X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER I. INTRODUCTION On November 25, 2020, plaintiff Michael Matzell (“Matzell” or “plaintiff”) filed this 42 U.S.C. §1983 (“§1983″) putative class action against defendants Jeffrey McKoy, Bruce Yelich, Stanley Barton, Trudylynn Boyea, Katherine Heading-Smith, Elizabeth Laramay, Anthony Annucci, and other unidentified New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (“DOCCS”) employees (together “defendants”). Plaintiff, a former inmate in New York state prison, alleges defendants’ decision to administratively disqualify him from DOCCS’ Shock Incarceration Program (“Shock”) despite a sentencing judge’s order that he enter the program violated his rights. Matzell brings claims under §1983 for violation of his rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Defendants have moved for judgment on the pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(c). The motion having been fully briefed, the Court will now consider it on the basis of the parties’ submissions without oral argument. II. BACKGROUND A. The Shock Incarceration Program Shock is a six-month program in which inmates are subject to “a highly structured routine of discipline, intensive regimentation, exercise and work therapy, together with substance abuse workshops, education, prerelease counseling, and self-improvement counseling.” Dkt. 1 (“Compl.”), 38 (citing N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 7, §1800.2).1 To be eligible for Shock, an inmate must be: (1) eligible for release (on parole or conditional release) within three years; (2) less than fifty years old; (3) free of any prior conviction for a violent felony offense; and (4) not currently serving a sentence for specified violent crimes. See id. 48 (citing N.Y. CORR. LAW §865(1)). A Shock participant who successfully completes the program is eligible for immediate release on parole or conditional release. See N.Y. CORR. LAW §867(4); N.Y. EXEC. LAW §259-i(2)(e); 7 N.Y.C.R.R. §§1800.2, 1800.4(c); 9 N.Y.C.R.R. §8010.2. Prior to 2009, DOCCS enjoyed broad discretion to admit or exclude individuals from Shock. Compl. 39. Indeed, until that point, only DOCCS could determine an inmate’s Shock eligibility; judges had no authority to order that an inmate be placed in the program. Id. 44. However, in 2009, the New York State Legislature passed the Drug Law Reform Act of 2009, (L 2009, ch 56, as codified in CPL 440.46 “DLRA”), which allowed sentencing judges to offer court-mandated substance abuse treatment to certain non-violent offenders without the approval of prosecutors. Id.

40-41. Specifically, the DLRA amended Penal Law §60.04(7) and enabled a sentencing court to “issue an order directing that [DOCCS] enroll the defendant in the shock incarceration program…provided that the defendant is an eligible inmate, as described in [N.Y. CORR. LAW §865(1)].” Id.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
September 05, 2024
New York, NY

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.


Learn More
September 06, 2024
Johannesburg

The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.


Learn More
September 12, 2024
New York, NY

Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.


Learn More

Our client, a boutique litigation firm established by former BigLaw partners, is seeking to hire a commercial litigation associate to join e...


Apply Now ›

COLE SCHOTZ P.C.Prominent mid Atlantic law firm with multiple regional office locations seeks a senior attorney with commercial real estate ...


Apply Now ›

ATTORNEYS WANTED ROCKLAND/BERGEN COUNTYKantrowitz, Goldhamer & Graifman, P.C. Expanding and established multi-practice, mul...


Apply Now ›
06/27/2024
The American Lawyer

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›
06/21/2024
Daily Business Review

Full Page Announcement


View Announcement ›
06/14/2024
New Jersey Law Journal

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›