X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

ESTATE OF HELEN INGBERMAN, Deceased (07-0879/B) — On the proverbial eve of trial in the proceeding to settle the account of Israel Ingberman as sole surviving executor of the will of Helen Ingberman, Objectant Francisco Colon, administrator of the estate of Jeanette Ingberman, has moved for an order: (1) permitting him to amend his (second amended) objections — thus enabling him to allege that Schedule A of the account is incomplete — (see CPLR 3025 [b]);1 and (2) compelling Petitioner to produce decedent’s financial records, including personal income tax returns of decedent, for the three years prior to decedent’s death. The belatedness of the motion warrants a presentation of a focused chronology. Background Decedent died on September 3, 2006. On March 20, 2007, letters testamentary issued to decedent’s two children: Jeanette Ingberman, who died on August 24, 2011, and Petitioner. On October 10, 2012, Petitioner filed his account as sole surviving executor and a petition for its settlement. Schedule A of the account reflects the following assets: cash or cash equivalents of $23,954.29; stocks valued at $7,746; tangibles valued at $2,500; minority interests in each of four limited liability companies (“LLCs”), collectively valued at $3,177,000; and a note, receivable from one of the LLCs, with a face amount of $70,000. Schedule A reflects a total value of $3,281,200.29 On May 29, 2014, Francisco Colon, as Administrator of the estate of post-deceased residuary beneficiary Jeanette Ingberman, filed objections to the account. Schedule E of the account reflected a September 1, 2009 distribution of Jeanette Ingberman’s share of decedent’s interests in the LLCs to Petitioner, individually. On July 15, 2015, this court denied Objectant’s motion for summary determination that this distribution was unsupported by any cognizable basis and, accordingly, invalid. On March 31, 2017, Objectant filed amended objections. On June 21, 2017, Objectant deposed Petitioner. During the deposition, counsel for Objectant questioned Petitioner regarding the last year or two of decedent’s life: decedent’s health (decedent had dementia and had an around-the-clock aide), decedent’s reliance on Petitioner to handle her financial affairs, the income generated by decedent’s interests in LLCs, and decedent’s living expenses.2

By letter dated August 23, 2017, Objectant asked Petitioner to produce decedent’s financial records from the last three years of her life. Thereafter, Objectant reiterated that request. All such requests were unavailing. On November 2, 2017, the court conducted a conference during which Objectant, noting the disparity between the annual income generated by the estate’s interests in the LLCs ($800,000) and the liquid assets in decedent’s estate on her date of death ($35,000) requested decedent’s personal income tax returns for the last three years of her life. Again, Petitioner refused to disclose them. At that point — more than four-and-a-half years ago — Objectant’s remedy was clear. Objectant could have filed a motion. With the exception of the instant motion, however, no discovery motion was filed. On April 10, 2018, Objectant filed second amended objections. Of the sixteen specified objections, only one pertained to Schedule A. Objectant alleged that the inclusion on Schedule A of five bank accounts, having a total value of $23,954.29, was inappropriate, on the basis that, at the time of her death, those accounts were held jointly with Jeanette Ingberman. On January 8, 2020, this court granted Objectant’s motion for partial summary determination on the issue of whether Jeanette Ingberman had made a gift of her share of decedent’s interests in the LLCs to Petitioner, individually. On May 4, 2021, the Appellate Division reversed that decision and denied the motion.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
November 27, 2024
London

Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.


Learn More
December 02, 2024 - December 03, 2024
Scottsdale, AZ

Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!


Learn More
December 11, 2024
Las Vegas, NV

This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.


Learn More

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROSECUTION PARALEGAL - NEW JERSEY OR NEW YORK OFFICESProminent mid-Atlantic law firm with multiple regional office lo...


Apply Now ›

Experienced Insurance Defense Attorney.No in office requirement.Send resume to:


Apply Now ›

The Republic of Palau Judiciary is seeking applicants for one Associate Justice position who will be assigned to the Appellate Division of ...


Apply Now ›