X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

On October 7, 2021, a hearing was held in reference to this summary proceeding to determine the validity of the Declaration of COVID Hardship submitted by each respondent. Petitioner was represented by Oliver Budde, Esq. Respondents appeared pro se and each testified on his or her own behalf. Each respondent testified at the hearing as follows: RESPONDENT MELANIE KIEFER Melanie Kiefer testified that neither she nor any member of her household suffered medically from COVID. In September, 2019 following the termination of her cleaning business that ended in August, 2019, she applied for Social Security disability caused by non-COVID illness and her lack of income was exacerbated by her providing care to her elderly grandparents. Notwithstanding her testimony concerning diminished income, Ms. Kiefer admitted that she recently settled a medical malpractice lawsuit commenced in Ulster County Supreme Court and received the sum of $389,000.00, presently a liquid asset. RESPONDENT DAVID KIEFER David Kiefer testified that he is employed as a full-time electrician, works 40 hours per week and earns approximately $800.00 per week. RESPONDENT WILLIAM WOLF William Wolfe testified that he is a tree surgeon and, since 2020, as a result of the COVID shutdowns, his income came to a halt. Nothing was presented by him, either documentary evidence or otherwise, to support his conclusory claim that he had no income in and since 2020. Nor did respondent testify or show proof that he or his family applied for or received cash assistance, assistance from the supplemental nutrition assistance program, supplemental social security, income from New York State Disability, income from the home energy assistance program, income from unemployment insurance or benefits under State and Federal law or any other public or private funds.. The court notes that on September 27, 2021, it sent a letter to all respondents advising them that the above-described income would be considered relevant evidence. WILLIAM WOLF, JR. William Wolfe Jr., testified that he worked for his father in the tree surgeon business and has had no work since 2020. Nothing was presented by him, either documentary evidence or otherwise, to support his conclusory claim that he had no income since March, 2020. Nor did respondent testify or show proof that he or his family applied for or received cash assistance, assistance from the supplemental nutrition assistance program, supplemental social security, income from New York State Disability, income from the home energy assistance program, income from unemployment insurance or benefits under State and Federal law or any other public or private funds.. The court notes that on September 27, 2021, it sent a letter to all respondents advising them that the above-described income would be considered relevant evidence. It should be noted that the health of each respondent was not affected by the COVID pandemic. Even if it was established that respondents, WOLF, may have suffered loss in income as an indirect result of COVID, it is undisputed that respondent, MELANIE A. KIEFER, received $389,000 as settlement of a lawsuit and has the financial ability to pay the rent due and/or the cost of moving. She also has the joint and severable obligation, as a joint tenant, to pay the entire rent due. Accordingly, no financial hardship has been shown by respondents’ household as a result of COVID. Based on the foregoing, the court finds that the COVID Hardship Declaration is invalid and, as such, the proceeding may proceed without further stay. The matter is scheduled for trial to be held on November 4, 2021 at 11:00 A.M., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard. The aforesaid constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court. Dated: October 25, 2021

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
September 04, 2025
New York, NY

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.


Learn More
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More
March 24, 2025
New York, NY

Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.


Learn More

The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a full-time regular Judicial Secretary I, Judic...


Apply Now ›

The County is looking for a skilled and seasoned County Attorney to oversee the Law Department in delivering top-tier legal services, repres...


Apply Now ›

Position Summary: The Corporate General Counsel will manage and coordinate all legal and compliance matters affecting the company. The Gen...


Apply Now ›