By Dillon, J.P., Connolly, Nelson, Genovesi, JJ.
THE PEOPLE, ETC., res, v. HENGJUN CHAO, app — Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, rendered August 9, 2017. Motion by the appellant pro se, inter alia, in effect, for the production of certain transcripts. Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is, in effect, for the production of certain transcripts is granted to the extent that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in the action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9), and filed with this Court; and it is further, ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9), and filed with this Court; and it is further, ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the respondent, without charge (see CPL 460.70); and it is further, ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for the respondent; and it is further, ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide the respondent with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further, ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied. DILLON, J.P., CONNOLLY, BRATHWAITE NELSON and GENOVESI, JJ., concur.
