X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

OPINION & ORDER Before the Court is the motion for summary judgment of Plaintiffs The National Retirement Fund and the Board of Trustees of the National Retirement Fund, each on behalf of the Legacy Plan of the National Retirement Fund (together, “Plaintiffs” or the “Fund”), (ECF No. 39), and the cross-motion for summary judgment of Defendant The Ruprecht Company (“Defendant” or “Ruprecht”), (ECF No. 43). For the following reasons, the Fund’s motion is GRANTED and Ruprecht’s cross-motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND A. Facts The following facts are based on the parties’ Local Civil Rule (“LR”) 56.1 Statements, (ECF No. 42 (“Fund 56.1 Stmt.”); ECF No. 46 (“Ruprecht 56.1 Stmt.”); ECF No. 49 (“Ruprecht 56.1 Resp.”); ECF No. 51 (“Fund 56.1 Resp.”)), and the evidentiary materials submitted by the parties, and are undisputed unless otherwise noted.1   The Fund is a Taft-Hartley trust fund that sponsors and administers the Legacy Plan of the National Retirement Fund (the “Plan”), a multi-employer pension plan, through its Trustees. (Ruprecht 56.1 Resp.

1-3.) Prior to 2014, Ruprecht was obligated to contribute to the Fund on behalf of certain of its employees, pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”). (Id. 4.) On November 1, 2014, Ruprecht withdrew from the Fund. (Id. 5.) Any such withdrawal triggers liability for the withdrawing party, and that withdrawal liability is calculated by the Fund. 29 U.S.C. §1382. Before its withdrawal, Ruprecht requested that the Fund provide it with estimates for its withdrawal liability for the 2012 and 2013 plan years, which the Fund did. (Ruprecht 56.1 Stmt.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
September 04, 2025
New York, NY

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.


Learn More
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More
March 24, 2025
New York, NY

Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.


Learn More

Title: Legal Counsel Reports to: Chief Executive Officer (CEO) FLSA Status: Exempt, Full Time Supervisory Responsibility: N/A Location: Remo...


Apply Now ›

Blume Forte Fried Zerres and Molinari 1 Main Street Chatham, NJ 07945Prominent Morris County Law Firm with a state-wide personal injury prac...


Apply Now ›

d Arcambal Ousley & Cuyler Burk, LLP, a well-established women-owned litigation firm, has an opening in our Parsippany, NJ office. We of...


Apply Now ›