X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Johanna Moquete, Bronx, appellant pro se. Letitia James, Attorney General, New York City (Linda D. Joseph of counsel), for respondent. Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 19, 2022, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant, a cashier for a financial services company, was informed by her employer on December 14, 2021 that, due to a New York City Department of Health mandate, all employees who worked in-person or interacted with the public were required to receive at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccination by December 27, 2021. Claimant failed to get the required vaccine and was informed on December 28, 2021 that she could not continue her employment. Claimant’s subsequent application for unemployment insurance benefits was denied by the Department of Labor in two initial determinations on the grounds that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause and, in the alternative, that she lost her employment due to misconduct. Following a hearing, the Administrative Law Judge affirmed the Department’s determination disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board affirmed on administrative appeal, and claimant appeals. We affirm. “Whether a claimant has good cause to leave employment is a factual issue for the Board to resolve and its determination will be upheld if supported by substantial evidence” (Matter of Brozak [Commissioner of Labor], 213 AD3d 1107, 1108 [3d Dept 2023] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). Claimant testified that she was informed by her employer that she was required to get the vaccine in order to maintain her employment. According to claimant, she told her employer that she was reluctant to get the vaccine due to health concerns, specifically that she had been experiencing chest pains in recent months. Claimant did not, however, provide her employer with any medical documentation supporting her claim or excusing her from getting the vaccine. Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause (see Labor Law § 593 [1]; Matter of Parks [Commissioner of Labor], 219 AD3d 1099, 1101-1102 [3d Dept 2023]). Claimant’s remaining contentions, to the extent not explicitly addressed, have been reviewed and found to be without merit. Clark, J.P., Lynch, Reynolds Fitzgerald and McShan, JJ., concur. ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
December 11, 2024
Las Vegas, NV

This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.


Learn More
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More
March 24, 2025
New York, NY

Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.


Learn More

McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a litigation associate for its office located in Hartford, CT. One to three years of experie...


Apply Now ›

Borteck & Czapek, P.C., based in Florham Park, is a boutique estates and trusts law firm specializing in estate planning and administrat...


Apply Now ›

Gwinnett County State Court is seeking an attorney to assist the Judge by conducting a variety of legal research, analysis, and document pre...


Apply Now ›