documents in response to respondent’s motion for discovery. Now before the court is a new motion by petitioner seeking to bar respondent from introducing the documents voluntarily produced by petitioner as evidence in the case, and seeking an order requiring respondent to pay use and occupancy from the commencement of the case on June 21, 2019 and continuing. Petitioner asks that this new motion be considered before the court turns to the prior motions. Respondent opposes the new motion. Petitioner’s motion is denied. First, because the case was commenced after June 14, 2019, the request for use and occupancy is governed by the provisions of the HSTPA, which bar any award of retroactive use and occupancy while a case is pending, and which also bar such an award where, as here, there is a claim of rent overcharge. In support of the second branch of the motion, petitioner argues, in essence, that it agreed to produce the documents before the Court of Appeals issued its decision in Regina Metropolitan v. DHCR, 2020 NY Slip Op. 02127, and that it would not have been required to produce the documents under the rule articulated in Regina. Respondent opposes the motion on the grounds that Regina did not in fact change the law affecting this case, and that even if it had, it is not a basis for setting aside a two attorney stipulation, freely entered into. Respondent is right on both counts. The stipulation in which petitioner agreed to provide the documents now at issue was freely negotiated by two experienced landlord-tenant attorneys. Petitioner did not give up any substantive rights. It remains free to argue, on the merits, that the documents it produced in discovery are not relevant or do not affect its rights. It simply decided not to continue to litigate a discovery motion. The fact that it now wishes it had not produced the documents does not form a basis upon which to set aside the stipulation or to bar respondent from using the documents that were the fruits of the agreement. Petitioner charted its own course. Further, although Regina held that the expanded statute of limitation for rent overcharges contained in the HSTPA could not be applied retroactively to revive rent overcharge claims on which the previous statute of limitations had already expired when the law was passed, it did not disturb pre-HSTPA law, which provided that a court could examine any part of the rental history of an apartment in order to determine the rent regulatory status of the apartment. See Regina at FN 4, East-West Renovating v. DHCR, 16 AD 3d 166 (1st Dept. 2005), Gersten v. 56 7th Avenue LLC, 88 AD 3d 189 (1st Dept. 2011), Rosa c. Koscal 59, 162 AD 3d 466 (1st Dept. 2018), Mautner-Glick Corp. v. Higgins, 64 Misc. 3d 16 (AT 1st Dept. 2019). In the case now before this court, the central issue is the rent regulatory status of the apartment. Petitioner argues that the Appellate Term in Vendaval Realty v. Felder, 2020 NY Slip Op. 50786 (U) (AT 1st Dept.) held that Regina applies to cases in which the issue is rent regulatory status. It did not. Vendaval is a rent overcharge case in which the trial court made a factual finding of fraud. The Appellate Term remanded the case for a new calculation of damages using the method prescribed in Regina. The court said nothing about the rules governing cases where status was the issue. The case will be restored to the court’s calendar for all purposes, including a review of the motions that remain pending. Counsel will receive a Teams invitation from chambers shortly. Dated: March 1, 2021

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
November 27, 2024
London

Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.


Learn More
December 02, 2024 - December 03, 2024
Scottsdale, AZ

Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!


Learn More
December 11, 2024
Las Vegas, NV

This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.


Learn More

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROSECUTION PARALEGAL - NEW JERSEY OR NEW YORK OFFICESProminent mid-Atlantic law firm with multiple regional office lo...


Apply Now ›

Experienced Insurance Defense Attorney.No in office requirement.Send resume to:


Apply Now ›

The Republic of Palau Judiciary is seeking applicants for one Associate Justice position who will be assigned to the Appellate Division of ...


Apply Now ›