PER CURIAM — On October 1, 2020, the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District served the respondent, as authorized pursuant to Judiciary Law §90(6), by means of substituted service, with a notice of petition and verified petition, both dated May 4, 2020, and thereafter, duly filed those papers with this Court together with an affidavit of service. The verified petition contains six charges of professional misconduct, which allege, inter alia, that the respondent misappropriated funds entrusted to him as a fiduciary incident to his practice of law, made cash withdrawals from his attorney special account, failed to render an account of his attorney special account, failed to maintain required bank and bookkeeping records, failed to cooperate with the Grievance Committee in its investigation, thereby engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, and based on all of the foregoing, engaged in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness as a lawyer. The notice of petition directed the respondent to serve and file his answer to the verified petition within 20 days after service upon him of the verified petition. To date, the respondent has neither served nor filed an answer to the verified petition, as directed, nor requested additional time in which to do so. The Grievance Committee moves to deem the charges against the respondent established based upon his default, and to impose such discipline upon him as this Court deems appropriate. Although the motion papers were served by the Grievance Committee upon the respondent on November 6, 2020, as authorized pursuant to Judiciary Law §90(6), by means of substituted service, he has neither opposed the instant motion nor interposed any other response thereto. Accordingly, the Grievance Committee’s motion is granted, the charges in the verified petition dated May 4, 2020, are deemed established, and, effective immediately, the respondent is disbarred, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law. All concur. LASALLE, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur. ORDERED that the Grievance Committee’s motion to deem the charges in the verified petition dated May 4, 2020, established is granted; and it is further, ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, the respondent, Kelly Douglas Talcott, a suspended attorney, is disbarred, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further, ORDERED that the respondent, Kelly Douglas Talcott, shall continue to comply with the rules governing the conduct of disbarred or suspended attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 1240.15); and it is further, ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, the respondent, Kelly Douglas Talcott, is commanded to continue to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and it is further, ORDERED that if the respondent, Kelly Douglas Talcott, has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency, and the respondent shall certify to the same in his affidavit of compliance pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1240.15(f). ENTER: Aprilanne Agostino Clerk of the Court
