The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document numbers (Motion 003) 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 71, 91, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 143, and 145 were read on this motion to DISMISS. The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document numbers (Motion 004) 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 92, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 142, and 146 were read on this motion to DISMISS. The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document numbers (Motion 005) 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 93, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, and 147 were read on this motion to DISMISS. DECISION ORDER ON MOTION Upon the foregoing documents, motion sequence numbers 003, 004, and 005, are consolidated for disposition in accordance with the following memorandum decision. In this insurance declaratory judgment action, plaintiff CP v. TS Fulton Owner (“Fulton Owner”) brings causes of action against its contractor U.S. Crane & Rigging LLC (“U.S. Crane”) and subcontractor NYC Crane Hoist & Rigging LLC (“NYC Crane,” and collectively the “Crane defendants”) for failure to procure insurance and contractual indemnification and related declaratory relief, as well as seeking a declaratory judgment that defendants Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company (“Ironshore”), Lexington Insurance Company (“Lexington”), and HDI Global Specialty SE (“HDI Global”) are required to provide coverage under their respective policies to Fulton Owner, and that Fulton Owner is an additional insured under the policies. The complaint alleges no claims against defendant Adrian Andrade, and Lexington has answered the complaint. Presently before the court are the Crane defendants’ (Mot. Seq. No. 003), HDI Global’s (Mot. Seq. No. 004), and Ironshore’s (Mot. Seq. No. 005) motions to dismiss the claims asserted against them in the amended verified complaint (NYSCEF Doc. No. 7). Background Fulton Owner hired U.S. Crane in connection with a construction project located at 118 Fulton Street in Manhattan (U.S. Crane contract, NYSCEF Doc. No. 99). As part of the contract, U.S. Crane agreed to “defend, indemnify, and hold harmless” Fulton Owner and several other entities to the fullest extent permitted by law from any act or omission by U.S. Crane, including but not limited to, breach of contract, breach of warranty, and wrongful or negligent acts or omissions (id., §5.3). Further, U.S. Crane agreed to procure insurance in the amounts and types specified by the contract (id., §6.3), with Fulton Owner and several other entities named as additional insureds (id., §6.3[h]). U.S. Crane then subcontracted a portion of its work to NYC Crane, and NYC Crane agreed to indemnify U.S. Crane and carry insurance naming Fulton Owner as an additional insured as part of the subcontract (subcontract, NYSCEF Doc. No. 100,
