Sarkisian v. OpenLocker Holdings Inc.

MEMORANDUM ORDER Before the Court is the motion to dismiss or to transfer venue of defendant OpenLocker Holdings, Inc. (“OpenLocker”) (Dkt. 10). Openlocker argues that this court lacks personal jurisdiction over the action and venue is improper here. In the alternative, Openlocker argues this case should be transferred to the Southern District of Florida. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court finds that it lacks personal jurisdiction over this action, and accordingly grants Openlocker’s motion to dismiss. I. Background This is an action to recover on two promissory notes. The notes were originally issued by Openlocker to CSI Business Finance in September 2006. Verified Complaint (“Compl.”)

6-7 (Dkt. 2-1). At the time, Openlocker was operating under the name W Technologies, Inc. Id. In June of 2015, CSI Business Finance sold the promissory notes to an individual, Serge Mersillan, who then assigned the notes to the plaintiffs in this action Sarkis Sarkisian and Frank Andrianakos. Compl.