DECISION AND ORDER INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Carol Thomas (“Plaintiff”) commenced the instant action on or about April 14, 2020, asserting products liability claims for design defect, manufacturing defect, failure to warn, non-specific defect,1 and negligence against ConAgra Foods, Inc., ConAgra Brands, Inc., DS Containers, Inc., and Full-Fill Industries, LLC (collectively “Defendants”), arising out of the combustion of a cooking spray can and resulting injuries to Plaintiff. (Dkt. 1). Presently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (the “R&R”) issued by United States Magistrate Judge Mark W. Pedersen on April 21, 2022 (Dkt. 59), recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint (Dkt. 48). For the reasons set forth below, the Court adopts the R&R to the extent that it denies Plaintiff’s motion to amend. BACKGROUND The Court assumes familiarity with the factual and procedural background of this case. The Court will provide a summary of certain background information particularly relevant to its evaluation of Plaintiff’s motion to amend and the R&R. In the complaint, Plaintiff alleges that DS Containers, Inc., manufactured vented DOT-2Q cooking spray cans; that Full-Fill Industries, LLC, filled, assembled, and packaged vented DOT-2Q cooking spray cans; and that ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Conagra Brands, Inc. sold and distributed various branded and private label cooking sprays to retailers throughout the United States and knew that DOT-2Q vented cooking spray containers released their contents at lower temperatures than is allowed by manufacturing specifications and tolerances. (Dkt. 1 at